Jenkins Selenium Plugin 3.141.59 and earlier has no CSRF protection for its HTTP endpoints, allowing attackers to perform all administrative actions provided by the plugin.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in DamiCMS v6.0.6 that can add an admin account via admin.php?s=/Admin/doadd.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in index.php/Dswjcms/User/tfAdd of Dswjcms 1.6.4 allows authenticated attackers to arbitrarily add administrator users.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Indexhibit 2.1.5 allows attackers to arbitrarily reset account passwords.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in Rockoa v1.9.8 allows an authenticated attacker to arbitrarily add an administrator account.

In Lansweeper 8.0.130.17, the web console is vulnerable to a CSRF attack that would allow a low-level Lansweeper user to elevate their privileges within the application.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EndRun Technologies Sonoma D12 Network Time Server (GPS) F/W 6010-0071-000 Ver 4.00 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code, cause a denial of service, gain escalated privileges, and gain sensitive information.

Combodo iTop contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability, attackers can execute specific commands via malicious site request forgery.

In TYPO3 CMS 9.0.0 through 9.5.16 and 10.0.0 through 10.4.1, it has been discovered that the backend user interface and install tool are vulnerable to a same-site request forgery. A backend user can be tricked into interacting with a malicious resource an attacker previously managed to upload to the web server. Scripts are then executed with the privileges of the victims' user session. In a worst-case scenario, new admin users can be created which can directly be used by an attacker. The vulnerability is basically a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) triggered by a cross-site scripting vulnerability (XSS) - but happens on the same target host - thus, it's actually a same-site request forgery. Malicious payload such as HTML containing JavaScript might be provided by either an authenticated backend user or by a non-authenticated user using a third party extension, e.g. file upload in a contact form with knowing the target location. To be successful, the attacked victim requires an active and valid backend or install tool user session at the time of the attack. This has been fixed in 9.5.17 and 10.4.2. The deployment of additional mitigation techniques is suggested as described below. - Sudo Mode Extension This TYPO3 extension intercepts modifications to security relevant database tables, e.g. those storing user accounts or storages of the file abstraction layer. Modifications need to confirmed again by the acting user providing their password again. This technique is known as sudo mode. This way, unintended actions happening in the background can be mitigated. - https://github.com/FriendsOfTYPO3/sudo-mode - https://extensions.typo3.org/extension/sudo_mode - Content Security Policy Content Security Policies tell (modern) browsers how resources served a particular site are handled. It is also possible to disallow script executions for specific locations. In a TYPO3 context, it is suggested to disallow direct script execution at least for locations /fileadmin/ and /uploads/.

Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to rename commands via '/rename_command?sid=', affecting the 'command_name' parameter.

Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to delete commands individually via '/delete_command?sid=', using the 'cid' parameter.

Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to delete all commands via '/delete_all_commands?sid='.

MuraCMS through 10.1.10 contains a CSRF vulnerability in the Add To Group functionality for user management (cUsers.cfc addToGroup method) that allows attackers to escalate privileges by adding any user to any group without proper authorization checks. The vulnerable function lacks CSRF token validation and directly processes user-supplied userId and groupId parameters via getUserManager().createUserInGorup(), enabling malicious websites to forge requests that automatically execute when an authenticated administrator visits a crafted page. Adding a user to the Super Admins group (s2 user) is not possible. Successful exploitation results in the attacker gaining privilege escalation both horizontally to other groups and vertically to the admin group. Escalation to the s2 User group is not possible.

A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user can craft a malicious CSRF payload that can result in arbitrary command execution.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been found on WIC1200, affecting version 1.1. An authenticated user could lead another user into executing unwanted actions inside the application they are logged in. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of propper CSRF token implementation.

A Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in ePolicy Orchestrator prior to 5.10.0 CP1 Update 2 allows a remote low privilege user to successfully add a new user with administrator privileges to the ePO server. This impacts the dashboard area of the user interface. To exploit this the attacker must change the HTTP payload post submission, prior to it reaching the ePO server.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in wpWax Legal Pages.This issue affects Legal Pages: from n/a through 1.3.7.

The admin-renamer-extended (aka Admin renamer extended) plugin 3.2.1 for WordPress allows wp-admin/plugins.php?page=admin-renamer-extended/admin.php CSRF.

The codection "Import users from CSV with meta" plugin before 1.14.2.2 for WordPress allows wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=acui_delete_attachment CSRF.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository wallabag/wallabag prior to 2.6.3.

The cross-site request forgery token in the request may be predictable or easily guessable allowing attackers to craft a malicious request, which could be triggered by a victim unknowingly. In a successful CSRF attack, the attacker could lead the victim user to carry out an action unintentionally.

WP_Admin_UI in the Crony Cronjob Manager plugin before 0.4.7 for WordPress has CSRF via the name parameter in an action=manage&do=create operation, as demonstrated by inserting XSS sequences.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alexey Trofimov's Access Code Feeder plugin <= 1.0.3 at WordPress.

HomeAutomation 3.3.2 suffers from an authenticated OS command execution vulnerability using custom command v0.1 plugin. This can be exploited with a CSRF vulnerability to execute arbitrary shell commands as the web user via the 'set_command_on' and 'set_command_off' POST parameters in '/system/systemplugins/customcommand/customcommand.plugin.php' by using an unsanitized PHP exec() function.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Recipe Plugin 1.2 and earlier allows attackers to send an HTTP request to an attacker-specified URL and parse the response as XML.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins CloudBees AWS Credentials Plugin 189.v3551d5642995 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an AWS service using an attacker-specified token.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webapi component in Synology Calendar before 2.3.4-0631 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

Dada Mail is a web-based e-mail list management system. In affected versions a bad actor could give someone a carefully crafted web page via email, SMS, etc, that - when visited, allows them control of the list control panel as if the bad actor was logged in themselves. This includes changing any mailing list password, as well as the Dada Mail Root Password - which could effectively shut out actual list owners of the mailing list and allow the bad actor complete and unfettered control of your mailing list. This vulnerability also affects profile logins. For this vulnerability to work, the target of the bad actor would need to be logged into the list control panel themselves. This CSRF vulnerability in Dada Mail affects all versions of Dada Mail v11.15.1 and below. Although we know of no known CSRF exploits that have happened in the wild, this vulnerability has been confirmed by our testing, and by a third party. Users are advised to update to version 11.16.0.

GNU Mailman before 2.1.35 may allow remote Privilege Escalation. A csrf_token value is not specific to a single user account. An attacker can obtain a value within the context of an unprivileged user account, and then use that value in a CSRF attack against an admin (e.g., for account takeover).

The Like Button Rating ♥ LikeBtn WordPress plugin before 2.6.38 does not have any authorisation and CSRF checks in the likebtn_export_votes AJAX action, which could allow any authenticated user, such as subscriber, to get a list of email and IP addresses of people who liked content from the blog.

The WP Extra File Types WordPress plugin before 0.5.1 does not have CSRF check when saving its settings, nor sanitise and escape some of them, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them and perform Cross-Site Scripting attacks

The Tawk.To Live Chat WordPress plugin before 0.6.0 does not have capability and CSRF checks in the tawkto_setwidget and tawkto_removewidget AJAX actions, available to any authenticated user. The first one allows low-privileged users (including simple subscribers) to change the 'tawkto-embed-widget-page-id' and 'tawkto-embed-widget-widget-id' parameters. Any authenticated user can thus link the vulnerable website to their own Tawk.to instance. Consequently, they will be able to monitor the vulnerable website and interact with its visitors (receive contact messages, answer, ...). They will also be able to display an arbitrary Knowledge Base. The second one will remove the live chat widget from pages.

The Maps Plugin using Google Maps for WordPress plugin before 1.8.1 does not have proper authorisation and CSRF in most of its AJAX actions, which could allow any authenticated users, such as subscriber to delete arbitrary posts and update the plugin's settings.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Google Cloud Backup Plugin 0.6 and earlier allows attackers to request a manual backup.

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in GreenCMS v.2.3 allows an attacker to gain privileges via the adduser function of index.php.

An issue was discovered in the webmail component in Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. When using preauth, CSRF tokens are not checked on some POST endpoints. Thus, when an authenticated user views an attacker-controlled page, a request will be sent to the application that appears to be intended. The CSRF token is omitted from the request, but the request still succeeds.

In Jenkins 2.399 and earlier, LTS 2.387.3 and earlier, POST requests are sent in order to load the list of context actions. If part of the URL includes insufficiently escaped user-provided values, a victim may be tricked into sending a POST request to an unexpected endpoint by opening a context menu.