uppy is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Adding a new pipeline in GoCD server version 21.3.0 has a functionality that could be abused to do an un-intended action in order to achieve a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). NOTE: the vendor's position is that the observed behavior is not a vulnerability, because the product's design allows an admin to configure outbound requests

flatCore-CMS version 2.0.8 calls dangerous functions, causing server-side request forgery vulnerabilities.

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in 60IndexPage up to 1.8.5. This affects an unknown part of the file /include/file.php of the component Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-252189 was assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

The server in Jamf Pro before 10.32.0 has an SSRF vulnerability, aka PI-006352. NOTE: Jamf Nation will also publish an article about this vulnerability.

Nagios XI Docker Wizard before version 1.1.3 is vulnerable to SSRF due to improper sanitation in table_population.php.

A vulnerability in which attackers could forge HTTP requests to manipulate the `charm` data directory to access or delete anything on the server. This has been patched and is available in release [v0.12.1](https://github.com/charmbracelet/charm/releases/tag/v0.12.1). We recommend that all users running self-hosted `charm` instances update immediately. This vulnerability was found in-house and we haven't been notified of any potential exploiters. ### Additional notes * Encrypted user data uploaded to the Charm server is safe as Charm servers cannot decrypt user data. This includes filenames, paths, and all key-value data. * Users running the official Charm [Docker images](https://github.com/charmbracelet/charm/blob/main/docker.md) are at minimal risk because the exploit is limited to the containerized filesystem.

Zoho ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus MSP before 10521 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 219736.

Appspace 6.2.4 allows SSRF via the api/v1/core/proxy/jsonprequest url parameter.

Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Jspxcms v9.0.0 allows SSRF.

maccms10 v2025.1000.4047 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in Email Settings.

The OnAir2 WordPress theme before 3.9.9.2 and QT KenthaRadio WordPress plugin before 2.0.2 have exposed proxy functionality to unauthenticated users, sending requests to this proxy functionality will have the web server fetch and display the content from any URI, this would allow for SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) and RFI (Remote File Inclusion) vulnerabilities on the website.

A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability was found in concrete5 < 8.5.5 that allowed a decimal notation encoded IP address to bypass the limitations in place for localhost allowing interaction with local services. Impact can vary depending on services exposed.CVSSv2.0 AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

The vSphere Web Client (FLEX/Flash) contains an SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) vulnerability in the vSAN Web Client (vSAN UI) plug-in. A malicious actor with network access to port 443 on vCenter Server may exploit this issue by accessing a URL request outside of vCenter Server or accessing an internal service.

PrinterLogic Web Stack versions 19.1.1.13 SP9 and below use user-controlled input to craft a URL, resulting in a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.

MuleSoft is aware of a Server Side Request Forgery vulnerability affecting certain versions of a Mule runtime component that may affect both CloudHub and on-premise customers. This affects: Mule 3.8.x,3.9.x,4.x runtime released before February 2, 2021.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Kylin. This issue affects Apache Kylin: from 4.0.0 through 5.0.2. You are fine as long as the Kylin's system and project admin access is well protected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 5.0.3, which fixes the issue.

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the /api/proxy/ component of linshenkx prompt-optimizer v1.3.0 to v1.4.2 allows attackers to scan internal resources via a crafted request.

An issue was discovered in Simple Machines Forum (SMF) before release 2.0.17. There is SSRF related to Subs-Package.php and Subs.php because user-supplied data is used directly in curl calls.

An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 10.2 through 11.11. Multiple features contained Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities caused by an insufficient validation to prevent DNS rebinding attacks.

Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) exists in the Print My Blog plugin before 1.6.7 for WordPress via the site parameter.

An SSRF issue was discovered in NmAPI.exe in Ipswitch WhatsUp Gold before 2018 (18.0). Malicious actors can submit specially crafted requests via the NmAPI executable to (1) gain unauthorized access to the WhatsUp Gold system, (2) obtain information about the WhatsUp Gold system, or (3) execute remote commands.

Adminer through 4.3.1 has SSRF via the server parameter.

A vulnerability classified as critical was found in IPC Unigy Management System 04.03.00.08.0027. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component HTTP Request Handler. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository janeczku/calibre-web prior to 0.6.18.

An unintended require and server-side request forgery vulnerabilities in jsreport version 2.5.0 and earlier allow attackers to execute arbitrary code.

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the addCustomThemePluginRepository function in index.php in WonderCMS 3.1.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL to the theme/plugin installer.

Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Web Compliance Manager in Quest Policy Authority version 8.1.2.200 allows attackers to scan internal ports and make outbound connections via the initFile.jsp file. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer

An SSRF issue was discovered in SquaredUp for SCOM 5.2.1.6654.

"HCL Digital Experience is susceptible to Server Side Request Forgery."

An XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in Zoho ManageEngine Desktop Central before the 07-Mar-2020 update allows remote unauthenticated users to read arbitrary files or conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request.

Emby Server before 4.5.0 allows SSRF via the Items/RemoteSearch/Image ImageURL parameter.

SSRF exists in osTicket before 1.14.3, where an attacker can add malicious file to server or perform port scanning.

Server-side request forgery in the Video Downloader for TikTok (aka downloader-tiktok) plugin 1.3 for WordPress lets an attacker send crafted requests from the back-end server of a vulnerable web application via the njt-tk-download-video parameter. It can help identify open ports, local network hosts and execute command on services

Server-side request forgery in Wcms 0.3.2 lets an attacker send crafted requests from the back-end server of a vulnerable web application via the path parameter to wex/cssjs.php. It can help identify open ports, local network hosts and execute command on local services.