Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2022-47758

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-27 Apr, 2023 | 00:00
Updated At-31 Jan, 2025 | 19:09
Rejected At-
Credits

Nanoleaf firmware v7.1.1 and below is missing TLS verification, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code via a DNS hijacking attack.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:27 Apr, 2023 | 00:00
Updated At:31 Jan, 2025 | 19:09
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

Nanoleaf firmware v7.1.1 and below is missing TLS verification, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code via a DNS hijacking attack.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
http://nanoleaf.com
N/A
https://pwning.tech/cve-2022-47758
N/A
https://pwning.tech/cve-2022-47758/
N/A
Hyperlink: http://nanoleaf.com
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://pwning.tech/cve-2022-47758
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://pwning.tech/cve-2022-47758/
Resource: N/A
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
1. CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
http://nanoleaf.com
x_transferred
https://pwning.tech/cve-2022-47758
x_transferred
https://pwning.tech/cve-2022-47758/
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://nanoleaf.com
Resource:
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://pwning.tech/cve-2022-47758
Resource:
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://pwning.tech/cve-2022-47758/
Resource:
x_transferred
2. CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-295CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-295
Description: CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.19.8CRITICAL
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Version: 3.1
Base score: 9.8
Base severity: CRITICAL
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:27 Apr, 2023 | 02:15
Updated At:31 Jan, 2025 | 20:15

Nanoleaf firmware v7.1.1 and below is missing TLS verification, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code via a DNS hijacking attack.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.19.8CRITICAL
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Secondary3.19.8CRITICAL
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 9.8
Base severity: CRITICAL
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 9.8
Base severity: CRITICAL
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CPE Matches

nanoleaf
nanoleaf
>>nanoleaf_firmware>>7.1.1
cpe:2.3:o:nanoleaf:nanoleaf_firmware:7.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE-295Secondary134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Secondary
Source: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
http://nanoleaf.comcve@mitre.org
Product
https://pwning.tech/cve-2022-47758cve@mitre.org
Exploit
Technical Description
Third Party Advisory
https://pwning.tech/cve-2022-47758/cve@mitre.org
N/A
http://nanoleaf.comaf854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Product
https://pwning.tech/cve-2022-47758af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Exploit
Technical Description
Third Party Advisory
https://pwning.tech/cve-2022-47758/af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
N/A
Hyperlink: http://nanoleaf.com
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Product
Hyperlink: https://pwning.tech/cve-2022-47758
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Exploit
Technical Description
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://pwning.tech/cve-2022-47758/
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: http://nanoleaf.com
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource:
Product
Hyperlink: https://pwning.tech/cve-2022-47758
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource:
Exploit
Technical Description
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://pwning.tech/cve-2022-47758/
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource: N/A

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

61Records found

CVE-2019-18826
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.23% / 45.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Dec, 2019 | 16:13
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Barco ClickShare Button R9861500D01 devices before 1.9.0 have Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust. The embedded 'dongle_bridge' program used to expose the functionalities of the ClickShare Button to a USB host, does not properly validate the whole certificate chain.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-barcon/a
Product-clickshare_cse-200\+_firmwareclickshare_cse-800clickshare_cs-100_firmwareclickshare_cse-800_firmwareclickshare_cse-200clickshare_cse-200_firmwareclickshare_cs-100clickshare_cse-200\+n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-26463
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-17.49% / 94.82%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Apr, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 16:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

strongSwan 5.9.8 and 5.9.9 potentially allows remote code execution because it uses a variable named "public" for two different purposes within the same function. There is initially incorrect access control, later followed by an expired pointer dereference. One attack vector is sending an untrusted client certificate during EAP-TLS. A server is affected only if it loads plugins that implement TLS-based EAP methods (EAP-TLS, EAP-TTLS, EAP-PEAP, or EAP-TNC). This is fixed in 5.9.10.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-strongswann/a
Product-strongswann/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CVE-2019-18633
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.20% / 41.75%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Oct, 2019 | 21:16
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

European Commission eIDAS-Node Integration Package before 2.3.1 has Missing Certificate Validation because a certain ExplicitKeyTrustEvaluator return value is not checked. NOTE: only 2.1 is confirmed to be affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-europan/a
Product-eidas-node_integration_packagen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-18847
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-2.61% / 85.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Aug, 2020 | 13:47
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Enterprise Access Client Auto-Updater allows for Remote Code Execution prior to version 2.0.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-akamain/a
Product-enterprise_application_accessn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-31183
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.20% / 42.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2022 | 19:50
Updated-22 Apr, 2025 | 17:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
mTLS client verification is skipped in fs2 on Node.js

fs2 is a compositional, streaming I/O library for Scala. When establishing a server-mode `TLSSocket` using `fs2-io` on Node.js, the parameter `requestCert = true` is ignored, peer certificate verification is skipped, and the connection proceeds. The vulnerability is limited to: 1. `fs2-io` running on Node.js. The JVM TLS implementation is completely independent. 2. `TLSSocket`s in server-mode. Client-mode `TLSSocket`s are implemented via a different API. 3. mTLS as enabled via `requestCert = true` in `TLSParameters`. The default setting is `false` for server-mode `TLSSocket`s. It was introduced with the initial Node.js implementation of fs2-io in 3.1.0. A patch is released in v3.2.11. The requestCert = true parameter is respected and the peer certificate is verified. If verification fails, a SSLException is raised. If using an unpatched version on Node.js, do not use a server-mode TLSSocket with requestCert = true to establish a mTLS connection.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-typeleveltypelevel
Product-fs2fs2
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2010-4533
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.28% / 50.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Nov, 2019 | 18:30
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 03:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

offlineimap before 6.3.4 added support for SSL server certificate validation but it is still possible to use SSL v2 protocol, which is a flawed protocol with multiple security deficiencies.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-offlineimapofflineimapDebian GNU/Linux
Product-offlineimapdebian_linuxofflineimap
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-21029
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-1.56% / 80.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Oct, 2019 | 21:46
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 13:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

systemd 239 through 245 accepts any certificate signed by a trusted certificate authority for DNS Over TLS. Server Name Indication (SNI) is not sent, and there is no hostname validation with the GnuTLS backend. NOTE: This has been disputed by the developer as not a vulnerability since hostname validation does not have anything to do with this issue (i.e. there is no hostname to be sent)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-systemd_projectn/aFedora Project
Product-fedorasystemdn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-45159
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.24% / 47.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Sep, 2024 | 00:00
Updated-13 Mar, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS 3.x before 3.6.1. With TLS 1.3, when a server enables optional authentication of the client, if the client-provided certificate does not have appropriate values in if keyUsage or extKeyUsage extensions, then the return value of mbedtls_ssl_get_verify_result() would incorrectly have the MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE and MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE bits clear. As a result, an attacker that had a certificate valid for uses other than TLS client authentication would nonetheless be able to use it for TLS client authentication. Only TLS 1.3 servers were affected, and only with optional authentication (with required authentication, the handshake would be aborted with a fatal alert).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aArm Limited
Product-mbed_tlsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-3738
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulDB
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulDB
CVSS Score-7.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.05% / 13.46%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Apr, 2024 | 17:31
Updated-21 Aug, 2025 | 00:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
cym1102 nginxWebUI saveCmd handlePath certificate validation

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in cym1102 nginxWebUI up to 3.9.9. This affects the function handlePath of the file /adminPage/conf/saveCmd. The manipulation of the argument nginxPath leads to improper certificate validation. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-260577 was assigned to this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nginxWebUI (cym1102)Nginx UI (0xJacky)
Product-nginxwebuinginxWebUInginx_ui
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-49369
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-17.66% / 94.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Nov, 2024 | 16:44
Updated-13 Nov, 2024 | 17:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Icinga 2 has a TLS Certificate Validation Bypass for JSON-RPC and HTTP API Connections

Icinga is a monitoring system which checks the availability of network resources, notifies users of outages, and generates performance data for reporting. The TLS certificate validation in all Icinga 2 versions starting from 2.4.0 was flawed, allowing an attacker to impersonate both trusted cluster nodes as well as any API users that use TLS client certificates for authentication (ApiUser objects with the client_cn attribute set). This vulnerability has been fixed in v2.14.3, v2.13.10, v2.12.11, and v2.11.12.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Icingaicinga
Product-icinga2icinga_web_2
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-42395
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.29% / 52.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Aug, 2024 | 18:56
Updated-12 Aug, 2024 | 18:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Unauthenticated Stack-Based Buffer Overflow Remote Command Execution (RCE) in the AP Certificate Management Service Accessed by the PAPI Protocol

There is a vulnerability in the AP Certificate Management Service which could allow a threat actor to execute an unauthenticated RCE attack. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system leading to complete system compromise.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-HP Inc.Aruba NetworksHewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
Product-arubaosinstantosHPE Aruba Networking InstantOS and Aruba Access Points running ArubaOS 10instant
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-787
Out-of-bounds Write
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found