Protection mechanism failure in Windows BitLocker allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature with a physical attack.

Protection mechanism failure in Windows Mark of the Web (MOTW) allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.

Microsoft Office Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

An authenticated attacker can exploit an Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Microsoft Azure Health Bot to elevate privileges over a network.

Windows NTLM Spoofing Vulnerability

Windows MapUrlToZone Denial of Service Vulnerability

Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Windows Scripting Engine Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Code Integrity Guard Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Windows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Windows Package Library Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability

BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Windows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Windows LockDown Policy (WLDP) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Microsoft Bing Search Spoofing Vulnerability

SmartScreen Prompt Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Windows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability

Internet Shortcut Files Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Azure CycleCloud Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Windows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Windows SmartScreen Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Microsoft Publisher Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Multiple vulnerabilities in the secure boot process of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software for the Firepower 1000 Series and Firepower 2100 Series Appliances could allow an authenticated, local attacker to bypass the secure boot mechanism. The vulnerabilities are due to insufficient protections of the secure boot process. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by injecting code into specific files that are then referenced during the device boot process. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to break the chain of trust and inject code into the boot process of the device, which would be executed at each boot and maintain persistence across reboots.

Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless WiFi software may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.