Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 'MicroPayments - Paid Author Subscriptions, Content, Downloads, Membership' versions prior to 1.9.6 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of an administrator and perform unintended operation via unspecified vectors.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Chalet application in Extreme Networks Switch Engine (EXOS) before 32.5.1.5, fixed in 31.7.2 and 32.5.1.5 allows attackers to run arbitrary code and cause other unspecified impacts via /jsonrpc API.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Job and Node ownership Plugin 0.13.0 and earlier allows attackers to change the owners and item-specific permissions of a job.

CSRF vulnerability in Smoothwall Express 3.

Selenium Selenium Grid (formerly Selenium Standalone Server) Fixed in 4.0.0-alpha-7 is affected by: DNS rebinding. The impact is: execute arbitrary code (remote). The component is: WebDriver endpoint of Selenium Grid / Selenium Standalone Server. The attack vector is: Triggered by browsing to to a malicious remote web server. The WebDriver endpoint of Selenium Server (Grid) is vulnerable to DNS rebinding. This can be used to execute arbitrary code on the machine.

The sitetweet WordPress plugin through 0.2 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack

The Nested Pages plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'settingsPage' function and missing santization of the 'tab' parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to call local php files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Geovision GV-ASWeb application with the version 6.1.1.0 or less that allows attackers to arbitrarily create Administrator accounts via a crafted GET request method. This vulnerability is used in chain with CVE-2024-56903 for a successful CSRF attack.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Pluck CMS v4.7.15 allows attackers to change the password of any given user by exploiting this feature leading to account takeover.

TYPO3 is a free and open source Content Management Framework. A vulnerability has been identified in the backend user interface functionality involving deep links. Specifically, this functionality is susceptible to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). Additionally, state-changing actions in downstream components incorrectly accepted submissions via HTTP GET and did not enforce the appropriate HTTP method. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires the victim to have an active session on the backend user interface and to be deceived into interacting with a malicious URL targeting the backend, which can occur under the following conditions: The user opens a malicious link, such as one sent via email. The user visits a compromised or manipulated website while the following settings are misconfigured: 1. `security.backend.enforceReferrer` feature is disabled, 2. `BE/cookieSameSite` configuration is set to lax or none. The vulnerability in the affected downstream component “Extension Manager Module” allows attackers to retrieve and install 3rd party extensions from the TYPO3 Extension Repository - which can lead to remote code execution in the worst case. Users are advised to update to TYPO3 versions 11.5.42 ELTS, 12.4.25 LTS, 13.4.3 LTS which fix the problem described.

REDCap through 14.9.6 has a security flaw in the Notes section of calendar events, exposing users to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. An attacker can exploit this by luring users into accessing a calendar event's notes, which triggers a logout request and terminates their session. This vulnerability stems from the absence of CSRF protections on the logout functionality, allowing malicious actions to be executed without user consent.

Stupid Simple CMS <=1.2.4 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin-edit.php.

IBM TXSeries for Multiplatforms 9.1 and 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in AdRotate Banner Manager Plugin <= 5.9 on WordPress.

The WP STAGING Pro WordPress Backup Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.6.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'sub' parameter called from the WP STAGING WordPress Backup Plugin - Backup Duplicator & Migration plugin. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to include any local files that end in '-settings.php' via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Amiro.CMS before 7.8.4 allows remote attackers to create an administrator account.

forma.lms 2.3.0.2 is affected by Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in formalms/appCore/index.php?r=lms/profile/show&ap=saveinfo via a GET request to change the admin email address in order to accomplish an account takeover.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in krishankakkar gap-hub-user-role gap-hub-user-role allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects gap-hub-user-role: from n/a through <= 3.4.1.

REDCap through 14.9.6 has a security flaw in the Project Dashboards name, exposing users to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. An attacker can exploit this by luring users into clicking on a Project Dashboards name that contains the malicious payload, which triggers a logout request and terminates their session. This vulnerability stems from the absence of CSRF protections on the logout functionality, allowing malicious actions to be executed without user consent.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in yonisink Sinking Dropdowns sinking-dropdowns allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Sinking Dropdowns: from n/a through <= 1.25.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in gholme4 Wayne Audio Player wayne-audio-player allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Wayne Audio Player: from n/a through <= 1.0.

Teedy <= 1.12 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF), due to the lack of CSRF protection.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in brandtoss WP Mailster wp-mailster allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Mailster: from n/a through <= 1.8.17.0.

The KuWFi 4G LTE AC900 router 1.0.13 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) on its web management interface. This vulnerability allows an attacker to trick an authenticated admin user into performing unauthorized actions, such as exploiting a command injection vulnerability in /goform/formMultiApnSetting. Successful exploitation can also lead to unauthorized configuration changes.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in Fortinet FortiVoiceEnterprise version 6.4.x, 6.0.x, FortiSwitch version 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, 6.4.0 through 6.4.10, 6.2.0 through 6.2.7, 6.0.x, FortiMail version 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, 6.4.0 through 6.4.6, 6.2.x, 6.0.x FortiRecorder version 6.4.0 through 6.4.2, 6.0.x, 2.7.x, 2.6.x, FortiNDR version 1.x.x allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute commands on the CLI via tricking an authenticated administrator to execute malicious GET requests.

A CSRF issue in /api/crontab on iRZ Mobile Routers through 2022-03-16 allows a threat actor to create a crontab entry in the router administration panel. The cronjob will consequently execute the entry on the threat actor's defined interval, leading to remote code execution, allowing the threat actor to gain filesystem access. In addition, if the router's default credentials aren't rotated or a threat actor discovers valid credentials, remote code execution can be achieved without user interaction.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Extended Choice Parameter Plugin 346.vd87693c5a_86c and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL.

In FileCloud before 21.3, the CSV user import functionality is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).

The Photo Gallery, Images, Slider in Rbs Image Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.19. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'rbs_ajax_create_article' and 'rbs_ajax_reset_views' functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new posts and reset gallery view counts via a forged request granted they can trick a Contributor+ level user into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

WeGIA v3.2.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).

TypesetterCMS v5.1 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which is exploited via a crafted POST request.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in hakeemnala Build App Online build-app-online allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Build App Online: from n/a through <= 1.0.23.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Web UI of Secomea GateManager allows phishing attacker to issue get request in logged in user session.

A cross-site request forgery (csrf) vulnerability exists in the WEBVIEW-M functionality of Socomec DIRIS Digiware M-70 1.6.9. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to unauthorized access. An attacker can stage a malicious webpage to trigger this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability affecting Delete Marker Category, Delete Map, and Copy Map functions in WP Google Map plugin (versions <= 4.2.3).

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Astoundify Jobify jobify allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Jobify: from n/a through < 4.3.0.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins SWAMP Plugin 1.2.6 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified web server using attacker-specified credentials.

The Stockists Manager for Woocommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the stockist_settings_main() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Checkmarx Plugin 2022.1.2 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified webserver using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Chef Sinatra Plugin 1.20 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins send an HTTP request to an attacker-controlled URL and have it parse an XML response.

Pandora FMS v7.0NG.759 allows Cross-Site Request Forgery in Bulk operation (User operation) resulting in elevation of privilege to Administrator group.

The uContext for Clickbank plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to, and including 3.9.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ~/app/sites/ajax/actions/keyword_save.php file that is called via the doAjax() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V, coated), SCALANCE X304-2FE, SCALANCE X306-1LD FE, SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V, coated), SCALANCE X307-3, SCALANCE X307-3, SCALANCE X307-3LD, SCALANCE X307-3LD, SCALANCE X308-2, SCALANCE X308-2, SCALANCE X308-2LD, SCALANCE X308-2LD, SCALANCE X308-2LH, SCALANCE X308-2LH, SCALANCE X308-2LH+, SCALANCE X308-2LH+, SCALANCE X308-2M, SCALANCE X308-2M, SCALANCE X308-2M PoE, SCALANCE X308-2M PoE, SCALANCE X308-2M TS, SCALANCE X308-2M TS, SCALANCE X310, SCALANCE X310, SCALANCE X310FE, SCALANCE X310FE, SCALANCE X320-1 FE, SCALANCE X320-1-2LD FE, SCALANCE X408-2, SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V), SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE TS (24V, ports on front), SIPLUS NET SCALANCE X308-2. The integrated web server of the affected device could allow remote attackers to perform actions with the permissions of a victim user, provided the victim user has an active session and is induced to trigger the malicious request.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins autonomiq Plugin 1.15 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL server using attacker-specified credentials.

Combodo iTop is a simple, web based IT Service Management tool. Several url endpoints are subject to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. Please refer to the linked GHSA for the complete list. This issue has been addressed in version 3.2.0 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

qdPM 9.2 allows Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the index.php/myAccount/update URI.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the 'pvmsg.php?action=add_message', pvmsg.php?action=confirm_delete , and ajax.server.php?page=user&action=flip_follow endpoints in Ampache <= 6.6.0.

JForum v2.8.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via http://target_host:port/jforum-2.8.0/jforum.page, which allows attackers to arbitrarily add admin accounts.

icms 7.0.16 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF).

The uContext for Amazon plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to, and including 3.9.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ~/app/sites/ajax/actions/keyword_save.php file that is called via the doAjax() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.