http4k is a functional toolkit for Kotlin HTTP applications. Prior to version 5.41.0.0, there is a potential XXE (XML External Entity Injection) vulnerability when http4k handling malicious XML contents within requests, which might allow attackers to read local sensitive information on server, trigger Server-side Request Forgery and even execute code under some circumstances. Version 5.41.0.0 contains a patch for the issue.

DB4Web server, when configured to use verbose debug messages, allows remote attackers to use DB4Web as a proxy and attempt TCP connections to other systems (port scan) via a request for a URL that specifies the target IP address and port, which produces a connection status in the resulting error message.

ClipperCMS 1.3.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the pkg_url parameter at /manager/index.php.

ClipperCMS 1.3.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the rss_url_news parameter at /manager/index.php.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor on Linux (Data Center Analytics, Analytics probe components), Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer on Linux (Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer detail view, Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer probe components) allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor: from 2.0.0-00 through 4.4.0-00; Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer: from 10.0.0-00 before 10.9.0-00.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository ionicabizau/parse-url prior to 7.0.0.

A security issue was discovered in Z-BlogPHP <= 1.7.2. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the zb_users/plugin/UEditor/php/action_crawler.php file allows remote attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs into the source parameter.

aEnrich’s a+HRD has inadequate filtering for specific URL parameter. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to send arbitrary HTTP(s) request to launch Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack, to perform arbitrary system command or disrupt service.

MuleSoft is aware of a Server Side Request Forgery vulnerability affecting certain versions of a Mule runtime component that may affect both CloudHub and on-premise customers. This affects: Mule 3.8.x,3.9.x,4.x runtime released before February 2, 2021.

GitLab EE 3.0 through 12.8.1 allows SSRF. An internal investigation revealed that a particular deprecated service was creating a server side request forgery risk.

Unauthenticated server side request forgery in HPE Serviceguard Manager

An XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in Zoho ManageEngine Desktop Central before the 07-Mar-2020 update allows remote unauthenticated users to read arbitrary files or conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request.

The uppy npm package < 1.9.3 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, which allows an attacker to scan local or external network or otherwise interact with internal systems.

SAP Netweaver AS ABAP, versions 700, 701, 702, 710, 711, 730, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, are vulnerable for Server Side Request Forgery Attack where in an attacker can use inappropriate path names containing malicious server names in the import/export of sessions functionality and coerce the web server into authenticating with the malicious server. Furthermore, if NTLM is setup the attacker can compromise confidentiality, integrity and availability of the SAP database.

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the addCustomThemePluginRepository function in index.php in WonderCMS 3.1.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL to the theme/plugin installer.

Insufficient RegEx in private-ip npm package v1.0.5 and below insufficiently filters reserved IP ranges resulting in indeterminate SSRF. An attacker can perform a large range of requests to ARIN reserved IP ranges, resulting in an indeterminable number of critical attack vectors, allowing remote attackers to request server-side resources or potentially execute arbitrary code through various SSRF techniques.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SoftLab Radio Player.This issue affects Radio Player: from n/a through 2.0.73.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Piotnet Piotnet Addons For Elementor Pro.This issue affects Piotnet Addons For Elementor Pro: from n/a through 7.1.17.

Gluu Oxauth before v4.4.1 allows attackers to execute blind SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) attacks via a crafted request_uri parameter.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ActiveCampaign.This issue affects ActiveCampaign: from n/a through 8.1.14.

DataEase is an open source data visualization analysis tool. In versions 2.10.14 and below, the vendor added a blacklist to filter ldap:// and ldaps://. However, omission of protection for the dns:// protocol results in an SSRF vulnerability. This issue is fixed in version 2.10.15.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Brave Brave Popup Builder.This issue affects Brave Popup Builder: from n/a through 0.6.5.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Rank Math SEO plugin <= 1.0.95 at WordPress.

Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE) and Proxmox Mail Gateway (PMG) are vulnerable to SSRF when proxying HTTP requests between pve(pmg)proxy and pve(pmg)daemon. An attacker with an unprivileged account can craft an HTTP request to achieve SSRF and file disclosure of any files on the server. Also, in Proxmox Mail Gateway, privilege escalation to the root@pam account is possible if the backup feature has ever been used, because backup files such as pmg-backup_YYYY_MM_DD_*.tgz have 0644 permissions and contain an authkey value. This is fixed in pve-http-server 4.1-3.

Volmarg Personal Management System 1.4.64 is vulnerable to SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) via uploading a SVG file. The server can make unintended HTTP and DNS requests to a server that the attacker controls.

TAXII libtaxii through 1.1.117, as used in EclecticIQ OpenTAXII through 0.2.0 and other products, allows SSRF via an initial http:// substring to the parse method, even when the no_network setting is used for the XML parser. NOTE: the vendor points out that the parse method "wraps the lxml library" and that this may be an issue to "raise ... to the lxml group.

undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`undici` is vulnerable to SSRF (Server-side Request Forgery) when an application takes in **user input** into the `path/pathname` option of `undici.request`. If a user specifies a URL such as `http://127.0.0.1` or `//127.0.0.1` ```js const undici = require("undici") undici.request({origin: "http://example.com", pathname: "//127.0.0.1"}) ``` Instead of processing the request as `http://example.org//127.0.0.1` (or `http://example.org/http://127.0.0.1` when `http://127.0.0.1 is used`), it actually processes the request as `http://127.0.0.1/` and sends it to `http://127.0.0.1`. If a developer passes in user input into `path` parameter of `undici.request`, it can result in an _SSRF_ as they will assume that the hostname cannot change, when in actual fact it can change because the specified path parameter is combined with the base URL. This issue was fixed in `undici@5.8.1`. The best workaround is to validate user input before passing it to the `undici.request` call.

Nextcloud Mail is an email application for the nextcloud personal cloud product. Affected versions shipped with a CSS minifier on the path `./vendor/cerdic/css-tidy/css_optimiser.php`. Access to the minifier is unrestricted and access may lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). It is recommendet to upgrade to Mail 1.12.7 or Mail 1.13.6. Users unable to upgrade may manually delete the file located at `./vendor/cerdic/css-tidy/css_optimiser.php`

A vulnerability in which attackers could forge HTTP requests to manipulate the `charm` data directory to access or delete anything on the server. This has been patched and is available in release [v0.12.1](https://github.com/charmbracelet/charm/releases/tag/v0.12.1). We recommend that all users running self-hosted `charm` instances update immediately. This vulnerability was found in-house and we haven't been notified of any potential exploiters. ### Additional notes * Encrypted user data uploaded to the Charm server is safe as Charm servers cannot decrypt user data. This includes filenames, paths, and all key-value data. * Users running the official Charm [Docker images](https://github.com/charmbracelet/charm/blob/main/docker.md) are at minimal risk because the exploit is limited to the containerized filesystem.

SSRF exists in osTicket before 1.14.3, where an attacker can add malicious file to server or perform port scanning.

A SSRF vulnerability exists in the downloadimage interface of CRMEB 3.0, which can remotely download arbitrary files on the server and remotely execute arbitrary code.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Blossom Themes BlossomThemes Email Newsletter.This issue affects BlossomThemes Email Newsletter: from n/a through 2.2.6.

A vulnerability was found in Dromara MaxKey up to 4.1.7 and classified as critical. This issue affects the function Add of the file maxkey-webs\maxkey-web-mgt\src\main\java\org\dromara\maxkey\web\apps\contorller\SAML20DetailsController.java of the component Meta URL Handler. The manipulation of the argument post leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

The iot-manager microservice 1.0.0 in Northern.tech Mender Enterprise before 3.2.2 allows SSRF because the Azure IoT Hub integration provides several SSRF primitives that can execute cross-tenant actions via internal API endpoints.

Monsta FTP 2.10.1 or below is prone to a server-side request forgery vulnerability due to insufficient restriction of the web fetch functionality. This allows attackers to read arbitrary local files and interact with arbitrary third-party services.

WSO2 API Manager 3.0.0 does not properly restrict outbound network access from a Publisher node, opening up the possibility of SSRF to this node's entire intranet.

A vulnerability was found in OTCMS 6.72. It has been classified as critical. Affected is the function UseCurl of the file /admin/info_deal.php of the component URL Parameter Handler. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-224016.

GitLab 8.10 and later through 12.9 is vulnerable to an SSRF in a project import note feature.

The server in Jamf Pro before 10.32.0 has an SSRF vulnerability, aka PI-006352. NOTE: Jamf Nation will also publish an article about this vulnerability.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in extendons WordPress & WooCommerce Scraper Plugin, Import Data from Any Site allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects WordPress & WooCommerce Scraper Plugin, Import Data from Any Site: from n/a through 1.0.7.

Azure Monitor Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in weixin.php of ChatGPT-wechat-personal commit a0857f6 allows attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in silence Silencesoft RSS Reader allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Silencesoft RSS Reader: from n/a through 0.6.

An issue in Prestashop v.8.1.7 and before allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the module upgrade functionality. NOTE: this is disputed by multiple parties, who report that exploitation requires that an attacker be able to hijack network requests made by an admin user (who, by design, is allowed to change the code that is running on the server).

A SSRF vulnerability in parsing the href attribute of XOP:Include in MTOM requests in versions of Apache CXF before 3.5.5 and 3.4.10 allows an attacker to perform SSRF style attacks on webservices that take at least one parameter of any type. 

A remote server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability was discovered in HPE OneView version(s): Prior to 7.0. HPE has provided a software update to resolve this vulnerability in HPE OneView.

A flawed DNS rebinding protection issue was discovered in GitLab CE/EE 10.2 and later in the `url_blocker.rb` which could result in SSRF where the library is utilized.

Jizhicms v1.9.5 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability via /admin.php/Plugins/update.html.