Nextcloud server is an open source home cloud implementation. In affected versions admins of a server were able to upload a logo or a favicon and to provided a file name which was not restricted and could overwrite files in the appdata directory. Administrators may have access to overwrite these files by other means but this method could be exploited by tricking an admin into uploading a maliciously named file. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Server is upgraded to 24.0.10 or 25.0.4. Users unable to upgrade should avoid ingesting logo files from untrusted sources.
Nextcloud Server is a Nextcloud package that handles data storage. In versions prior to 19.0.13, 20.0.11, and 21.0.3, filenames where not escaped by default in controllers using `DownloadResponse`. When a user-supplied filename was passed unsanitized into a `DownloadResponse`, this could be used to trick users into downloading malicious files with a benign file extension. This would show in UI behaviours where Nextcloud applications would display a benign file extension (e.g. JPEG), but the file will actually be downloaded with an executable file extension. The vulnerability is patched in versions 19.0.13, 20.0.11, and 21.0.3. Administrators of Nextcloud instances do not have a workaround available, but developers of Nextcloud apps may manually escape the file name before passing it into `DownloadResponse`.
Nextcloud Desktop Client prior to 3.1.3 is vulnerable to resource injection by way of missing validation of URLs, allowing a malicious server to execute remote commands. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
user_oidc is the OIDC connect user backend for Nextcloud, an open source collaboration platform. A vulnerability in versions 1.0.0 until 1.3.0 effectively allowed an attacker to bypass the state protection as they could just copy the expected state token from the first request to their second request. Users should upgrade user_oidc to 1.3.0 to receive a patch for the issue. No known workarounds are available.
The sitetweet WordPress plugin through 0.2 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in admin_manager.php of Seacms up to v12.8 allows attackers to arbitrarily add an admin account.
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in /admin/index.php?lfj=member&action=editmember of Qibosoft v7 allows attackers to arbitrarily add administrator accounts.
A Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exits in ZZZCMS V1.7.1 via the save_user funciton in save.php.
IBM TXSeries for Multiplatforms 9.1 and 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in George Holmes II Wayne Audio Player allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Wayne Audio Player: from n/a through 1.0.
Prima Systems FlexAir, Versions 2.3.38 and prior. An unauthenticated user can send unverified HTTP requests, which may allow the attacker to perform certain actions with administrative privileges if a logged-in user visits a malicious website.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Yonatan Reinberg of Social Ink Sinking Dropdowns allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Sinking Dropdowns: from n/a through 1.25.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EditionGuard Dev Team EditionGuard for WooCommerce – eBook Sales with DRM allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects EditionGuard for WooCommerce – eBook Sales with DRM: from n/a through 3.4.2.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Amarjeet Amar allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects gap-hub-user-role: from n/a through 3.4.1.
Cross-site request forgery has been identified in Moxa IKS and EDS, which may allow for the execution of unauthorized actions on the device.
XWiki Platform is a generic wiki platform offering runtime services for applications built on top of it. In affected versions of `org.xwiki.platform:xwiki-platform-logging-ui` it is possible to trick a user with programming rights into visiting a constructed url where e.g., by embedding an image with this URL in a document that is viewed by a user with programming rights which will evaluate an expression in the constructed url and execute it. This issue has been addressed in versions 13.10.11, 14.4.7, and 14.10. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.
Linear eMerge 50P/5000P devices allow Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
Optergy Proton/Enterprise devices allow Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
Subrion CMS 4.2.1 has CSRF in panel/modules/plugins/. The attacker can remotely activate/deactivate the plugins.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Keith Solomon Configurable Tag Cloud (CTC) plugin <= 5.2 versions.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Hikari Denwa router/Home GateWay (Hikari Denwa router/Home GateWay provided by NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE EAST CORPORATION PR-S300NE/RT-S300NE/RV-S340NE firmware version Ver. 19.41 and earlier, PR-S300HI/RT-S300HI/RV-S340HI firmware version Ver.19.01.0005 and earlier, PR-S300SE/RT-S300SE/RV-S340SE firmware version Ver.19.40 and earlier, PR-400NE/RT-400NE/RV-440NE firmware version Ver.7.42 and earlier, PR-400KI/RT-400KI/RV-440KI firmware version Ver.07.00.1010 and earlier, PR-400MI/RT-400MI/RV-440MI firmware version Ver. 07.00.1012 and earlier, PR-500KI/RT-500KI firmware version Ver.01.00.0090 and earlier, RS-500KI firmware version Ver.01.00.0070 and earlier, PR-500MI/RT-500MI firmware version Ver.01.01.0014 and earlier, and RS-500MI firmware version Ver.03.01.0019 and earlier, and Hikari Denwa router/Home GateWay provided by NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE WEST CORPORATION PR-S300NE/RT-S300NE/RV-S340NE firmware version Ver. 19.41 and earlier, PR-S300HI/RT-S300HI/RV-S340HI firmware version Ver.19.01.0005 and earlier, PR-S300SE/RT-S300SE/RV-S340SE firmware version Ver.19.40 and earlier, PR-400NE/RT-400NE/RV-440NE firmware version Ver.7.42 and earlier, PR-400KI/RT-400KI/RV-440KI firmware version Ver.07.00.1010 and earlier, PR-400MI/RT-400MI/RV-440MI firmware version Ver. 07.00.1012 and earlier, PR-500KI/RT-500KI firmware version Ver.01.00.0090 and earlier, and PR-500MI/RT-500MI firmware version Ver.01.01.0011 and earlier) allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Category Specific RSS feed Subscription version v2.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Zoho SalesIQ 1.0.8 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Personalized WooCommerce Cart Page 2.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Related YouTube Videos versions prior to 1.9.9 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Skpstorm SK WP Settings Backup allows Object Injection.This issue affects SK WP Settings Backup: from n/a through 1.0.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HTML5 Maps 1.6.5.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
Combodo iTop is a simple, web based IT Service Management tool. Several url endpoints are subject to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. Please refer to the linked GHSA for the complete list. This issue has been addressed in version 3.2.0 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.
Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects JR6150 before 1.0.1.10, R6050 before 1.0.1.10, R6250 before 1.0.4.12, R6300v2 before 1.0.4.8, R6700 before 1.0.1.16, R6900 before 1.0.1.16, R7300DST before 1.0.0.54, R7900 before 1.0.1.12, R8000 before 1.0.3.32, and R8500 before 1.0.2.74.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SuPlugins Superb Social Media Share Buttons and Follow Buttons for WordPress plugin <= 1.1.3 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ben Marshall Jobify - Job Board WordPress Theme allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Jobify - Job Board WordPress Theme: from n/a through 4.2.3.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Custom Body Class 0.6.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Custom CSS Pro 1.0.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Online Lesson Booking 0.8.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Fugu Maintenance Switch plugin <= 1.5.2 versions.
Multiple endpoints in GestioIP v3.5.7 are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). An attacker can execute actions via the admin's browser by hosting a malicious URL, leading to data modification, deletion, or exfiltration.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Whydonate Whydonate – FREE Donate button – Crowdfunding – Fundraising plugin <= 3.12.15 versions.
A Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in PHPOK 5.2.060 via admin.php?c=admin&f=save, which could let a remote malicious user execute arbitrary code.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Spell Check 7.1.9 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress Ultra Simple Paypal Shopping Cart v4.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
The wp-eMember WordPress plugin before 10.6.6 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks
IBM Cloud Private 2.1.0, 3.1.0, 3.1.1, and 3.1.2 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 158338.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WhileTrue Most And Least Read Posts Widget allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Most And Least Read Posts Widget: from n/a through 2.5.18.
IBM Cloud Private 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 158116.
IBM QRadar SIEM 7.2 and 7.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 159132.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Build Failure Analyzer Plugin 2.4.1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified hostname and port using attacker-specified username and password.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Bhaskar Dhote Back Link Tracker allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Back Link Tracker: from n/a through 1.0.0.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in weDevs Happy Addons for Elementor plugin <= 3.8.2 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Robert Schulz (sprd.Net AG) Spreadshop plugin <= 1.6.5 versions.
IBM OpenPages with Watson 8.3 and 9.0 IBM OpenPages could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions, caused by improper validation and management of authentication cookies. By modifying the CSRF token and Session Id cookie parameters using the cookies of another user, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to bypass security restrictions and gain unauthorized access to the vulnerable application.