IBM Aspera Faspex 4.0 through 4.4.2 and 5.0 through 5.0.5 could allow a malicious actor to bypass IP whitelist restrictions using a specially crafted HTTP request. IBM X-Force ID: 254268.

IBM Sterling Connect:Express for UNIX 1.5 browser UI is vulnerable to attacks that rely on the use of cookies without the SameSite attribute. IBM X-Force ID: 252055.

IBM Db2 12.1.0 through 12.1.4 is vulnerable to authorization bypass when uploading to a remote object storage path with a special query.

IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.4 could allow a user to change other user's credentials due to improper access controls. IBM X-Force ID: 249847.

IBM Security Access Manager 9.0.1 through 9.0.6 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate which could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. IBM X-Force ID: 158510.

IBM Jazz for Service Management 1.1.3.0 through 1.1.3.25 does not set the secure attribute on authorization tokens or session cookies. Attackers may be able to get the cookie values by sending a http:// link to a user or by planting this link in a site the user goes to. The cookie will be sent to the insecure link and the attacker can then obtain the cookie value by snooping the traffic.

IBM Cognos Controller 11.0.0 through 11.0.1, and IBM Controller 11.1.0 through 11.1.1 could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information due to the use of hardcoded cryptographic keys for signing session cookies.

IBM Cloud Pak for Data System - Cyclops 11.3.0.2 through Interim Fix 002 IBM Cloud Pak for Data System uses default passwords default passwords from the manufacturing process for use during the installation process, which could allow an attacker to bypass authentication.

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.7 and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5 and 6.2.1.1 could disclose sensitive information due to a missing or insecure SameSite attribute for a sensitive cookie.

IBM Cognos Controller 10.4.1, 10.4.2, and 11.0.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a stack trace is returned in the browser. IBM X-Force ID: 245403.

IBM SmartCloud Analytics 1.3.1 through 1.3.5 does not set the secure attribute on authorization tokens or session cookies. This could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 159185.

IBM QRadar SIEM 7.3 and 7.4 when configured to use Active Directory Authentication may be susceptible to spoofing attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 165877.

IBM Security Secret Server 10.7 does not set the secure attribute on authorization tokens or session cookies. This could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 170044.

IBM Cognos Controller 10.3.0, 10.3.1, 10.4.0, and 10.4.1 does not set the secure attribute on authorization tokens or session cookies. This could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 158876.

Insufficient Logging vulnerability in Hitachi HiRDB Server, HiRDB Server With Addtional Function, HiRDB Structured Data Access Facility.This issue affects HiRDB Server: before 09-60-39, before 09-65-23, before 09-66-17, before 10-01-10, before 10-03-12, before 10-04-06, before 10-05-06, before 10-06-02; HiRDB Server With Addtional Function: before 09-60-2M, before 09-65-/W , before 09-66-/Q ; HiRDB Structured Data Access Facility: before 09-60-39, before 10-03-12, before 10-04-06, before 10-06-02.

IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7 DataStage Flow Designer  transmits sensitive information via URL or query parameters that could be exposed to an unauthorized actor using man in the middle techniques.

A vulnerability was found in ISS BlackICE PC Protection. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the component Update Handler which allows cleartext transmission of data. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer

IBM Sterling Partner Engagement Manager 6.2.3.0 through 6.2.3.5 and 6.2.4.0 through 6.2.4.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information in cleartext in a communication channel that can be sniffed by unauthorized actors.

In the Message Entry and Repair (MER) facility of IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services 3.2.4 the sending address and the message type of FIN messages are assumed to be immutable. However, an attacker might modify these elements of a business transaction. IBM X-Force ID: 273183.

IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7, 11.2.0, and 11.2.1 could be vulnerable to a Log Injection attack by constructing URLs from user-controlled data. This could enable attackers to make arbitrary requests to the internal network or to the local file system. IBM X-Force ID: 240266.

IBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises 11.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate which could disclose sensitive information which could aid further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 240455.

"IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.1, 21.0.2, 21.0.3, 21.0.4, and 21.0.5 is vulnerable to incorrect permission assignment which could allow access to application configurations. IBM X-Force ID: 238679."

IBM CICS TX 11.1 does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes web scripting syntax in HTTP headers that can be used by web browser components that can process raw headers. IBM X-Force ID: 229452.

IBM API Connect 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.5.0, 10.0.1.0 through 10.0.1.7, and 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.20 is vulnerable to External Service Interaction attack, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to induce the application to perform server-side DNS lookups or HTTP requests to arbitrary domain names. By submitting suitable payloads, an attacker can cause the application server to attack other systems that it can interact with. IBM X-Force ID: 230264.

IBM Security Directory Integrator 7.2.0 and IBM Security Verify Directory Integrator 10.0.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to set the HTTPOnly flag. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information from the cookie. IBM X-Force ID: 228587.

IBM Security Directory Suite 8.0.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 228568.

IBM Concert Software 1.0.0 through 1.1.0 is vulnerable to excessive data exposure, allowing attackers to access sensitive information without proper filtering.

IBM Security Guardium Key Lifecycle Manager 4.1, 4.1.1, 4.2.0, and 4.2.1 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques.

IBM Concert 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 vulnerable to attacks that rely on the use of cookies without the SameSite attribute.

IBM Common Cryptographic Architecture 7.0.0 through 7.5.51 could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a timing attack during certain RSA operations.

IBM PowerSC 1.3, 2.0, and 2.1 may allow a remote attacker to view session identifiers passed via URL query strings. IBM X-Force ID: 275110.

IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5 could disclose sensitive email information in responses from offense rules. IBM X-Force ID: 275709.

IBM Security Verify Governance, Identity Manager virtual appliance component 10.0.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 225078.

IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.1 and 21.0.2 is vulnerable to External Service Interaction attack, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to induce the application to perform server-side DNS lookups or HTTP requests to arbitrary domain names. By submitting suitable payloads, an attacker can cause the application server to attack other systems that it can interact with. IBM X-Force ID: 224156.

IBM Sterling Partner Engagement Manager 6.2.0 could allow an attacker to impersonate another user due to missing revocation mechanism for the JWT token. IBM X-Force ID: 219131.

IBM SAN Volume Controller, IBM Storwize, IBM FlashSystem and IBM Storage Virtualize 8.6 products could allow a remote attacker to spoof a trusted system that would not be correctly validated by the Storwize server. This could lead to a user connecting to a malicious host, believing that it was a trusted system and deceived into accepting spoofed data. IBM X-Force ID: 271016.

IBM Aspera Console 3.4.0 through 3.4.4 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to set the HTTPOnly flag. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information from the cookie.

IBM Storage Scale Container Native Storage Access 5.1.2.1 -through 5.1.7.0 could allow an attacker to initiate connections to containers from external networks. IBM X-Force ID: 237812.

IBM Sterling Partner Engagement Manager 6.1.2, 6.2.0, and 6.2.2 could allow a remote user to perform unauthorized actions due to improper authentication. IBM X-Force ID: 266896.

IBM CICS TX Standard 11.1 and Advanced 10.1, 11.1 performs an operation at a privilege level that is higher than the minimum level required, which creates new weaknesses or amplifies the consequences of other weaknesses. IBM X-Force ID: 266163.

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.5 and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.2 could disclose sensitive information in the HTTP response using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 265507.

IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 through 21.0.7.1 runtime is vulnerable to information disclosure of script content if the remote REST request computer policy is enabled. IBM X-Force ID: 263470.

IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence 5.2.6 Virtual Appliance could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques due to not properly invalidating session tokens. IBM X-Force ID: 175420.

IBM Security Access Manager Container 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.6.1 does not require that docker images should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 261196.

IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 through 21.0.7.8 could disclose sensitive information from access to RPA scripts, workflows and related data. IBM X-Force ID: 261606.

IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.5 could allow a remote attacked to bypass IP restrictions due to improper access controls. IBM X-Force ID: 259649.

IBM TXSeries for Multiplatforms 8.1, 8.2, 9.1, CICS TX Standard, 11.1, CICS TX Advanced 10.1, and 11.1 does not set the secure attribute on authorization tokens or session cookies. Attackers may be able to get the cookie values by sending a http:// link to a user or by planting this link in a site the user goes to. The cookie will be sent to the insecure link and the attacker can then obtain the cookie value by snooping the traffic. IBM X-Force ID: 257102.

Under certain conditions, RSA operations performed by IBM Common Cryptographic Architecture (CCA) 7.0.0 through 7.5.36 may exhibit non-constant-time behavior. This could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information using a timing-based attack. IBM X-Force ID: 257676.

IBM TXSeries for Multiplatforms 8.1, 8.2, 9.1, CICS TX Standard, 11.1, CICS TX Advanced 10.1, and 11.1 could transmit sensitive information in query parameters that could be intercepted using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 257105.

IBM QRadar 7.3, 7.4, and 7.5 could allow a malicious actor to impersonate an actor due to key exchange without entity authentication. IBM X-Force ID: 208756.