Sourcecodester Restaurant Management System 1.0 is affected by an admin/staff-exec.php Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability due to a lack of CSRF protection. This could lead to an attacker tricking the administrator into executing arbitrary code or adding a staff entry via a crafted HTML page.
SourceCodester Best Employee Management System 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in /admin/Operation/User.php page.
SourceCodester Best Employee Management System V1.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in /admin/change_pass.php via the password parameter.
A directory listing vulnerability in Best Student Result Management System v1.0 allows attackers to list directories and sensitive files within the application without requiring authorization.
A directory listing vulnerability in Customer Support System v1 allows attackers to list directories and sensitive files within the application without requiring authorization.
A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Online Railway Reservation System 1.0. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /admin/. The manipulation of the argument page with the input trains/schedules/system_info leads to improper authorization. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A directory listing vulnerability in School Fees Management System v1.0 allows attackers to list directories and sensitive files within the application without requiring authorization.
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in DedeCMS 5.7. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /src/dede/makehtml_map.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-258922 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MagePeople Team Bus Ticket Booking with Seat Reservation allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Bus Ticket Booking with Seat Reservation: from n/a through 5.4.3.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WhileTrue Most And Least Read Posts Widget allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Most And Least Read Posts Widget: from n/a through 2.5.18.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPWeb Social Auto Poster allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Social Auto Poster: from n/a through 5.3.15.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Tran Table of Contents Plus allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Table of Contents Plus: from n/a through 2408.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Noor Alam WordPress Image SEO allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WordPress Image SEO: from n/a through 1.1.4.
In WordPress before 4.7.5, there is improper handling of post meta data values in the XML-RPC API.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Compress WP Compress – Image Optimizer [All-In-One].This issue affects WP Compress – Image Optimizer [All-In-One]: from n/a through 6.10.35.
The WP Prayer II WordPress plugin through 2.4.7 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
TP-Link C2 and C20i devices through firmware 0.9.1 4.2 v0032.0 Build 160706 Rel.37961n have too permissive iptables rules, e.g., SNMP is not blocked on any interface.
In Moodle 2.x and 3.x, a CSRF attack is possible that allows attackers to change the "number of courses displayed in the course overview block" configuration setting.
The Copymatic – AI Content Writer & Generator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'copymatic-menu' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the copymatic_apikey option via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities leading to single or bulk e-mail entries deletion discovered in Email Tracker WordPress plugin (versions <= 5.2.6).
The Sertifier Certificate & Badge Maker for WordPress – Tutor LMS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.19. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'sertifier_settings' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's api key via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in DedeCMS 5.7. Affected is an unknown function of the file /src/dede/sys_safe.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-263316. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
The WP Logs Book WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
The Snippet Shortcodes plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when adding or editing shortcodes. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify shortcodes via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The VR Calendar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the syncCalendar() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger a calendar sync via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
In mblog <= 3.5.0 there is a CSRF vulnerability in the background article management. The attacker constructs a CSRF load. Once the administrator clicks a malicious link, the article will be deleted.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Shahjahan Jewel Fluent Support allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Fluent Support: from n/a through 1.9.1.
WordPress plugin "Carousel Slider" provided by Sayful Islam contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability on Hero image selection feature. While logged in to the WordPress site with Carousel Slider plugin enabled, accessing a crafted page may cause a user to alter the contents of the WordPress site.
CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.2.16 with the value[#][*] parameter to the admin/settings/update/ page. The Navigation Social can be changed.
The Comparison Slider plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions hooked to AJAX actions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change slider titles, delete sliders and modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
glFusion CMS 1.7.9 is affected by a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in /public_html/admin/plugins/bad_behavior2/blacklist.php. Using the CSRF vulnerability to trick the administrator to click, an attacker can add a blacklist.
CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.1.18 with the colophon parameter to the admin/settings/update/ page. The Colophon can be changed.
The WP Logs Book WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not have CSRF check when clearing logs, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin clear the logs them via a CSRF attack
WordPress plugin "Carousel Slider" provided by Sayful Islam contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability on Carousel image selection feature. While logged in to the WordPress site with Carousel Slider plugin enabled, accessing a crafted page may cause a user to alter the contents of the WordPress site.
CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.1.18 with the nav-social[#] parameter to the admin/settings/update/ page. The Navigation Social can be changed.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPMU DEV Hummingbird.This issue affects Hummingbird: from n/a through 3.9.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 10up Simple Local Avatars.This issue affects Simple Local Avatars: from n/a through 2.7.10.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Dinesh Karki WP Armour Extended.This issue affects WP Armour Extended: from n/a through 1.26.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eyecix JobSearch allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects JobSearch: from n/a through 2.5.3.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Checkout Plugins Stripe Payments For WooCommerce by Checkout.This issue affects Stripe Payments For WooCommerce by Checkout: from n/a through 1.9.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP User Manager.This issue affects WP User Manager: from n/a through 2.9.10.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Automattic, Inc. Crowdsignal Dashboard – Polls, Surveys & more allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Crowdsignal Dashboard – Polls, Surveys & more: from n/a through 3.1.2.
The Amministrazione Trasparente plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 7.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the at_save_aturl_meta() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update meta data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The Defender Security plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.4.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the verify_otp_login_time() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to verify a one time login via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Nasirahmed Advanced Form Integration.This issue affects Advanced Form Integration: from n/a through 1.89.4.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Brave Brave Popup Builder.This issue affects Brave Popup Builder: from n/a through 0.7.0.
A security vulnerability in HPE IceWall Agent products could be exploited remotely to cause a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the login flow.
The Better Search plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.5.2. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to import settings via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
`solidus_frontend` is the cart and storefront for the Solidus e-commerce project. Versions of `solidus_frontend` prior to 3.1.5, 3.0.5, and 2.11.14 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that allows a malicious site to add an item to the user's cart without their knowledge. Versions 3.1.5, 3.0.5, and 2.11.14 contain a patch for this issue. The patch adds CSRF token verification to the "Add to cart" action. Adding forgery protection to a form that missed it can have some side effects. Other CSRF protection strategies as well as a workaround involving modifcation to config/application.rb` are available. More details on these mitigations are available in the GitHub Security Advisory.
The Custom CSS, JS & PHP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.0.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save code snippets via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.