External control of a file name in Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.6 and Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.3 allows a remote authenticated attacker with admin privileges to read arbitrary files.

A path traversal vulnerability exists in Pulse Connect Secure <9.1R8 which allows an authenticated attacker to read arbitrary files via the administrator web interface.

A vulnerability in the Pulse Connect Secure < 9.1R8.2 admin web interface could allow an authenticated attacker to gain arbitrary file reading access through Pulse Collaboration via XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability.

An unauthenticated attacked could send a specifically crafted web request causing a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Ivanti Avalanche Remote Control server.

SSRF in Ivanti Connect Secure before 22.7R2.9 or 22.8R2, Ivanti Policy Secure before 22.7R1.6, Ivanti ZTA Gateway before 2.8R2.3-723 and Ivanti Neurons for Secure Access before 22.8R1.4 (Fix deployed on 02-Aug-2025) allows a remote authenticated attacker with admin privileges to enumerate internal services.

Server-side request forgery in Ivanti Avalanche before version 6.4.5 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to leak sensitive information.

A server-side request forgery vulnerability in the SAML component of Ivanti Connect Secure (9.x, 22.x) and Ivanti Policy Secure (9.x, 22.x) and Ivanti Neurons for ZTA allows an attacker to access certain restricted resources without authentication.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Creative Themes Blocksy Companion blocksy-companion.This issue affects Blocksy Companion: from n/a through <= 2.0.42.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPManageNinja LLC Ninja Tables.This issue affects Ninja Tables: from n/a through 5.0.9.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Really Simple Plugins Really Simple SSL.This issue affects Really Simple SSL: from n/a through 7.2.3.

Dell PowerProtect DD, versions prior to 8.0, LTS 7.13.1.0, LTS 7.10.1.30, LTS 7.7.5.40 contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A remote high privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to disclosure of information on the application or remote client.

A vulnerability in the API of Cisco ISE could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the underlying operating system of an affected device and conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack through an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need valid Super Admin credentials. This vulnerability is due to improper handling of XML External Entity (XXE) entries when parsing XML input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted API request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to read arbitrary files on the underlying operating system or conduct an SSRF attack through the affected device.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack through an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper input validation for specific HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary network requests that are sourced from the affected device. To successfully exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need valid Super Admin credentials.

The Friends plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.5 via the discover_available_feeds function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

The WPGet API – Connect to any external REST API plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.10. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application which can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

The Stream plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.2 due to insufficient validation on the webhook feature. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application which can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

The Ninja Forms Webhooks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.7 via the form webhook functionality. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

The Uncanny Automator – Easy Automation, Integration, Webhooks & Workflow Builder Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.2 via the 'call_webhook' method of the Automator_Send_Webhook class This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Antabot White-Jotter up to 0.2.2. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /admin/content/editor of the component Article Editor. The manipulation of the argument articleCover leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in NiteoThemes CMP – Coming Soon & Maintenance.This issue affects CMP – Coming Soon & Maintenance: from n/a through 4.1.10.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SeedProd Coming Soon Page, Under Construction & Maintenance Mode by SeedProd coming-soon allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Coming Soon Page, Under Construction & Maintenance Mode by SeedProd: from n/a through <= 6.19.8.

** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in yuan1994 tpAdmin 1.3.12. Affected is the function remote of the file application\admin\controller\Upload.php. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-225408. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

PinchTab is a standalone HTTP server that gives AI agents direct control over a Chrome browser. PinchTab v0.8.3 contains a server-side request forgery issue in the optional scheduler's webhook delivery path. When a task is submitted to `POST /tasks` with a user-controlled `callbackUrl`, the v0.8.3 scheduler sends an outbound HTTP `POST` to that URL when the task reaches a terminal state. In that release, the webhook path validated only the URL scheme and did not reject loopback, private, link-local, or other non-public destinations. Because the v0.8.3 implementation also used the default HTTP client behavior, redirects were followed and the destination was not pinned to validated IPs. This allowed blind SSRF from the PinchTab server to attacker-chosen HTTP(S) targets reachable from the server. This issue is narrower than a general unauthenticated internet-facing SSRF. The scheduler is optional and off by default, and in token-protected deployments the attacker must already be able to submit tasks using the server's master API token. In PinchTab's intended deployment model, that token represents administrative control rather than a low-privilege role. Tokenless deployments lower the barrier further, but that is a separate insecure configuration state rather than impact created by the webhook bug itself. PinchTab's default deployment model is local-first and user-controlled, with loopback bind and token-based access in the recommended setup. That lowers practical risk in default use, even though it does not remove the underlying webhook issue when the scheduler is enabled and reachable. This was addressed in v0.8.4 by validating callback targets before dispatch, rejecting non-public IP ranges, pinning delivery to validated IPs, disabling redirect following, and validating `callbackUrl` during task submission.

A malicious actor who has been authenticated and granted specific permissions in Apache Superset may use the import dataset feature in order to conduct Server-Side Request Forgery attacks and query internal resources on behalf of the server where Superset is deployed. This vulnerability exists in Apache Superset versions up to and including 2.0.1.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in KaizenCoders URL Shortify url-shortify allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects URL Shortify: from n/a through <= 1.12.3.

Group-Office is an enterprise customer relationship management and groupware tool. Prior to versions 6.8.150, 25.0.82, and 26.0.5, an authenticated user within the System Administrator group can trigger a full SSRF via the WOPI service discovery URL, including access to internal hosts/ports. The SSRF response body can be exfiltrated via the built‑in debug system, turning it into a visible SSRF. This also allows full server-side file read. This issue has been patched in versions 6.8.150, 25.0.82, and 26.0.5.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A high-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to manipulate server-side requests and access unauthorized resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A high-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to manipulate server-side requests and bypass security controls. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

Discourse is a platform for community discussion. A malicious admin could use this vulnerability to perform port enumeration on the local host or other hosts on the internal network, as well as against hosts on the Internet. Latest `stable`, `beta`, and `test-passed` versions are now patched. As a workaround, self-hosters can use `DISCOURSE_BLOCKED_IP_BLOCKS` env var (which overrides `blocked_ip_blocks` setting) to stop webhooks from accessing private IPs.

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's notification webhook feature. The Slack and generic webhook notification handlers accept user-supplied URLs without SSRF validation, allowing a repository administrator to make the Quay worker issue POST requests to internal network addresses or cloud infrastructure endpoints that should not be reachable from the application.

The ManageJiraConnectors API in Atlassian Jira Align before version 10.109.2 allows remote attackers to exploit this issue to access internal network resources via a Server-Side Request Forgery. This can be exploited by a remote, unauthenticated attacker with Super Admin privileges by sending a specially crafted HTTP request.

The User Language Switch plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.10 due to missing URL validation on the 'download_language()' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

A vulnerability was found in kalcaddle kodbox 1.61. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /?explorer/upload/serverDownload of the component Download from Link Handler. Performing manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

The WP Import Export Lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 3.9.30 via the wpie_import_upload_file_from_url AJAX action. The plugin's URL downloader first calls wp_safe_remote_get() (which correctly blocks private/reserved IP ranges), but when that call returns a WP_Error — the exact outcome for any blocked internal host — the Download::download_file() method falls back to GuzzleHttp\Client::request() with the original attacker-supplied URL and no SSRF protection (and with TLS verification disabled). This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services such as the cloud metadata endpoint at 169.

The Featured Image Plus – Quick & Bulk Edit with Unsplash plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.6 via the fip_get_image_options() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository omeka/omeka-s prior to 4.0.2.

An issue was discovered in Gradle Enterprise 2018.5 - 2020.2.4. When configuring Gradle Enterprise to integrate with a SAML identity provider, an XML metadata file can be uploaded by an administrator. The server side processing of this file dereferences XML External Entities (XXE), allowing a remote attacker with administrative access to perform server side request forgery.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Dimitar Ivanov HTTP Headers.This issue affects HTTP Headers: from n/a through 1.18.11.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Andy Moyle Church Admin.This issue affects Church Admin: from n/a through 3.7.56.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in kodeshpa Simplified simplified allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Simplified: from n/a through <= 1.0.11.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack. A successful exploit allows an attacker to enumerate information about the internal     structure of the EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator host leading to potential disclosure of sensitive information.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPWebinarSystem WebinarPress wp-webinarsystem allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects WebinarPress: from n/a through <= 1.33.28.

A remote authenticated server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability was discovered in Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager version(s): 6.10.4 and below, 6.9.9 and below, 6.8.9-HF2 and below, 6.7.x and below. Aruba has released updates to ClearPass Policy Manage that address this security vulnerability.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPChill Download Monitor.This issue affects Download Monitor: from n/a through 4.8.1.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.6 (and earlier), 2.4.5-p2 (and earlier) and 2.4.4-p3 (and earlier) are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. An admin-privilege authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.6 (and earlier), 2.4.5-p2 (and earlier) and 2.4.4-p3 (and earlier) are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. An admin-privilege authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

Server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in CONPROSYS HMI System (CHS) versions prior to 3.5.3. A user who can access the affected product with an administrative privilege may bypass the database restriction set on the query setting page, and connect to a user unintended database.

A server-side request forgery in PAN-OS software enables an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to use the administrative web interface as a proxy, which enables the attacker to view internal network resources not otherwise accessible.

An authenticated Zabbix Super Admin can exploit the oauth.authorize action to read arbitrary files from the webserver leading to potential confidentiality loss.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WP Royal Royal Elementor Addons royal-elementor-addons allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Royal Elementor Addons: from n/a through <= 1.7.1006.