Sametime is impacted by lack of clickjacking protection in Outlook add-in. The application is not implementing appropriate protections in order to protect users from clickjacking attacks.

HCL iNotes v9, v10 and v11 is susceptible to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability due to improper handling of message content. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using specially-crafted markup to execute script in a victim's web browser within the security context of the hosting Web site and/or steal the victim's cookie-based authentication credentials.

"HCL AppScan Enterprise is susceptible to Cross-Site Scripting while importing a specially crafted test policy."

HCL Verse is susceptible to a Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability.  By tricking a user into clicking a crafted URL, a remote unauthenticated attacker could execute script in a victim's web browser to perform operations as the victim and/or steal the victim's cookies, session tokens, or other sensitive information.

HCL Connections v5.5, v6.0, and v6.5 contains an open redirect vulnerability which could be exploited by an attacker to conduct phishing attacks.

HCL DevOps Deploy / Launch is generating an obsolete HTTP header.

A Persistent Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability can be carried out on certain pages of Unica Platform.  An attacker could hijack a user's session and perform other attacks.

HCL Digital Experience is susceptible to cross site scripting (XSS). One subcomponent is vulnerable to reflected XSS. In reflected XSS, an attacker must induce a victim to click on a crafted URL from some delivery mechanism (email, other web site).

Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. This XSS vulnerability is in the Download Status Report, which is served by the BigFix Server. 

A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Web Reports component of HCL BigFix Platform can possibly allow an attack to exploit an application parameter during execution of the Save Report.

A Persistent Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability can be carried out in a certain field of the Unica Platform.  An attacker could hijack a user's session and perform other attacks.

HCL DRYiCE MyXalytics is impacted by an Open Redirect vulnerability which could allow an attacker to redirect users to malicious sites, potentially leading to phishing attacks or other security threats.

Host Header Injection vulnerability in the HCL BigFix OSD Bare Metal Server version 311.12 or lower allows attacker to supply invalid input to cause the OSD Bare Metal Server to perform a redirect to an attacker-controlled domain.

 URL redirection in Login page in HCL BigFix WebUI allows malicious user to redirect the client browser to an external site via redirect URL response header.

HCL Verse is susceptible to a Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. By tricking a user into entering crafted markup a remote, unauthenticated attacker could execute script in a victim's web browser to perform operations as the victim and/or steal the victim's cookies, session tokens, or other sensitive information.

HCL Verse v10 and v11 is susceptible to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability due to improper handling of message content. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using specially-crafted markup to execute script in a victim's web browser within the security context of the hosting Web site and/or steal the victim's cookie-based authentication credentials.

 In HCL Digital Experience, URLs can be constructed to redirect users to untrusted sites.

HCL iNotes is susceptible to a Reflected Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability caused by improper validation of user-supplied input supplied with a form POST request. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using a specially-crafted URL to execute script in a victim's web browser within the security context of the hosting web site and/or steal the victim's cookie-based authentication credentials.

In Digital Experience 8.5, 9.0, and 9.5, WSRP consumer is vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS).

HCL Digital Experience 8.5, 9.0, 9.5 is susceptible to cross-site scripting (XSS). The vulnerability could be employed in a reflected or non-persistent XSS attack.

HCL Digital Experience 8.5, 9.0, 9.5 is susceptible to cross site scripting (XSS). One subcomponent is vulnerable to reflected XSS. In reflected XSS, an attacker must induce a victim to click on a crafted URL from some delivery mechanism (email, other web site).

HCL Notes versions previous to releases 9.0.1 FP10 IF8, 10.0.1 FP6 and 11.0.1 FP1 is susceptible to a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could use this vulnerability to execute script in a victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting Web site and/or steal the victim's cookie-based authentication credentials.

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Web Reports component of HCL BigFix Platform can possibly allow an attacker to execute malicious javascript code in the application session or in database, via remote injection, while rendering content in a web page.

Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability identified in BigFix Server version 9.5.12.68, allowing for potential data exfiltration. This XSS vulnerability is in the Gather Status Report, which is served by the BigFix Relay.

A Persistent XSS vulnerability can be carried out in a certain field of Unica Campaign.  An attacker could hijack a user's session and perform other attacks.

HCL Connections is vulnerable to reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) where an attacker may leverage these issues to execute arbitrary script code in the browser of an unsuspecting user after visiting the vulnerable URL which contains the malicious script code. This may allow the attacker to steal cookie-based authentication credentials and comprise a user's account then launch other attacks.

"HCL AppScan Enterprise advisory API documentation is susceptible to clickjacking, which could allow an attacker to embed the contents of untrusted web pages in a frame."

HCL DRYiCE AEX is impacted by a lack of clickjacking protection in the AEX web application. An attacker can use multiple transparent or opaque layers to trick a user into clicking on a button or link on another page than the one intended.

This vulnerability allows users to execute a clickjacking attack in the meeting's chat.

An issue in Yamcs 5.8.6 allows attackers to send aribitrary telelcommands in a Command Stack via Clickjacking.

The swagger-ui-dist package before 4.1.3 for Node.js could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim.

IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.0 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 172877.

The issue was addressed with improved UI handling. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.6, Safari 17.6, macOS Monterey 12.7.6, macOS Ventura 13.6.8. Visiting a website that frames malicious content may lead to UI spoofing.

Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to 3.2.5 and 3.3.0.beta5, the vulnerability allows an attacker to inject iframes from any domain, bypassing the intended restrictions enforced by the allowed_iframes setting. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.2.5 and 3.3.0.beta5.

IBM Security Directory Server 6.4.0 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 165950.

A vulnerability has been found in multiple revisions of Emerson Rosemount X-STREAM Gas Analyzer. The affected product’s web interface allows an attacker to route click or keystroke to another page provided by the attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information.

IBM Cloud Application Performance Management 8.1.4 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 157509.

IBM SmartCloud Analytics 1.3.1 through 1.3.5 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 159186.

IBM WebSphere eXtreme Scale 8.6 Admin Console could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 158102.

IBM Security Information Queue (ISIQ) 1.0.0, 1.0.1, and 1.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 159226.

A clickjacking vulnerability exists in zenml-io/zenml versions up to and including 0.55.5 due to the application's failure to set appropriate X-Frame-Options or Content-Security-Policy HTTP headers. This vulnerability allows an attacker to embed the application UI within an iframe on a malicious page, potentially leading to unauthorized actions by tricking users into interacting with the interface under the attacker's control. The issue was addressed in version 0.56.3.

The browser could have been confused into transferring a pointer lock state into another tab, which could have lead to clickjacking attacks. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 85.

Clickjacking vulnerability in Clibo Manager v1.1.9.12 in the '/public/login' directory, a login panel. This vulnerability occurs due to the absence of an X-Frame-Options server-side header. An attacker could overlay a transparent iframe to perform click hijacking on victims.

A vulnerability in the web-based interface of Cisco HyperFlex Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute a cross-frame scripting (XFS) attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient HTML iframe protection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by directing a user to an attacker-controlled web page that contains a malicious HTML iframe. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct clickjacking or other clientside browser attacks.

The timing of a button click causing a popup to disappear was approximately the same length as the anti-clickjacking delay on permission prompts. It was possible to use this fact to surprise users by luring them to click where the permission grant button would be about to appear. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 115.6 and Firefox < 121.

A clickjacking vulnerability has been identified in OnCell G3150A-LTE Series firmware versions v1.3 and prior. This vulnerability is caused by incorrectly restricts frame objects, which can lead to user confusion about which interface the user is interacting with. This vulnerability may lead the attacker to trick the user into interacting with the application.

By manipulating the fullscreen feature while opening a data-list, an attacker could have overlaid a text box over the address bar. This could have led to user confusion and possible spoofing attacks. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 127.

Palantir Gotham was found to be vulnerable to a bug where under certain circumstances, the frontend could have applied an incorrect classification to a newly created property or link.

SmartBear CodeCollaborator v6.1.6102 was discovered to contain a vulnerability in the web UI which would allow an attacker to conduct a clickjacking attack.

Improper restriction of rendered UI layers or frames in EC-CUBE versions from 3.0.0 to 3.0.18 leads to clickjacking attacks. If a user accesses a specially crafted page while logged into the administrative page, unintended operations may be conducted.