Pterodactyl is an open-source game server management panel built with PHP 7, React, and Go. In affected versions of Pterodactyl a malicious user can trigger a user logout if a signed in user visits a malicious website that makes a request to the Panel's sign-out endpoint. This requires a targeted attack against a specific Panel instance, and serves only to sign a user out. **No user details are leaked, nor is any user data affected, this is simply an annoyance at worst.** This is fixed in version 1.6.3.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1158.v7c1b_73a_69a_08 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins send an HTTP request to an attacker-specified webserver.

The Funnelforms Free plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the fnsf_delete_posts function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

solidus_backend is the admin interface for the Solidus e-commerce framework. Versions prior to 3.1.6, 3.0.6, and 2.11.16 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. The vulnerability allows attackers to change the state of an order's adjustments if they hold its number, and the execution happens on a store administrator's computer. Users should upgrade to solidus_backend 3.1.6, 3.0.6, or 2.11.16 to receive a patch.

An issue in the save_users() function of Online Discussion Forum Site 1 allows unauthenticated attackers to arbitrarily create or update user accounts.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in service/impl/UserLocalServiceImpl.java in Liferay Portal 4.3.6 allows remote attackers to perform unspecified actions as unspecified authenticated users via the User-Agent HTTP header, which is used when composing Forgot Password e-mail messages in HTML format.

kimai2 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in code-projects Blood Bank Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /file/delete.php. The manipulation of the argument bid leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Other endpoints might be affected as well.

kimai2 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Airangel HSMX Gateway devices through 5.2.04 allow CSRF.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in wp-contact-form/options-contactform.php in the WP-ContactForm 1.5 alpha and earlier plugin for WordPress allow remote attackers to perform actions as administrators via the (1) wpcf_question, (2) wpcf_success_msg, or (3) wpcf_error_msg parameter to wp-admin/admin.php.

The Plugin LBstopattack WordPress plugin before 1.1.3 does not use nonces when saving its settings, making it possible for attackers to conduct CSRF attacks. This could allow attackers to disable the plugin's protections.

firefly-iii is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in modcp.php in Woltlab Burning Board (wBB) 2.3.6 PL2 allows remote attackers to delete threads as moderators or administrators via a thread_del action.

firefly-iii is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

FUEL CMS 1.5.0 login.php contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Gadu-Gadu does not properly perform protocol handling, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks and add arbitrary user accounts or cause a denial of service as administrators via an unspecified "crafted link," possibly related to the gg protocol.

The editor deletion form in BUEditor 4.7.x before 4.7.x-1.0 and 5.x before 5.x-1.1, a module for Drupal, does not follow Drupal's Forms API submission model, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks and delete custom editor interfaces.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in BugTracker.NET before 2.7.2 allow remote attackers to delete arbitrary bugs and perform other administrative tasks via unspecified vectors, possibly related to delete_*.aspx pages, and massedit.aspx, subscribe.aspx, flag.aspx, and relationships.aspx.

The Nested Pages WordPress plugin <= 3.1.15 was vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery via the `npBulkAction`s and `npBulkEdit` `admin_post` actions, which allowed attackers to trash or permanently purge arbitrary posts as well as changing their status, reassigning their ownership, and editing other metadata.

IBM Engineering Requirements Quality Assistant On-Premises (All versions) is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force Id: 208310.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) exists on Altus Nexto, Nexto Xpress, and Hadron Xtorm devices via any CGI endpoint. This affects Nexto NX3003 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX3004 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX3005 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX3010 1.8.3.0, Nexto NX3020 1.8.3.0, Nexto NX3030 1.8.3.0, Nexto NX5100 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX5101 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX5110 1.1.2.8, Nexto NX5210 1.1.2.8, Nexto Xpress XP300 1.8.11.0, Nexto Xpress XP315 1.8.11.0, Nexto Xpress XP325 1.8.11.0, Nexto Xpress XP340 1.8.11.0, and Hadron Xtorm HX3040 1.7.58.0.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ikiwiki before 2.42 allows remote attackers to modify user preferences, including passwords, via the (1) preferences and (2) edit forms.

firefly-iii is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

twill is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Admin portlet in Liferay Portal before 4.4.0 allows remote authenticated users to perform unspecified actions as unspecified other authenticated users via the Shutdown message.

A vulnerability was found in automad up to 1.10.9. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /dashboard?controller=UserCollection::createUser of the component User Creation Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-248687. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Feature 4.7.x-dev and 5.x-dev before 20071206, a Drupal module, does not follow Drupal's Forms API submission model, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the balancer-manager in mod_proxy_balancer for Apache HTTP Server 2.2.x allows remote attackers to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

firefly-iii is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the aggregator module in Drupal 4.7.x before 4.7.11 and 5.x before 5.6 allows remote attackers to delete items from a feed as privileged users.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the mycalendar plugin before 0.13 for Serendipity allows remote attackers to perform actions as blog administrators, which can be leveraged to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks on the blog page.

A vulnerability has been found in PHPGurukul Nipah Virus Testing Management System 1.0 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file manage-phlebotomist.php. The manipulation of the argument pid leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-246640.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Plone CMS 3.0.5 and 3.0.6 allow remote attackers to (1) add arbitrary accounts via the join_form page and (2) change the privileges of arbitrary groups via the prefs_groups_overview page.

The EventON - WordPress Virtual Event Calendar Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.4 (for Pro) & 2.2.7 (for Free). This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the evo_eventpost_update_meta function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary post metadata via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Free Open-Source Inventory Management System v.1.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the staff_list parameter in the index.php component.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FuseTalk 2.0 allows remote attackers to create arbitrary accounts via a link to adduser.cfm.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Thomson/Alcatel SpeedTouch 7G router, as used for the BT Home Hub 6.2.6.B and earlier, allow remote attackers to perform actions as administrators via unspecified POST requests, as demonstrated by enabling an inbound remote-assistance HTTPS session on TCP port 51003. NOTE: an authentication bypass can be leveraged to exploit this in the absence of an existing administrative session. NOTE: SpeedTouch 780 might also be affected by some of these issues.

The EventON - WordPress Virtual Event Calendar Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.4 (Pro) & 2.2.8 (Free). This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_virtual_event_settings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify virtual event settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 1024 CMS 1.2.5 allows remote attackers to perform some actions as administrators, as demonstrated by (1) an unspecified action that creates a file containing PHP code and (2) unspecified use of the forum component. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.

The eCommerce Product Catalog Plugin for WordPress plugin before 3.3.26 does not have CSRF checks in some of its admin pages, which could allow attackers to make logged-in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks, such as delete all products

The Interactive Contact Form and Multi Step Form Builder with Drag & Drop Editor WordPress plugin before 3.4.2 does not have CSRF checks on some of its form actions such as deletion and duplication, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin perform such actions via CSRF attacks

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Simple PHP Blog (SPHPBlog) 0.4.9 allow remote attackers to perform delete actions as administrators via (1) the block_id parameter to add_block.php or (2) the link_id parameter to add_link.php.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress Media File Renamer – Auto & Manual Rename plugin (versions <= 5.1.9). Affected parameters "post_title", "filename", "lock". This allows changing the uploaded media title, media file name, and media locking state.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress uListing plugin (versions <= 2.0.5) makes it possible for attackers to update settings.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WebUI component in Blue Coat SSL Visibility Appliance SV800, SV1800, SV2800, and SV3800 3.6.x through 3.8.x before 3.8.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.

The Word Balloon WordPress plugin before 4.20.3 does not protect some of its actions against CSRF attacks, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to trick a logged in user to delete arbitrary avatars by clicking a link.

A Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in ipa/session/login_password in all supported versions of IPA. This flaw allows an attacker to trick the user into submitting a request that could perform actions as the user, resulting in a loss of confidentiality and system integrity. During community penetration testing it was found that for certain HTTP end-points FreeIPA does not ensure CSRF protection. Due to implementation details one cannot use this flaw for reflection of a cookie representing already logged-in user. An attacker would always have to go through a new authentication attempt.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the /op/op.UnlockDocument.php in SeedDMS v5.1.x <5.1.23 and v6.0.x <6.0.16 allows a remote attacker to unlock any document without victim's knowledge, by enticing an authenticated user to visit an attacker's web page.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability leading to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in CalderaWP License Manager (WordPress plugin) <= 1.2.11.