Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2026-23992

Summary
Assigner-GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID-a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At-22 Jan, 2026 | 02:20
Updated At-22 Jan, 2026 | 15:21
Rejected At-
Credits

go-tuf improperly validates the configured threshold for delegations

go-tuf is a Go implementation of The Update Framework (TUF). Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.3.1, a compromised or misconfigured TUF repository can have the configured value of signature thresholds set to 0, which effectively disables signature verification. This can lead to unauthorized modification to TUF metadata files is possible at rest, or during transit as no integrity checks are made. Version 2.3.1 fixes the issue. As a workaround, always make sure that the TUF metadata roles are configured with a threshold of at least 1.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID:a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At:22 Jan, 2026 | 02:20
Updated At:22 Jan, 2026 | 15:21
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
go-tuf improperly validates the configured threshold for delegations

go-tuf is a Go implementation of The Update Framework (TUF). Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.3.1, a compromised or misconfigured TUF repository can have the configured value of signature thresholds set to 0, which effectively disables signature verification. This can lead to unauthorized modification to TUF metadata files is possible at rest, or during transit as no integrity checks are made. Version 2.3.1 fixes the issue. As a workaround, always make sure that the TUF metadata roles are configured with a threshold of at least 1.

Affected Products
Vendor
theupdateframework
Product
go-tuf
Versions
Affected
  • >= 2.0.0, < 2.3.1
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-347CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-347
Description: CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.15.9MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.9
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/security/advisories/GHSA-fphv-w9fq-2525
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/commit/b38d91fdbc69dfe31fe9230d97dafe527ea854a0
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/security/advisories/GHSA-fphv-w9fq-2525
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/commit/b38d91fdbc69dfe31fe9230d97dafe527ea854a0
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security-advisories@github.com
Published At:22 Jan, 2026 | 03:15
Updated At:17 Feb, 2026 | 16:02

go-tuf is a Go implementation of The Update Framework (TUF). Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.3.1, a compromised or misconfigured TUF repository can have the configured value of signature thresholds set to 0, which effectively disables signature verification. This can lead to unauthorized modification to TUF metadata files is possible at rest, or during transit as no integrity checks are made. Version 2.3.1 fixes the issue. As a workaround, always make sure that the TUF metadata roles are configured with a threshold of at least 1.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Secondary3.15.9MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Primary3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.9
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CPE Matches

theupdateframework
theupdateframework
>>go-tuf>>Versions from 2.0.0(inclusive) to 2.3.1(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:theupdateframework:go-tuf:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-347Primarysecurity-advisories@github.com
CWE ID: CWE-347
Type: Primary
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/commit/b38d91fdbc69dfe31fe9230d97dafe527ea854a0security-advisories@github.com
Patch
https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/security/advisories/GHSA-fphv-w9fq-2525security-advisories@github.com
Patch
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/commit/b38d91fdbc69dfe31fe9230d97dafe527ea854a0
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Patch
Hyperlink: https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/security/advisories/GHSA-fphv-w9fq-2525
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Patch
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

76Records found

CVE-2020-15957
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.55% / 71.95%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jul, 2020 | 13:08
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in DP3T-Backend-SDK before 1.1.1 for Decentralised Privacy-Preserving Proximity Tracing (DP3T). When it is configured to check JWT before uploading/publishing keys, it is possible to skip the signature check by providing a JWT token with alg=none.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-dp3t-backend-software_development_kit_projectn/a
Product-dp3t-backend-software_development_kitn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2002-1706
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.19% / 63.82%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Jun, 2005 | 04:00
Updated-16 Apr, 2026 | 00:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Cisco IOS software 11.3 through 12.2 running on Cisco uBR7200 and uBR7100 series Universal Broadband Routers allows remote attackers to modify Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) settings via a DOCSIS file without a Message Integrity Check (MIC) signature, which is approved by the router.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCisco Systems, Inc.
Product-ubr7100iosubr7200n/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-46176
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.65% / 46.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jan, 2023 | 20:07
Updated-10 Mar, 2025 | 21:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cargo did not verify SSH host keys

Cargo is a Rust package manager. The Rust Security Response WG was notified that Cargo did not perform SSH host key verification when cloning indexes and dependencies via SSH. An attacker could exploit this to perform man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks. This vulnerability has been assigned CVE-2022-46176. All Rust versions containing Cargo before 1.66.1 are vulnerable. Note that even if you don't explicitly use SSH for alternate registry indexes or crate dependencies, you might be affected by this vulnerability if you have configured git to replace HTTPS connections to GitHub with SSH (through git's [`url.<base>.insteadOf`][1] setting), as that'd cause you to clone the crates.io index through SSH. Rust 1.66.1 will ensure Cargo checks the SSH host key and abort the connection if the server's public key is not already trusted. We recommend everyone to upgrade as soon as possible.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-rust-langrust-lang
Product-cargocargo
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-15827
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.69% / 48.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Aug, 2020 | 20:24
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In JetBrains ToolBox version 1.17 before 1.17.6856, the set of signature verifications omitted the jetbrains-toolbox.exe file.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJetBrains s.r.o.
Product-toolboxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2024-23456
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zscaler, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zscaler, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 13.13%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Aug, 2024 | 15:21
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 21:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Signature validation issue leads to Anti-Tampering bypass

Anti-tampering can be disabled under certain conditions without signature validation. This affects Zscaler Client Connector <4.2.0.190 with anti-tampering enabled.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Zscaler, Inc.
Product-client_connectorClient Connectorclient_connector
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-41340
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.46% / 36.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Sep, 2022 | 18:22
Updated-22 May, 2025 | 15:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The secp256k1-js package before 1.1.0 for Node.js implements ECDSA without required r and s validation, leading to signature forgery.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-secp256k1-js_projectn/a
Product-secp256k1-jsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-14515
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.84% / 53.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Sep, 2020 | 19:48
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

CodeMeter (All versions prior to 6.90 when using CmActLicense update files with CmActLicense Firm Code) has an issue in the license-file signature checking mechanism, which allows attackers to build arbitrary license files, including forging a valid license file as if it were a valid license file of an existing vendor. Only CmActLicense update files with CmActLicense Firm Code are affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wibun/a
Product-codemeterCodeMeter
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-13101
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.73% / 49.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Aug, 2020 | 07:04
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In OASIS Digital Signature Services (DSS) 1.0, an attacker can control the validation outcome (i.e., trigger either a valid or invalid outcome for a valid or invalid signature) via a crafted XML signature, when the InlineXML option is used. This defeats the expectation of non-repudiation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-oasis-openn/a
Product-oasis_digital_signature_servicesn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-13845
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.52% / 39.88%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jul, 2020 | 17:23
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Sylabs Singularity 3.0 through 3.5 has Improper Validation of an Integrity Check Value. Image integrity is not validated when an ECL policy is enforced. The fingerprint required by the ECL is compared against the signature object descriptor(s) in the SIF file, rather than to a cryptographically validated signature.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sylabsn/a
Product-singularityn/a
CWE ID-CWE-354
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-31172
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.40% / 31.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Jul, 2022 | 13:55
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 17:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
OpenZeppelin Contracts's SignatureChecker may revert on invalid EIP-1271 signers

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.1.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to the SignatureChecker reverting. `SignatureChecker.isValidSignatureNow` is not expected to revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8's `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn't implement EIP-1271 as expected. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `SignatureChecker` to check the validity of a signature and handle invalid signatures in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openzeppelinOpenZeppelin
Product-contractsopenzeppelin-contracts
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-13415
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.75% / 50.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 May, 2020 | 20:48
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller through 5.1. An attacker with any signed SAML assertion from the Identity Provider can establish a connection (even if that SAML assertion has expired or is from a user who is not authorized to access Aviatrix), aka XML Signature Wrapping.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aAviatrix Systems, Inc.
Product-controllern/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2026-33895
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.26% / 16.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 20:47
Updated-14 Apr, 2026 | 01:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Forge has signature forgery in Ed25519 due to missing S > L check

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.4.0, Ed25519 signature verification accepts forged non-canonical signatures where the scalar S is not reduced modulo the group order (`S >= L`). A valid signature and its `S + L` variant both verify in forge, while Node.js `crypto.verify` (OpenSSL-backed) rejects the `S + L` variant, as defined by the specification. This class of signature malleability has been exploited in practice to bypass authentication and authorization logic (see CVE-2026-25793, CVE-2022-35961). Applications relying on signature uniqueness (i.e., dedup by signature bytes, replay tracking, signed-object canonicalization checks) may be bypassed. Version 1.4.0 patches the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-digitalbazaardigitalbazaar
Product-forgeforge
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-11093
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.93% / 56.10%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Dec, 2020 | 20:05
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 11:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Authorization bypass in Hyperledger Indy

Hyperledger Indy Node is the server portion of a distributed ledger purpose-built for decentralized identity. In Hyperledger Indy before version 1.12.4, there is lack of signature verification on a specific transaction which enables an attacker to make certain unauthorized alterations to the ledger. Updating a DID with a nym transaction will be written to the ledger if neither ROLE or VERKEY are being changed, regardless of sender. A malicious DID with no particular role can ask an update for another DID (but cannot modify its verkey or role). This is bad because 1) Any DID can write a nym transaction to the ledger (i.e., any DID can spam the ledger with nym transactions), 2) Any DID can change any other DID's alias, 3) The update transaction modifies the ledger metadata associated with a DID.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-hyperledgerThe Linux Foundation
Product-indy-nodeindy-node
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-49079
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.40% / 31.68%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Nov, 2023 | 18:56
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 21:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Misskey's missing signature validation allows arbitrary users to impersonate any remote user.

Misskey is an open source, decentralized social media platform. Misskey's missing signature validation allows arbitrary users to impersonate any remote user. This issue has been patched in version 2023.11.1-beta.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-misskeymisskey-dev
Product-misskeymisskey
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-24884
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-10||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.97% / 57.46%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 May, 2022 | 23:50
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:29
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Trivial signature forgery in ecdsautils

ecdsautils is a tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify). `ecdsa_verify_[prepare_]legacy()` does not check whether the signature values `r` and `s` are non-zero. A signature consisting only of zeroes is always considered valid, making it trivial to forge signatures. Requiring multiple signatures from different public keys does not mitigate the issue: `ecdsa_verify_list_legacy()` will accept an arbitrary number of such forged signatures. Both the `ecdsautil verify` CLI command and the libecdsautil library are affected. The issue has been fixed in ecdsautils 0.4.1. All older versions of ecdsautils (including versions before the split into a library and a CLI utility) are vulnerable.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ecdsautils_projectfreifunk-gluonFedora ProjectDebian GNU/Linux
Product-ecdsautilsdebian_linuxfedoraecdsautils
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-24771
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.72% / 48.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2022 | 13:25
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in node-forge

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.3.0, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification code is lenient in checking the digest algorithm structure. This can allow a crafted structure that steals padding bytes and uses unchecked portion of the PKCS#1 encoded message to forge a signature when a low public exponent is being used. The issue has been addressed in `node-forge` version 1.3.0. There are currently no known workarounds.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-digitalbazaardigitalbazaar
Product-forgeforge
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-46234
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.51% / 39.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Oct, 2023 | 14:31
Updated-10 Apr, 2025 | 20:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
browserify-sign vulnerable via an upper bound check issue in `dsaVerify` that leads to a signature forgery attack

browserify-sign is a package to duplicate the functionality of node's crypto public key functions, much of this is based on Fedor Indutny's work on indutny/tls.js. An upper bound check issue in `dsaVerify` function allows an attacker to construct signatures that can be successfully verified by any public key, thus leading to a signature forgery attack. All places in this project that involve DSA verification of user-input signatures will be affected by this vulnerability. This issue has been patched in version 4.2.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-browserifybrowserifyDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxbrowserify-signbrowserify-sign
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-24772
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.01% / 58.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2022 | 13:30
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in `node-forge`

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.3.0, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification code does not check for tailing garbage bytes after decoding a `DigestInfo` ASN.1 structure. This can allow padding bytes to be removed and garbage data added to forge a signature when a low public exponent is being used. The issue has been addressed in `node-forge` version 1.3.0. There are currently no known workarounds.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-digitalbazaardigitalbazaar
Product-forgeforge
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2025-65945
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 9.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Dec, 2025 | 18:45
Updated-09 Mar, 2026 | 21:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
auth0/node-jws improper HMAC signature verification vulnerability

auth0/node-jws is a JSON Web Signature implementation for Node.js. In versions 3.2.2 and earlier and version 4.0.0, auth0/node-jws has an improper signature verification vulnerability when using the HS256 algorithm under specific conditions. Applications are affected when they use the jws.createVerify() function for HMAC algorithms and use user-provided data from the JSON Web Signature protected header or payload in HMAC secret lookup routines, which can allow attackers to bypass signature verification. This issue has been patched in versions 3.2.3 and 4.0.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-auth0auth0
Product-node-jwsnode-jws
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-21134
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-8.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.91% / 55.25%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-28 Jan, 2022 | 19:10
Updated-15 Apr, 2025 | 19:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A firmware update vulnerability exists in the &quot;update&quot; firmware checks functionality of reolink RLC-410W v3.0.0.136_20121102. A specially-crafted HTTP request can lead to firmware update. An attacker can send a sequence of requests to trigger this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aReolink Innovation Limited
Product-rlc-410w_firmwarerlc-410wn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-3322
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cloudflare, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cloudflare, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.7||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 15.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Oct, 2022 | 09:25
Updated-05 May, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Lock WARP switch bypass on WARP mobile client using iOS quick action

Lock Warp switch is a feature of Zero Trust platform which, when enabled, prevents users of enrolled devices from disabling WARP client. Due to insufficient policy verification by WARP iOS client, this feature could be bypassed by using the "Disable WARP" quick action.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cloudflare, Inc.
Product-warp_mobile_clientWARP
CWE ID-CWE-862
Missing Authorization
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-17561
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.63% / 73.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Mar, 2020 | 18:44
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The "Apache NetBeans" autoupdate system does not fully validate code signatures. An attacker could modify the downloaded nbm and include additional code. "Apache NetBeans" versions up to and including 11.2 are affected by this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software FoundationOracle Corporation
Product-netbeansgraalvmApache NetBeans
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2005-2182
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.19% / 63.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jul, 2005 | 04:00
Updated-16 Apr, 2026 | 00:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Grandstream BudgeTone (BT) 100 Voice over IP (VoIP) phones do not properly check the Call-ID, branch, and tag values in a NOTIFY message to verify a subscription, which allows remote attackers to spoof messages such as the "Messages waiting" message.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-grandstreamn/a
Product-bt-100_firmwarebt-100n/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2005-2181
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.19% / 63.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jul, 2005 | 04:00
Updated-16 Apr, 2026 | 00:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Cisco 7940/7960 Voice over IP (VoIP) phones do not properly check the Call-ID, branch, and tag values in a NOTIFY message to verify a subscription, which allows remote attackers to spoof messages such as the "Messages waiting" message.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCisco Systems, Inc.
Product-ip_phone_7940_firmwareip_phone_7940ip_phone_7960ip_phone_7960_firmwaren/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-44878
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.90% / 54.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jan, 2022 | 12:52
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 04:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

If an OpenID Connect provider supports the "none" algorithm (i.e., tokens with no signature), pac4j v5.3.0 (and prior) does not refuse it without an explicit configuration on its side or for the "idtoken" response type which is not secure and violates the OpenID Core Specification. The "none" algorithm does not require any signature verification when validating the ID tokens, which allows the attacker to bypass the token validation by injecting a malformed ID token using "none" as the value of "alg" key in the header with an empty signature value.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pac4jn/a
Product-pac4jn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-11841
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-2.00% / 78.21%
||
7 Day CHG+0.36%
Published-22 May, 2019 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A message-forgery issue was discovered in crypto/openpgp/clearsign/clearsign.go in supplementary Go cryptography libraries 2019-03-25. According to the OpenPGP Message Format specification in RFC 4880 chapter 7, a cleartext signed message can contain one or more optional "Hash" Armor Headers. The "Hash" Armor Header specifies the message digest algorithm(s) used for the signature. However, the Go clearsign package ignores the value of this header, which allows an attacker to spoof it. Consequently, an attacker can lead a victim to believe the signature was generated using a different message digest algorithm than what was actually used. Moreover, since the library skips Armor Header parsing in general, an attacker can not only embed arbitrary Armor Headers, but also prepend arbitrary text to cleartext messages without invalidating the signatures.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxGo
Product-cryptodebian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-39392
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 11.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Aug, 2023 | 11:33
Updated-10 Oct, 2024 | 14:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Vulnerability of insecure signatures in the OsuLogin module. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause OsuLogin to be maliciously modified and overwritten.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Product-emuiharmonyosHarmonyOSEMUI
CWE ID-CWE-16
Not Available
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-41830
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.35% / 67.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2021 | 08:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 03:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Double Certificate Attack

It is possible for an attacker to manipulate signed documents and macros to appear to come from a trusted source. All versions of Apache OpenOffice up to 4.1.10 are affected. Users are advised to update to version 4.1.11. See CVE-2021-25633 for the LibreOffice advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-openofficeApache OpenOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-41832
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.30% / 66.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2021 | 08:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 03:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Content Manipulation with Certificate Validation Attack

It is possible for an attacker to manipulate documents to appear to be signed by a trusted source. All versions of Apache OpenOffice up to 4.1.10 are affected. Users are advised to update to version 4.1.11. See CVE-2021-25635 for the LibreOffice advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-openofficeApache OpenOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2026-9793
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 2.11%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 May, 2026 | 03:44
Updated-03 Jun, 2026 | 18:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Keycloak: keycloak: security policy bypass in jwe-encrypted request object processing

A flaw was found in Keycloak. When a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) encrypted request object is submitted, Keycloak may incorrectly process unsigned claims if the decrypted content is raw JSON, bypassing the configured signature policy. This allows a remote attacker to submit unauthorized claims, leading to a compromise of data integrity within the OpenID Connect (OIDC) authorization flow. While a redirect URI allowlist acts as a compensating control, this vulnerability violates OIDC Core and Financial-grade API (FAPI) signing requirements.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-build_of_keycloakRed Hat Build of Keycloak
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2026-5050
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 10.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Apr, 2026 | 05:29
Updated-22 Apr, 2026 | 20:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Payment Gateway for Redsys & WooCommerce Lite <= 7.0.0 - Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature to Unauthenticated Payment Status Manipulation

The Payment Gateway for Redsys & WooCommerce Lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in versions up to, and including, 7.0.0 due to successful_request() handlers calculating a local signature but not validating Ds_Signature from the request before accepting payment status across the Redsys, Bizum, and Google Pay gateway flows. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to forge payment callback data and mark pending orders as paid when they know a valid order key and order amount, potentially allowing checkout completion and product or service fulfillment without a successful payment.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-jconti
Product-Payment Gateway for Redsys & WooCommerce Lite
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-34433
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Eclipse Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Eclipse Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.34% / 25.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Aug, 2021 | 17:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 00:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Eclipse Californium version 2.0.0 to 2.6.4 and 3.0.0-M1 to 3.0.0-M3, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally succeeds without verifying the server side's signature on the client side, if that signature is not included in the server's ServerKeyExchange.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Eclipse Foundation AISBL
Product-californiumEclipse Californium
CWE ID-CWE-322
Key Exchange without Entity Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-33054
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.99% / 57.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2021 | 14:40
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

SOGo 2.x before 2.4.1 and 3.x through 5.x before 5.1.1 does not validate the signatures of any SAML assertions it receives. Any actor with network access to the deployment could impersonate users when SAML is the authentication method. (Only versions after 2.0.5a are affected.)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-inversen/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxsogon/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-30130
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.08% / 60.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

phpseclib before 2.0.31 and 3.x before 3.0.7 mishandles RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-phpseclibn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxphpseclibn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-29500
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.60% / 43.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2021 | 20:05
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Missing validation of JWT signature

bubble fireworks is an open source java package relating to Spring Framework. In bubble fireworks before version 2021.BUILD-SNAPSHOT there is a vulnerability in which the package did not properly verify the signature of JSON Web Tokens. This allows to forgery of valid JWTs.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-bubble_fireworks_projectfxbin
Product-bubble_fireworksbubble-fireworks
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-28091
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.32% / 67.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2021 | 14:39
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 21:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Lasso all versions prior to 2.7.0 has improper verification of a cryptographic signature.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-entrouvertn/aDebian GNU/LinuxFedora Project
Product-lassodebian_linuxfedoran/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-25636
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.97% / 57.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect trust validation of signature with ambiguous KeyInfo children

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to contain both "X509Data" and "KeyValue" children of the "KeyInfo" tag, which when opened caused LibreOffice to verify using the "KeyValue" but to report verification with the unrelated "X509Data" value. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7.2 versions prior to 7.2.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationFedora Project
Product-fedoralibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-44714
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.27% / 18.39%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 May, 2026 | 16:51
Updated-18 May, 2026 | 19:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
bitcoinj: ScriptExecution P2PKH/P2WPKH Verification Bypass

The bitcoinj library is a Java implementation of the Bitcoin protocol. Prior to 0.17.1, ScriptExecution.correctlySpends() contains two fast-path verification bugs for standard P2PKH and native P2WPKH spends in core/src/main/java/org/bitcoinj/script/ScriptExecution.java. In both branches, bitcoinj verifies an attacker-controlled signature/public-key pair but fails to verify that the public key is the one committed to by the output being spent. As a result, any attacker keypair can satisfy bitcoinj's local verification for arbitrary P2PKH and P2WPKH outputs. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.17.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-bitcoinj
Product-bitcoinj
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2025-47949
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.9||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.47% / 37.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 May, 2025 | 19:28
Updated-19 Sep, 2025 | 17:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
samlify SAML Signature Wrapping attack

samlify is a Node.js library for SAML single sign-on. A Signature Wrapping attack has been found in samlify prior to version 2.10.0, allowing an attacker to forge a SAML Response to authenticate as any user. An attacker would need a signed XML document by the identity provider. Version 2.10.0 fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-samlify_projecttngan
Product-samlifysamlify
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2025-29915
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 13.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Apr, 2025 | 19:51
Updated-29 May, 2025 | 15:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Suricata af-packet: defrag option can lead to truncated packets affecting visibility

Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. The AF_PACKET defrag option is enabled by default and allows AF_PACKET to re-assemble fragmented packets before reaching Suricata. However the default packet size in Suricata is based on the network interface MTU which leads to Suricata seeing truncated packets. Upgrade to Suricata 7.0.9, which uses better defaults and adds warnings for user configurations that may lead to issues.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-oisfOISF
Product-suricatasuricata
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-5390
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.21% / 64.41%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Jan, 2020 | 18:11
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 08:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

PySAML2 before 5.0.0 does not check that the signature in a SAML document is enveloped and thus signature wrapping is effective, i.e., it is affected by XML Signature Wrapping (XSW). The signature information and the node/object that is signed can be in different places and thus the signature verification will succeed, but the wrong data will be used. This specifically affects the verification of assertion that have been signed.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pysaml2_projectn/aCanonical Ltd.Debian GNU/Linux
Product-ubuntu_linuxpysaml2debian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-3347
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.39% / 30.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Jul, 2023 | 14:54
Updated-20 Nov, 2025 | 17:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Samba: smb2 packet signing is not enforced when "server signing = required" is set

A vulnerability was found in Samba's SMB2 packet signing mechanism. The SMB2 packet signing is not enforced if an admin configured "server signing = required" or for SMB2 connections to Domain Controllers where SMB2 packet signing is mandatory. This flaw allows an attacker to perform attacks, such as a man-in-the-middle attack, by intercepting the network traffic and modifying the SMB2 messages between client and server, affecting the integrity of the data.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.Fedora ProjectSamba
Product-storageenterprise_linuxfedorasambaRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Storage 3Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CWE ID-CWE-924
Improper Enforcement of Message Integrity During Transmission in a Communication Channel
CVE-2020-36285
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.90% / 55.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2021 | 15:38
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Union Pay up to 3.3.12, for iOS mobile apps, contains a CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability, allows attackers to shop for free in merchants' websites and mobile apps, via a crafted authentication code (MAC) which is generated based on a secret key which is NULL.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-unionpayintln/a
Product-union_payn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-36284
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.90% / 55.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2021 | 15:36
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Union Pay up to 3.4.93.4.9, for android, contains a CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability, allows attackers to shop for free in merchants' websites and mobile apps, via a crafted authentication code (MAC) which is generated based on a secret key which is NULL.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-unionpayintln/a
Product-union_payn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-25934
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.27% / 18.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 May, 2023 | 06:58
Updated-29 Jan, 2025 | 17:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

DELL ECS prior to 3.8.0.2 contains an improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability. A network attacker with an ability to intercept the request could potentially exploit this vulnerability to modify the body data of the request.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-elastic_cloud_storageECS
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-28086
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.59% / 43.43%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Dec, 2020 | 18:09
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 16:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

pass through 1.7.3 has a possibility of using a password for an unintended resource. For exploitation to occur, the user must do a git pull, decrypt a password, and log into a remote service with the password. If an attacker controls the central Git server or one of the other members' machines, and also controls one of the services already in the password store, they can rename one of the password files in the Git repository to something else: pass doesn't correctly verify that the content of a file matches the filename, so a user might be tricked into decrypting the wrong password and sending that to a service that the attacker controls. NOTE: for environments in which this threat model is of concern, signing commits can be a solution.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-zx2c4n/a
Product-password-storen/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-22742
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.58% / 43.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Jan, 2023 | 22:49
Updated-10 Mar, 2025 | 21:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
libgit2 fails to verify SSH keys by default

libgit2 is a cross-platform, linkable library implementation of Git. When using an SSH remote with the optional libssh2 backend, libgit2 does not perform certificate checking by default. Prior versions of libgit2 require the caller to set the `certificate_check` field of libgit2's `git_remote_callbacks` structure - if a certificate check callback is not set, libgit2 does not perform any certificate checking. This means that by default - without configuring a certificate check callback, clients will not perform validation on the server SSH keys and may be subject to a man-in-the-middle attack. Users are encouraged to upgrade to v1.4.5 or v1.5.1. Users unable to upgrade should ensure that all relevant certificates are manually checked.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libgit2libgit2
Product-libgit2libgit2
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2026-33894
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.24% / 15.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 20:45
Updated-17 Apr, 2026 | 21:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Forge has signature forgery in RSA-PKCS due to ASN.1 extra field

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.4.0, RSASSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification accepts forged signatures for low public exponent keys (e=3). Attackers can forge signatures by stuffing “garbage” bytes within the ASN structure in order to construct a signature that passes verification, enabling Bleichenbacher style forgery. This issue is similar to CVE-2022-24771, but adds bytes in an addition field within the ASN structure, rather than outside of it. Additionally, forge does not validate that signatures include a minimum of 8 bytes of padding as defined by the specification, providing attackers additional space to construct Bleichenbacher forgeries. Version 1.4.0 patches the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-digitalbazaardigitalbazaar
Product-forgeforge
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-23533
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.92% / 55.77%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2021 | 15:34
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 14:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Union Pay up to 1.2.0, for web based versions contains a CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability, allows attackers to shop for free in merchants' websites and mobile apps, via a crafted authentication code (MAC) which is generated based on a secret key which is NULL.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-unionpayintln/a
Product-union_payn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-22659
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.31% / 22.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Jan, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-03 Apr, 2025 | 18:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Ruckus R310 10.5.1.0.199, Ruckus R500 10.5.1.0.199, Ruckus R600 10.5.1.0.199, Ruckus T300 10.5.1.0.199, Ruckus T301n 10.5.1.0.199, Ruckus T301s 10.5.1.0.199, SmartCell Gateway 200 (SCG200) before 3.6.2.0.795, SmartZone 100 (SZ-100) before 3.6.2.0.795, SmartZone 300 (SZ300) before 3.6.2.0.795, Virtual SmartZone (vSZ) before 3.6.2.0.795, ZoneDirector 1100 9.10.2.0.130, ZoneDirector 1200 10.2.1.0.218, ZoneDirector 3000 10.2.1.0.218, ZoneDirector 5000 10.0.1.0.151, a vulnerability allows attackers to exploit the official image signature to force injection unauthorized image signature.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ruckuswirelessn/a
Product-zonedirector_3000zonedirector_1200_firmwaret300_firmwarescg200_firmwarer600sz-100_firmwarevszvsz_firmwarer310_firmwarer600_firmwarer500_firmwarezonedirector_1100r500zonedirector_5000t301szonedirector_1100_firmwaret301s_firmwarer310zonedirector_3000_firmwarezonedirector_5000_firmwaret300scg200sz-300_firmwaresz-100zonedirector_1200t301n_firmwaresz-300t301nn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found