The Stockists Manager for Woocommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the stockist_settings_main() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Orange Form WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not have any authorisation and CSRF checks in all of its AJAX calls, for example the or_delete_filed one which is available to both unauthenticated and authenticated users could allow attackers to delete arbitrary posts.The AJAX calls performing actions on posts also do not ensure that the post belong to them (or that they are allowed to perform such action on it)

The uContext for Amazon plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to, and including 3.9.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ~/app/sites/ajax/actions/keyword_save.php file that is called via the doAjax() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Batavi before 1.0 has CSRF.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WebberZone Top 10 – WordPress Popular posts by WebberZone plugin <= 3.3.2 versions.

In FileCloud before 21.3, file upload is not protected against Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).

The web interface on Supermicro X10DRH-iT motherboards with BIOS 2.0a and IPMI firmware 03.40 allows remote attackers to exploit a cgi/config_user.cgi CSRF issue to add new admin users. The fixed versions are BIOS 3.2 and firmware 03.88.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in James Mehorter Device Theme Switcher.This issue affects Device Theme Switcher: from n/a through 3.0.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Custom Login Page | Temporary Users | Rebrand Login | Login Captcha plugin <= 1.1.3 versions.

TypesetterCMS v5.1 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which is exploited via a crafted POST request.

pramodmahato BlogCMS through 2019-12-31 has admin/changepass.php CSRF.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in the GACL functionality of OpenEMR 5.0.2 and development version 6.0.0 (commit babec93f600ff1394f91ccd512bcad85832eb6ce). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to the execution of arbitrary requests in the context of the victim. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability leading to plugin Settings Update discovered in WP Content Copy Protection & No Right Click WordPress plugin (versions <= 3.4.4).

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2021.2.1, URL injection leading to CSRF was possible.

WebFOCUS Business Intelligence 8.0 (SP6) allows a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack against administrative users within the /ibi_apps/WFServlet(.ibfs) endpoint. The impact may be creation of an administrative user. It can also be exploited in conjunction with CVE-2016-9044.

The Widgets for Google Reviews plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 10.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation within setup_no_reg_header.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset plugin settings and remove reviews via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities were present in Tufin SecureTrack, affecting all versions prior to R20-2 GA.

clearsystem.php in NukeViet 4.4 allows CSRF with resultant HTML injection via the deltype parameter to the admin/index.php?nv=webtools&op=clearsystem URI.

This vulnerability occurs in user accounts creation and deleteion related pages of IPTIME NAS products. The vulnerability could be exploited by a lack of validation when a POST request is made to this page. An attacker can use this vulnerability to or delete user accounts, or to escalate arbitrary user privileges.

An issue was discovered in the SiteOrigin Page Builder plugin before 2.10.16 for WordPress. The live editor feature did not do any nonce verification, allowing for requests to be forged on behalf of an administrator. The live_editor_panels_data $_POST variable allows for malicious JavaScript to be executed in the victim's browser.

The WP 2FA – Two-factor authentication for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the send_backup_codes_email function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to send emails with arbitrary content to registered users via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator or other registered user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. While a nonce check is present, it is only executed if a nonce is set. By omitting a nonce from the request, the check can be bypassed.

An issue was discovered in the SiteOrigin Page Builder plugin before 2.10.16 for WordPress. The action_builder_content function did not do any nonce verification, allowing for requests to be forged on behalf of an administrator. The panels_data $_POST variable allows for malicious JavaScript to be executed in the victim's browser.

Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware 5.2 has CSRF

A cross-site request forgery (csrf) vulnerability exists in the boa CSRF protection functionality of Realtek rtl819x Jungle SDK v3.4.11. A specially crafted network request can lead to CSRF. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.

AOS-CX lacks Anti-CSRF protections in place for state-changing operations. This can potentially be exploited by an attacker to execute commands in the context of another user in ArubaOS-CX Switches version(s): AOS-CX 10.10.xxxx: 10.10.0002 and below, AOS-CX 10.09.xxxx: 10.09.1020 and below, AOS-CX 10.08.xxxx: 10.08.1060 and below, AOS-CX 10.06.xxxx: 10.06.0200 and below. Aruba has released upgrades for ArubaOS-CX Switch Devices that address this security vulnerability.

geminabox (aka Gem in a Box) before 0.13.7 has CSRF, as demonstrated by an unintended gem upload.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Marco Milesi ANAC XML Bandi di Gara.This issue affects ANAC XML Bandi di Gara: from n/a through 7.5.

Ozeki NG SMS Gateway through 4.17.6 has multiple CSRF vulnerabilities. For example, an administrator, by following a link, can be tricked into making unwanted changes such as installing new modules or changing a password.

Silverpeas Core 6.3.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Domain SQL Create function.

An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before 5.4.1204. An API call on the web interface lacked a session token check to control access, leading to CSRF.

An issue was discovered in Verint Impact 360 15.1. At wfo/control/signin, the login form can accept submissions from external websites. In conjunction with CVE-2019-12783, this can be used by attackers to "crowdsource" bruteforce login attempts on the target site, allowing them to guess and potentially compromise valid credentials without ever sending any traffic from their own machine to the target site.

An issue was discovered in MediaWiki before 1.35.5, 1.36.x before 1.36.3, and 1.37.x before 1.37.1. MassEditRegex allows CSRF.

The Similarity WordPress plugin through 3.0 does not have CSRF check in place when resetting its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin reset them via a CSRF attack

Pligg CMS v2.0.2 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/domain_management.php?id=0&list=whitelist&remove=pligg.com

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Djo Original texts Yandex WebMaster plugin <= 1.18 versions.

The WP To Do plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wptodo_addcomment function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add comments to to do items via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in pixelpost 1.7.3 could allow remote attackers to change the admin password.

The E Unlocked - Student Result WordPress plugin through 1.0.4 is lacking CSRF and validation when uploading the School logo, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin upload arbitrary files, such as PHP via a CSRF attack

A vulnerability has been found in mtons mblog up to 3.5.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

** PRODUCT NOT SUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** A Cross Side Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was found in Codiad v1.7.8 and later. The request to download a plugin from the marketplace is only available to admin users and it isn't CSRF protected in components/market/controller.php. This might cause admins to make a vulnerable request without them knowing and result in remote code execution. NOTE: the vendor states "Codiad is no longer under active maintenance by core contributors."

A spoofing vulnerability exists in Microsoft SharePoint when it improperly handles requests to authorize applications, resulting in cross-site request forgery (CSRF).To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to create a page specifically designed to cause a cross-site request, aka 'Microsoft SharePoint Spoofing Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1261.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Serena Villa Auto Excerpt everywhere plugin <= 1.5 versions.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in jerryshensjf JPACookieShop 蛋糕商城JPA版 up to 24a15c02b4f75042c9f7f615a3fed2ec1cefb999. This affects an unknown part of the file AdminTypeCustController.java. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable.

The Easy restaurant menu manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the nsc_eprm_save_menu() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload a menu file via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

D-Link DIR-865L Ax 1.20B01 Beta devices allow CSRF.

A vulnerability has been found in 495300897 wx-shop up to de1b66331368695779cfc6e4d11a64caddf8716e and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available.

Fastweb FASTGate GPON FGA2130FWB devices through 2020-05-26 allow CSRF via the router administration web panel, leading to an attacker's ability to perform administrative actions such as modifying the configuration.

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Drupal Core Form API does not properly handle certain form input from cross-site requests, which can lead to other vulnerabilities.

The WebDorado Contact Form Builder plugin before 1.0.69 for WordPress allows CSRF via the wp-admin/admin-ajax.php action parameter, with resultant local file inclusion via directory traversal, because there can be a discrepancy between the $_POST['action'] value and the $_GET['action'] value, and the latter is unsanitized.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in code-projects Simple Car Rental System 1.0. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.