A CSRF issue was found in OpenShift Enterprise 1.2. The web console is using 'Basic authentication' and the REST API has no CSRF attack protection mechanism. This can allow an attacker to obtain the credential and the Authorization: header when requesting the REST API via web browser.

OTCMS v3.85 has CSRF in the admin/member_deal.php Admin Panel page, leading to creation of a new management group account, as demonstrated by superadmin.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AA-Team WZone – Lite Version plugin 3.1 Lite versions.

letodms 3.3.6 has CSRF via change password

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Latepoint LatePoint allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects LatePoint: from n/a through 4.9.91.

The Omnishop plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery on its /users/delete REST route in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.9. The route’s permission_callback only verifies that the requester is logged in, but fails to require any nonce or other proof of intent. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary user accounts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The CB (legacy) WordPress plugin through 0.9.4.18 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting codes, timeframes, and bookings via CSRF attacks

A vulnerability in the vManage web-based UI (web UI) of the Cisco SD-WAN Solution could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web UI on an affected instance of vManage. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user.

IBM Storage TS4500 Library 1.11.0.0 and 2.11.0.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

IBM CICS TX Standard 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

IBM Cognos Controller 11.0.0 and 11.0.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

A vulnerability has been identified in SENTRON 7KT PAC1260 Data Manager (All versions). The web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to change arbitrary device settings by tricking a legitimate device administrator to click on a malicious link.

The Webwork action Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection implementation in Jira before version 8.4.0 allows remote attackers to bypass its protection via "cookie tossing" a CSRF cookie from a subdomain of a Jira instance.

The Simple File List WordPress plugin before 4.4.12 does not implement nonce checks, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin create new page and change it's content via a CSRF attack.

Some Kyocera printers (such as the ECOSYS M5526cdw 2R7_2000.001.701) did not implement any mechanism to avoid CSRF. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to the takeover of a local account on the device.

phpBB version 3.2.7 allows the stealing of an Administration Control Panel session id by leveraging CSRF in the Remote Avatar feature. The CSRF Token Hijacking leads to stored XSS

A vulnerability was found in automad up to 1.10.9. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /dashboard?controller=UserCollection::createUser of the component User Creation Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-248687. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Some Xerox printers (such as the Phaser 3320 V53.006.16.000) did not implement any mechanism to avoid CSRF attacks. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to the takeover of a local account on the device.

Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in ELECOM wireless LAN routers. Viewing a malicious page while logging in to the affected product with an administrative privilege, the user may be directed to perform unintended operations such as changing the login ID, login password, etc.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in beescms v4 allows attackers to delete the administrator account via crafted request to /admin/admin_admin.php.

OutSystems Platform 10 through 11 allows ImageResourceDetail.aspx CSRF for content modifications and file uploads. NOTE: The product is self-hosted by the customer, even though it has a *.outsystemsenterprise.com domain name.) NOTE: The vendor claims that the independent researcher created the report without any type of validation and that no such vulnerability exists

The eCommerce Product Catalog Plugin for WordPress plugin before 3.3.26 does not have CSRF checks in some of its admin pages, which could allow attackers to make logged-in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks, such as delete all products

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Smartsupp Smartsupp – live chat, chatbots, AI and lead generation allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Smartsupp – live chat, chatbots, AI and lead generation: from n/a through 3.6.

Shenzhen Tenda AC7 firmware version V03.03.03.01_cn and prior does not implement CSRF protections for administrative functions in the web management interface. The interface does not enforce anti-CSRF tokens or robust origin validation, which can allow an attacker to induce a logged-in administrator to perform unintended state-changing requests and modify router settings.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in bingo!CMS 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of other users for requests that modify configuration or change content via unspecified vectors.

ismartgate PRO 1.5.9 is vulnerable to CSRF that allows remote attackers to upload imae files via /index.php

A Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in ipa/session/login_password in all supported versions of IPA. This flaw allows an attacker to trick the user into submitting a request that could perform actions as the user, resulting in a loss of confidentiality and system integrity. During community penetration testing it was found that for certain HTTP end-points FreeIPA does not ensure CSRF protection. Due to implementation details one cannot use this flaw for reflection of a cookie representing already logged-in user. An attacker would always have to go through a new authentication attempt.

The Open eClass platform (formerly known as GUnet eClass) is a complete course management system. Prior to version 4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in multiple teacher-restricted endpoints allows attackers to induce authenticated teachers to perform unintended actions, such as modifying assignment grades, via crafted requests. This issue has been patched in version 4.2.

The EventON - WordPress Virtual Event Calendar Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.4 (Pro) & 2.2.8 (Free). This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_virtual_event_settings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify virtual event settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Interactive Contact Form and Multi Step Form Builder with Drag & Drop Editor WordPress plugin before 3.4.2 does not have CSRF checks on some of its form actions such as deletion and duplication, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin perform such actions via CSRF attacks

React Router is a router for React. In @remix-run/server-runtime version prior to 2.17.3. and react-router 7.0.0 through 7.11.0, React Router (or Remix v2) is vulnerable to CSRF attacks on document POST requests to UI routes when using server-side route action handlers in Framework Mode, or when using React Server Actions in the new unstable RSC modes. There is no impact if Declarative Mode (<BrowserRouter>) or Data Mode (createBrowserRouter/<RouterProvider>) is being used. This issue has been patched in @remix-run/server-runtime version 2.17.3 and react-router version 7.12.0.

The Word Balloon WordPress plugin before 4.20.3 does not protect some of its actions against CSRF attacks, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to trick a logged in user to delete arbitrary avatars by clicking a link.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in TeamMate+ 21.0.0.0 that allows a remote attacker to modify application data (upload malicious/forged files on a TeamMate server, or replace existing uploaded files with malicious/forged files). The specific flaw exists within the handling of Upload/DomainObjectDocumentUpload.ashx requests because of failure to validate a CSRF token before handling a POST request.

The AdminPad WordPress plugin before 2.2 does not have CSRF check when updating admin's note, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin update their notes via a CSRF attack

WTCMS 1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the index.php?g=admin&m=nav&a=add_post component that allows attackers to arbitrarily add articles in the administrator background.

The EventON - WordPress Virtual Event Calendar Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.4 (for Pro) & 2.2.7 (for Free). This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the evo_eventpost_update_meta function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary post metadata via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Snare for Linux before 1.7.0 has CSRF in the web interface.

A vulnerability was determined in SourceCodester/Patrick Mvuma Patients Waiting Area Queue Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely.

The Funnelforms Free plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the fnsf_delete_posts function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

kimai2 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

An issue was discovered in CMSUno before 1.6.1. uno.php allows CSRF to change the admin password.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in (1) addaddress.php, (2) toggleignore.php, (3) removeignore.php, and (4) removeaddress.php in Infopop UBB.Threads before 6.5.2 Beta allow remote attackers to modify settings as another user via a link or IMG tag.

PHPGurukul Hospital Management System v4.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the 'Add Doctor' module. The application fails to enforce CSRF token validation on the add-doctor.php endpoint. This allows remote attackers to create arbitrary Doctor accounts (privileged users) by tricking an authenticated administrator into visiting a malicious page.

A cross-site request forgery security issue exists in the product and version listed. The vulnerability stems from missing CSRF checks on the impacted form. This allows for unintended configuration modification if an attacker can convince a logged in admin to visit a crafted link.

The Multi-Scheduler plugin 1.0.0 for WordPress has a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the forms it presents, allowing the possibility of deleting records (users) when an ID is known.

PHPgurukul Online Course Registration v3.1 lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection on all administrative forms. An attacker can perform unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated administrators by tricking them into visiting a malicious webpage.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FuseTalk 2.0 allows remote attackers to create arbitrary accounts via a link to adduser.cfm.

Microhard Systems IPn4G 1.1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user consent. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to change admin passwords, add new users, and modify system settings by tricking authenticated users into loading a specially crafted page.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Doofinder Doofinder WP & WooCommerce Search.This issue affects Doofinder WP & WooCommerce Search: from n/a through 2.0.33.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EnvialoSimple EnvíaloSimple.This issue affects EnvíaloSimple: from n/a through 2.2.