Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects D1500 before 1.0.0.25, D500 before 1.0.0.25, D6100 before 1.0.0.55, D7000 before 1.0.1.50, D7800 before 1.0.1.28, EX6100v2 before 1.0.1.60, EX6150v2 before 1.0.1.60, JNR1010v2 before 1.1.0.46, JR6150 before 1.0.1.16, JWNR2010v5 before 1.1.0.46, PR2000 before 1.0.0.18, R6020 before 1.0.0.26, R6050 before 1.0.1.16, R6080 before 1.0.0.26, R6100 before 1.0.1.20, R6220 before 1.1.0.60, R7500 before 1.0.0.118, R7500v2 before 1.0.3.20, R7800 before 1.0.2.40, R9000 before 1.0.2.52, WN3000RPv3 before 1.0.2.50, WN3100RPv2 before 1.0.0.40, WNDR3700v5 before 1.1.0.48, WNDR4300v2 before 1.0.0.48, WNDR4500v3 before 1.0.0.48, WNR1000v4 before 1.1.0.46, WNR2000v5 before 1.0.0.62, WNR2020 before 1.1.0.46, and WNR2050 before 1.1.0.46.

An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 4.0.0, 3.10.2, and 3.9.2. CSRF can occur if CORS is enabled.

An issue was discovered in the Image Resizer plugin before 2.0.9 for Craft CMS. There are CSRF issues with the log-clear controller action.

The avada theme before 5.1.5 for WordPress has CSRF.

MFScripts YetiShare 3.5.2 through 4.5.3 does not set the SameSite flag on session cookies, allowing the cookie to be sent in cross-site requests and potentially be used in cross-site request forgery attacks.

Konker v2.3.9 was to discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).

An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 5.12.0, 5.11.1, 5.10.2, 5.9.2, and 4.10.10. The login page allows CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Custom Body Class 0.6.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Virgial Berveling's Manage Notification E-mails plugin <= 1.8.2 on WordPress.

An issue was discovered in the Real-Time Find and Replace plugin before 4.0.2 for WordPress. The far_options_page function did not do any nonce verification, allowing for requests to be forged on behalf of an administrator. The find and replace rules could be updated with malicious JavaScript, allowing for that be executed later in the victims browser.

An issue was discovered in the SiteOrigin Page Builder plugin before 2.10.16 for WordPress. The live editor feature did not do any nonce verification, allowing for requests to be forged on behalf of an administrator. The live_editor_panels_data $_POST variable allows for malicious JavaScript to be executed in the victim's browser.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sybre Waaijer Pro Mime Types – Manage file media types plugin <= 1.0.7 versions.

In Joomla! before 3.9.19, missing token checks in com_postinstall lead to CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Custom CSS Pro 1.0.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 6.0.0.0 through 6.0.3.8 and 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.2.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 230824.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Online Lesson Booking 0.8.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 214210.

In Rukovoditel 2.5.2 has a form_session_token value to prevent CSRF attacks. This protection mechanism can be bypassed with another user's valid token. Thus, an attacker can change the Admin password by using a CSRF attack and escalate his/her privileges.

The POST SMTP Mailer WordPress plugin before 2.5.7 does not have proper CSRF checks in some AJAX actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in users with the manage_postman_smtp capability resend an email to an arbitrary address (for example a password reset email could be resent to an attacker controlled email, and allow them to take over an account).

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in GetResponse plugin <= 5.5.20 at WordPress.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Spell Check 7.1.9 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

iSmartgate PRO 1.5.9 is vulnerable to CSRF via the busca parameter in the form used for searching for users, accessible via /index.php. (This can be combined with reflected XSS.)

There is a CSRF vulnerability on Netman-204 version 02.05. An attacker could manage to change administrator passwords through a Cross Site Request Forgery due to the lack of proper validation on the CRSF token. This vulnerability could allow a remote attacker to access the administrator panel, being able to modify different parameters that are critical for industrial operations.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress Ultra Simple Paypal Shopping Cart v4.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

Pepperl+Fuchs Comtrol IO-Link Master in Version 1.5.48 and below is prone to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the web interface.

Dell EMC Data Protection Central versions 19.1, 19.2, 19.3, 19.4, 19.5, 19.6, contain(s) a Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability. A(n) remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to processing of unintended server operations.

An issue was discovered in ProVide (formerly zFTPServer) through 13.1. The Admin Interface allows CSRF for actions such as: Change any username and password, admin ones included; Create/Delete users; Enable/Disable Services; Set a rogue update proxy; and Shutdown the server.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the persona_xsrf_token function in persona.module in the Mozilla Persona module 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.11 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of aribitrary users via a security token that is not a string data type.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Opsview before 4.4.1 and Opsview Core before 20130522 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the administrator password via unspecified vectors.

In Dolibarr 10.0.6, forms are protected with a CSRF token against CSRF attacks. The problem is any CSRF token in any user's session can be used in another user's session. CSRF tokens should not be valid in this situation.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Smart Forms 2.6.15 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via a specially crafted page.

The data-tables-generator-by-supsystic plugin before 1.9.92 for WordPress lacks CSRF nonce checks for AJAX actions. One consequence of this is stored XSS.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Palasthotel by Edward Bock, Katharina Rompf Sunny Search plugin <= 1.0.2 versions.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins EasyQA Plugin 1.0 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified HTTP server.

A carefully crafted invocation on the Image plugin could trigger an CSRF vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki before 2.11.3, which could allow a group privilege escalation of the attacker's account. Further examination of this issue established that it could also be used to modify the email associated with the attacked account, and then a reset password request from the login page.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco Linksys WRT110 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that have unspecified impact via unknown vectors.

Improper Authorization vulnerability of Pepperl+Fuchs P+F Comtrol RocketLinx ES7510-XT, ES8509-XT, ES8510-XT, ES9528-XTv2, ES7506, ES7510, ES7528, ES8508, ES8508F, ES8510, ES8510-XTE, ES9528/ES9528-XT (all versions) and ICRL-M-8RJ45/4SFP-G-DIN, ICRL-M-16RJ45/4CP-G-DIN FW 1.2.3 and below is prone to unauthenticated device administration.

ASUS RT-N56U devices allow CSRF.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Loftek Nexus 543 IP Camera allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that change (1) passwords or (2) firewall configuration, as demonstrated by a request to set_users.cgi.

WordPress WP Cleanfix Plugin 2.4.4 has CSRF

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Convertigo Mobile Platform Plugin 1.1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL.

The Western Digital WD Discovery application before 3.8.229 for MyCloud Home on Windows and macOS is vulnerable to CSRF, with impacts such as stealing data, modifying disk contents, or exhausting disk space.

An issue was discovered in ProVide (formerly zFTPServer) through 13.1. CSRF exists in the User Web Interface, as demonstrated by granting filesystem access to the public for uploading and deleting files and directories.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in JoomSky JS Job Manager plugin <= 2.0.0 versions.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Report Portal Plugin 0.5 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified bearer token authentication.

NVIDIA DGX servers, all DGX-1 with BMC firmware versions prior to 3.38.30, contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the AMI BMC firmware in which the web application does not sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request, which can lead to information disclosure or code execution.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in W3 Eden Download Manager plugin <= 3.2.48 at WordPress.

WordPress plugin wp-cleanfix has Remote Code Execution

Unisys Data Exchange Management Studio before 6.0.IC2 and 7.x before 7.0.IC1 doesn't have an Anti-CSRF token to authenticate the POST request. Thus, a cross-site request forgery attack could occur.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository ikus060/rdiffweb prior to 2.4.3.