IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.3, 11.5, and 11.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 176268.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Josh Kohlbach Product Feed PRO for WooCommerce woo-product-feed-pro allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Product Feed PRO for WooCommerce: from n/a through <= 13.5.2.
The Go MCP SDK used Go's standard encoding/json. Prior to version 1.4.1, the Go SDK's Streamable HTTP transport accepted browser-generated cross-site `POST` requests without validating the `Origin` header and without requiring `Content-Type: application/json`. In deployments without Authorization, especially stateless or sessionless configurations, this allows an arbitrary website to send MCP requests to a local server and potentially trigger tool execution. Version 1.4.1 contains a patch for the issue.
The PropertyHive plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.19. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'save_account_details' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to edit the name, email address, and password of an administrator account via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Nexxt Solutions Nebula 300+ firmware through version 12.01.01.37 does not implement CSRF protections on state-changing endpoints such as /goform/setSysTools and other administrative interfaces. As a result, an attacker can craft malicious web requests that are executed in the context of an authenticated administrator’s browser, leading to unauthorized configuration changes, including enabling services or modifying system settings.
An issue was discovered in Selesta Visual Access Manager (VAM) 4.15.0 through 4.29. It allows Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) on any HTML form. An attacker can exploit the vulnerability to abuse functionalities such as change password, add user, add privilege, and so on.
PeteReport Version 0.5 contains a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability allowing an attacker to trick users into deleting users, products, reports and findings on the application.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 3xLogic Infinias Access Control through 6.6.9586.0 allows remote attackers to execute malicious and unauthorized actions (e.g., delete application users) by sending a crafted HTML document or encoded URL to a user that the website trusts. The user needs to have an active privileged session.
A CSRF vulnerability exists in the FTP Settings of Web File Manager in Rumpus FTP 8.2.9.1. Exploitation of this vulnerability can result in manipulation of Server FTP settings at RAPR/FTPSettingsSet.html.
A CSRF vulnerability exists in the Upload Center Forms Component of Web File Manager in Rumpus FTP 8.2.9.1. This could allow an attacker to delete, create, and update the upload forms via RAPR/TriggerServerFunction.html.
The Misiek Photo Album WordPress plugin through 1.4.3 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users delete arbitrary albums via a CSRF attack
A CSRF vulnerability exists in the Web File Manager's Create/Delete Accounts functionality of Rumpus FTP Server 8.2.9.1. By exploiting it, an attacker can Create and Delete accounts via RAPR/TriggerServerFunction.html.
letodms 3.3.6 has CSRF via change password
The ILC Thickbox WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
A CSRF vulnerability exists in the Web File Manager's Network Setting functionality of Rumpus FTP Server 8.2.9.1. By exploiting it, an attacker can manipulate the SMTP setting and other network settings via RAPR/NetworkSettingsSet.html.
A CSRF vulnerability exists in the Folder Sets Settings of Web File Manager in Rumpus FTP 8.2.9.1. This allows an attacker to Create/Delete Folders after exploiting it at RAPR/FolderSetsSet.html.
An issue was discovered in Landing-CMS 0.0.6. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can change the admin's password via the password/ URI,
OTCMS v3.85 has CSRF in the admin/member_deal.php Admin Panel page, leading to creation of a new management group account, as demonstrated by superadmin.
The Visual Sound (old) WordPress plugin through 1.06 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
The Posts reminder WordPress plugin through 0.20 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
The Visual Sound WordPress plugin through 1.03 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
The AZIndex WordPress plugin through 0.8.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin delete arbitrary indexes via a CSRF attack
The webtoffee-gdpr-cookie-consent WordPress plugin before 2.6.1 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting visit logs via CSRF attacks
The Light Poll WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not have CSRF checks when deleting polls, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform such action via a CSRF attack
The WP MultiTasking WordPress plugin through 0.1.12 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
An issue was discovered in fastadmin 1.0.0.20190705_beta. There is a public/admin/general.config/edit CSRF vulnerability, as demonstrated by resultant XSS via the row[name] parameter.
The HTML Forms WordPress plugin before 1.3.34 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks
The WP MultiTasking WordPress plugin through 0.1.12 does not have CSRF check when updating exit popups, which could allow attackers to make logged admins perform such action via a CSRF attack
The Social Auto Poster plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 5.3.14. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on multiple functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add, modify, or delete post meta and plugin options.
SODOLA SL902-SWTGW124AS firmware versions through 200.1.20 contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in its management interface that allows attackers to induce authenticated users into submitting forged requests. Attackers can craft malicious requests that execute unauthorized configuration or administrative actions with the victim's privileges when the authenticated user visits a malicious webpage.
The WP MultiTasking WordPress plugin through 0.1.12 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
A Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in GitHub Enterprise Server allowed write operations on a victim-owned repository by exploiting incorrect request types. A mitigating factor is that the attacker would have to be a trusted GitHub Enterprise Server user, and the victim would have to visit a tag in the attacker's fork of their own repository. vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior 3.14 and was fixed in version 3.13.1, 3.12.6, 3.11.12, 3.10.14, and 3.9.17. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.
WTCMS 1.0 allows index.php?g=admin&m=index&a=index CSRF with resultant XSS.
Parse Dashboard is a standalone dashboard for managing Parse Server apps. In versions 7.3.0-alpha.42 through 9.0.0-alpha.7, the AI Agent API endpoint (`POST /apps/:appId/agent`) lacks CSRF protection. An attacker can craft a malicious page that, when visited by an authenticated dashboard user, submits requests to the agent endpoint using the victim's session. The fix in version 9.0.0-alpha.8 adds CSRF middleware to the agent endpoint and embeds a CSRF token in the dashboard page. As a workaround, remove the `agent` configuration block from your dashboard configuration. Dashboards without an `agent` config are not affected.
IBM Business Automation Workflow traditional 21.0.1 through 21.0.3, 20.0.0.1 through 20.0.0.2, 19.0.0.1 through 19.0.0.3, 18.0.0.0 through 18.0.0.1, IBM Business Automation Workflow containers V21.0.1 - V21.0.3 20.0.0.1 through 20.0.0.2, IBM Business Process Manager 8.6.0.0 through 8.6.0.201803, and 8.5.0.0 through 8.5.0.201706 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Comtrend router WLD71-T1_v2.0.201820, affecting the GRG-4280us version. This vulnerability allows an attacker to force an end user to execute unwanted actions in a web application to which he is authenticated.
The Ninja Forms plugin before 3.4.27.1 for WordPress allows CSRF via services integration.
Caddy is an extensible server platform that uses TLS by default. Prior to version 2.11.1, the local caddy admin API (default listen `127.0.0.1:2019`) exposes a state-changing `POST /load` endpoint that replaces the entire running configuration. When origin enforcement is not enabled (`enforce_origin` not configured), the admin endpoint accepts cross-origin requests (e.g., from attacker-controlled web content in a victim browser) and applies an attacker-supplied JSON config. This can change the admin listener settings and alter HTTP server behavior without user intent. Version 2.11.1 contains a fix for the issue.
A vulnerability in the vManage web-based UI (web UI) of the Cisco SD-WAN Solution could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web UI on an affected instance of vManage. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user.
Astro is a web framework for content-driven websites. In affected versions a bug in Astro’s CSRF-protection middleware allows requests to bypass CSRF checks. When the `security.checkOrigin` configuration option is set to `true`, Astro middleware will perform a CSRF check. However, a vulnerability exists that can bypass this security. A semicolon-delimited parameter is allowed after the type in `Content-Type`. Web browsers will treat a `Content-Type` such as `application/x-www-form-urlencoded; abc` as a `simple request` and will not perform preflight validation. In this case, CSRF is not blocked as expected. Additionally, the `Content-Type` header is not required for a request. This issue has been addressed in version 4.16.17 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco SD-WAN vManage Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user. These actions could include modifying the system configuration and deleting accounts.
The Open eClass platform (formerly known as GUnet eClass) is a complete course management system. Prior to version 4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in multiple teacher-restricted endpoints allows attackers to induce authenticated teachers to perform unintended actions, such as modifying assignment grades, via crafted requests. This issue has been patched in version 4.2.
The CP Contact Form with PayPal plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.52. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cp_contact_form_paypal_check_init_actions() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add discount codes via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The Inline Google Maps WordPress plugin through 5.11 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack, and lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SEO Panel version 4.10.0 allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized user password resets.
The Useful Banner Manager WordPress plugin through 1.6.1 does not perform CSRF checks on POST requests to its admin page, allowing an attacker to trick a logged in admin to add, modify or delete banners from the plugin by submitting a form.
The Ask me WordPress theme before 6.8.2 does not perform CSRF checks for any of its AJAX actions, allowing an attacker to trick logged in users to perform various actions on their behalf on the site.
The Discy WordPress theme before 5.2 does not check for CSRF tokens in the AJAX action discy_reset_options, allowing an attacker to trick an admin into resetting the site settings back to defaults.
The Rename wp-login.php WordPress plugin through 2.6.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating the secret login URL, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
Shenzhen Tenda AC7 firmware version V03.03.03.01_cn and prior does not implement CSRF protections for administrative functions in the web management interface. The interface does not enforce anti-CSRF tokens or robust origin validation, which can allow an attacker to induce a logged-in administrator to perform unintended state-changing requests and modify router settings.