Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Open Social allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Open Social: from 0.0.0 before 12.3.14, from 12.4.0 before 12.4.13.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Enterprise MFA - TFA for Drupal allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Enterprise MFA - TFA for Drupal: from 0.0.0 before 4.7.0, from 5.0.0 before 5.2.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Restrict route by IP allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Restrict route by IP: from 0.0.0 before 1.3.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Cache Utility allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Cache Utility: from 0.0.0 before 1.2.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Drupal Symfony Mailer Lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Drupal Symfony Mailer Lite: from 0.0.0 before 1.0.6.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Migrate Tools allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Migrate Tools: from 0.0.0 before 6.0.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Gutenberg allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Gutenberg: from 0.0.0 before 2.13.0, from 3.0.0 before 3.0.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal AI (Artificial Intelligence) allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects AI (Artificial Intelligence): from 1.0.0 before 1.0.2.

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Drupal Core Form API does not properly handle certain form input from cross-site requests, which can lead to other vulnerabilities.

Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Commerce Alphabank Redirect allows Functionality Misuse.This issue affects Commerce Alphabank Redirect: from 0.0.0 before 1.0.3.

Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Commerce Eurobank (Redirect) allows Functionality Misuse.This issue affects Commerce Eurobank (Redirect): from 0.0.0 before 2.1.1.

Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Block permissions allows Forceful Browsing.This issue affects Block permissions: from 1.0.0 before 1.2.0.

Arbitrary PHP code execution vulnerability in Drupal Core under certain circumstances. An attacker could trick an administrator into visiting a malicious site that could result in creating a carefully named directory on the file system. With this directory in place, an attacker could attempt to brute force a remote code execution vulnerability. Windows servers are most likely to be affected. This issue affects: Drupal Drupal Core 8.8.x versions prior to 8.8.8; 8.9.x versions prior to 8.9.1; 9.0.1 versions prior to 9.0.1.

The QuickEdit module does not properly validate access to routes, which could allow cross-site request forgery under some circumstances and lead to possible data integrity issues. Sites are only affected if the QuickEdit module (which comes with the Standard profile) is installed. Removing the "access in-place editing" permission from untrusted users will not fully mitigate the vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Search API Solr allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Search API Solr: from 0.0.0 before 4.3.9.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Matomo Analytics allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Matomo Analytics: from 0.0.0 before 1.24.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Google Tag allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Google Tag: from 0.0.0 before 1.8.0, from 2.0.0 before 2.0.8.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal OAuth2 Client allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects OAuth2 Client: from 0.0.0 before 4.1.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal ECA: Event - Condition - Action allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects ECA: Event - Condition - Action: from 0.0.0 before 1.1.12, from 2.0.0 before 2.0.16, from 2.1.0 before 2.1.7, from 0.0.0 before 1.2.*.

Some administrative paths in Drupal 8.2.x before 8.2.7 did not include protection for CSRF. This would allow an attacker to disable some blocks on a site. This issue is mitigated by the fact that users would have to know the block ID.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal POST File allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects POST File: from 0.0.0 before 1.0.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Acquia DAM allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Acquia DAM: from 0.0.0 before 1.0.13, from 1.1.0 before 1.1.0-beta3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Minify JS allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Minify JS: from 0.0.0 before 3.0.3.

The Entity Embed module provides a filter to allow embedding entities in content fields. In certain circumstances, the filter could allow an unprivileged user to inject HTML into a page when it is accessed by a trusted user with permission to embed entities. In some cases, this could lead to cross-site scripting.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Configuration Split allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Configuration Split: from 0.0.0 before 1.10.0, from 2.0.0 before 2.0.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal General Data Protection Regulation allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects General Data Protection Regulation: from 0.0.0 before 3.0.1, from 3.1.0 before 3.1.2.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in pixelpost 1.7.3 could allow remote attackers to change the admin password.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in OpenACS bug-tracker. Affected is an unknown function of the file lib/nav-bar.adp of the component Search. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The name of the patch is aee43e5714cd8b697355ec3bf83eefee176d3fc3. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-217440.

The XWiki Admin Tools Application provides tools to help the administration of XWiki. Starting in version 4.4 and prior to version 4.5.1, a cross site request forgery vulnerability in the admin tool for executing shell commands on the server allows an attacker to execute arbitrary shell commands by tricking an admin into loading the URL with the shell command. A very simple possibility for an attack are comments. When the attacker can leave a comment on any page in the wiki it is sufficient to include an image with an URL like `/xwiki/bin/view/Admin/RunShellCommand?command=touch%20/tmp/attacked` in the comment. When an admin views the comment, the file `/tmp/attacked` will be created on the server. The output of the command is also vulnerable to XWiki syntax injection which offers a simple way to execute Groovy in the context of the XWiki installation and thus an even easier way to compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the whole XWiki installation. This has been patched by adding a form token check in version 4.5.1 of the admin tools. Some workarounds are available. The patch can be applied manually to the affected wiki pages. Alternatively, the document `Admin.RunShellCommand` can also be deleted if the possibility to run shell commands isn't needed.

The logout option within MFA did not include the necessary token to avoid the risk of users inadvertently being logged out via CSRF.

The Side Menu Lite WordPress plugin before 4.2.1 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting buttons via CSRF attacks

idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin/banner_deal.php?mudi=del&dataType=&dataTypeCN=%E5%9B%BE%E7%89%87%E5%B9%BF%E5%91%8A&theme=cs&dataID=6.

CSRF vulnerability in Smoothwall Express 3.

The WP Prayer WordPress plugin through 2.0.9 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its email settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin/homePro_deal.php?mudi=del&dataType=&dataTypeCN.

Remote Cross-site Request forgery (CSRF) potential has been identified in UCMBD Server version DDM Content Pack V 10.20, 10.21, 10.22, 10.22 CUP7, 10.30, 10.31, 10.32, 10.33, 10.33 CUP2, 11.0 and CMS Server version 2018.05 BACKGROUND which could allow for remote unsafe deserialization and cross-site request forgery (CSRF).

CSRF tokens are generated using math/rand, which is not a cryptographically secure random number generator, allowing an attacker to predict values and bypass CSRF protections with relatively few requests.

An issue was discovered in Western Bridge Cobub Razor 0.7.2. Authentication is not required for /index.php?/manage/channel/modifychannel. For example, with a crafted channel name, stored XSS is triggered during a later /index.php?/manage/channel request by an admin.

In Ultimaker S3 3D printer, Ultimaker S5 3D printer, Ultimaker 3 3D printer S-line through 6.3 and Ultimaker 3 through 5.2.16, the local webserver hosts APIs vulnerable to CSRF. They do not verify incoming requests.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Western Bridge Cobub Razor 0.7.2 via /index.php?/user/createNewUser/, resulting in account creation.

Apache OFBiz 17.12.01 is vulnerable to some CSRF attacks.

Due to insufficient CSRF protection, SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (Monitoring Application), before versions 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3, may lead to an authenticated user to send unintended request to the web server, leading to Cross Site Request Forgery.

In FileCloud before 21.3, the CSV user import functionality is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).

An attacker could send a malicious link to an authenticated operator, which may allow remote attackers to perform actions with the permissions of the user on the Sunny WebBox Firmware Version 1.6 and prior. This device uses IP addresses to maintain communication after a successful login, which would increase the ease of exploitation.

The Ads Pro Plugin - Multi-Purpose WordPress Advertising Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.89. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the bsaCreateAdTemplate function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject and execute arbitrary PHP code via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Nifty Newsletters WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery via the sola_nl_wp_head function found in the ~/sola-newsletters.php file which allows attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts, in versions up to and including 4.0.23.

A potential Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been identified in ArcSight Management Center (ArcMC) in all versions prior to 2.81. This vulnerability could be exploited to allow for Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in code-projects Traffic Offense Reporting System 1.0. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Remote Cross-site Request forgery (CSRF) potential has been identified in UCMBD Browser version 4.10, 4.11, 4.12, 4.13, 4.14, 4.15, 4.15.1 which could allow for remote unsafe deserialization and cross-site request forgery (CSRF).

The kento-post-view-counter plugin through 2.8 for WordPress has wp-admin/admin.php?page=kentopvc_settings CSRF.