Microsoft SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.</p> <p><strong>UPDATE</strong> August 10, 2021: Microsoft has completed the investigation and has released security updates to address this vulnerability. Please see the Security Updates table for the applicable update for your system. We recommend that you install these updates immediately. This security update changes the Point and Print default behavior; please see <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/help/5005652">KB5005652</a>.</p>

Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Windows Remote Desktop Licensing Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Windows Fax Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Windows IP Routing Management Snapin Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Kernel Streaming WOW Thunk Service Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

An authenticated attacker can exploit an Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Microsoft Azure Health Bot to elevate privileges over a network.

Improper authentication in Microsoft Dataverse allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.</p> <p>UPDATE July 7, 2021: The security update for Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 and Windows 10, Version 1607 have been released. Please see the Security Updates table for the applicable update for your system. We recommend that you install these updates immediately. If you are unable to install these updates, see the FAQ and Workaround sections in this CVE for information on how to help protect your system from this vulnerability.</p> <p>In addition to installing the updates, in order to secure your system, you must confirm that the following registry settings are set to 0 (zero) or are not defined (<strong>Note</strong>: These registry keys do not exist by default, and therefore are already at the secure setting.), also that your Group Policy setting are correct (see FAQ):</p> <ul> <li>HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows NT\Printers\PointAndPrint</li> <li>NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall = 0 (DWORD) or not defined (default setting)</li> <li>UpdatePromptSettings = 0 (DWORD) or not defined (default setting)</li> </ul> <p><strong>Having NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall set to 1 makes your system vulnerable by design.</strong></p> <p>UPDATE July 6, 2021: Microsoft has completed the investigation and has released security updates to address this vulnerability. Please see the Security Updates table for the applicable update for your system. We recommend that you install these updates immediately. If you are unable to install these updates, see the FAQ and Workaround sections in this CVE for information on how to help protect your system from this vulnerability. See also <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/topic/31b91c02-05bc-4ada-a7ea-183b129578a7">KB5005010: Restricting installation of new printer drivers after applying the July 6, 2021 updates</a>.</p> <p>Note that the security updates released on and after July 6, 2021 contain protections for CVE-2021-1675 and the additional remote code execution exploit in the Windows Print Spooler service known as “PrintNightmare”, documented in CVE-2021-34527.</p>

Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Windows Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

An authenticated attacker can bypass Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection in Microsoft Copilot Studio to leak sensitive information over a network.

Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

IBM Concert Software 1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2, and 1.0.2.1 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information that could aid in further attacks against the system.

Microsoft SQL Server Native Scoring Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Microsoft SQL Server Native Scoring Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smack: tcp: ipv4, fix incorrect labeling Currently, Smack mirrors the label of incoming tcp/ipv4 connections: when a label 'foo' connects to a label 'bar' with tcp/ipv4, 'foo' always gets 'foo' in returned ipv4 packets. So, 1) returned packets are incorrectly labeled ('foo' instead of 'bar') 2) 'bar' can write to 'foo' without being authorized to write. Here is a scenario how to see this: * Take two machines, let's call them C and S, with active Smack in the default state (no settings, no rules, no labeled hosts, only builtin labels) * At S, add Smack rule 'foo bar w' (labels 'foo' and 'bar' are instantiated at S at this moment) * At S, at label 'bar', launch a program that listens for incoming tcp/ipv4 connections * From C, at label 'foo', connect to the listener at S. (label 'foo' is instantiated at C at this moment) Connection succeedes and works. * Send some data in both directions. * Collect network traffic of this connection. All packets in both directions are labeled with the CIPSO of the label 'foo'. Hence, label 'bar' writes to 'foo' without being authorized, and even without ever being known at C. If anybody cares: exactly the same happens with DCCP. This behavior 1st manifested in release 2.6.29.4 (see Fixes below) and it looks unintentional. At least, no explanation was provided. I changed returned packes label into the 'bar', to bring it into line with the Smack documentation claims.

Microsoft SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability

OLE Automation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kprobes: Fix possible use-after-free issue on kprobe registration When unloading a module, its state is changing MODULE_STATE_LIVE -> MODULE_STATE_GOING -> MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED. Each change will take a time. `is_module_text_address()` and `__module_text_address()` works with MODULE_STATE_LIVE and MODULE_STATE_GOING. If we use `is_module_text_address()` and `__module_text_address()` separately, there is a chance that the first one is succeeded but the next one is failed because module->state becomes MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED between those operations. In `check_kprobe_address_safe()`, if the second `__module_text_address()` is failed, that is ignored because it expected a kernel_text address. But it may have failed simply because module->state has been changed to MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED. In this case, arm_kprobe() will try to modify non-exist module text address (use-after-free). To fix this problem, we should not use separated `is_module_text_address()` and `__module_text_address()`, but use only `__module_text_address()` once and do `try_module_get(module)` which is only available with MODULE_STATE_LIVE.

Trend Micro Password Manager (Consumer) version 5.0.0.1217 and below is vulnerable to an Exposed Hazardous Function Remote Code Execution vulnerability which could allow an unprivileged client to manipulate the registry and escalate privileges to SYSTEM on affected installations. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability.

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

An information exposure vulnerability has been found, the exploitation of which could allow a remote user to retrieve sensitive information stored on the server such as credential files, configuration files, application files, etc., simply by appending any of the following parameters to the end of the URL: %00 %0a, %20, %2a, %a0, %aa, %c0 and %ca.

Path traversal vulnerability whose exploitation could allow an authenticated remote user to bypass SecurityManager's intended restrictions and list a parent directory via any filename, such as a multiple ..%2F value affecting the 'dodoc' parameter in the /MailAdmin_dll.htm file.

IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 is vulnerable to a privilege escalation vulnerability when using the SAML Web Inbound Trust Association Interceptor (TAI). IBM X-Force ID: 202006.

IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 could allow a remote user to gain elevated privileges on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 201300.

Zoom Chat through 2021-04-09 on Windows and macOS allows certain remote authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code without user interaction. An attacker must be within the same organization, or an external party who has been accepted as a contact. NOTE: this is specific to the Zoom Chat software, which is different from the chat feature of the Zoom Meetings and Zoom Video Webinars software.

Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Microsoft Jet Red Database Engine and Access Connectivity Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability

Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability