Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.6 (and earlier), 2.4.5-p2 (and earlier) and 2.4.4-p3 (and earlier) are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. An admin-privilege authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p2, 2.4.6-p7, 2.4.5-p9, 2.4.4-p10 (and earlier) are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. An admin-privilege authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

The Download Manager WordPress plugin before 3.2.55 does not validate one of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to list and read arbitrary files and folders outside of the blog directory

Adobe ColdFusion versions 2018 Update 15 (and earlier) and 2021 Update 5 (and earlier) are affected by an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability that could result in Arbitrary file system read. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction, but does require administrator privileges.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-beta1 (and earlier), 2.4.6-p2 (and earlier), 2.4.5-p4 (and earlier) and 2.4.4-p5 (and earlier) are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read by an admin-privilege authenticated attacker. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

Adobe ColdFusion versions Update 14 (and earlier) and Update 4 (and earlier) are affected by an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability that could result in information disclosure. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction, but does require administrator privileges.

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.4 and earlier have a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.

Adobe Commerce versions 3.2.5 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to a security feature bypass. A low privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to send crafted requests from the vulnerable server to internal systems, which could result in the bypassing of security measures such as firewalls. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5 and earlier have a server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5 and earlier have a blind server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5 and earlier have a server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.

AEM Forms SP6 add-on for AEM 6.5.6.0 and Forms add-on package for AEM 6.4 Service Pack 8 Cumulative Fix Pack 2 (6.4.8.2) have a blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. This vulnerability could be exploited by an unauthenticated attacker to gather information about internal systems that reside on the same network.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a maliciously crafted URL or interact with a compromised web page. Scope is changed.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-beta1 (and earlier), 2.4.6-p2 (and earlier), 2.4.5-p4 (and earlier) and 2.4.4-p5 (and earlier) are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. A high-privileged authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction, scope is changed due to the fact that an attacker can enforce file read outside the application's path boundary.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A high-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to manipulate server-side requests and bypass security controls. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7, 2.4.6-p5, 2.4.5-p7, 2.4.4-p8 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. A low-privilege authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction..

ColdFusion versions 2025.1, 2023.13, 2021.19 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to limited file system read. A high-privilege authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to manipulate server-side requests and bypass security controls allowing unauthorized read access.

ColdFusion versions 2025.2, 2023.14, 2021.20 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. A high-privilege authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of URLs. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction and scope is changed. The vulnerable component is restricted to internal IP addresses.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A high-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to manipulate server-side requests and access unauthorized resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

An issue was discovered in Adobe Connect 9.6.2 and earlier versions. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists that could be abused to bypass network access controls.

Magento Commerce versions 2.4.2 (and earlier), 2.4.2-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.7 (and earlier) are affected by a blind SSRF vulnerability in the bundled dotmailer extension. An attacker with admin privileges could abuse this to achieve remote code execution should Redis be enabled.

Adobe Experience Manager Cloud Service offering, as well as versions 6.5.8.0 (and below) is affected by a Server-side Request Forgery. An authenticated attacker could leverage this vulnerability to contact systems blocked by the dispatcher. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

Adobe Campaign Classic Gold Standard 10 (and earlier), 20.3.1 (and earlier), 20.2.3 (and earlier), 20.1.3 (and earlier), 19.2.3 (and earlier) and 19.1.7 (and earlier) are affected by a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to use the Campaign instance to issue unauthorized requests to internal or external resources.

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.2 and 6.3 have a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.4 and earlier have a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.

Adobe Campaign version 7.3.1 (and earlier) and 8.3.9 (and earlier) are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. A low-privilege authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

SSRF in Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.8 and Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.5 allows a remote authenticated attacker with admin rights to access internal network services.

A server-side request forgery in PAN-OS software enables an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to use the administrative web interface as a proxy, which enables the attacker to view internal network resources not otherwise accessible.

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been reported to affect QuLog Center. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow remote attackers who have gained administrator access to read application data. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QuLog Center 1.7.0.829 ( 2024/10/01 ) and later QuLog Center 1.8.0.888 ( 2024/10/15 ) and later QTS 4.5.4.2957 build 20241119 and later QuTS hero h4.5.4.2956 build 20241119 and later

Strapi is an open-source content management system. Prior to version 4.25.2, inputting a local domain into the Webhooks URL field leads to the application fetching itself, resulting in a server side request forgery (SSRF). This issue has been patched in version 4.25.2.

A remote authenticated server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability was discovered in Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager version(s): 6.10.4 and below, 6.9.9 and below, 6.8.9-HF2 and below, 6.7.x and below. Aruba has released updates to ClearPass Policy Manage that address this security vulnerability.

An issue was found in mipjz 5.0.5. In the mipPost method of \app\setting\controller\ApiAdminTool.php, the value of the postAddress parameter is not processed and is directly passed into curl_exec execution and output, resulting in a Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that can read server files.

An issue was discovered in mipjz 5.0.5. In the push method of app\tag\controller\ApiAdminTag.php the value of the postAddress parameter is not processed and is directly passed into curl_exec execution and output, resulting in Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that can read server files.

The Total Upkeep – WordPress Backup Plugin plus Restore & Migrate by BoldGrid plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.16.8 via the 'download' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Antabot White-Jotter up to 0.2.2. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /admin/content/editor of the component Article Editor. The manipulation of the argument articleCover leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

A malicious actor who has been authenticated and granted specific permissions in Apache Superset may use the import dataset feature in order to conduct Server-Side Request Forgery attacks and query internal resources on behalf of the server where Superset is deployed. This vulnerability exists in Apache Superset versions up to and including 2.0.1.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository omeka/omeka-s prior to 4.0.2.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Andy Moyle Church Admin.This issue affects Church Admin: from n/a through 3.7.56.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Dimitar Ivanov HTTP Headers.This issue affects HTTP Headers: from n/a through 1.18.11.

Flarum is open-source forum software. Prior to versions 1.8.16 and 2.0.0-rc.1, Flarum's patch for CVE-2023-27577 restricted the @import and data-uri() LESS features in the custom_less setting, but the same restriction was never applied to other settings registered as LESS config variables (for example theme_primary_color and theme_secondary_color, as well as any key registered via Extend\Settings::registerLessConfigVar()). Those values are interpolated verbatim into the LESS source at compile time, allowing an authenticated administrator to craft a theme-color value that injects an arbitrary @import directive into the compiled forum.css. Because the underlying LESS parser honours @import (inline) '<path>', an attacker can read arbitrary files reachable by the PHP process (local file inclusion) or trigger outbound HTTP(S) requests (server-side request forgery). This issue has been patched in versions 1.8.16 and 2.0.0-rc.1.

Kargo manages and automates the promotion of software artifacts. In versions 1.4.0 through 1.6.3, 1.7.0-rc.1 through 1.7.8, 1.8.0-rc.1 through 1.8.11, and 1.9.0-rc.1 through 1.9.4, the http and http-download promotion steps allow Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) against link-local addresses, most critically the cloud instance metadata endpoint (169.254.169.254), enabling exfiltration of sensitive data such as IAM credentials. These steps provide full control over request headers and methods, rendering cloud provider header-based SSRF mitigations ineffective. An authenticated attacker with permissions to create/update Stages or craft Promotion resources can exploit this by submitting a malicious Promotion manifest, with response data retrievable via Promotion status fields, Git repositories, or a second http step. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.6.4, 1.7.9, 1.8.12 and 1.9.5.

Xibo is an open source digital signage platform with a web content management system and Windows display player software. An authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in versions prior to 4.4.1 allows users with DataSet permissions to make arbitrary HTTP requests from the CMS server to internal or external network resources. This can be exploited to scan internal infrastructure, access local cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., AWS IMDS), interact with internal services that lack authentication, or exfiltrate data. Exploitation of the vulnerability is possible on behalf of an authorized user who has both of the following privileges, which are not granted to non-admins as standard: Include "Add DataSet" button to allow for additional DataSets to be created independently to Layouts. Users should upgrade to version 4.4.1 which fixes this issue. Upgrading to a fixed version is necessary to remediate. Users unable to upgrade should revoke such privileges from users they do not trust.

Group-Office is an enterprise customer relationship management and groupware tool. Prior to versions 6.8.150, 25.0.82, and 26.0.5, an authenticated user within the System Administrator group can trigger a full SSRF via the WOPI service discovery URL, including access to internal hosts/ports. The SSRF response body can be exfiltrated via the built‑in debug system, turning it into a visible SSRF. This also allows full server-side file read. This issue has been patched in versions 6.8.150, 25.0.82, and 26.0.5.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPChill Download Monitor.This issue affects Download Monitor: from n/a through 4.8.1.

Server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in CONPROSYS HMI System (CHS) versions prior to 3.5.3. A user who can access the affected product with an administrative privilege may bypass the database restriction set on the query setting page, and connect to a user unintended database.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPManageNinja LLC Ninja Tables.This issue affects Ninja Tables: from n/a through 5.0.9.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WP Royal Royal Elementor Addons royal-elementor-addons allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Royal Elementor Addons: from n/a through <= 1.7.1006.

A weakness has been identified in ZenTao up to 21.7.6-85642. The impacted element is the function fetchHook of the file module/webhook/model.php of the component Webhook Module. This manipulation causes server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.