Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2023-20532

Summary
Assigner-AMD
Assigner Org ID-b58fc414-a1e4-4f92-9d70-1add41838648
Published At-10 Jan, 2023 | 20:57
Updated At-07 Apr, 2025 | 18:33
Rejected At-
Credits

Insufficient input validation in the SMU may allow an attacker to improperly lock resources, potentially resulting in a denial of service.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:AMD
Assigner Org ID:b58fc414-a1e4-4f92-9d70-1add41838648
Published At:10 Jan, 2023 | 20:57
Updated At:07 Apr, 2025 | 18:33
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

Insufficient input validation in the SMU may allow an attacker to improperly lock resources, potentially resulting in a denial of service.

Affected Products
Vendor
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. AMD
Product
2nd Gen EPYC
Package Name
AGESA
Platforms
  • x86
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • various
Vendor
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.AMD
Product
3rd Gen EPYC
Package Name
AGESA
Platforms
  • x86
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • various
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://www.amd.com/en/corporate/product-security/bulletin/AMD-SB-1032
vendor-advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.amd.com/en/corporate/product-security/bulletin/AMD-SB-1032
Resource:
vendor-advisory
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
1. CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://www.amd.com/en/corporate/product-security/bulletin/AMD-SB-1032
vendor-advisory
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.amd.com/en/corporate/product-security/bulletin/AMD-SB-1032
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_transferred
2. CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-20CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-20
Description: CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:psirt@amd.com
Published At:11 Jan, 2023 | 08:15
Updated At:07 Apr, 2025 | 19:15

Insufficient input validation in the SMU may allow an attacker to improperly lock resources, potentially resulting in a denial of service.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Secondary3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CPE Matches

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7h12_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7h12_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7h12>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7h12:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7f72_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7f72_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7f72>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7f72:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7f52_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7f52_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7f52>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7f52:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7f32_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7f32_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7f32>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7f32:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7742_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7742_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7742>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7742:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7702p_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7702p_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7702p>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7702p:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7702_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7702_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7702>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7702:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7662_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7662_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7662>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7662:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7642_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7642_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7642>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7642:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7552_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7552_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7552>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7552:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7542_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7542_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7542>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7542:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7532_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7532_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7532>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7532:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7502p_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7502p_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7502p>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7502p:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7502_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7502_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7502>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7502:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7452_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7452_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7452>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7452:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7402_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7402_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7402>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7402:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7402p_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7402p_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7402p>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7402p:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7352_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7352_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7352>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7352:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7302p_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7302p_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7302p>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7302p:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7302_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7302_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7302>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7302:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7282_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7282_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7282>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7282:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7272_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7272_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7272>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7272:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7262_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7262_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7262>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7262:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7252_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7252_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7252>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7252:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7232p_firmware>>Versions before romepi_1.0.0.c(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7232p_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
amd
>>epyc_7232p>>-
cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7232p:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-20Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE-20Secondary134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
CWE ID: CWE-20
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-20
Type: Secondary
Source: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://www.amd.com/en/corporate/product-security/bulletin/AMD-SB-1032psirt@amd.com
Vendor Advisory
https://www.amd.com/en/corporate/product-security/bulletin/AMD-SB-1032af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.amd.com/en/corporate/product-security/bulletin/AMD-SB-1032
Source: psirt@amd.com
Resource:
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.amd.com/en/corporate/product-security/bulletin/AMD-SB-1032
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource:
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

121Records found

CVE-2023-41268
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Samsung TV & Appliance
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Samsung TV & Appliance
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 22.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Dec, 2023 | 03:46
Updated-02 Dec, 2024 | 15:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Possible stack overflow due to insufficient input validation

Improper input validation vulnerability in Samsung Open Source Escargot allows stack overflow and segmentation fault. This issue affects Escargot: from 3.0.0 through 4.0.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Samsung Open SourceSamsung
Product-escargotEscargot
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-787
Out-of-bounds Write
CVE-2020-15190
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 40.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Sep, 2020 | 18:35
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Segfault in Tensorflow

In Tensorflow before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, the `tf.raw_ops.Switch` operation takes as input a tensor and a boolean and outputs two tensors. Depending on the boolean value, one of the tensors is exactly the input tensor whereas the other one should be an empty tensor. However, the eager runtime traverses all tensors in the output. Since only one of the tensors is defined, the other one is `nullptr`, hence we are binding a reference to `nullptr`. This is undefined behavior and reported as an error if compiling with `-fsanitize=null`. In this case, this results in a segmentation fault The issue is patched in commit da8558533d925694483d2c136a9220d6d49d843c, and is released in TensorFlow versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1, or 2.3.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Google LLCopenSUSETensorFlow
Product-tensorflowleaptensorflow
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-15194
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.22% / 44.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Sep, 2020 | 18:40
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Denial of Service in Tensorflow

In Tensorflow before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, the `SparseFillEmptyRowsGrad` implementation has incomplete validation of the shapes of its arguments. Although `reverse_index_map_t` and `grad_values_t` are accessed in a similar pattern, only `reverse_index_map_t` is validated to be of proper shape. Hence, malicious users can pass a bad `grad_values_t` to trigger an assertion failure in `vec`, causing denial of service in serving installations. The issue is patched in commit 390611e0d45c5793c7066110af37c8514e6a6c54, and is released in TensorFlow versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1, or 2.3.1."

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Google LLCopenSUSETensorFlow
Product-tensorflowleaptensorflow
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-15191
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 47.74%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Sep, 2020 | 18:41
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Undefined behavior in Tensorflow

In Tensorflow before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a user passes an invalid argument to `dlpack.to_dlpack` the expected validations will cause variables to bind to `nullptr` while setting a `status` variable to the error condition. However, this `status` argument is not properly checked. Hence, code following these methods will bind references to null pointers. This is undefined behavior and reported as an error if compiling with `-fsanitize=null`. The issue is patched in commit 22e07fb204386768e5bcbea563641ea11f96ceb8 and is released in TensorFlow versions 2.2.1, or 2.3.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Google LLCopenSUSETensorFlow
Product-tensorflowleaptensorflow
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-252
Unchecked Return Value
CVE-2020-3496
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.35% / 56.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Aug, 2020 | 16:15
Updated-13 Nov, 2024 | 18:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Small Business Smart and Managed Switches Denial of Service Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the IPv6 packet processing engine of Cisco Small Business Smart and Managed Switches could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of incoming IPv6 traffic. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted IPv6 packet through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the switch management CLI to stop responding, resulting in a DoS condition. This vulnerability is specific to IPv6 traffic. IPv4 traffic is not affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-sf550x-48mpsg250-10p_firmwaresf250-24psg300-10p_firmwaresg300-52_firmwaresg250-18_firmwaresg500-52mp_firmwaresg250x-24p_firmwaresg300-52sg250x-24psg200-26sg250-18sg500-28sg500x-48sg350x-24mpsg200-50p_firmwaresg200-26_firmwaresx550x-24sg550x-48p_firmwaresg200-08psf200-24_firmwaresg300-20sg500-28psf250-24p_firmwaresg350x-48_firmwaresg350xg-24tsx550x-12fsf200-48sg350x-24_firmwaresf350-48psf350-48sg550x-48mp_firmwaresg500x-24psf300-48psf300-24_firmwaresg500-52sf300-24mp_firmwaresg500-28mpp_firmwaresf550x-24mp_firmwaresg500-52psg350-28sg350x-24mp_firmwaresg500-52_firmwaresf250-24sg200-10fpsf300-24ppsg550x-48psf550x-48p_firmwaresg350x-48mp_firmwaresg250x-24_firmwaresg250-50hp_firmwaresx550x-24ft_firmwaresg300-10mpp_firmwaresg350x-24sg250x-24sf550x-48_firmwaresg200-50sg300-52mpsg350-10p_firmwaresf200-48p_firmwaresg200-50psg200-26fp_firmwaresf302-08p_firmwaresg350-10psg500-52mpsg355-10psx550x-16ft_firmwaresg250-50psg300-52psf250-48sg250-26hpsg250x-48p_firmwaresg300-20_firmwaresf500-24p_firmwaresf500-48sg300-10sfpsg200-50fpsg550x-24_firmwaresg250x-48_firmwaresg300-28_firmwaresf302-08psg500-28mppsf500-24psf200-24p_firmwaresg250-50p_firmwaresf302-08ppsf350-48p_firmwaresf300-48sg350xg-48t_firmwaresg250-26sg300-10sfp_firmwaresg250x-48sf550x-48mp_firmwaresg350-28p_firmwaresf550x-24_firmwaresf250-48hp_firmwaresg350xg-2f10sg300-28ppsg300-52mp_firmwaresf500-48_firmwaresg500-28p_firmwaresg350-10mpsf550x-48psg550x-24mppsf550x-24sf500-48psf200-24psg500-52p_firmwaresg350xg-24f_firmwaresf500-48p_firmwaresg300-28mpsf302-08mp_firmwaresf350-48mp_firmwaresf250-24_firmwaresg350-28mpsf302-08sg350-28mp_firmwaresg300-28pp_firmwaresg350x-48sf200-24sx550x-24fsg500x-48psg250-26_firmwaresg350-10mp_firmwaresf302-08mpp_firmwaresg500x-48p_firmwaresg355-10p_firmwaresg550x-24mp_firmwaresg200-18_firmwaresg300-10psg300-52p_firmwaresf300-48ppsg500x-24_firmwaresg350xg-24t_firmwaresg550x-48_firmwaresf550x-24p_firmwaresg350x-24p_firmwaresg300-10mp_firmwaresf302-08_firmwaresg200-08p_firmwaresf200-24fp_firmwaresg300-10mpsg550x-24sf300-08sg300-10ppsg250-50_firmwaresf350-48_firmwaresg250-10psg200-08sg350xg-2f10_firmwaresx550x-24f_firmwaresg250-08sg350-28psg250-26hp_firmwaresg200-26fpsg200-26p_firmwaresg350xg-48tsf550x-48sg300-28sg200-10fp_firmwaresx550x-52_firmwaresg350-28_firmwaresg300-10_firmwaresg250-08hpsg350-10sg350x-48psg550x-24mpsg500x-24sf300-24p_firmwaresx550x-16ftsg550x-48mpsg350-10_firmwaresx550x-24ftsx550x-52sg250x-48psg200-50fp_firmwaresg500x-24p_firmwaresg250-26psg300-10pp_firmwaresf500-24sg300-10sf550x-24psf300-48p_firmwaresf350-48mpsg250-50sf200-24fpsg300-10mppsg550x-24p_firmwaresg500xg-8f8t_firmwaresg300-28psf300-24psg200-26psf200-48psf300-24sg550x-24psg200-08_firmwaresg350x-48mpsf302-08mppsf302-08mpsg550x-48sf300-48pp_firmwaresf250-48_firmwaresg350x-48p_firmwaresg250-08_firmwaresf300-24mpsg300-28mp_firmwaresg350x-24psf550x-24mpsx550x-12f_firmwaresf302-08pp_firmwaresg250-50hpsg550x-24mpp_firmwaresf250-48hpsg200-18sg200-50_firmwaresg500x-48_firmwaresg250-26p_firmwaresf300-08_firmwaresg350xg-24fsf200-48_firmwaresx550x-24_firmwaresg500xg-8f8tsg500-28_firmwaresf500-24_firmwaresg250-08hp_firmwaresf300-48_firmwaresf300-24pp_firmwaresg300-28p_firmwareCisco Small Business 250 Series Smart Switches Software
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-15168
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-2.6||LOW
EPSS-0.08% / 23.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2020 | 18:25
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
File size limit bypass in node-fetch

node-fetch before versions 2.6.1 and 3.0.0-beta.9 did not honor the size option after following a redirect, which means that when a content size was over the limit, a FetchError would never get thrown and the process would end without failure. For most people, this fix will have a little or no impact. However, if you are relying on node-fetch to gate files above a size, the impact could be significant, for example: If you don't double-check the size of the data after fetch() has completed, your JS thread could get tied up doing work on a large file (DoS) and/or cost you money in computing.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-node-fetch_projectnode-fetch
Product-node-fetchnode-fetch
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-29508
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.24% / 46.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jul, 2022 | 19:25
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Dell BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition, versions before 4.1.5, and Dell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions before 4.6, contain an Improper Input Validation Vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Oracle CorporationDell Inc.
Product-http_serverweblogic_server_proxy_plug-inbsafe_crypto-c-micro-editiondatabasebsafe_micro-edition-suitesecurity_serviceDell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite
CWE ID-CWE-331
Insufficient Entropy
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-28898
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.82% / 73.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Apr, 2021 | 18:03
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 16:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In QED ResourceXpress through 4.9k, a large numeric or alphanumeric value submitted in specific URL parameters causes a server error in script execution due to insufficient input validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-resourcexpressn/a
Product-resourcexpressn/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-24615
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.33% / 55.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Sep, 2020 | 03:38
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Pexip Infinity before 24.1 has Improper Input Validation, leading to temporary denial of service via SIP.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pexipn/a
Product-pexip_infinityn/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2024-47934
Matching Score-4
Assigner-3ad20294-822c-4ebc-9301-f9a7cf62d46e
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-3ad20294-822c-4ebc-9301-f9a7cf62d46e
CVSS Score-6.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.26% / 49.35%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Jan, 2025 | 03:00
Updated-08 Jan, 2025 | 14:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
TXOne Networks Portable Inspector Management Program Improper Input Validation Vulnerability

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Management Program in TXOne Networks Portable Inspector and Portable Inspector Pro Edition allows remote attacker to crash management service. The Denial of Service situation can be resolved by restarting the management service. This issue affects Portable Inspector: through 1.0.0; Portable Inspector Pro Edition: through 1.0.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-TXOne Networks
Product-Portable InspectorPortable Inspector Pro Edition
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2024-39281
Matching Score-4
Assigner-FreeBSD
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-FreeBSD
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.18% / 40.39%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Nov, 2024 | 15:01
Updated-10 Jan, 2025 | 13:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Unbounded allocation in ctl(4) CAM Target Layer

The command ctl_persistent_reserve_out allows the caller to specify an arbitrary size which will be passed to the kernel's memory allocator.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-FreeBSD Foundation
Product-FreeBSDfreebsd
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-12526
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.38% / 58.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 May, 2021 | 13:45
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 18:29
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
BECKHOFF: DoS-Vulnerability for TwinCAT OPC UA Server and IPC Diagnostics UA Server

TwinCAT OPC UA Server in versions up to 2.3.0.12 and IPC Diagnostics UA Server in versions up to 3.1.0.1 from Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG are vulnerable to denial of service attacks. The attacker needs to send several specifically crafted requests to the running OPC UA server. After some of these requests the OPC UA server is no longer responsive to any client. This is without effect to the real-time functionality of IPCs.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG
Product-ipc_diagnostics_ua_servertf6100twincat_opc_ua_serverTwinCAT OPC UA ServerTF6100IPC Diagnostics UA Server
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2022-39236
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 20.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Sep, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 16:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Matrix Javascript SDK improper beacon events can cause availability issues

Matrix Javascript SDK is the Matrix Client-Server SDK for JavaScript. Starting with version 17.1.0-rc.1, improperly formed beacon events can disrupt or impede the matrix-js-sdk from functioning properly, potentially impacting the consumer's ability to process data safely. Note that the matrix-js-sdk can appear to be operating normally but be excluding or corrupting runtime data presented to the consumer. This is patched in matrix-js-sdk v19.7.0. Redacting applicable events, waiting for the sync processor to store data, and restarting the client are possible workarounds. Alternatively, redacting the applicable events and clearing all storage will fix the further perceived issues. Downgrading to an unaffected version, noting that such a version may be subject to other vulnerabilities, will additionally resolve the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Matrix.org Foundation
Product-javascript_sdkmatrix-js-sdk
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2022-36023
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7||HIGH
EPSS-0.50% / 64.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Aug, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 17:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Remote denial of service in Hyperledger Fabric Gateway

Hyperledger Fabric is an enterprise-grade permissioned distributed ledger framework for developing solutions and applications. If a gateway client application sends a malformed request to a gateway peer it may crash the peer node. Version 2.4.6 checks for the malformed gateway request and returns an error to the gateway client. There are no known workarounds, users must upgrade to version 2.4.6.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-hyperledgerhyperledger
Product-fabricfabric
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-37013
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 47.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Nov, 2021 | 15:27
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 01:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

There is a Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Huawei Smartphone.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability will cause the availability of users is affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Product-harmonyosHarmonyOS
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-3531
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.26% / 48.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 May, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 17:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in the Red Hat Ceph Storage RGW in versions before 14.2.21. When processing a GET Request for a swift URL that ends with two slashes it can cause the rgw to crash, resulting in a denial of service. The greatest threat to the system is of availability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.Fedora Project
Product-ceph_storagecephfedoraceph
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2022-30721
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Samsung Mobile
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Samsung Mobile
CVSS Score-2.5||LOW
EPSS-0.06% / 17.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Jun, 2022 | 17:58
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 06:56
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper input validation check logic vulnerability in libsmkvextractor prior to SMR Jun-2022 Release 1 allows attackers to trigger crash.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Google LLCSamsung Electronics
Product-androidSamsung Mobile Devices
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-27420
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.21% / 44.07%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Mar, 2022 | 19:46
Updated-16 Apr, 2025 | 16:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
GE UR family input validation

GE UR firmware versions prior to version 8.1x web server task does not properly handle receipt of unsupported HTTP verbs, resulting in the web server becoming temporarily unresponsive after receiving a series of unsupported HTTP requests. When unresponsive, the web server is inaccessible. By itself, this is not particularly significant as the relay remains effective in all other functionality and communication channels.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-geGE
Product-multilin_l90_firmwaremultilin_b90_firmwaremultilin_b30_firmwaremultilin_c60multilin_b90multilin_t35_firmwaremultilin_c30multilin_c30_firmwaremultilin_f60_firmwaremultilin_n60multilin_t35multilin_c60_firmwaremultilin_l30_firmwaremultilin_c70multilin_c95_firmwaremultilin_c70_firmwaremultilin_g30_firmwaremultilin_c95multilin_n60_firmwaremultilin_l60multilin_m60_firmwaremultilin_t60multilin_t60_firmwaremultilin_g60_firmwaremultilin_l90multilin_g60multilin_f60multilin_m60multilin_g30multilin_f35_firmwaremultilin_l30multilin_d30_firmwaremultilin_d60_firmwaremultilin_d60multilin_b30multilin_l60_firmwaremultilin_f35multilin_d30UR family
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2024-27241
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 25.97%
||
7 Day CHG-0.00%
Published-15 Jul, 2024 | 17:17
Updated-20 Aug, 2025 | 15:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Zoom Apps and SDKs - Improper Input Validation

Improper input validation in some Zoom Apps and SDKs may allow an authenticated user to conduct a denial of service via network access.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Zoom Communications, Inc.
Product-roomsworkplace_virtual_desktop_infrastructuremeeting_software_development_kitworkplace_desktopworkplaceZoom Apps and SDKsmeeting_software_development_kitroomsworkplace_desktopvirtual_desktop_infrastructureworkplace_app
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-8476
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (ABB)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (ABB)
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.38% / 58.71%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Apr, 2020 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 10:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
ABB Central Licensing System - Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

For the Central Licensing Server component used in ABB products ABB Ability™ System 800xA and related system extensions versions 5.1, 6.0 and 6.1, Compact HMI versions 5.1 and 6.0, Control Builder Safe 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0, Symphony Plus -S+ Operations 3.0 to 3.2 Symphony Plus -S+ Engineering 1.1 to 2.2, Composer Harmony 5.1, 6.0 and 6.1, Melody Composer 5.3, 6.1/6.2 and SPE for Melody 1.0SPx (Composer 6.3), Harmony OPC Server (HAOPC) Standalone 6.0, 6.1 and 7.0, ABB Ability™ System 800xA/ Advant® OCS Control Builder A 1.3 and 1.4, Advant® OCS AC100 OPC Server 5.1, 6.0 and 6.1, Composer CTK 6.1 and 6.2, AdvaBuild 3.7 SP1 and SP2, OPCServer for MOD 300 (non-800xA) 1.4, OPC Data Link 2.1 and 2.2, Knowledge Manager 8.0, 9.0 and 9.1, Manufacturing Operations Management 1812 and 1909, ABB AbilityTM SCADAvantage versions 5.1 to 5.6.5, a weakness in validation of input exists that allows an attacker to alter licenses assigned to the system nodes by sending specially crafted messages to the CLS web service.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ABB
Product-compact_hmi800xa_systemcontrol_builder_safeManufacturing Operations ManagementABB Ability™ SCADAvantageControl Builder SafeComposer HarmonyOPC Server for Mod 300 (non-800xA)Knowledge ManagerOPC Data LinkCentral Licensing SystemAdvaBuildSymphony Plus S+ OperationsComposer CTKSymphony Plus S+ Engineering ABB Ability System 800xAComposer Melody Harmony OPC Server StandaloneAdvant OCS AC 100 OPS ServerAdvant OCS Control Builder ACompact HMI
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2017-18873
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.38% / 58.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Jun, 2020 | 17:44
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 21:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 4.3.0, 4.2.1, and 4.1.2. It allows attackers to cause a denial of service (channel invisibility) via a misformatted post.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMattermost, Inc.
Product-mattermost_servern/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
Details not found