An issue was found on TRENDnet TEW-831DR 1.0 601.130.1.1356 devices. The web interface is vulnerable to CSRF. An attacker can change the pre-shared key of the Wi-Fi router if the interface's IP address is known.

Trendnet IP-110wn camera fw_tv-ip110wn_v2(1.2.2.68) has an XSS vulnerability via the prefix parameter in /admin/general.cgi.

In TrendNet TW100-S4W1CA 2.3.32, it is possible to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the router's web interface via the "echo" command.

Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in TRENDnet TV-IP110WN V1.2.2.64 V1.2.2.65 V1.2.2.68 via the profile parameter. in a GET request in view.cgi.

Trendnet IP-110wn camera fw_tv-ip110wn_v2(1.2.2.68) has an xss vulnerability via the proname parameter in /admin/scheprofile.cgi

In TrendNet TW100-S4W1CA 2.3.32, due to a lack of proper session controls, a threat actor could make unauthorized changes to an affected router via a specially crafted web page. If an authenticated user were to interact with a malicious web page it could allow for a complete takeover of the router.

Trendnet AC2600 TEW-827DRU version 2.08B01 does not properly implement csrf protections. Most pages lack proper usage of CSRF protections or mitigations. Additionally, pages that do make use of CSRF tokens are trivially bypassable as the server does not appear to validate them properly (i.e. re-using an old token or finding the token thru some other method is possible).

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in TRENDnet TEW-812DRU router with firmware before 1.0.9.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change admin credentials in a request to setSysAdm.cgi, (2) enable remote management or (3) enable port forwarding in an Apply action to uapply.cgi, or (4) have unspecified impact via a request to setNTP.cgi. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.

Undocumented TELNET service in TRENDnet TEW-812DRU when a web page named backdoor contains an HTML parameter of password and a value of j78G¬DFdg_24Mhw3.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the apache2-slms package in SUSE Lifecycle Management Server (SLMS) 1.0 on SUSE Linux Enterprise (SLE) 11 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via vectors related to improper parameter quoting. NOTE: some sources report that this is a vulnerability in a product named "Apache SLMS," but that is incorrect.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository usememos/memos prior to 0.9.1.

The Checkout Fields Manager WordPress plugin before 1.0.2, Abandoned Cart Recovery WordPress plugin before 1.2.5, Custom Fields for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.0.4, Custom Order Number WordPress plugin through 1.0.1, Custom Registration Forms Builder WordPress plugin before 1.0.2, Advanced Free Gifts WordPress plugin before 1.0.2, Gift Registry for WooCommerce WordPress plugin through 1.0.1, Image Watermark for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.0.1, Order Approval for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.1.0, Order Tracking for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.0.2, Price Calculator for WooCommerce WordPress plugin through 1.0.3, Product Dynamic Pricing and Discounts WordPress plugin through 1.0.6, Product Labels and Stickers WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 have flawed CSRF checks in various places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository usememos/memos prior to 0.9.1.

A vulnerability was found in dolibarr_project_timesheet up to 4.5.5. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Form Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 4.5.6.a is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is 082282e9dab43963e6c8f03cfaddd7921de377f4. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-216880.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ACollab 1.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that add personal agenda items.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Add Administrator function of the default version of nbnbk allows attackers to arbitrarily add Administrator accounts.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in index.php in FlatNuke 2.6, and possibly 3, allows remote attackers to change the password and privilege level of arbitrary accounts via the user parameter and modified (1) regpass and (2) level parameters in a none_Login action, as demonstrated by using a Flash object to automatically make the request.

Bosscms v2.0.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Add function under the Administrator List module.

The Optimize images ALT Text & names for SEO using AI WordPress plugin before 2.0.8 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged-in admin change them via a CSRF attack.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Advanced Booking Calendar plugin <= 1.7.1 on WordPress.

White Shark System (WSS) 1.3.2 is vulnerable to CSRF. Attackers can use the user_edit_password.php file to modify the user password.

Plesk Obsidian allows a CSRF attack, e.g., via the /api/v2/cli/commands REST API to change an Admin password. NOTE: Obsidian is a specific version of the Plesk product: version numbers were used through version 12, and then the convention was changed so that versions are identified by names ("Obsidian"), not numbers.

AeroCMS v0.0.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF).

The BruteBank WordPress plugin before 1.9 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged-in admin change them via a CSRF attack.

Jenkins Pipeline: Stage View Plugin 2.26 and earlier does not correctly encode the ID of 'input' steps when using it to generate URLs to proceed or abort Pipeline builds, allowing attackers able to configure Pipelines to specify 'input' step IDs resulting in URLs that would bypass the CSRF protection of any target URL in Jenkins.

EyouCMS V1.5.9-UTF8-SP1 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Edit Admin Profile module. This vulnerability allows attackers to arbitrarily change Administrator account information.

An issue was discovered in CMSUno before 1.6.1. uno.php allows CSRF to change the admin password.

The Wholesale Market WordPress plugin before 2.2.2, Wholesale Market for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.0.1 have a flawed CSRF check when updating their settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin update them via a CSRF attack

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in admin.php in ScriptsEz Ez Blog 1.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add a blog via the add_blog action, (2) approve a comment via the approve_comment action, (3) change administrator information including the password via the admin_opt action, and (4) delete a blog via the delete action.

The Bulk Delete Users by Email WordPress plugin through 1.2 does not have CSRF check when deleting users, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete non admin users by knowing their email via a CSRF attack

Philips Clinical Collaboration Platform, Versions 12.2.1 and prior. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties required to process the data safely and correctly.

RPCMS v3.0.2 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows attackers to arbitrarily change the password of any account.

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the t3lib_div::quoteJSvalue API function in TYPO3 4.0.13 and earlier, 4.1.x before 4.1.13, 4.2.x before 4.2.10, and 4.3.x before 4.3beta2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors related to the sanitizing algorithm.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in bingo!CMS 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of other users for requests that modify configuration or change content via unspecified vectors.

A cross-site request forgery security issue exists in the product and version listed. The vulnerability stems from missing CSRF checks on the impacted form. This allows for unintended configuration modification if an attacker can convince a logged in admin to visit a crafted link.

PHPgurukul Online Course Registration v3.1 lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection on all administrative forms. An attacker can perform unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated administrators by tricking them into visiting a malicious webpage.

iBall WRB303N devices allow CSRF attacks, as demonstrated by enabling remote management, enabling DHCP, or modifying the subnet range for IP addresses.

The Disable Json API, Login Lockdown, XMLRPC, Pingback, Stop User Enumeration Anti Hacker Scan WordPress plugin before 4.20 does not have proper authorisation and CSRF in an AJAX action, allowing any authenticated users, such as subscriber to call it and install and activate arbitrary plugins from wordpress.org

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OpenText™ Web Site Management Server allows Cross Site Request Forgery. The vulnerability could make a user, with active session inside the product, click on a page that contains this malicious HTML triggering to perform changes unconsciously. This issue affects Web Site Management Server: 16.7.0, 16.7.1.

PHPGurukul Hospital Management System v4.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the 'Add Doctor' module. The application fails to enforce CSRF token validation on the add-doctor.php endpoint. This allows remote attackers to create arbitrary Doctor accounts (privileged users) by tricking an authenticated administrator into visiting a malicious page.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the affected device with the privileges of the targeted user.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco ATA 190 Series Analog Telephone Adapter firmware could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the affected device with the privileges of the targeted user.

In nodebb-plugin-blog-comments before version 0.7.0, a logged in user is vulnerable to an XSS attack which could allow a third party to post on their behalf on the forum. This is due to lack of CSRF validation.

A vulnerability in Cisco Emergency Responder could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a CSRF attack, which could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient protections for the web UI of an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user, such as deleting users from the device.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.6-p3, 2.4.5-p5, 2.4.4-p6 and earlier are affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to trick a victim into performing actions they did not intend to do, which could be used to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction, typically in the form of the victim clicking a link or visiting a malicious website.

A vulnerability in the web UI feature of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system through the web UI. This vulnerability is due to incorrectly accepting configuration changes through the HTTP GET method. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a currently authenticated administrator to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to change the configuration of the affected device.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified username and password.

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Pet Grooming Management Software 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely.

The Advanced Import WordPress plugin before 1.3.8 does not have CSRF check when installing and activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin install arbitrary plugins from WordPress.org, and activate arbitrary ones from the blog via CSRF attacks

The CP Contact Form with PayPal plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.52. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cp_contact_form_paypal_check_init_actions() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add discount codes via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.