Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2022-31172

Summary
Assigner-GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID-a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At-21 Jul, 2022 | 13:55
Updated At-23 Apr, 2025 | 17:57
Rejected At-
Credits

OpenZeppelin Contracts's SignatureChecker may revert on invalid EIP-1271 signers

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.1.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to the SignatureChecker reverting. `SignatureChecker.isValidSignatureNow` is not expected to revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8's `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn't implement EIP-1271 as expected. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `SignatureChecker` to check the validity of a signature and handle invalid signatures in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID:a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At:21 Jul, 2022 | 13:55
Updated At:23 Apr, 2025 | 17:57
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
OpenZeppelin Contracts's SignatureChecker may revert on invalid EIP-1271 signers

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.1.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to the SignatureChecker reverting. `SignatureChecker.isValidSignatureNow` is not expected to revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8's `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn't implement EIP-1271 as expected. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `SignatureChecker` to check the validity of a signature and handle invalid signatures in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.

Affected Products
Vendor
OpenZeppelin
Product
openzeppelin-contracts
Versions
Affected
  • >= 4.1.0, < 4.7.1
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-20CWE-20: Improper Input Validation
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-20
Description: CWE-20: Improper Input Validation
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-4g63-c64m-25w9
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-4g63-c64m-25w9
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
1. CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-4g63-c64m-25w9
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-4g63-c64m-25w9
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
2. CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security-advisories@github.com
Published At:22 Jul, 2022 | 04:15
Updated At:01 Aug, 2022 | 15:56

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.1.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to the SignatureChecker reverting. `SignatureChecker.isValidSignatureNow` is not expected to revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8's `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn't implement EIP-1271 as expected. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `SignatureChecker` to check the validity of a signature and handle invalid signatures in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Secondary3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CPE Matches

openzeppelin
openzeppelin
>>contracts>>Versions from 4.1.0(inclusive) to 4.7.1(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:openzeppelin:contracts:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-347Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE-20Secondarysecurity-advisories@github.com
CWE ID: CWE-347
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-20
Type: Secondary
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552security-advisories@github.com
Patch
Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-4g63-c64m-25w9security-advisories@github.com
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-4g63-c64m-25w9
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

170Records found

CVE-2020-13415
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 33.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 May, 2020 | 20:48
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller through 5.1. An attacker with any signed SAML assertion from the Identity Provider can establish a connection (even if that SAML assertion has expired or is from a user who is not authorized to access Aviatrix), aka XML Signature Wrapping.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aAviatrix Systems, Inc.
Product-controllern/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-10663
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-4.32% / 88.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Apr, 2020 | 20:58
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 11:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The JSON gem through 2.2.0 for Ruby, as used in Ruby 2.4 through 2.4.9, 2.5 through 2.5.7, and 2.6 through 2.6.5, has an Unsafe Object Creation Vulnerability. This is quite similar to CVE-2013-0269, but does not rely on poor garbage-collection behavior within Ruby. Specifically, use of JSON parsing methods can lead to creation of a malicious object within the interpreter, with adverse effects that are application-dependent.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-json_projectn/aApple Inc.Fedora ProjectDebian GNU/LinuxRubyopenSUSE
Product-debian_linuxfedorarubymacosjsonleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-11093
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 37.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Dec, 2020 | 20:05
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 11:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Authorization bypass in Hyperledger Indy

Hyperledger Indy Node is the server portion of a distributed ledger purpose-built for decentralized identity. In Hyperledger Indy before version 1.12.4, there is lack of signature verification on a specific transaction which enables an attacker to make certain unauthorized alterations to the ledger. Updating a DID with a nym transaction will be written to the ledger if neither ROLE or VERKEY are being changed, regardless of sender. A malicious DID with no particular role can ask an update for another DID (but cannot modify its verkey or role). This is bad because 1) Any DID can write a nym transaction to the ledger (i.e., any DID can spam the ledger with nym transactions), 2) Any DID can change any other DID's alias, 3) The update transaction modifies the ledger metadata associated with a DID.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-hyperledgerThe Linux Foundation
Product-indy-nodeindy-node
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-39392
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 5.77%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Aug, 2023 | 11:33
Updated-10 Oct, 2024 | 14:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Vulnerability of insecure signatures in the OsuLogin module. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause OsuLogin to be maliciously modified and overwritten.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Product-emuiharmonyosHarmonyOSEMUI
CWE ID-CWE-16
Not Available
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-40012
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.04% / 11.88%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Aug, 2023 | 15:33
Updated-03 Oct, 2024 | 15:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
uthenticode EKU validation bypass

uthenticode is a small cross-platform library for partially verifying Authenticode digital signatures. Versions of uthenticode prior to the 2.x series did not check Extended Key Usages in certificates, in violation of the Authenticode X.509 certificate profile. As a result, a malicious user could produce a "signed" PE file that uthenticode would verify and consider valid using an X.509 certificate that isn't entitled to produce code signatures (e.g., a SSL certificate). By design, uthenticode does not perform full-chain validation. However, the absence of EKU validation was an unintended oversight. The 2.0.0 release series includes EKU checks. There are no workarounds to this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-trailofbitstrailofbits
Product-uthenticodeuthenticode
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CWE ID-CWE-325
Missing Cryptographic Step
CVE-2019-8640
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.24% / 47.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Oct, 2020 | 19:38
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A logic issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Mojave 10.14.5, Security Update 2019-003 High Sierra, Security Update 2019-003 Sierra. A sandboxed process may be able to circumvent sandbox restrictions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Apple Inc.
Product-mac_os_xmacOS
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2019-6690
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-22.01% / 95.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Mar, 2019 | 17:02
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 20:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

python-gnupg 0.4.3 allows context-dependent attackers to trick gnupg to decrypt other ciphertext than intended. To perform the attack, the passphrase to gnupg must be controlled by the adversary and the ciphertext should be trusted. Related to a "CWE-20: Improper Input Validation" issue affecting the affect functionality component.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSUSEopenSUSEPython Software FoundationDebian GNU/LinuxCanonical Ltd.
Product-ubuntu_linuxdebian_linuxlinux_enterprisepython-gnupgbackportsleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2024-54100
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
CVSS Score-6.2||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 13.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Dec, 2024 | 11:25
Updated-14 Jan, 2025 | 18:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Vulnerability of improper access control in the secure input module Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause features to perform abnormally.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Product-harmonyosemuiHarmonyOSEMUI
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2015-9415
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.34% / 56.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Sep, 2019 | 23:31
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 08:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The bj-lazy-load plugin before 1.0 for WordPress has Remote File Inclusion.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-angrycreativen/a
Product-bj_lazy_loadn/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-33964
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 37.60%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 May, 2023 | 17:07
Updated-09 Jan, 2025 | 20:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
mx-chain-go does not treat invalid transaction with wrong username correctly

mx-chain-go is an implementation of the MultiversX blockchain protocol written in the Go language. Metachain cannot process a cross-shard miniblock. Prior to version 1.4.16, an invalid transaction with the wrong username on metachain is not treated correctly on the metachain transaction processor. This is strictly a processing issue that could have happened on MultiversX chain. If an error like this had occurred, the metachain would have stopped notarizing blocks from the shard chains. The resuming of notarization is possible only after applying a patched binary version. A patch in version 1.4.16 introduces `processIfTxErrorCrossShard` for the metachain transaction processor. There are no known workarounds for this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-multiversxmultiversx
Product-mx-chain-gomx-chain-go
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-37149
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.80% / 73.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Nov, 2021 | 15:20
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 01:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Request Smuggling - multiple attacks

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in header parsing of Apache Traffic Server allows an attacker to smuggle requests. This issue affects Apache Traffic Server 8.0.0 to 8.1.2 and 9.0.0 to 9.1.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxtraffic_serverApache Traffic Server
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-36030
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Adobe Systems Incorporated
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Adobe Systems Incorporated
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.43% / 79.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Sep, 2021 | 14:31
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Magento Commerce Improper Input Validation During Checkout Process Could Lead To Privilege Escalation

Magento Commerce versions 2.4.2 (and earlier), 2.4.2-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.7 (and earlier) are affected by an improper input validation vulnerability during the checkout process. An unauthenticated attacker can leverage this vulnerability to alter the price of items.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Adobe Inc.
Product-magento_open_sourceadobe_commerceMagento Commerce
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-26613
Matching Score-4
Assigner-KrCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-KrCERT/CC
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.31% / 53.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Feb, 2022 | 22:05
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
tobesoft nexacro arbitrary file creation vulnerability

improper input validation vulnerability in nexacro permits copying file to the startup folder using rename method.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-tobesofttobesoft co., ltdMicrosoft Corporation
Product-windowsnexacroNexacro 17
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-20706
Matching Score-4
Assigner-NEC Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-NEC Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Nov, 2021 | 23:30
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 17:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper input validation vulnerability in the WebManager CLUSTERPRO X 4.3 for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 4.3 for Windows and earlier, CLUSTERPRO X 4.3 SingleServerSafe for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 4.3 SingleServerSafe for Windows and earlier allows attacker to remote file upload via network.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-NEC Corporation
Product-clusterpro_xclusterpro_x_singleserversafeexpresscluster_xexpresscluster_x_singleserversafeCLUSTERPRO X
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-21405
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.17% / 38.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Apr, 2021 | 21:35
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
BLS Signature "Malleability"

Lotus is an Implementation of the Filecoin protocol written in Go. BLS signature validation in lotus uses blst library method VerifyCompressed. This method accepts signatures in 2 forms: "serialized", and "compressed", meaning that BLS signatures can be provided as either of 2 unique byte arrays. Lotus block validation functions perform a uniqueness check on provided blocks. Two blocks are considered distinct if the CIDs of their blockheader do not match. The CID method for blockheader includes the BlockSig of the block. The result of these issues is that it would be possible to punish miners for valid blocks, as there are two different valid block CIDs available for each block, even though this must be unique. By switching from the go based `blst` bindings over to the bindings in `filecoin-ffi`, the code paths now ensure that all signatures are compressed by size and the way they are deserialized. This happened in https://github.com/filecoin-project/lotus/pull/5393.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-filecoinfilecoin-project
Product-lotuslotus
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2012-6070
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.64% / 69.60%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Nov, 2019 | 16:37
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 21:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Falconpl before 0.9.6.9-git20120606 misuses the libcurl API which may allow remote attackers to interfere with security checks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-falconplfalconpl
Product-falconplfalconpl
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-8787
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Mar, 2020 | 21:34
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 10:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

SuiteCRM 7.10.x versions prior to 7.10.23 and 7.11.x versions prior to 7.11.11 allow for an invalid Bean ID to be submitted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSalesAgility Ltd.
Product-suitecrmn/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-8476
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (ABB)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (ABB)
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.38% / 58.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Apr, 2020 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 10:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
ABB Central Licensing System - Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

For the Central Licensing Server component used in ABB products ABB Ability™ System 800xA and related system extensions versions 5.1, 6.0 and 6.1, Compact HMI versions 5.1 and 6.0, Control Builder Safe 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0, Symphony Plus -S+ Operations 3.0 to 3.2 Symphony Plus -S+ Engineering 1.1 to 2.2, Composer Harmony 5.1, 6.0 and 6.1, Melody Composer 5.3, 6.1/6.2 and SPE for Melody 1.0SPx (Composer 6.3), Harmony OPC Server (HAOPC) Standalone 6.0, 6.1 and 7.0, ABB Ability™ System 800xA/ Advant® OCS Control Builder A 1.3 and 1.4, Advant® OCS AC100 OPC Server 5.1, 6.0 and 6.1, Composer CTK 6.1 and 6.2, AdvaBuild 3.7 SP1 and SP2, OPCServer for MOD 300 (non-800xA) 1.4, OPC Data Link 2.1 and 2.2, Knowledge Manager 8.0, 9.0 and 9.1, Manufacturing Operations Management 1812 and 1909, ABB AbilityTM SCADAvantage versions 5.1 to 5.6.5, a weakness in validation of input exists that allows an attacker to alter licenses assigned to the system nodes by sending specially crafted messages to the CLS web service.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ABB
Product-compact_hmi800xa_systemcontrol_builder_safeManufacturing Operations ManagementABB Ability™ SCADAvantageControl Builder SafeComposer HarmonyOPC Server for Mod 300 (non-800xA)Knowledge ManagerOPC Data LinkCentral Licensing SystemAdvaBuildSymphony Plus S+ OperationsComposer CTKSymphony Plus S+ Engineering ABB Ability System 800xAComposer Melody Harmony OPC Server StandaloneAdvant OCS AC 100 OPS ServerAdvant OCS Control Builder ACompact HMI
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-36285
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 32.07%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2021 | 15:38
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Union Pay up to 3.3.12, for iOS mobile apps, contains a CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability, allows attackers to shop for free in merchants' websites and mobile apps, via a crafted authentication code (MAC) which is generated based on a secret key which is NULL.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-unionpayintln/a
Product-union_payn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-3322
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cloudflare, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cloudflare, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.7||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.02% / 2.63%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Oct, 2022 | 09:25
Updated-05 May, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Lock WARP switch bypass on WARP mobile client using iOS quick action

Lock Warp switch is a feature of Zero Trust platform which, when enabled, prevents users of enrolled devices from disabling WARP client. Due to insufficient policy verification by WARP iOS client, this feature could be bypassed by using the "Disable WARP" quick action.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cloudflare, Inc.
Product-warp_mobile_clientWARP
CWE ID-CWE-862
Missing Authorization
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
Details not found