The Salon booking system WordPress plugin through 9.6.5 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

CSRF in admin/add-news.php in Chadha PHPKB Standard Multi-Language 9 allows attackers to add a new news article via a crafted request.

The Upcoming for Calendly plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.4. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's Calendly API key via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Truefy Embed plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'truefy_embed_options_update' settings update action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings, including the API key, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ARI Soft Contact Form 7 Connector.This issue affects Contact Form 7 Connector: from n/a through 1.2.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Yannick Lefebvre Link Library.This issue affects Link Library: from n/a through 7.5.13.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins GitLab Branch Source Plugin 684.vea_fa_7c1e2fe3 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL.

The Coding Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings including the theme configuration via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The WP Youtube Video Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce verification on the wpYTVideoGallerySettingSave() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in John Tendik JTRT Responsive Tables.This issue affects JTRT Responsive Tables: from n/a through 4.1.9.

The Popover Windows plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WpSimpleTools Basic Log Viewer.This issue affects Basic Log Viewer: from n/a through 1.0.4.

The WPBlogSyn plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's remote sync settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Premium Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.11.53. This is due to missing nonce validation in the 'insert_inner_template' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create arbitrary Elementor templates via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator or other user with the edit_posts capability into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ryan Duff, Peter Westwood WP Contact Form.This issue affects WP Contact Form: from n/a through 1.6.

The Advanced Product Fields (Product Addons) for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.17. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'maybe_duplicate' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to duplicate and publish product field groups, including draft and pending field groups, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Matt Martz & Andy Stratton Page Restrict.This issue affects Page Restrict: from n/a through 2.5.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Janis Elsts Admin Menu Editor.This issue affects Admin Menu Editor: from n/a through 1.12.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Native Grid LLC A no-code page builder for beautiful performance-based content.This issue affects A no-code page builder for beautiful performance-based content: from n/a through 2.1.20.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SoniNow Team Debug.This issue affects Debug: from n/a through 1.10.

A vulnerability in the web interface of Cisco Webex Meetings could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web interface on an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions. These actions could include joining meetings and scheduling training sessions.

The Pretty Links – Affiliate Links, Link Branding, Link Tracking & Marketing Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.6.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving plugin settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin's configuration including stripe integration via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Himer WordPress theme before 2.1.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make users vote on any polls, including those they don't have access to via a CSRF attack

A vulnerability was found in Bdtask G-Prescription Gynaecology & OBS Consultation Software 1.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /Setting/change_password_save of the component Password Reset Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-256046 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in M&S Consulting Email Before Download.This issue affects Email Before Download: from n/a through 6.9.7.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Stiofan UsersWP userswp allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects UsersWP: from n/a through <= 1.2.53.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wpzita Zita Elementor Site Library zita-site-library allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Zita Elementor Site Library: from n/a through <= 1.6.6.

The RapidLoad Power-Up for Autoptimize plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.7.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the clear_uucss_logs function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to clear plugin logs via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Brainstorm Force Sigmize sigmize allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Sigmize: from n/a through <= 0.0.9.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in themelooks Enter Addons enteraddons allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Enter Addons: from n/a through <= 2.3.2.

The Download Plugins and Themes in ZIP from Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the download_plugin_bulk and download_theme_bulk functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to archive all the sites plugins and themes and place them in the `wp-content/uploads/` directory via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in themastercut Revision Manager TMC revision-manager-tmc allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Revision Manager TMC: from n/a through <= 2.8.22.

CSRF in admin/manage-comments.php in Chadha PHPKB Standard Multi-Language 9 allows attackers to delete a comment via a crafted request.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Martyn Chamberlin Don't Muck My Markup.This issue affects Don't Muck My Markup: from n/a through 1.8.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Dreamer CMS 4.1.3. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/menu/toEdit. The manipulation of the argument id leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-256314 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

The Float menu WordPress plugin before 4.3.1 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting menu, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete them via a CSRF attack

The HelpDesk contact form plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the handle_query_args() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's license ID and contact form ID settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Himer WordPress theme before 2.1.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks. These include declining and accepting group invitations or leaving a group

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Paolo GeoDirectory allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects GeoDirectory: from n/a before 2.8.150.

The WP Fastest Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wpfc_remove_cdn_integration_ajax_request_callback function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change cdn settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Asgaros Forum plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the set_subscription_level() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the subscription settings of authenticated users via a forged request granted they can trick a logged-in user into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Shenzhen Tenda W30E V2 firmware versions up to and including V16.01.0.19(5037) lack cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protections on administrative endpoints, including those used to change administrator account credentials. As a result, an attacker can craft malicious requests that, when triggered by an authenticated user’s browser, modify administrative passwords and other configuration settings.

A vulnerability has been found in Bdtask/CodeCanyon Wholesale Inventory Control and Inventory Management System up to 20250320. This issue affects some unknown processing. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

The Dam Spam plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.8. This is due to missing nonce verification on the pending comment deletion action in the cleanup page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete all pending comments via a forged request granted they can trick an admin into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The teachPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 9.0.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the import.php page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete imports via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Mollie Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.13. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the duplicateForm() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to duplicate forms via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AA-Team SearchAzon searchazon allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects SearchAzon: from n/a through <= 1.4.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in richardevcom Add Polylang support for Customizer add-polylang-support-for-customizer allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Add Polylang support for Customizer: from n/a through <= 1.4.5.

The WP Landing Page plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.9.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'wplp_api_update_text' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary post meta via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Clearfy Cache – WordPress optimization plugin, Minify HTML, CSS & JS, Defer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the "wbcr_upm_change_flag" function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disable plugin/theme update notifications via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.