Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2022-30315

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-28 Jul, 2022 | 15:41
Updated At-03 Aug, 2024 | 06:48
Rejected At-
Credits

Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager (SM and FSC) through 2022-05-06 has Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity. According to FSCT-2022-0053, there is a Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager insufficient logic security controls issue. The affected components are characterized as: Honeywell FSC runtime (FSC-CPU, QPP), Honeywell Safety Builder. The potential impact is: Remote Code Execution, Denial of Service. The Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager family of safety controllers utilize the unauthenticated Safety Builder protocol (FSCT-2022-0051) for engineering purposes, including downloading projects and control logic to the controller. Control logic is downloaded to the controller on a block-by-block basis. The logic that is downloaded consists of FLD code compiled to native machine code for the CPU module (which applies to both the Safety Manager and FSC families). Since this logic does not seem to be cryptographically authenticated, it allows an attacker capable of triggering a logic download to execute arbitrary machine code on the controller's CPU module in the context of the runtime. While the researchers could not verify this in detail, the researchers believe that the microprocessor underpinning the FSC and Safety Manager CPU modules is incapable of offering memory protection or privilege separation capabilities which would give an attacker full control of the CPU module. There is no authentication on control logic downloaded to the controller. Memory protection and privilege separation capabilities for the runtime are possibly lacking. The researchers confirmed the issues in question on Safety Manager R145.1 and R152.2 but suspect the issue affects all FSC and SM controllers and associated Safety Builder versions regardless of software or firmware revision. An attacker who can communicate with a Safety Manager controller via the Safety Builder protocol can execute arbitrary code without restrictions on the CPU module, allowing for covert manipulation of control operations and implanting capabilities similar to the TRITON malware (MITRE ATT&CK software ID S1009). A mitigating factor with regards to some, but not all, of the above functionality is that these require the Safety Manager physical keyswitch to be in the right position.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:28 Jul, 2022 | 15:41
Updated At:03 Aug, 2024 | 06:48
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager (SM and FSC) through 2022-05-06 has Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity. According to FSCT-2022-0053, there is a Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager insufficient logic security controls issue. The affected components are characterized as: Honeywell FSC runtime (FSC-CPU, QPP), Honeywell Safety Builder. The potential impact is: Remote Code Execution, Denial of Service. The Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager family of safety controllers utilize the unauthenticated Safety Builder protocol (FSCT-2022-0051) for engineering purposes, including downloading projects and control logic to the controller. Control logic is downloaded to the controller on a block-by-block basis. The logic that is downloaded consists of FLD code compiled to native machine code for the CPU module (which applies to both the Safety Manager and FSC families). Since this logic does not seem to be cryptographically authenticated, it allows an attacker capable of triggering a logic download to execute arbitrary machine code on the controller's CPU module in the context of the runtime. While the researchers could not verify this in detail, the researchers believe that the microprocessor underpinning the FSC and Safety Manager CPU modules is incapable of offering memory protection or privilege separation capabilities which would give an attacker full control of the CPU module. There is no authentication on control logic downloaded to the controller. Memory protection and privilege separation capabilities for the runtime are possibly lacking. The researchers confirmed the issues in question on Safety Manager R145.1 and R152.2 but suspect the issue affects all FSC and SM controllers and associated Safety Builder versions regardless of software or firmware revision. An attacker who can communicate with a Safety Manager controller via the Safety Builder protocol can execute arbitrary code without restrictions on the CPU module, allowing for covert manipulation of control operations and implanting capabilities similar to the TRITON malware (MITRE ATT&CK software ID S1009). A mitigating factor with regards to some, but not all, of the above functionality is that these require the Safety Manager physical keyswitch to be in the right position.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://www.forescout.com/blog/
x_refsource_MISC
https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/advisories/icsa-22-207-02
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://www.forescout.com/blog/
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/advisories/icsa-22-207-02
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://www.forescout.com/blog/
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/advisories/icsa-22-207-02
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.forescout.com/blog/
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/advisories/icsa-22-207-02
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:28 Jul, 2022 | 16:15
Updated At:08 Aug, 2023 | 14:21

Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager (SM and FSC) through 2022-05-06 has Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity. According to FSCT-2022-0053, there is a Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager insufficient logic security controls issue. The affected components are characterized as: Honeywell FSC runtime (FSC-CPU, QPP), Honeywell Safety Builder. The potential impact is: Remote Code Execution, Denial of Service. The Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager family of safety controllers utilize the unauthenticated Safety Builder protocol (FSCT-2022-0051) for engineering purposes, including downloading projects and control logic to the controller. Control logic is downloaded to the controller on a block-by-block basis. The logic that is downloaded consists of FLD code compiled to native machine code for the CPU module (which applies to both the Safety Manager and FSC families). Since this logic does not seem to be cryptographically authenticated, it allows an attacker capable of triggering a logic download to execute arbitrary machine code on the controller's CPU module in the context of the runtime. While the researchers could not verify this in detail, the researchers believe that the microprocessor underpinning the FSC and Safety Manager CPU modules is incapable of offering memory protection or privilege separation capabilities which would give an attacker full control of the CPU module. There is no authentication on control logic downloaded to the controller. Memory protection and privilege separation capabilities for the runtime are possibly lacking. The researchers confirmed the issues in question on Safety Manager R145.1 and R152.2 but suspect the issue affects all FSC and SM controllers and associated Safety Builder versions regardless of software or firmware revision. An attacker who can communicate with a Safety Manager controller via the Safety Builder protocol can execute arbitrary code without restrictions on the CPU module, allowing for covert manipulation of control operations and implanting capabilities similar to the TRITON malware (MITRE ATT&CK software ID S1009). A mitigating factor with regards to some, but not all, of the above functionality is that these require the Safety Manager physical keyswitch to be in the right position.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.19.8CRITICAL
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 9.8
Base severity: CRITICAL
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CPE Matches

Honeywell International Inc.
honeywell
>>safety_manager_firmware>>-
cpe:2.3:o:honeywell:safety_manager_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Honeywell International Inc.
honeywell
>>safety_manager>>-
cpe:2.3:h:honeywell:safety_manager:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-345Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-345
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/advisories/icsa-22-207-02cve@mitre.org
Mitigation
Third Party Advisory
US Government Resource
https://www.forescout.com/blog/cve@mitre.org
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/advisories/icsa-22-207-02
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Mitigation
Third Party Advisory
US Government Resource
Hyperlink: https://www.forescout.com/blog/
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

58Records found

CVE-2023-3028
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Automotive Security Research Group (ASRG)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Automotive Security Research Group (ASRG)
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 6.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Jun, 2023 | 05:34
Updated-10 Jan, 2025 | 18:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper backend communication allows access and manipulation of the telemetry data

Insufficient authentication in the MQTT backend (broker) allows an attacker to access and even manipulate the telemetry data of the entire fleet of vehicles using the HopeChart HQT-401 telematics unit. Other models are possibly affected too. Multiple vulnerabilities were identified: - The MQTT backend does not require authentication, allowing unauthorized connections from an attacker. - The vehicles publish their telemetry data (e.g. GPS Location, speed, odometer, fuel, etc) as messages in public topics. The backend also sends commands to the vehicles as MQTT posts in public topics. As a result, an attacker can access the confidential data of the entire fleet that is managed by the backend. - The MQTT messages sent by the vehicles or the backend are not encrypted or authenticated. An attacker can create and post messages to impersonate a vehicle or the backend. The attacker could then, for example, send incorrect information to the backend about the vehicle's location. - The backend can inject data into a vehicle´s CAN bus by sending a specific MQTT message on a public topic. Because these messages are not authenticated or encrypted, an attacker could impersonate the backend, create a fake message and inject CAN data in any vehicle managed by the backend. The confirmed version is 201808021036, however further versions have been also identified as potentially impacted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-hopechartHangzhou Hopechart IoT Technology Co., Ltd.
Product-hqt401hqt401_firmwareHQT401
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-319
Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2016-1000004
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.15% / 36.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Feb, 2020 | 12:38
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Insufficient type checks were employed prior to casting input data in SimpleXMLElement_exportNode and simplexml_import_dom. This issue affects HHVM versions prior to 3.9.5, all versions between 3.10.0 and 3.12.3 (inclusive), and all versions between 3.13.0 and 3.14.1 (inclusive).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aFacebook
Product-hhvmn/a
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2023-2987
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.10% / 28.18%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 May, 2023 | 02:40
Updated-13 Jan, 2025 | 16:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Wordapp plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass due to an use of insufficiently unique cryptographic signature on the 'wa_pdx_op_config_set' function in versions up to, and including, 1.5.0. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to the plugin to change the 'validation_token' in the plugin config, providing access to the plugin's remote control functionalities, such as creating an admin access URL, which can be used for privilege escalation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wordappwordapp
Product-wordappWordapp
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2022-29958
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.13% / 33.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jul, 2022 | 21:04
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 06:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

JTEKT TOYOPUC PLCs through 2022-04-29 do not ensure data integrity. They utilize the unauthenticated CMPLink/TCP protocol for engineering purposes, including downloading projects and control logic to the PLC. Control logic is downloaded to the PLC on a block-by-block basis with a given memory address and a blob of machine code. The logic that is downloaded to the PLC is not cryptographically authenticated, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary machine code on the PLC's CPU module in the context of the runtime. In the case of the PC10G-CPU, and likely for other CPU modules of the TOYOPUC family, a processor without MPU or MMU is used and this no memory protection or privilege-separation capabilities are available, giving an attacker full control over the CPU.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-jtektn/a
Product-plus_cpu_tcc-6740pc3jx-d_tcc-6902_firmwarepc10pe-1616p_tcc-1102_firmwarepc10p_tcc-6372_firmwarepc10b_tcc-1021pc3jx-d_tcc-6902pcdl_tkc-6688pc10ge_tcc-6464_firmwarepcdl_tkc-6688_firmwarepc10p_tcc-6372pc10b-p_tcc-6373pc10b_tcc-1021_firmwarepc10p-dp_tcc-6726_firmwarepc10g-cpu_tcc-6353plus_cpu_tcc-6740_firmwarepc10p-dp_tcc-6726pc10el_tcc-4747_firmwarepc10p-dp-io_tcc-6752_firmwarepc3jx_tcc-6901pc3jx_tcc-6901_firmwarepc10pe_tcc-1101_firmwarepc10pe_tcc-1101pc10e_tcc-4737_firmwarepc10e_tcc-4737nano_10gx_tuc-1157nano_cpu_tuc-6941_firmwarepc10p-dp-io_tcc-6752pc10g-cpu_tcc-6353_firmwarepc10ge_tcc-6464pc10pe-1616p_tcc-1102pc10b-p_tcc-6373_firmwarepc10el_tcc-4747nano_10gx_tuc-1157_firmwarenano_cpu_tuc-6941n/a
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2021-43616
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.77% / 72.50%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Nov, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 04:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The npm ci command in npm 7.x and 8.x through 8.1.3 proceeds with an installation even if dependency information in package-lock.json differs from package.json. This behavior is inconsistent with the documentation, and makes it easier for attackers to install malware that was supposed to have been blocked by an exact version match requirement in package-lock.json. NOTE: The npm team believes this is not a vulnerability. It would require someone to socially engineer package.json which has different dependencies than package-lock.json. That user would have to have file system or write access to change dependencies. The npm team states preventing malicious actors from socially engineering or gaining file system access is outside the scope of the npm CLI.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-npmjsn/aNetApp, Inc.Fedora Project
Product-next_generation_application_programming_interfacefedoranpmn/a
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2024-38432
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Israel National Cyber Directorate (INCD)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Israel National Cyber Directorate (INCD)
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 17.14%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jul, 2024 | 08:50
Updated-06 Sep, 2024 | 21:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Matrix – Tafnit v8 CWE-646: Reliance on File Name or Extension of Externally-Supplied File

Matrix Tafnit v8 - CWE-646: Reliance on File Name or Extension of Externally-Supplied File

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Matrix I.T. Ltd.
Product-tafnitTafnit v8
CWE ID-CWE-646
Reliance on File Name or Extension of Externally-Supplied File
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2022-31813
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.07% / 22.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Jun, 2022 | 10:00
Updated-01 May, 2025 | 15:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
mod_proxy X-Forwarded-For dropped by hop-by-hop mechanism

Apache HTTP Server 2.4.53 and earlier may not send the X-Forwarded-* headers to the origin server based on client side Connection header hop-by-hop mechanism. This may be used to bypass IP based authentication on the origin server/application.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fedora ProjectNetApp, Inc.The Apache Software Foundation
Product-http_serverfedoraclustered_data_ontapApache HTTP Server
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CWE ID-CWE-348
Use of Less Trusted Source
CVE-2021-26608
Matching Score-4
Assigner-KrCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-KrCERT/CC
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 46.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Sep, 2021 | 12:54
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
handysoft groupware arbitrary file download and execution vulnerability

An arbitrary file download and execution vulnerability was found in the HShell.dll of handysoft Co., Ltd groupware ActiveX module. This issue is due to missing support for integrity check of download URL or downloaded file hash.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-handysofthandysoftMicrosoft Corporation
Product-windowshshellHShell.dll
CWE ID-CWE-353
Missing Support for Integrity Check
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found