Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Restrict route by IP allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Restrict route by IP: from 0.0.0 before 1.3.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Search API Solr allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Search API Solr: from 0.0.0 before 4.3.9.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal AI (Artificial Intelligence) allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects AI (Artificial Intelligence): from 1.0.0 before 1.0.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal ECA: Event - Condition - Action allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects ECA: Event - Condition - Action: from 0.0.0 before 1.1.12, from 2.0.0 before 2.0.16, from 2.1.0 before 2.1.7, from 0.0.0 before 1.2.*.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Cache Utility allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Cache Utility: from 0.0.0 before 1.2.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Google Tag allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Google Tag: from 0.0.0 before 1.8.0, from 2.0.0 before 2.0.8.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Configuration Split allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Configuration Split: from 0.0.0 before 1.10.0, from 2.0.0 before 2.0.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal OAuth2 Client allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects OAuth2 Client: from 0.0.0 before 4.1.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Login Time Restriction allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Login Time Restriction: from 0.0.0 before 1.0.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Acquia Content Hub allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Acquia Content Hub: from 0.0.0 before 3.6.4, from 3.7.0 before 3.7.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Currency allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Currency: from 0.0.0 before 3.5.0.

Some administrative paths in Drupal 8.2.x before 8.2.7 did not include protection for CSRF. This would allow an attacker to disable some blocks on a site. This issue is mitigated by the fact that users would have to know the block ID.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Open Social allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Open Social: from 0.0.0 before 12.3.14, from 12.4.0 before 12.4.13.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Enterprise MFA - TFA for Drupal allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Enterprise MFA - TFA for Drupal: from 0.0.0 before 4.7.0, from 5.0.0 before 5.2.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Automated Logout allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Automated Logout: from 0.0.0 before 1.7.0, from 2.0.0 before 2.0.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Matomo Analytics allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Matomo Analytics: from 0.0.0 before 1.24.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal POST File allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects POST File: from 0.0.0 before 1.0.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Minify JS allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Minify JS: from 0.0.0 before 3.0.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Migrate Tools allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Migrate Tools: from 0.0.0 before 6.0.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Acquia DAM allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Acquia DAM: from 0.0.0 before 1.0.13, from 1.1.0 before 1.1.0-beta3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Drupal Symfony Mailer Lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Drupal Symfony Mailer Lite: from 0.0.0 before 1.0.6.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Gutenberg allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Gutenberg: from 0.0.0 before 2.13.0, from 3.0.0 before 3.0.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Migrate queue importer allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Migrate queue importer: from 0.0.0 before 2.1.1.

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Drupal Core Form API does not properly handle certain form input from cross-site requests, which can lead to other vulnerabilities.

The QuickEdit module does not properly validate access to routes, which could allow cross-site request forgery under some circumstances and lead to possible data integrity issues. Sites are only affected if the QuickEdit module (which comes with the Standard profile) is installed. Removing the "access in-place editing" permission from untrusted users will not fully mitigate the vulnerability.

The Entity Embed module provides a filter to allow embedding entities in content fields. In certain circumstances, the filter could allow an unprivileged user to inject HTML into a page when it is accessed by a trusted user with permission to embed entities. In some cases, this could lead to cross-site scripting.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Theme Negotiation by Rules allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Theme Negotiation by Rules: from 0.0.0 before 1.2.1.

OPNsense is a FreeBSD based firewall and routing platform. Prior to 26.1.4, multiple OPNsense MVC API endpoints perform state‑changing operations but are accessible via HTTP GET requests without CSRF protection. The framework CSRF validation in ApiControllerBase only applies to POST/PUT/DELETE methods, allowing authenticated GET requests to bypass CSRF verification. As a result, a malicious website can trigger privileged backend actions when visited by an authenticated user, causing unintended service reloads and configuration changes through configd. This results in an authenticated Cross‑Site Request Forgery vulnerability allowing unauthorized system state changes. This vulnerability is fixed in 26.1.4.

The Nested Pages WordPress plugin <= 3.1.15 was vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery via the `npBulkAction`s and `npBulkEdit` `admin_post` actions, which allowed attackers to trash or permanently purge arbitrary posts as well as changing their status, reassigning their ownership, and editing other metadata.

Geovision GV-ASWeb with the version 6.1.1.0 or less allows attackers to modify POST request method with the GET against critical functionalities, such as account management. This vulnerability is used in chain with CVE-2024-56901 for a successful CSRF attack.

The WP Contact Form 7 DB Handler plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery leading to Arbitrary File Deletion via SQL Injection and PHP Object Injection in versions up to and including 3.0. This is due to a missing nonce verification in the process_bulk_action() function, the nonce check is only executed when _wpnonce is present in the POST body, allowing it to be trivially bypassed by omitting the field, combined with the use of an unsanitized, unparameterized user-supplied value in a numeric SQL context (WHERE ID = $ID) and the unsafe deserialization of the query result's post_content field. An attacker can craft a CSRF page that tricks a logged-in administrator into triggering a UNION-based SQL injection payload (using CHAR() to avoid esc_sql quote-escaping) that returns a malicious serialized PHP array as post_content; upon deserialization, array values associated with keys containing 'ys_cfdbh_file' are used as file paths appended to the uploads directory path without any path traversal validation, and then passed to wp_delete_file(), allowing the attacker to delete arbitrary files on the server (e.g., wp-config.php, system files).

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wowza Streaming Engine through 4.8.11+5 allows a remote attacker to delete a user account via the /enginemanager/server/user/delete.htm userName parameter. The application does not implement a CSRF token for the GET request. This issue was resolved in Wowza Streaming Engine release 4.8.14.

The CM Email Registration Blacklist and Whitelist WordPress plugin before 1.4.9 does not have CSRF check when adding or deleting an item from the blacklist or whitelist, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin add or delete settings from the blacklist or whitelist menu via a CSRF attack

Ampache is a web based audio/video streaming application and file manager. The current implementation of token parsing fails to properly validate CSRF tokens when activating or deactivating catalog. This vulnerability allows an attacker to exploit CSRF attacks, potentially enabling them to change website features that should only be managed by administrators through malicious requests. This issue has been addressed in version 7.0.1 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Ampache is a web based audio/video streaming application and file manager. The current implementation of token parsing fails to properly validate CSRF tokens when activating or deactivating plugins. This vulnerability allows an attacker to exploit CSRF attacks, potentially enabling them to change website features that should only be managed by administrators through malicious requests. This issue has been addressed in version 7.0.1 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Ampache is a web based audio/video streaming application and file manager. The current implementation of token parsing fails to properly validate CSRF tokens when activating or deactivating controllers. This vulnerability allows an attacker to exploit CSRF attacks, potentially enabling them to change website features that should only be managed by administrators through malicious requests. This issue has been addressed in version 7.0.1 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in web GUI of Secomea GateManager allows an attacker to execute malicious code. This issue affects: Secomea GateManager All versions prior to 9.4.

The Quiz And Survey Master plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 8.0.8. This is due to missing nonce validation on the function associated with the qsm_remove_file_fd_question AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary media files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

TenderDocTransfer developed by Chunghwa Telecom has a Arbitrary File Delete vulnerability. The application sets up a simple local web server and provides APIs for communication with the target website. Due to the lack of CSRF protection in the APIs, unauthenticated remote attackers could use these APIs through phishing. Additionally, one of the APIs contains an Absolute Path Traversal vulnerability, allowing attackers to delete arbitrary files on the user's system.

The Quick Restaurant Menu plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on its AJAX actions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update menu items, via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Chamilo is a learning management system. Prior to version 1.11.34, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability allows an attacker to delete projects inside a course without the victim’s consent. The issue arises because sensitive actions such as project deletion do not implement anti-CSRF protections (tokens) and GET based requests. As a result, an authenticated user (Trainer) can be tricked into executing this unwanted action by simply visiting a malicious page. This issue has been patched in version 1.11.34.

Sewio’s Real-Time Location System (RTLS) Studio version 2.0.0 up to and including version 2.6.2 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery in its monitor services. An attacker could take advantage of this vulnerability to execute arbitrary maintenance operations and cause a denial-of-service condition.

The PgHero gem through 2.6.0 for Ruby allows CSRF.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the clear_personality_files_list function of the parisneo/lollms-webui v9.6. The vulnerability arises from the use of a GET request to clear personality files list, which lacks proper CSRF protection. This flaw allows attackers to trick users into performing actions without their consent, such as deleting important files on the system. The issue is present in the application's handling of requests, making it susceptible to CSRF attacks that could lead to unauthorized actions being performed on behalf of the user.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in MiniCMS v1.11 allows attackers to arbitrarily delete local .dat files via clicking on a malicious link.

A CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists that could induce users to perform unintended actions, leading to the override of the system�s configurations when an attacker persuades a user to visit a rogue website. Affected Product: spaceLYnk (V2.6.2 and prior), Wiser for KNX (formerly homeLYnk) (V2.6.2 and prior), fellerLYnk (V2.6.2 and prior)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Access Demo Importer <= 1.0.7 on WordPress allows an attacker to reset all data (posts / pages / media).

MuraCMS through 10.1.10 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows attackers to permanently destroy all deleted content stored in the trash system through a simple CSRF attack. The vulnerable cTrash.empty function lacks CSRF token validation, enabling malicious websites to forge requests that irreversibly delete all trashed content when an authenticated administrator visits a crated webpage. Successful exploitation of the CSRF vulnerability results in potentially catastrophic data loss within the MuraCMS system. When an authenticated administrator visits a malicious page containing the CSRF exploit, their browser automatically submits a hidden form that permanently empties the entire trash system without any validation, confirmation dialog, or user consent.

The miniOrange's Google Authenticator WordPress plugin before 5.5 does not have proper authorisation and CSRF checks when handling the reconfigureMethod, and does not validate the parameters passed to it properly. As a result, unauthenticated users could delete arbitrary options from the blog, making it unusable.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in issabel-pbx v.4.0.0-6 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the delete user grouplist function.