Fiber is an express inspired web framework written in Go. A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the application, which allows an attacker to obtain tokens and forge malicious requests on behalf of a user. This can lead to unauthorized actions being taken on the user's behalf, potentially compromising the security and integrity of the application. The vulnerability is caused by improper validation and enforcement of CSRF tokens within the application. This vulnerability has been addressed in version 2.50.0 and users are advised to upgrade. Users should take additional security measures like captchas or Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) and set Session cookies with SameSite=Lax or SameSite=Secure, and the Secure and HttpOnly attributes.
This package provides universal methods to use multiple template engines with the Fiber web framework using the Views interface. This vulnerability specifically impacts web applications that render user-supplied data through this template engine, potentially leading to the execution of malicious scripts in users' browsers when visiting affected web pages. The vulnerability has been addressed, the template engine now defaults to having autoescape set to `true`, effectively mitigating the risk of XSS attacks.
Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in FlyCms v.1.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the system/article/category_edit component.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in pixelpost 1.7.3 could allow remote attackers to change the admin password.
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in OpenACS bug-tracker. Affected is an unknown function of the file lib/nav-bar.adp of the component Search. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The name of the patch is aee43e5714cd8b697355ec3bf83eefee176d3fc3. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-217440.
FlyCms v1.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /system/score/del.
FlyCms v1.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /system/admin/add_group_save
FlyCms v1.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerbility via /system/site/filterKeyword_save
FlyCms v1.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /system/email/email_conf_updagte
Stupid Simple CMS <=1.2.4 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin-edit.php.
Flusity-CMS v2.33 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /cover/addons/info_media_gallery/action/edit_addon_post.php
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cozmoslabs Profile Builder Pro.This issue affects Profile Builder Pro: from n/a through 3.10.0.
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Guanzhou Tozed Kangwei Intelligent Technology ZLTS10G software version S10G_3.11.6 allows attackers to takeover user accounts via sending a crafted POST request to /goform/goform_set_cmd_process.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Marco Milesi Browser Theme Color.This issue affects Browser Theme Color: from n/a through 1.3.
pyLoad is a free and open-source Download Manager written in pure Python. The `pyload` API allows any API call to be made using GET requests. Since the session cookie is not set to `SameSite: strict`, this opens the library up to severe attack possibilities via a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. As a result any API call can be made via a CSRF attack by an unauthenticated user. This issue has been addressed in release `0.5.0b3.dev78`. All users are advised to upgrade.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in DroitThemes Droit Elementor Addons – Widgets, Blocks, Templates Library For Elementor Builder.This issue affects Droit Elementor Addons – Widgets, Blocks, Templates Library For Elementor Builder: from n/a through 3.1.5.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in livewire before v3.0.4, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code getCsrfToken function. NOTE: the vendor disputes this because the 5d88731 commit fixes a usability problem (HTTP 419 status codes for legitimate client activity), not a security problem.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Spell Check.This issue affects WP Spell Check: from n/a through 9.17.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WooCommerce AutomateWoo plugin <= 5.7.1 versions.
Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in IgnitedCMS v1.0 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information and gain privilege via the component "/admin/profile/save_profile".
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Atakan Au 1 click disable all.This issue affects 1 click disable all: from n/a through 1.0.1.
The XWiki Admin Tools Application provides tools to help the administration of XWiki. Starting in version 4.4 and prior to version 4.5.1, a cross site request forgery vulnerability in the admin tool for executing shell commands on the server allows an attacker to execute arbitrary shell commands by tricking an admin into loading the URL with the shell command. A very simple possibility for an attack are comments. When the attacker can leave a comment on any page in the wiki it is sufficient to include an image with an URL like `/xwiki/bin/view/Admin/RunShellCommand?command=touch%20/tmp/attacked` in the comment. When an admin views the comment, the file `/tmp/attacked` will be created on the server. The output of the command is also vulnerable to XWiki syntax injection which offers a simple way to execute Groovy in the context of the XWiki installation and thus an even easier way to compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the whole XWiki installation. This has been patched by adding a form token check in version 4.5.1 of the admin tools. Some workarounds are available. The patch can be applied manually to the affected wiki pages. Alternatively, the document `Admin.RunShellCommand` can also be deleted if the possibility to run shell commands isn't needed.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Supsystic Easy Google Maps plugin <= 1.11.7 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Inventory Manager plugin <= 2.1.0.13 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Etoile Web Design Front End Users plugin <= 3.2.24 versions.
FlyCms v1.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /system/email/email_templets_update.
FlyCms v1.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /system/user/group_update
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AboZain,O7abeeb,UnitOne Custom Dashboard Widgets allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Custom Dashboard Widgets: from n/a through 1.3.1.
FlyCms v1.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /system/admin/update_group_save.
The LearnPress – WordPress LMS Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the filter_users functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to elevate their privileges to that of a teacher via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin/banner_deal.php?mudi=del&dataType=&dataTypeCN=%E5%9B%BE%E7%89%87%E5%B9%BF%E5%91%8A&theme=cs&dataID=6.
CSRF vulnerability in Smoothwall Express 3.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Azure VM Agents Plugin 852.v8d35f0960a_43 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified Azure Cloud server using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeinProgress WIP Custom Login plugin <= 1.2.9 versions.
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Shell does not properly validate file paths, aka "Windows Shell Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This affects Windows 10 Servers, Windows 10.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PI Websolution Conditional shipping & Advanced Flat rate shipping rates / Flexible shipping for WooCommerce shipping plugin <= 1.6.4.4 versions.
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin/homePro_deal.php?mudi=del&dataType=&dataTypeCN.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WooCommerce Product Recommendations plugin <= 2.3.0 versions.
Remote Cross-site Request forgery (CSRF) potential has been identified in UCMBD Server version DDM Content Pack V 10.20, 10.21, 10.22, 10.22 CUP7, 10.30, 10.31, 10.32, 10.33, 10.33 CUP2, 11.0 and CMS Server version 2018.05 BACKGROUND which could allow for remote unsafe deserialization and cross-site request forgery (CSRF).
CSRF tokens are generated using math/rand, which is not a cryptographically secure random number generator, allowing an attacker to predict values and bypass CSRF protections with relatively few requests.
An issue was discovered in Western Bridge Cobub Razor 0.7.2. Authentication is not required for /index.php?/manage/channel/modifychannel. For example, with a crafted channel name, stored XSS is triggered during a later /index.php?/manage/channel request by an admin.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in realmag777 BEAR plugin <= 1.1.3.1 versions.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Western Bridge Cobub Razor 0.7.2 via /index.php?/user/createNewUser/, resulting in account creation.
Apache OFBiz 17.12.01 is vulnerable to some CSRF attacks.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ciprian Popescu YouTube Playlist Player plugin <= 4.6.4 versions.
Due to insufficient CSRF protection, SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (Monitoring Application), before versions 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3, may lead to an authenticated user to send unintended request to the web server, leading to Cross Site Request Forgery.
In FileCloud before 21.3, the CSV user import functionality is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
SideQuest is a place to get virtual reality applications for Oculus Quest. The SideQuest desktop application uses deep links with a custom protocol (`sidequest://`) to trigger actions in the application from its web contents. Because, prior to version 0.10.35, the deep link URLs were not sanitized properly in all cases, a one-click remote code execution can be achieved in cases when a device is connected, the user is presented with a malicious link and clicks it from within the application. As of version 0.10.35, the custom protocol links within the electron application are now being parsed and sanitized properly.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Crocoblock JetFormBuilder — Dynamic Blocks Form Builder plugin <= 3.0.6 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Krzysztof Wielogórski Stop Referrer Spam plugin <= 1.3.0 versions.