Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2023-1514

Summary
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
Assigner Org ID-e383dce4-0c27-4495-91c4-0db157728d17
Published At-19 Dec, 2023 | 14:22
Updated At-02 Aug, 2024 | 05:49
Rejected At-
Credits

A vulnerability exists in the component RTU500 Scripting interface. When a client connects to a server using TLS, the server presents a certificate. This certificate links a public key to the identity of the service and is signed by a Certification Authority (CA), allowing the client to validate that the remote service can be trusted and is not malicious. If the client does not validate the parameters of the certificate, then attackers could be able to spoof the identity of the service. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using faking the identity of a RTU500 device and intercepting the messages initiated via the RTU500 Scripting interface.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
â–¼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:Hitachi Energy
Assigner Org ID:e383dce4-0c27-4495-91c4-0db157728d17
Published At:19 Dec, 2023 | 14:22
Updated At:02 Aug, 2024 | 05:49
Rejected At:
â–¼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

A vulnerability exists in the component RTU500 Scripting interface. When a client connects to a server using TLS, the server presents a certificate. This certificate links a public key to the identity of the service and is signed by a Certification Authority (CA), allowing the client to validate that the remote service can be trusted and is not malicious. If the client does not validate the parameters of the certificate, then attackers could be able to spoof the identity of the service. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using faking the identity of a RTU500 device and intercepting the messages initiated via the RTU500 Scripting interface.

Affected Products
Vendor
Hitachi Energy Ltd.Hitachi Energy
Product
RTU500 Scripting Interface
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • 1.0.1.30
  • 1.0.2
  • 1.1.1
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-295CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-295
Description: CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.17.4HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.4
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
CAPEC-151CAPEC-151 Identity Spoofing
CAPEC ID: CAPEC-151
Description: CAPEC-151 Identity Spoofing
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://publisher.hitachienergy.com/preview?DocumentId=8DBD000152&languageCode=en&Preview=true
vendor-advisory
Hyperlink: https://publisher.hitachienergy.com/preview?DocumentId=8DBD000152&languageCode=en&Preview=true
Resource:
vendor-advisory
â–¼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://publisher.hitachienergy.com/preview?DocumentId=8DBD000152&languageCode=en&Preview=true
vendor-advisory
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://publisher.hitachienergy.com/preview?DocumentId=8DBD000152&languageCode=en&Preview=true
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
â–¼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cybersecurity@hitachienergy.com
Published At:19 Dec, 2023 | 15:15
Updated At:28 Dec, 2023 | 17:00

A vulnerability exists in the component RTU500 Scripting interface. When a client connects to a server using TLS, the server presents a certificate. This certificate links a public key to the identity of the service and is signed by a Certification Authority (CA), allowing the client to validate that the remote service can be trusted and is not malicious. If the client does not validate the parameters of the certificate, then attackers could be able to spoof the identity of the service. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using faking the identity of a RTU500 device and intercepting the messages initiated via the RTU500 Scripting interface.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Secondary3.17.4HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.4
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CPE Matches

Hitachi Energy Ltd.
hitachienergy
>>rtu500_scripting_interface>>1.0.1.30
cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:rtu500_scripting_interface:1.0.1.30:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Hitachi Energy Ltd.
hitachienergy
>>rtu500_scripting_interface>>1.0.2
cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:rtu500_scripting_interface:1.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Hitachi Energy Ltd.
hitachienergy
>>rtu500_scripting_interface>>1.1.1
cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:rtu500_scripting_interface:1.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE-295Secondarycybersecurity@hitachienergy.com
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Secondary
Source: cybersecurity@hitachienergy.com
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://publisher.hitachienergy.com/preview?DocumentId=8DBD000152&languageCode=en&Preview=truecybersecurity@hitachienergy.com
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://publisher.hitachienergy.com/preview?DocumentId=8DBD000152&languageCode=en&Preview=true
Source: cybersecurity@hitachienergy.com
Resource:
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

182Records found

CVE-2024-28021
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.27% / 18.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jun, 2024 | 13:30
Updated-29 Oct, 2024 | 15:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability exists in the FOXMAN-UN/UNEM server that affects the message queueing mechanism’s certificate validation. If exploited an attacker could spoof a trusted entity causing a loss of confidentiality and integrity.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Hitachi Energy Ltd.
Product-foxman-unfoxman_ununemFOXMAN-UNUNEMfoxman-ununem
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-2500
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.34% / 25.19%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 May, 2025 | 12:29
Updated-30 May, 2025 | 16:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability exists in the SOAP Web services of the Asset Suite versions listed below. If successfully exploited, an attacker could gain unauthorized access to the product and the time window of a possible password attack could be expanded.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Hitachi Energy Ltd.
Product-Asset Suite
CWE ID-CWE-256
Plaintext Storage of a Password
CVE-2021-22278
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (ABB)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (ABB)
CVSS Score-6.7||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 2.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Oct, 2021 | 12:45
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 18:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Certificate verification vulnerability in Update Manager of PCM600 Engineering Tool

A certificate validation vulnerability in PCM600 Update Manager allows attacker to get unwanted software packages to be installed on computer which has PCM600 installed.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Hitachi Energy Ltd.ABB
Product-update_managerpcm600PCM600PCM600 Update Manager
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-39205
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
CVSS Score-7.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.17% / 6.94%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Jun, 2025 | 12:13
Updated-30 Jan, 2026 | 18:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability exists in the IEC 61850 in MicroSCADA X SYS600 product. The certificate validation of the TLS protocol allows remote Man-in-the-Middle attack due to missing proper validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Hitachi Energy Ltd.
Product-microscada_x_sys600MicroSCADA X SYS600
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-32144
Matching Score-4
Assigner-6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db
CVSS Score-7.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 11.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Apr, 2026 | 12:28
Updated-27 May, 2026 | 15:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
OCSP designated-responder authorization bypass via missing signature verification

Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP public_key (pubkey_ocsp module) allows OCSP designated-responder authorization bypass via missing signature verification. The OCSP response validation in public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 does not verify that a CA-designated responder certificate was cryptographically signed by the issuing CA. Instead, it only checks that the responder certificate's issuer name matches the CA's subject name and that the certificate has the OCSPSigning extended key usage. An attacker who can intercept or control OCSP responses can create a self-signed certificate with a matching issuer name and the OCSPSigning EKU, and use it to forge OCSP responses that mark revoked certificates as valid. This affects SSL/TLS clients using OCSP stapling, which may accept connections to servers with revoked certificates, potentially transmitting sensitive data to compromised servers. Applications using the public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 API directly are also affected, with impact depending on usage context. This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/public_key/src/pubkey_ocsp.erl and program routines pubkey_ocsp:is_authorized_responder/3. This issue affects OTP from OTP 27.0 until OTP 28.4.2 and 27.3.4.10 corresponding to public_key from 1.16 until 1.20.3 and 1.17.1.2, and ssl from 11.2 until 11.5.4 and 11.2.12.7.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-erlangErlang
Product-erlang\/public_keyerlang\/sslerlang\/otpOTP
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-27018
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.54% / 41.18%
||
7 Day CHG+0.02%
Published-30 Aug, 2021 | 17:56
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The mechanism which performs certificate validation was discovered to have a flaw that resulted in certificates signed by an internal certificate authority to not be properly validated. This issue only affects clients that are configured to utilize Tenable.sc as the vulnerability data source.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aPerforce Software, Inc. ("Puppet")
Product-remediatePuppet Remediate
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-26911
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.09% / 61.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Feb, 2021 | 20:54
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

core/imap/MCIMAPSession.cpp in Canary Mail before 3.22 has Missing SSL Certificate Validation for IMAP in STARTTLS mode.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libmailcorecanarymailn/a
Product-canary_mailmailcore2n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-45391
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.40% / 31.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 18:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Jenkins NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher Plugin 4.8.0.143 and earlier globally and unconditionally disables SSL/TLS certificate and hostname validation for the entire Jenkins controller JVM.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Jenkins
Product-ns-nd_integration_performance_publisherJenkins NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher Plugin
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-31892
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.49% / 38.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Jul, 2021 | 11:02
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SINUMERIK Analyse MyCondition (All versions), SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance (All versions), SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-Monitor (All versions), SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-Tuning (All versions), SINUMERIK Integrate Client 02 (All versions >= V02.00.12 < 02.00.18), SINUMERIK Integrate Client 03 (All versions >= V03.00.12 < 03.00.18), SINUMERIK Integrate Client 04 (V04.00.02 and all versions >= V04.00.15 < 04.00.18), SINUMERIK Integrate for Production 4.1 (All versions < V4.1 SP10 HF3), SINUMERIK Integrate for Production 5.1 (V5.1), SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /Remote (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /Spindel Monitor (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyPrograms (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyResources /Programs (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyResources /Tools (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyTools (All versions), SINUMERIK Operate V4.8 (All versions < V4.8 SP8), SINUMERIK Operate V4.93 (All versions < V4.93 HF7), SINUMERIK Operate V4.94 (All versions < V4.94 HF5), SINUMERIK Optimize MyProgramming /NX-Cam Editor (All versions). Due to an error in a third-party dependency the ssl flags used for setting up a TLS connection to a server are overwitten with wrong settings. This results in a missing validation of the server certificate and thus in a possible TLS MITM szenario.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-sinumerik_manage_mytoolssinumerik_manage_myprogramssinumerik_integrate_clientsinumerik_analyse_myconditionsinumerik_manage_myresources_firmwaresinumerik_analyse_mycondition_firmwaresinumerik_manage_mytools_firmwaresinumerik_optimize_myprogramming_firmwaresinumerik_manage_mymachinessinumerik_optimize_myprogrammingsinumerik_analyze_myperformance_firmwaresinumerik_analyze_myperformancesinumerik_integrate_client_firmwaresinumerik_integrate_for_productionsinumerik_manage_myresourcessinumerik_manage_mymachines_firmwaresinumerik_operate_firmwaresinumerik_integrate_for_production_firmwaresinumerik_operatesinumerik_manage_myprograms_firmwareSINUMERIK Analyse MyConditionSINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-TuningSINUMERIK Operate V4.94SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /Spindel MonitorSINUMERIK Integrate Client 02SINUMERIK Manage MyResources /ProgramsSINUMERIK Integrate for Production 5.1SINUMERIK Integrate for Production 4.1SINUMERIK Optimize MyProgramming /NX-Cam EditorSINUMERIK Manage MyResources /ToolsSINUMERIK Manage MyMachinesSINUMERIK Operate V4.93SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformanceSINUMERIK Operate V4.8SINUMERIK Integrate Client 03SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-MonitorSINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /RemoteSINUMERIK Manage MyProgramsSINUMERIK Integrate Client 04SINUMERIK Manage MyTools
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-7821
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Ivanti
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Ivanti
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.51% / 39.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 May, 2026 | 15:26
Updated-07 May, 2026 | 20:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper certificate validation in Ivanti EPMM before versions 12.6.1.1, 12.7.0.1, and 12.8.0.1 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to enroll a device belonging to a restricted set of unenrolled devices, leading to information disclosure about EPMM appliance and impacting on the integrity of the newly enrolled device identity.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Ivanti Software
Product-endpoint_manager_mobileEndpoint Manager Mobile
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25636
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.97% / 57.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect trust validation of signature with ambiguous KeyInfo children

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to contain both "X509Data" and "KeyValue" children of the "KeyInfo" tag, which when opened caused LibreOffice to verify using the "KeyValue" but to report verification with the unrelated "X509Data" value. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7.2 versions prior to 7.2.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationFedora Project
Product-fedoralibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-24281
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.31% / 22.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Mar, 2026 | 08:50
Updated-10 Mar, 2026 | 18:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache ZooKeeper: Reverse-DNS fallback enables hostname verification bypass in ZooKeeper ZKTrustManager

Hostname verification in Apache ZooKeeper ZKTrustManager falls back to reverse DNS (PTR) when IP SAN validation fails, allowing attackers who control or spoof PTR records to impersonate ZooKeeper servers or clients with a valid certificate for the PTR name. It's important to note that attacker must present a certificate which is trusted by ZKTrustManager which makes the attack vector harder to exploit. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.8.6 or 3.9.5, which fixes this issue by introducing a new configuration option to disable reverse DNS lookup in client and quorum protocols.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-zookeeperApache ZooKeeper
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-350
Reliance on Reverse DNS Resolution for a Security-Critical Action
CVE-2021-25634
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.69% / 47.77%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Oct, 2021 | 13:33
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 00:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Timestamp Manipulation with Signature Wrapping

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to modify a digitally signed ODF document to insert an additional signing time timestamp which LibreOffice would incorrectly present as a valid signature signed at the bogus signing time. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7-0 versions prior to 7.0.6; 7-1 versions prior to 7.1.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxlibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1320
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-8.19% / 94.14%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Jan, 2019 | 18:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Thrift Java client library versions 0.5.0 through 0.11.0 can bypass SASL negotiation isComplete validation in the org.apache.thrift.transport.TSaslTransport class. An assert used to determine if the SASL handshake had successfully completed could be disabled in production settings making the validation incomplete.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationF5, Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxOracle Corporation
Product-global_lifecycle_management_opatchdebian_linuxnosql_databasethrifttraffix_signaling_delivery_controllerApache Thrift
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-36377
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.57% / 42.87%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jul, 2021 | 12:11
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 00:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Fossil before 2.14.2 and 2.15.x before 2.15.2 often skips the hostname check during TLS certificate validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-fossil-scmn/aFedora Project
Product-fossilfedoran/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0227
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-2.13% / 79.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Apr, 2018 | 20:00
Updated-29 Nov, 2024 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) Virtual Private Network (VPN) Client Certificate Authentication feature for Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to establish an SSL VPN connection and bypass certain SSL certificate verification steps. The vulnerability is due to incorrect verification of the SSL Client Certificate. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by connecting to the ASA VPN without a proper private key and certificate pair. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to establish an SSL VPN connection to the ASA when the connection should have been rejected. This vulnerability affects Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software that is running on the following Cisco products: 3000 Series Industrial Security Appliances (ISA), ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, ASA 5500-X Series Next-Generation Firewalls, ASA Services Module for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Switches and Cisco 7600 Series Routers, Adaptive Security Virtual Appliances (ASAv), Firepower 4110 Security Appliances, Firepower 9300 ASA Security Modules. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg40155.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCisco Systems, Inc.
Product-firepower_threat_defenseadaptive_security_appliance_softwareCisco Adaptive Security Appliance
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-39948
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.28% / 19.19%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Feb, 2023 | 18:06
Updated-22 Oct, 2024 | 20:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.0.0 through 7.0.7, 6.4 all versions, 6.2 all versions, 6.0 all versions and FortiProxy 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, 2.0 all versions, 1.2 all versions may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the FortiOS/FortiProxy device and remote servers hosting threat feeds (when the latter are configured as Fabric connectors in FortiOS/FortiProxy)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-fortiproxyfortiosFortiOSFortiProxy
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-48697
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 5.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 May, 2026 | 00:00
Updated-27 May, 2026 | 15:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

FastNetMon Community Edition through 1.2.9 does not verify TLS certificates on outbound HTTPS connections. The execute_web_request_secure() function in src/fast_library.cpp creates a boost::asio::ssl::context with tls_client mode and calls set_default_verify_paths() to load CA certificates, but never calls set_verify_mode(boost::asio::ssl::verify_peer). Without this call, OpenSSL performs the TLS handshake without validating the server's certificate chain, making all HTTPS connections vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks. This function is used for telemetry reporting to community-stats.fastnetmon.com, which sends system information including CPU model, kernel version, traffic statistics, and software configuration. An attacker can intercept and modify this data or redirect it to a malicious server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pavel-odintsovn/a
Product-fastnetmonn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-50752
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Check Point Software Ltd.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Check Point Software Ltd.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-4.86% / 90.89%
||
7 Day CHG+0.61%
Published-08 Jun, 2026 | 11:00
Updated-10 Jun, 2026 | 13:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Certificate Validation Bypass in VPN Site-to-Site Connections Using IKEv1

A weakness in the certificate validation logic of the deprecated IKEv1 key exchange may allow an unauthenticated attacker positioned as a man-in-the-middle to bypass certificate validation in VPN site-to-site connections that use certificate-based authentication. Successful exploitation could allow interception or modification of traffic traversing the VPN tunnel.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Product-Quantum Security GatewaySpark Firewalls
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25633
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.71% / 48.66%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2021 | 16:43
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 18:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Content Manipulation with Double Certificate Attack

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to combine multiple certificate data, which when opened caused LibreOffice to display a validly signed indicator but whose content was unrelated to the signature shown. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7-0 versions prior to 7.0.6; 7-1 versions prior to 7.1.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxlibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32156
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.74% / 49.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jun, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-25 Feb, 2026 | 16:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise and Universal Forwarder CLI connections lacked TLS cert validation

In Splunk Enterprise and Universal Forwarder versions before 9.0, the Splunk command-line interface (CLI) did not validate TLS certificates while connecting to a remote Splunk platform instance by default. After updating to version 9.0, see Configure TLS host name validation for the Splunk CLI https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation#Configure_TLS_host_name_validation_for_the_Splunk_CLI to enable the remediation. The vulnerability does not affect the Splunk Cloud Platform. At the time of publishing, we have no evidence of exploitation of this vulnerability by external parties. The issue requires conditions beyond the control of a potential bad actor such as a machine-in-the-middle attack. Hence, Splunk rates the complexity of the attack as High.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunkuniversal_forwarderSplunk EnterpriseUniversal Forwarder
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32151
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.73% / 49.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jun, 2022 | 16:46
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise disabled TLS validation using the CA certificate stores in Python 3 libraries by default

The httplib and urllib Python libraries that Splunk shipped with Splunk Enterprise did not validate certificates using the certificate authority (CA) certificate stores by default in Splunk Enterprise versions before 9.0 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions before 8.2.2203. Python 3 client libraries now verify server certificates by default and use the appropriate CA certificate stores for each library. Apps and add-ons that include their own HTTP libraries are not affected. For Splunk Enterprise, update to Splunk Enterprise version 9.0 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communications (https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation) to enable the remediation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunksplunk_cloud_platformSplunk EnterpriseSplunk Cloud Platform
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-43550
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.08% / 60.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Oct, 2024 | 17:35
Updated-09 Jun, 2026 | 18:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Windows Secure Channel Spoofing Vulnerability

Windows Secure Channel Spoofing Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_10_21h2windows_10_1809windows_server_2016windows_server_2022_23h2windows_server_2012windows_10_1507windows_11_21h2windows_11_24h2windows_10_22h2windows_server_2022windows_11_22h2windows_server_2019windows_10_1607windows_11_23h2Windows 11 Version 23H2Windows Server 2016Windows 10 Version 1607Windows 11 version 21H2Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 21H2Windows 10 Version 1507Windows 11 Version 24H2Windows 11 version 22H3Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1809Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)Windows 11 version 22H2Windows Server 2022Windows Server 2012Windows 10 Version 22H2Windows Server 2012 R2
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-6594
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.76% / 75.07%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Aug, 2017 | 19:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The transit path validation code in Heimdal before 7.3 might allow attackers to bypass the capath policy protection mechanism by leveraging failure to add the previous hop realm to the transit path of issued tickets.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-heimdal_projectn/aopenSUSE
Product-leapheimdaln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-11043
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (ABB)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (ABB)
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.21% / 10.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Jan, 2026 | 15:52
Updated-26 Jan, 2026 | 15:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Server Certificate Validation in Automation Studio

An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in the OPC-UA client and ANSL over TLS client used in Automation Studio versions before 6.5 could allow an unauthenticated attacker on the network to position themselves to intercept and interfere with data exchanges.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-B&R Industrial Automation GmbH
Product-B&R Automation Studio
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-27782
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-2.60% / 83.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Jun, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-27 May, 2026 | 14:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libcurl would reuse a previously created connection even when a TLS or SSHrelated option had been changed that should have prohibited reuse.libcurl keeps previously used connections in a connection pool for subsequenttransfers to reuse if one of them matches the setup. However, several TLS andSSH settings were left out from the configuration match checks, making themmatch too easily.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSplunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)CURLDebian GNU/Linux
Product-universal_forwardercurldebian_linuxhttps://github.com/curl/curl
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-42011
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.39% / 30.25%
||
7 Day CHG+0.08%
Published-07 May, 2026 | 13:51
Updated-16 Jun, 2026 | 21:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Gnutls: gnutls: security bypass due to incorrect name constraint handling

A flaw was found in gnutls. This vulnerability occurs because permitted name constraints were incorrectly ignored when previous Certificate Authorities (CAs) only had excluded name constraints. A remote attacker could exploit this to bypass critical name constraint checks during certificate validation. This bypass could lead to the acceptance of invalid certificates, potentially enabling spoofing or man-in-the-middle attacks against affected systems.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Hardened ImagesRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-38861
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Checkmk GmbH
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Checkmk GmbH
CVSS Score-4.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 8.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Sep, 2024 | 08:11
Updated-20 Dec, 2024 | 18:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Lack of TLS validation in plugin MikroTik on Checkmk Exchange

Improper Certificate Validation in Checkmk Exchange plugin MikroTik allows attackers in MitM position to intercept traffic. This issue affects MikroTik: from 2.0.0 through 2.5.5, from 0.4a_mk through 2.0a.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-tomtretbar
Product-mikrotik
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-9697
Matching Score-4
Assigner-ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.28% / 19.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Jun, 2026 | 16:46
Updated-23 Jun, 2026 | 05:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
undici vulnerable to TLS certificate validation bypass via dropped requestTls in SOCKS5 ProxyAgent

Impact: undici's ProxyAgent silently drops the requestTls option when configured with a SOCKS5 proxy URI (socks5:// or socks://). The target HTTPS connection through the SOCKS5 tunnel falls back to Node's default trust store, ignoring user-configured ca, cert, key, rejectUnauthorized, and servername settings. Applications that pin to an internal or corporate CA via requestTls.ca will, when their proxy URI is SOCKS5, get the default Mozilla CA bundle as the trust anchor instead. Any cert signed by any publicly-trusted CA for the target hostname is accepted, breaking the intended pin and enabling MITM read and tamper of the HTTPS exchange. Affected applications are those that use undici's ProxyAgent (or Socks5ProxyAgent directly) with SOCKS5 AND rely on requestTls for TLS scope restriction. The bug was introduced in undici 7.23.0 when SOCKS5 support was added. Patches: Upgrade to undici v7.28.0 or v8.5.0. Workarounds: No workaround is available within the SOCKS5 path. If a SOCKS5 proxy with TLS scope restriction is required and an upgrade is not yet possible, route the traffic through an HTTP-proxy ProxyAgent instead, where requestTls is honored correctly.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-undici
Product-undici
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-21654
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.06% / 60.19%
||
7 Day CHG+0.02%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 22:35
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 19:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect configuration handling allows TLS session re-use without re-validation in Envoy

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy, designed for cloud-native applications. Envoy's tls allows re-use when some cert validation settings have changed from their default configuration. The only workaround for this issue is to ensure that default tls settings are used. Users are advised to upgrade.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-envoyproxyenvoyproxy
Product-envoyenvoy
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-22156
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.55% / 41.65%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Jan, 2022 | 00:20
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS: Certificate validation is skipped when fetching system scripts from a HTTPS URL

An Improper Certificate Validation weakness in the Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to perform Person-in-the-Middle (PitM) attacks when a system script is fetched from a remote source at a specified HTTPS URL, which may compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the device. The following command can be executed by an administrator via the CLI to refresh a script from a remote location, which is affected from this vulnerability: >request system scripts refresh-from (commit | event | extension-service | op | snmp) file filename url <https-url> This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS All versions prior to 18.4R2-S9, 18.4R3-S9; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R2-S3, 19.1R3-S7; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S7, 19.2R3-S3; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R3-S4; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R3-S7; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2-S2, 20.1R3; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R2-S1, 20.3R3; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R2; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R1-S1, 21.1R2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-junosJunos OS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-300
Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint
CWE ID-CWE-358
Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard
CVE-2026-53475
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.25% / 16.37%
||
7 Day CHG+0.09%
Published-10 Jun, 2026 | 13:55
Updated-16 Jun, 2026 | 14:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Assisted-migration-agent: tls verification disabled on all vcenter connections

A flaw was found in assisted-migration-agent. The application hardcodes insecure Transport Layer Security (TLS) connections when communicating with vCenter. This vulnerability allows a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacker to intercept and harvest vCenter administrator credentials. This can lead to unauthorized access to vCenter.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-kubev2v
Product-assisted_migration_agent
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-21656
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.77% / 50.74%
||
7 Day CHG+0.02%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 22:25
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 19:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
X.509 subjectAltName matching bypass in Envoy

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy, designed for cloud-native applications. The default_validator.cc implementation used to implement the default certificate validation routines has a "type confusion" bug when processing subjectAltNames. This processing allows, for example, an rfc822Name or uniformResourceIndicator to be authenticated as a domain name. This confusion allows for the bypassing of nameConstraints, as processed by the underlying OpenSSL/BoringSSL implementation, exposing the possibility of impersonation of arbitrary servers. As a result Envoy will trust upstream certificates that should not be trusted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-envoyproxyenvoyproxy
Product-envoyenvoy
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-843
Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
CVE-2022-20814
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.90% / 54.90%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Nov, 2024 | 15:32
Updated-31 Jul, 2025 | 15:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence VCS Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the certificate validation of Cisco&nbsp;Expressway-C and Cisco&nbsp;TelePresence VCS could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data.&nbsp;&nbsp;The vulnerability is due to a lack of validation of the SSL server certificate that an affected device receives when it establishes a connection to a Cisco&nbsp;Unified Communications Manager device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using a man-in-the-middle technique to intercept the traffic between the devices, and then using a self-signed certificate to impersonate the endpoint. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view the intercepted traffic in clear text or alter the contents of the traffic. Note: Cisco&nbsp;Expressway-E is not affected by this vulnerability.Cisco&nbsp;has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-telepresence_video_communication_serverCisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) Expresswaytelepresence_video_communication_server
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-45389
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 8.83%
||
7 Day CHG+0.07%
Published-15 Jun, 2026 | 00:00
Updated-17 Jun, 2026 | 15:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In OCaml-TLS before 2.1.0, the server implementation does insufficient checks of the certificate provided by the client (when doing client authentication), which allows impersonation with certificates that are not meant for client authentication (because of KeyUsage and ExtendedKeyUsage).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/a
Product-n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-41132
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.6||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 9.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 May, 2026 | 18:53
Updated-15 May, 2026 | 14:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
CKAN: No certificate validation on STMP connection

CKAN is an open-source DMS (data management system) for powering data hubs and data portals. Prior to 2.10.10 and 2.11.5, the configured SMTP server may be spoofed with any certificate (e.g. self-signed), leaving credentials and all emails sent open to MITM attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.10.10 and 2.11.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-okfnckan
Product-ckanckan
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-44531
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-8.37% / 94.25%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Feb, 2022 | 18:27
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Accepting arbitrary Subject Alternative Name (SAN) types, unless a PKI is specifically defined to use a particular SAN type, can result in bypassing name-constrained intermediates. Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 was accepting URI SAN types, which PKIs are often not defined to use. Additionally, when a protocol allows URI SANs, Node.js did not match the URI correctly.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this disable the URI SAN type when checking a certificate against a hostname. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Node.js (OpenJS Foundation)Oracle Corporation
Product-peoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsgraalvmmysql_enterprise_monitormysql_clustermysql_connectorsmysql_workbenchnode.jsmysql_serverNode
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-38325
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.61% / 44.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jul, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-30 Oct, 2024 | 16:00
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The cryptography package before 41.0.2 for Python mishandles SSH certificates that have critical options.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-cryptography.ion/a
Product-cryptographyn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-35560
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Amazon
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Amazon
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.26% / 17.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Apr, 2026 | 20:10
Updated-14 Apr, 2026 | 16:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper certificate validation in identity provider connection components in Amazon Athena ODBC driver

Improper certificate validation in the identity provider connection components in Amazon Athena ODBC driver before 2.1.0.0 might allow a man-in-the-middle threat actor to intercept authentication credentials due to insufficient default transport security when connecting to identity providers. This only applies to connections with external identity providers and does not apply to connections with Athena. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 2.1.0.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-amazonAmazonApple Inc.Microsoft CorporationLinux Kernel Organization, Inc
Product-linux_kernelathena_odbcwindowsmacosAmazon Athena ODBC driver
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-35389
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 7.41%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2026 | 20:11
Updated-09 Apr, 2026 | 20:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Bulwark Webmail S/MIME signature verification accepted self-signed certificates

Bulwark Webmail is a self-hosted webmail client for Stalwart Mail Server. Prior to 1.4.11, S/MIME signature verification did not validate the certificate trust chain (checkChain: false). Any email signed with a self-signed or untrusted certificate was displayed as having a valid signature. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.4.11.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-bulwarkmailbulwarkmail
Product-webmailwebmail
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-33810
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.26% / 16.99%
||
7 Day CHG-0.00%
Published-08 Apr, 2026 | 01:06
Updated-20 Apr, 2026 | 18:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Case-sensitive excludedSubtrees name constraints cause Auth Bypass in crypto/x509

When verifying a certificate chain containing excluded DNS constraints, these constraints are not correctly applied to wildcard DNS SANs which use a different case than the constraint. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in the VerifyOptions.Roots CertPool, or in the system certificate pool.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Go standard libraryGo
Product-gocrypto/x509
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-34580
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.19% / 8.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Apr, 2026 | 21:12
Updated-17 Apr, 2026 | 20:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Botan has a certificate authentication bypass due to trust anchor confusion

Botan is a C++ cryptography library. In 3.11.0, the function Certificate_Store::certificate_known had a misleading name; it would return true if any certificate in the store had a DN (and subject key identifier, if set) matching that of the argument. It did not check that the cert it found and the cert it was passed were actually the same certificate. In 3.11.0 an extension of path validation logic was made which assumed that certificate_known only returned true if the certificates were in fact identical. The impact is that if an end entity certificate is presented, and its DN (and subject key identifier, if set) match that of any trusted root, the end entity certificate is accepted immediately as if it itself were a trusted root. , This vulnerability is fixed in 3.11.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-botan_projectrandombit
Product-botanbotan
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-33753
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.2||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 8.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Apr, 2026 | 14:54
Updated-21 Apr, 2026 | 18:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in rfc3161-client

rfc3161-client is a Python library implementing the Time-Stamp Protocol (TSP) described in RFC 3161. Prior to 1.0.6, an Authorization Bypass vulnerability in rfc3161-client's signature verification allows any attacker to impersonate a trusted TimeStamping Authority (TSA). By exploiting a logic flaw in how the library extracts the leaf certificate from an unordered PKCS#7 bag of certificates, an attacker can append a spoofed certificate matching the target common_name and Extended Key Usage (EKU) requirements. This tricks the library into verifying these authorization rules against the forged certificate while validating the cryptographic signature against an actual trusted TSA (such as FreeTSA), thereby bypassing the intended TSA authorization pinning entirely. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.6.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-trailofbitstrailofbits
Product-rfc3161-clientrfc3161-client
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-33896
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 8.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 20:50
Updated-14 Apr, 2026 | 01:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Forge has a basicConstraints bypass in its certificate chain verification (RFC 5280 violation)

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.4.0, `pki.verifyCertificateChain()` does not enforce RFC 5280 basicConstraints requirements when an intermediate certificate lacks both the `basicConstraints` and `keyUsage` extensions. This allows any leaf certificate (without these extensions) to act as a CA and sign other certificates, which node-forge will accept as valid. Version 1.4.0 patches the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-digitalbazaardigitalbazaar
Product-forgeforge
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-42027
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.48% / 37.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Dec, 2021 | 12:06
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 03:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SINUMERIK Edge (All versions < V3.2). The affected software does not properly validate the server certificate when initiating a TLS connection. This could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between the client and the intended server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-sinumerik_edgeSINUMERIK Edge
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-3336
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Amazon
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Amazon
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.68% / 47.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Mar, 2026 | 21:15
Updated-11 Mar, 2026 | 17:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
PKCS7_verify Certificate Chain Validation Bypass in AWS-LC

Improper certificate validation in PKCS7_verify() in AWS-LC allows an unauthenticated user to bypass certificate chain verification when processing PKCS7 objects with multiple signers, except the final signer. Customers of AWS services do not need to take action. Applications using AWS-LC should upgrade to AWS-LC version 1.69.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-amazonAWS
Product-aws-lc-sysaws_libcryptoAWS-LC
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-3618
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-2.04% / 78.60%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Mar, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 17:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

ALPACA is an application layer protocol content confusion attack, exploiting TLS servers implementing different protocols but using compatible certificates, such as multi-domain or wildcard certificates. A MiTM attacker having access to victim's traffic at the TCP/IP layer can redirect traffic from one subdomain to another, resulting in a valid TLS session. This breaks the authentication of TLS and cross-protocol attacks may be possible where the behavior of one protocol service may compromise the other at the application layer.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vsftpd_projectsendmailn/aDebian GNU/LinuxFedora ProjectF5, Inc.
Product-debian_linuxfedoranginxvsftpdsendmailALPACA
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-47619
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.29% / 20.18%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 May, 2025 | 15:12
Updated-19 Sep, 2025 | 19:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
tranport: TLS host name wildcard matching too lax

syslog-ng is an enhanced log daemo. Prior to version 4.8.2, `tls_wildcard_match()` matches on certificates such as `foo.*.bar` although that is not allowed. It is also possible to pass partial wildcards such as `foo.a*c.bar` which glib matches but should be avoided / invalidated. This issue could have an impact on TLS connections, such as in man-in-the-middle situations. Version 4.8.2 contains a fix for the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-oneidentitysyslog-ng
Product-syslog-ngsyslog-ng
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-3547
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenVPN Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenVPN Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.97% / 57.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jul, 2021 | 10:35
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 17:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OpenVPN 3 Core Library version 3.6 and 3.6.1 allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to bypass the certificate authentication by issuing an unrelated server certificate using the same hostname found in the verify-x509-name option in a client configuration.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openvpnn/a
Product-openvpnOpenVPN 3 Core Library
CWE ID-CWE-305
Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-34599
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.46% / 36.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Dec, 2021 | 09:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in CODESYS Git

Affected versions of CODESYS Git in Versions prior to V1.1.0.0 lack certificate validation in HTTPS handshakes. CODESYS Git does not implement certificate validation by default, so it does not verify that the server provides a valid and trusted HTTPS certificate. Since the certificate of the server to which the connection is made is not properly verified, the server connection is vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-CODESYS GmbH
Product-development_systemgitCODESYS Git
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
Details not found