Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) leading to Arbitrary File Upload vulnerability in Rara One Click Demo Import plugin <= 1.2.9 on WordPress allows attackers to trick logged-in admin users into uploading dangerous files into /wp-content/uploads/ directory.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in raratheme Rara Business rara-business allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Rara Business: from n/a through <= 1.2.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in raratheme Education Zone education-zone allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Education Zone: from n/a through <= 1.3.4.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in raratheme Travel Agency travel-agency allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Travel Agency: from n/a through <= 1.4.9.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in raratheme Elegant Pink elegant-pink allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Elegant Pink: from n/a through <= 1.3.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in raratheme Construction Landing Page construction-landing-page allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Construction Landing Page: from n/a through <= 1.3.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in raratheme Perfect Portfolio perfect-portfolio allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Perfect Portfolio: from n/a through <= 1.2.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in raratheme Preschool and Kindergarten preschool-and-kindergarten allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Preschool and Kindergarten: from n/a through <= 1.2.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in raratheme Benevolent benevolent allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Benevolent: from n/a through <= 1.3.4.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Book Landing Page.This issue affects Book Landing Page: from n/a through 1.2.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in raratheme Chic Lite chic-lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Chic Lite: from n/a through <= 1.1.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in raratheme JobScout jobscout allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects JobScout: from n/a through <= 1.1.4.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Restaurant and Cafe.This issue affects Restaurant and Cafe: from n/a through 1.2.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme The Conference.This issue affects The Conference: from n/a through 1.2.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Spa and Salon.This issue affects Spa and Salon: from n/a through 1.2.7.

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Rara Themes Business One Page allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Business One Page: from n/a through 1.2.9.

tianti v2.3 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /user/ajax/save. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary operations via a crafted GET or POST request.

The CSRF protection mechanism implemented in the web administration panel on NETGEAR JGS516PE/GS116Ev2 v2.6.0.43 devices could be bypassed by omitting the CSRF token parameter in HTTP requests.

In ScadaBR version 1.2.0, a CSRF vulnerability could allow an attacker to trigger any authenticated action through a victim's session by luring any logged-in user to a malicious webpage.

DedeCMS v6.1.9 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows attackers to arbitrarily add Administrator accounts and modify Admin passwords.

A vulnerability was identified in calcom cal.diy up to 4.9.4. Impacted is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Axigen Mail Server before 10.5.57 and 10.6.x before 10.6.26 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WebAdmin interface through improper handling of the _s (breadcrumb) parameter. The application accepts state-changing requests via the GET method and automatically processes base64-encoded commands queued in the _s parameter immediately after administrator authentication. Attackers can craft malicious URLs that, when clicked by administrators, execute arbitrary administrative actions upon login without further user interaction, including creating rogue administrator accounts or modifying critical server configurations.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ibasit GlobalQuran globalquran allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects GlobalQuran: from n/a through <= 1.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in rainafarai Notification for Telegram notification-for-telegram allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Notification for Telegram: from n/a through <= 3.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wow-Company Modal Window modal-window allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Modal Window: from n/a through <= 6.1.4.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SeedProd Coming Soon Page, Under Construction & Maintenance Mode by SeedProd coming-soon allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Coming Soon Page, Under Construction & Maintenance Mode by SeedProd: from n/a through <= 6.18.9.

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Student Grades Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in saleandro Songkick Concerts and Festivals songkick-concerts-and-festivals allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Songkick Concerts and Festivals: from n/a through <= 0.9.7.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Brainstorm Force Starter Templates astra-sites allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Starter Templates: from n/a through <= 4.4.9.

Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Wi-Fi AP UNIT 'AC-WPS-11ac series'. If a user views a malicious page while logged in, unintended operations may be performed.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Shahjahan Jewel FluentSMTP fluent-smtp allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects FluentSMTP: from n/a through <= 2.2.80.

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester CET Automated Grading System with AI Predictive Analytics 1.0. This affects an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

The CM Ad Changer – A simple tool to control and optimize your site's banners plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cmac_campaigns_action function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to permanently delete arbitrary advertising campaigns, including their associated banner records and uploaded files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Really Simple Plugins Really Simple SSL really-simple-ssl allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Really Simple SSL: from n/a through <= 9.1.4.

The Two-factor authentication (formerly IP Vault) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ipv_save_changes function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's firewall and two-factor authentication settings — including the operating mode, request include/exclude rules, authentication slug, and log retention period — potentially disabling protection entirely via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The auto making JSON-LD plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the amJL_certification function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's license key option, and subsequently trigger license validation and pro feature installation on the victim site without the administrator's consent via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Successful exploitation can trigger downstream calls to amJL_is_license_valid() and amJL_download_and_install_pro_features(), meaning the impact extends beyond a simple settings change to unauthorized installation of plugin components.

The Search Simple Fields plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the search_simple_fields_options() function in functions_admin.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings — including post types to search in, custom fields, media fields and the custom media function name — via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The CDN Linker lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.3.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ossdl_off_options() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings — including the CDN URL used to rewrite all static asset references on the site — via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The GoStats for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the gostats_manage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings (gostats_siteid and gostats_server options) via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The MetaMagic SEO Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the metamagic_update_options function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's SEO settings, including enabling or disabling the plugin and toggling description and keyword meta tag output via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The PeachPay — Payments & Express Checkout for WooCommerce (supports Stripe, PayPal, Square, Authorize.net, NMI) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.120.46. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the peachpay_stripe_handle_admin_actions function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to permanently delete all stored Stripe credentials — including publishable keys, secret keys, webhook secrets, and Apple Pay configuration — from the WordPress database, disabling Stripe payment processing for the store via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in RSTheme Ultimate Coming Soon & Maintenance ultimate-coming-soon allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Ultimate Coming Soon & Maintenance: from n/a through <= 1.0.9.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in g5theme Essential Real Estate essential-real-estate allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Essential Real Estate: from n/a through <= 5.1.8.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Shafaet Alam Attire Blocks attire-blocks allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Attire Blocks: from n/a through <= 1.9.6.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Ubiquiti Networks UniFi Controller before 3.2.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create a new admin user via a request to api/add/admin; (2) have unspecified impact via a request to api/add/wlanconf; change the guest (3) password, (4) authentication method, or (5) restricted subnets via a request to api/set/setting/guest_access; (6) block, (7) unblock, or (8) reconnect users by MAC address via a request to api/cmd/stamgr; change the syslog (9) server or (10) port via a request to api/set/setting/rsyslogd; (11) have unspecified impact via a request to api/set/setting/smtp; change the syslog (12) server, (13) port, or (14) authentication settings via a request to api/cmd/cfgmgr; or (15) change the Unifi Controller name via a request to api/set/setting/identity.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPGMaps WP Go Maps wp-google-maps.This issue affects WP Go Maps: from n/a through <= 9.0.40.

Jenkins Bitbucket Server Integration Plugin 2.1.0 through 4.1.3 (both inclusive) allows attackers to craft URLs that would bypass the CSRF protection of any target URL in Jenkins.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in bnielsen Indeed API indeed-api allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Indeed API: from n/a through <= 0.5.

The Tectite Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the admin_init function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings, including the tectite_forms_button option, via a forged request via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Laiser Tag plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the addOptionsPageFields function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings, including the API key, tag blacklist, relevance threshold, batch size, and tagging toggles, via a forged request via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.