A CSRF Vulnerability exists in Kemp Load Master before 7.0-18a via unspecified vectors in administrative pages.
Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the 'pvmsg.php?action=add_message', pvmsg.php?action=confirm_delete , and ajax.server.php?page=user&action=flip_follow endpoints in Ampache <= 6.6.0.
boot2docker 1.2 and earlier allows attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks by leveraging Docker daemons enabling TCP connections without TLS authentication.
The wp-eMember WordPress plugin before 10.6.6 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins SSH Plugin 2.6.1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified SSH server using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Drupal Symfony Mailer Lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Drupal Symfony Mailer Lite: from 0.0.0 before 1.0.6.
The Ultimate Classified Listings plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the update_profile function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify victim's email via a forged request, which might lead to account takeover, granted they can trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in DarkMySite DarkMySite – Advanced Dark Mode Plugin for WordPress darkmysite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects DarkMySite – Advanced Dark Mode Plugin for WordPress: from n/a through 1.2.8.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Easy Digital Downloads.This issue affects Easy Digital Downloads: from n/a through 3.2.6.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Zoho Campaigns.This issue affects Zoho Campaigns: from n/a through 2.0.7.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CreativeThemes Blocksy Companion.This issue affects Blocksy Companion: from n/a through 2.0.28.
Multiple endpoints in GestioIP v3.5.7 are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). An attacker can execute actions via the admin's browser by hosting a malicious URL, leading to data modification, deletion, or exfiltration.
Combodo iTop is a simple, web based IT Service Management tool. A CSRF can be performed on CSV import simulation. This issue has been fixed in versions 3.1.2 and 3.2.0. All users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Themeisle Multiple Page Generator Plugin – MPG.This issue affects Multiple Page Generator Plugin – MPG: from n/a through 3.4.0.
A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Online Employee Leave Management System 1.0. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /admin/addemployee.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The identifier VDB-207853 was assigned to this vulnerability.
XWiki Platform is a generic wiki platform. Starting in version 13.9-rc-1 and prior to versions 4.10.19, 15.5.4, and 15.10-rc-1, when the realtime editor is installed in XWiki, it allows arbitrary remote code execution with the interaction of an admin user with programming right. More precisely, by getting an admin user to either visit a crafted URL or to view an image with this URL that could be in a comment, the attacker can get the admin to execute arbitrary XWiki syntax including scripting macros with Groovy or Python code. This compromises the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the whole XWiki installation. This vulnerability has been patched in XWiki 14.10.19, 15.5.4 and 15.9. As a workaround, one may update `RTFrontend.ConvertHTML` manually with the patch. This will, however, break some synchronization processes in the realtime editor, so upgrading should be the preferred way on installations where this editor is used.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Autocomplete Parameter Plugin 1.1 and earlier allows attackers to execute arbitrary code without sandbox protection if the victim is an administrator.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Storable Configs Plugin 1.0 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins parse a local XML file (e.g., archived artifacts) that uses external entities for extraction of secrets from the Jenkins controller or server-side request forgery.
All-Dynamics Digital Signage System 2.0.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative users without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that automatically submits forms to create a new user with global administrative privileges when a logged-in user visits the page.
A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0). The web interface of the affected devices are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. By tricking an authenticated victim user to click a malicious link, an attacker could perform arbitrary actions on the device on behalf of the victim user.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Zaytech Smart Online Order for Clover.This issue affects Smart Online Order for Clover: from n/a through 1.5.5.
Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Image Slider by NextCode plugin <= 1.1.2 at WordPress.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Blossom Themes Sarada Lite.This issue affects Sarada Lite: from n/a through 1.1.2.
"IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a "user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 227295.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aftab Muni's Disable Right Click For WP plugin <= 1.1.6 at WordPress.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in WWBN AVideo 11.6 and dev master commit 3f7c0364. A specially-crafted HTTP request can lead to increased privileges. An attacker can get an authenticated user to send a crafted HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) leading to Arbitrary File Upload vulnerability in Rara One Click Demo Import plugin <= 1.2.9 on WordPress allows attackers to trick logged-in admin users into uploading dangerous files into /wp-content/uploads/ directory.
Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Admin Management Xtended plugin <= 2.4.4 at WordPress.
The Deviceconnect microservice through 1.3.0 in Northern.tech Mender Enterprise before 3.2.2. allows Cross-Origin Websocket Hijacking.
Delta Controls enteliTOUCH 3.40.3935, 3.40.3706, and 3.33.4005 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted HTTP request.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Bhaskar Dhote Back Link Tracker allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Back Link Tracker: from n/a through 1.0.0.
IBM OpenPages with Watson 8.3 and 9.0 IBM OpenPages could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions, caused by improper validation and management of authentication cookies. By modifying the CSRF token and Session Id cookie parameters using the cookies of another user, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to bypass security restrictions and gain unauthorized access to the vulnerable application.
Remote Code Execution (RCE) in Alexander Stokmann's Code Snippets Extended plugin <= 1.4.7 on WordPress via Cross-Site Request Forgery.
Enabling and disabling installed H5P libraries did not include the necessary token to prevent a CSRF risk.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in MiKa's OSM – OpenStreetMap plugin <= 6.0.1 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Smash Balloon Custom Twitter Feeds (Tweets Widget) allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Custom Twitter Feeds (Tweets Widget): from n/a through 2.2.3.
LexisNexis Firco Compliance Link 3.7 allows CSRF.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Ubiquiti Networks UniFi Controller before 3.2.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create a new admin user via a request to api/add/admin; (2) have unspecified impact via a request to api/add/wlanconf; change the guest (3) password, (4) authentication method, or (5) restricted subnets via a request to api/set/setting/guest_access; (6) block, (7) unblock, or (8) reconnect users by MAC address via a request to api/cmd/stamgr; change the syslog (9) server or (10) port via a request to api/set/setting/rsyslogd; (11) have unspecified impact via a request to api/set/setting/smtp; change the syslog (12) server, (13) port, or (14) authentication settings via a request to api/cmd/cfgmgr; or (15) change the Unifi Controller name via a request to api/set/setting/identity.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in D-Link DWR-113 (Rev. Ax) with firmware before 2.03b02 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the admin password via unspecified vectors.
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Online Banquet Booking System v1.0 allows attackers to change admin credentials via a crafted POST request.
The SULly WordPress plugin before 4.3.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks
Advantech ADAM-5630 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. It allows an attacker to partly circumvent the same origin policy, which is designed to prevent different websites from interfering with each other.
DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/article_add.php
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in XXL-Job v2.3.0 allows attackers to arbitrarily create administrator accounts via the component /gaia-job-admin/user/add.
In Rukovoditel 2.5.2 has a form_session_token value to prevent CSRF attacks. This protection mechanism can be bypassed with another user's valid token. Thus, an attacker can change the Admin password by using a CSRF attack and escalate his/her privileges.
The data-tables-generator-by-supsystic plugin before 1.9.92 for WordPress lacks CSRF nonce checks for AJAX actions. One consequence of this is stored XSS.
The InstaWP Connect – 1-click WP Staging & Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.1.0.83. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the '/migrate/templates/main.php' file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to include and execute arbitrary files on the server, allowing the execution of any PHP code in those files. This can be used to bypass access controls, obtain sensitive data, or achieve code execution in cases where images and other “safe” file types can be uploaded and included.
An issue was discovered in ProVide (formerly zFTPServer) through 13.1. The Admin Interface allows CSRF for actions such as: Change any username and password, admin ones included; Create/Delete users; Enable/Disable Services; Set a rogue update proxy; and Shutdown the server.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Julian Weinert // cs&m Hover Image plugin <= 1.4.1 versions.
The Shopwarden – Automated WooCommerce monitoring & testing plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.11. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_setting() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary options and achieve privilege escalation via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.