A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in jerryshensjf JPACookieShop 蛋糕商城JPA版 up to 24a15c02b4f75042c9f7f615a3fed2ec1cefb999. This affects an unknown part of the file AdminTypeCustController.java. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable.

In mblog <= 3.5.0 there is a CSRF vulnerability in the background article management. The attacker constructs a CSRF load. Once the administrator clicks a malicious link, the article will be deleted.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Gitea before 1.5.2 via API routes.This can be dangerous especially with state altering POST requests.

The Sertifier Certificate & Badge Maker for WordPress – Tutor LMS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.19. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'sertifier_settings' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's api key via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in wpWax Legal Pages.This issue affects Legal Pages: from n/a through 1.3.7.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tribulant Newsletters.This issue affects Newsletters: from n/a through 4.9.7.

The Zoho Flow plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.14.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the zoho_flow_deactivate_plugin function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify typography settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Video Share VOD – Turnkey Video Site Builder Script plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the adminExport() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and execute remote code when the Server command execution setting is enabled via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SKT Themes Posterity allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Posterity: from n/a through 3.3.

A Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Advanced Electron Forums (AEF) through 1.0.9 due to inadequate confirmation for sensitive transactions in the administrator functions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rocket Elements Split Test For Elementor.This issue affects Split Test For Elementor: from n/a through 1.6.9.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Preschool and Kindergarten allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Preschool and Kindergarten: from n/a through 1.2.1.

The Customify theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in version 0.4.11. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the reset_customize_section function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset theme customization settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CreativeThemes Blocksy allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Blocksy: from n/a through 2.0.22.

BigProf Online Invoicing System before 3.0 offers a functionality that allows an administrator to move the records of members across groups. The applicable endpoint (admin/pageTransferOwnership.php) lacks CSRF protection, resulting in an attacker being able to escalate their privileges to Administrator and effectively taking over the application.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in /admin/maintenance/ of Domainmod 4.13 allows attackers to arbitrarily delete logs.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Royal Bard allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Bard: from n/a through 2.210.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MyThemeShop Schema Lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Schema Lite: from n/a through 1.2.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in realmag777 HUSKY – Products Filter for WooCommerce (formerly WOOF).This issue affects HUSKY – Products Filter for WooCommerce (formerly WOOF): from n/a through 1.3.4.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FameThemes OnePress allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects OnePress: from n/a through 2.3.6.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in richardevcom Add Polylang support for Customizer add-polylang-support-for-customizer allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Add Polylang support for Customizer: from n/a through <= 1.4.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in BlazeThemes Trendy News allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Trendy News: from n/a through 1.0.15.

In TYPO3 CMS 9.0.0 through 9.5.16 and 10.0.0 through 10.4.1, it has been discovered that the backend user interface and install tool are vulnerable to a same-site request forgery. A backend user can be tricked into interacting with a malicious resource an attacker previously managed to upload to the web server. Scripts are then executed with the privileges of the victims' user session. In a worst-case scenario, new admin users can be created which can directly be used by an attacker. The vulnerability is basically a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) triggered by a cross-site scripting vulnerability (XSS) - but happens on the same target host - thus, it's actually a same-site request forgery. Malicious payload such as HTML containing JavaScript might be provided by either an authenticated backend user or by a non-authenticated user using a third party extension, e.g. file upload in a contact form with knowing the target location. To be successful, the attacked victim requires an active and valid backend or install tool user session at the time of the attack. This has been fixed in 9.5.17 and 10.4.2. The deployment of additional mitigation techniques is suggested as described below. - Sudo Mode Extension This TYPO3 extension intercepts modifications to security relevant database tables, e.g. those storing user accounts or storages of the file abstraction layer. Modifications need to confirmed again by the acting user providing their password again. This technique is known as sudo mode. This way, unintended actions happening in the background can be mitigated. - https://github.com/FriendsOfTYPO3/sudo-mode - https://extensions.typo3.org/extension/sudo_mode - Content Security Policy Content Security Policies tell (modern) browsers how resources served a particular site are handled. It is also possible to disallow script executions for specific locations. In a TYPO3 context, it is suggested to disallow direct script execution at least for locations /fileadmin/ and /uploads/.

The LatePoint plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.94. This is due to missing nonce validation on the change_password() function of its customer_cabinet__change_password AJAX route. The plugin hooks this endpoint via wp_ajax and wp_ajax_nopriv but does not verify a nonce or user capability before resetting the user’s password. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers who trick a logged-in customer (or, with “WP users as customers” enabled, an administrator) into visiting a malicious link to take over their account.

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in 07FLYCMS, 07FLY-CMS and 07FlyCRM up to 1.3.9. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product is published under multiple names. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in blazethemes Digital Newspaper.This issue affects Digital Newspaper: from n/a through 1.1.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Blossom Themes Blossom Shop allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Blossom Shop: from n/a through 1.1.7.

YzmCMS v6.3 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgey (CSRF) via the component /yzmcms/comment/index/init.html.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Groundhogg Inc. Groundhogg allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Groundhogg: from n/a through 3.4.2.3.

DBHcms v1.2.0 has no CSRF protection mechanism,as demonstrated by CSRF for index.php?dbhcms_pid=-70 can add a user.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Book Landing Page.This issue affects Book Landing Page: from n/a through 1.2.3.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in CodeAstro Online Movie Ticket Booking System 1.0. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

glFusion CMS 1.7.9 is affected by a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in /public_html/admin/plugins/bad_behavior2/blacklist.php. Using the CSRF vulnerability to trick the administrator to click, an attacker can add a blacklist.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Freshlight Lab WP Mobile Menu allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Mobile Menu: from n/a through 2.8.4.3.

Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware 5.2 has CSRF

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in pluginsware Advanced Classifieds & Directory Pro advanced-classifieds-and-directory-pro allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Advanced Classifieds & Directory Pro: from n/a through <= 3.2.9.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tikweb Management Fast User Switching fast-user-switching allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Fast User Switching: from n/a through <= 1.4.10.

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alessandro Piconi Simple Keyword to Link simple-keyword-to-link allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Simple Keyword to Link: from n/a through <= 1.5.

The Newsletter Popup WordPress plugin through 1.2 does not have CSRF check when deleting list, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform such action via a CSRF attack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Averta Depicter Slider.This issue affects Depicter Slider: from n/a through 2.0.6.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rustaurius Five Star Restaurant Reservations restaurant-reservations allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Five Star Restaurant Reservations: from n/a through <= 2.7.7.

Axigen Mail Server before 10.5.57 and 10.6.x before 10.6.26 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WebAdmin interface through improper handling of the _s (breadcrumb) parameter. The application accepts state-changing requests via the GET method and automatically processes base64-encoded commands queued in the _s parameter immediately after administrator authentication. Attackers can craft malicious URLs that, when clicked by administrators, execute arbitrary administrative actions upon login without further user interaction, including creating rogue administrator accounts or modifying critical server configurations.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Constantin Boiangiu Vimeotheque codeflavors-vimeo-video-post-lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Vimeotheque: from n/a through <= 2.3.5.2.

PHPFusion version 9.03.90 is vulnerable to CSRF attack which leads to deletion of all shoutbox messages by the attacker on behalf of the logged in victim.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wphocus My auctions allegro my-auctions-allegro-free-edition allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects My auctions allegro: from n/a through <= 3.6.32.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in SeaCMS up to 13.2. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /admin_type.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

The Amministrazione Trasparente plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 7.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the at_save_aturl_meta() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update meta data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component admin/type_deal.php?mudi=del

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rhys Wynne WP Email Capture wp-email-capture allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Email Capture: from n/a through <= 3.12.5.