CSRF in admin/manage-categories.php in Chadha PHPKB Standard Multi-Language 9 allows attackers to delete a category via a crafted request.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Chef Sinatra Plugin in the ChefBuilderConfiguration.DescriptorImpl#doTestConnection form validation method allows attackers to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server.

The OAuth Single Sign On WordPress plugin before 6.24.2 does not have CSRF checks when discarding Identify providers (IdP), which could allow attackers to make logged in admins delete all IdP via a CSRF attack

Plesk Obsidian allows a CSRF attack, e.g., via the /api/v2/cli/commands REST API to change an Admin password. NOTE: Obsidian is a specific version of the Plesk product: version numbers were used through version 12, and then the convention was changed so that versions are identified by names ("Obsidian"), not numbers.

A carefully crafted request on UserPreferences.jsp could trigger an CSRF vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki before 2.11.3, which could allow the attacker to modify the email associated with the attacked account, and then a reset password request from the login page.

An issue was discovered in Cscms 4.1.0. There is an admin.php/pay CSRF vulnerability that can change the payment account to redirect funds.

Darktrace Enterprise Immune System before 3.1 allows CSRF via the /whitelisteddomains endpoint.

Darktrace Enterprise Immune System before 3.1 allows CSRF via the /config endpoint.

The AdminPad WordPress plugin before 2.2 does not have CSRF check when updating admin's note, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin update their notes via a CSRF attack

An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition before 11.6.10, 11.7.x before 11.7.6, and 11.8.x before 11.8.1. It allows CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in LogStare Collector. If a user views a crafted page while logged, unintended operations may be performed.

MiniCMS 1.10 allows mc-admin/post.php?state=publish&delete= CSRF to delete articles, a different vulnerability than CVE-2018-18891.

An issue was discovered in Pluck 4.7.9-dev1. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can delete modules via a /admin.php?action=module_delete&var1= URI.

letodms 3.3.6 has CSRF via change password

An issue was discovered in Pluck 4.7.9-dev1. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can delete pictures via a /admin.php?action=deleteimage&var1= URI.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository usememos/memos prior to 0.9.1.

IBM Integration Bus for z/OS 10.1 through 10.1.0.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 284564.

JioFi 4G M2S 1.0.2 devices have CSRF via the SSID name and Security Key field under Edit Wi-Fi Settings (aka a SetWiFi_Setting request to cgi-bin/qcmap_web_cgi).

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AA-Team WZone – Lite Version plugin 3.1 Lite versions.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2 can lead to unintended data deletion from customer pages.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2. This can result in unintended deletion of user roles.

C.P.Sub before 5.3 allows CSRF via a manage.php?p=article_del&id= URI.

Wowza Streaming Engine 4.8.0 and earlier suffers from multiple CSRF vulnerabilities. For example, an administrator, by following a link, can be tricked into making unwanted changes such as adding another admin user via enginemanager/server/user/edit.htm in the Server->Users component. This issue was resolved in Wowza Streaming Engine 4.8.5.

AeroCMS v0.0.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF).

A vulnerability was found in jsnjfz WebStack-Guns 1.0. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

wg7.php in Webgalamb 7.0 lacks security measures to prevent CSRF attacks, as demonstrated by wg7.php?options=1 to change the administrator password.

The Optimize images ALT Text & names for SEO using AI WordPress plugin before 2.0.8 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged-in admin change them via a CSRF attack.

Westermo DR-250 Pre-5162 and DR-260 Pre-5162 routers allow CSRF.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in xxl-api v1.3.0 allows attackers to arbitrarily add users to the management module via a crafted GET request.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in IceHrm 31.0.0.OS allows attackers to delete arbitrary users or achieve account takeover via the app/service.php URI.

IBM Security Key Lifecycle Manager 3.0 and 3.0.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 165137.

The vulnerability have been reported to affect earlier versions of Helpdesk. If exploited, this cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability could allow attackers to force NAS users to execute unintentional actions through a web application. QNAP has already fixed the issue in Helpdesk 3.0.3 and later.

IBM StoredIQ 7.6.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 158700.

A vulnerability was found in morontt zend-blog-number-2. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the file application/forms/Comment.php of the component Comment Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The name of the patch is 36b2d4abe20a6245e4f8df7a4b14e130b24d429d. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-215250 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

Jenkins Pipeline: Stage View Plugin 2.26 and earlier does not correctly encode the ID of 'input' steps when using it to generate URLs to proceed or abort Pipeline builds, allowing attackers able to configure Pipelines to specify 'input' step IDs resulting in URLs that would bypass the CSRF protection of any target URL in Jenkins.

The Bulk Delete Users by Email WordPress plugin through 1.2 does not have CSRF check when deleting users, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete non admin users by knowing their email via a CSRF attack

The WP Coder WordPress plugin before 2.5.3 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting code created by the plugin, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary ones via a CSRF attack

YzmCMS v6.3 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows attackers to arbitrarily delete user accounts via /admin/admin_manage/delete.

The reSmush.it : the only free Image Optimizer & compress plugin WordPress plugin before 0.4.4 does not perform CSRF checks for any of its AJAX actions, allowing an attackers to trick logged in users to perform various actions on their behalf on the site.

The Easy Username Updater WordPress plugin before 1.0.5 does not implement CSRF checks, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change any user's username includes the admin

The Omnishop plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery on its /users/delete REST route in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.9. The route’s permission_callback only verifies that the requester is logged in, but fails to require any nonce or other proof of intent. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary user accounts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM), Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (Unified CM SME), and Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service (Unified CM IM&P) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the targeted user. These actions could include modifying the device configuration and deleting (but not creating) user accounts.

Various installation setup resources in Jira before version 8.5.2 allow remote attackers to configure a Jira instance, which has not yet finished being installed, via Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities.

IBM Db2U 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 237212.

IBM Db2U 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 237210.

Cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Energy Management Controller with Cloud Services JH-RVB1 /JH-RV11 Ver.B0.1.9.1 and earlier allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to change the product settings.

On Netis DL4323 devices, CSRF exists via form2logaction.cgi to delete all logs.

Snare for Linux before 1.7.0 has CSRF in the web interface.

CSRF vulnerability in Headless API in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.107, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions allows remote attackers to execute any Headless API via the `endpoint` parameter.

The WP OAuth Server (OAuth Authentication) WordPress plugin before 3.4.2 does not have CSRF check when regenerating secrets, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins regenerate the secret of an arbitrary client given they know the client ID