In onCreate of CalendarDebugActivity.java, there is a possible way to export calendar data to the sdcard without user consent due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11Android ID: A-174046397

In onCreate of BluetoothPairingSelectionFragment.java, there is a possible EoP due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10 Android-11 Android-12 Android-9Android ID: A-182810085

In multiple locations, there is a possible way to trick a user into accepting a permission due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In setTransactionState of SurfaceFlinger.cpp, there is a possible way to perform tapjacking due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In onCreate of PhoneAccountSettingsActivity.java and related files, there is a possible way to mislead the user into enabling a malicious phone account due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10 Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-246933785

In hide of WindowState.java, there is a possible way to bypass tapjacking/overlay protection by launching the activity in portrait mode first and then rotating it to landscape mode. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.

In onCreate of multiple files, there is a possible way to trick the user into granting health permissions due to tapjacking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In maybeShowDialog of ControlsSettingsDialogManager.kt, there is a possible overlay of the ControlsSettingsDialog due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In multiple locations, there is a possible privilege escalation due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In onCreate of various files, there is a possible tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege or denial of server with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-227203202

In onCreate of BluetoothPairingDialog.java, there is a possible tapjacking vector due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege and untrusted devices accessing contact lists with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-8.0 Android-8.1 Android-9 Android-10 Android-11Android ID: A-155648639

Improper access control vulnerability in Samsung Members prior to versions 2.4.85.11 in Android O(8.1) and below, and 3.9.10.11 in Android P(9.0) and above allows untrusted applications to cause local file inclusion in webview.

A possible buffer overflow vulnerability in NPU driver prior to SMR JUN-2021 Release 1 allows arbitrary memory write and code execution.

In CreateAudioBroadcast of broadcaster.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In checkKeyIntentParceledCorrectly of AccountManagerService.java, there is a possible way to launch arbitrary activities using system privileges due to Parcel Mismatch. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

An improper validation vulnerability in FilterProvider prior to SMR Dec-2021 Release 1 allows local arbitrary code execution.

Improper validation check vulnerability in PackageManager prior to SMR July-2021 Release 1 allows untrusted applications to get dangerous level permission without user confirmation in limited circumstances.

Intent redirection in Samsung Experience Service versions 10.8.0.4 in Android P(9.0) below, and 12.2.0.5 in Android Q(10.0) above allows attacker to execute privileged action.

Using unsafe PendingIntent in Slow Motion Editor prior to version 3.5.18.5 allows local attackers unauthorized action without permission via hijacking the PendingIntent.

Improper input validation vulnerability in AR Emoji Editor prior to version 4.4.03.5 in Android Q(10.0) and above allows untrusted applications to access arbitrary files with an escalated privilege.

There exists an insecure default user permission in Google Cloud Migrate to containers from version 1.1.0 to 1.2.2 Windows installs. A local "m2cuser" was greated with administrator privileges. This posed a security risk if the "analyze" or "generate" commands were interrupted or skipping the action to delete the local user “m2cuser”. We recommend upgrading to 1.2.3 or beyond

Using unsafe PendingIntent in Customization Service prior to version 2.2.02.1 in Android O(8.x), 2.4.03.0 in Android P(9.0), 2.7.02.1 in Android Q(10.0) and 2.9.01.1 in Android R(11.0) allows local attackers to perform unauthorized action without permission via hijacking the PendingIntent.

In multiple locations, there is a possible way that avdtp and avctp channels could be unencrypted due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

An improper access control vulnerability in genericssoservice prior to SMR JUN-2021 Release 1 allows local attackers to execute protected activity with system privilege via untrusted applications.

An improper length check in APAService prior to SMR Sep-2021 Release 1 results in stack based Buffer Overflow.

An improper exception control in softsimd prior to SMR APR-2021 Release 1 allows unprivileged applications to access the API in softsimd.

An improper validation vulnerability in FilterProvider prior to SMR Dec-2021 Release 1 allows attackers to write arbitrary files via a path traversal vulnerability.

A possible out of bounds write vulnerability in NPU driver prior to SMR JUN-2021 Release 1 allows arbitrary memory write.

In setTransactionState of SurfaceFlinger.cpp, there is a possible way to change protected display attributes due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In ion service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In telocom service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In telecom service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In telecom service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In Oppo's battery application, the third-party SDK provides the function of loading a third-party Provider, which can be used.

In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In power manager, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

The Security Team discovered an integer overflow bug that allows an attacker with code execution to issue memory cache invalidation operations on pages that they don’t own, allowing them to control kernel memory from userspace. We recommend upgrading to kernel version 4.1 or beyond.

An attacker can modify the pointers in enclave memory to overwrite arbitrary memory addresses within the secure enclave. It is recommended to update past 0.6.3 or git commit https://github.com/google/asylo/commit/a47ef55db2337d29de19c50cd29b0deb2871d31c

In linkturbo, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

An attacker can modify the address to point to trusted memory to overwrite arbitrary trusted memory. It is recommended to update past 0.6.2 or git commit https://github.com/google/asylo/commit/53ed5d8fd8118ced1466e509606dd2f473707a5c

An attacker can change the pointer to untrusted memory to point to trusted memory region which causes copying trusted memory to trusted memory, if the latter is later copied out, it allows for reading of memory regions from the trusted region. It is recommended to update past 0.6.2 or git commit https://github.com/google/asylo/commit/53ed5d8fd8118ced1466e509606dd2f473707a5c

An attacker can craft a specific IdaPro *.i64 file that will cause the BinDiff plugin to load an invalid memory offset. This can allow the attacker to control the instruction pointer and execute arbitrary code. It is recommended to upgrade BinDiff 7

In IoT Devices SDK, there is an implementation of calloc() that doesn't have a length check. An attacker could pass in memory objects larger than the buffer and wrap around to have a smaller buffer than required, allowing the attacker access to the other parts of the heap. We recommend upgrading the Google Cloud IoT Device SDK for Embedded C used to 1.0.3 or greater.

In onTransact of IncidentService.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to memory corruption. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In discovery_thread of Dns64Configuration.cpp, there is a possible memory corruption due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In setActualDefaultRingtoneUri of RingtoneManager.java, there is a possible way to bypass content providers read permissions due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.