A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Tenda AC18 15.03.05.05. Affected is the function fromSysToolReboot of the file /goform/SysToolReboot. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-257058 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Tenda AC15 15.03.05.18. Affected by this vulnerability is the function fromSysToolReboot of the file /goform/SysToolReboot. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-257671. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Tenda AC15 15.03.05.18. Affected by this issue is the function fromSysToolRestoreSet of the file /goform/SysToolRestoreSet. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-257672. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Tenda AC18 15.03.05.05. Affected by this vulnerability is the function fromSysToolRestoreSet of the file /goform/SysToolRestoreSet. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-257059. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Shenzhen Tenda W30E V2 firmware versions up to and including V16.01.0.19(5037) lack cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protections on administrative endpoints, including those used to change administrator account credentials. As a result, an attacker can craft malicious requests that, when triggered by an authenticated user’s browser, modify administrative passwords and other configuration settings.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Tenda AC9 15.03.02.13. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Shenzhen Tenda AC7 firmware version V03.03.03.01_cn and prior does not implement CSRF protections for administrative functions in the web management interface. The interface does not enforce anti-CSRF tokens or robust origin validation, which can allow an attacker to induce a logged-in administrator to perform unintended state-changing requests and modify router settings.

Shenzhen Tenda F3 Wireless Router firmware V12.01.01.55_multi contains a clickjacking vulnerability in the web-based administrative interface. The interface does not set the X-Frame-Options header, allowing attacker-controlled sites to embed administrative pages in an iframe and trick an authenticated administrator into unintended interactions that may result in unauthorized configuration changes.

Tenda i22 V1.0.0.3(4687) is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via function fromSysToolRestoreSet.

Tenda AC6V1.0 V15.03.05.19 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via function fromSysToolReboot.

Tenda i22 V1.0.0.3(4687) is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via function fromSysToolReboot.

Tenda AC6V1.0 V15.03.05.19 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via function fromSysToolRestoreSet.

Tenda AX12 V22.03.01.21_CN was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /goform/SysToolRestoreSet .

Tenda AC1206 US_AC1206V1.0RTL_V15.03.06.23_multi_TD01 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via function fromSysToolReboot.

Tenda AC1206 US_AC1206V1.0RTL_V15.03.06.23_multi_TD01 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via function fromSysToolRestoreSet.

Tenda AX1803 US_AX1803v2.0br_v1.0.0.1_2994_CN_ZGYD01_4 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via function TendaAteMode.

Tenda AX1803 US_AX1803v2.0br_v1.0.0.1_2994_CN_ZGYD01_4 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via function fromSysToolReboot.

A CSRF issue in the /goform/SysToolReboot endpoint of Tenda AC15 AC1900 version 15.03.05.19 allows remote attackers to reboot the device and cause denial of service via a payload hosted by an attacker-controlled web page.

Tenda AX12 V22.03.01.21_CN was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the function sub_42E328 at /goform/SysToolReboot.

Tenda AX12 V22.03.01.21_CN was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the function sub_422168 at /goform/WifiExtraSet.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Shenzhen Tenda Technology Tenda A32 Router with firmware 5.07.53_CN allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that reboot the device via a request to goform/SysToolReboot.

The Seraphinite Accelerator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.27.21. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'OnAdminApi_CacheOpBegin' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform several administrative actions, including deleting the cache, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in John James Jacoby WP Media Categories wp-media-categories allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Media Categories: from n/a through <= 2.1.0.

IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7, 11.2.4, and 12.0.0 is vulnerable to form action hijacking where it is possible to modify the form action to reference an arbitrary path. IBM X-Force ID: 255898.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TangibleWP Vehica Core vehica-core allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Vehica Core: from n/a through <= 1.0.100.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in yonifre Lenix scss compiler lenix-scss-compiler allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Lenix scss compiler: from n/a through <= 1.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Zoho Flow Zoho Flow zoho-flow allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Zoho Flow: from n/a through <= 2.14.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in andy_moyle Church Admin church-admin.This issue affects Church Admin: from n/a through <= 4.1.32.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in grooni Groovy Menu groovy-menu-free allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Groovy Menu: from n/a through <= 1.4.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Galaxy Weblinks Post Featured Video post-featured-video allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Post Featured Video: from n/a through <= 1.7.

The Yougler Blogger Profile Page plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, v1.01. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'yougler-plugin.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

JBoss KeyCloak is vulnerable to soft token deletion via CSRF

The MicroPayments – Fans Paysite: Paid Creator Subscriptions, Digital Assets, Wallet plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the adminOptions() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The POST SMTP Mailer WordPress plugin before 2.5.7 does not have proper CSRF checks in some AJAX actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in users with the manage_postman_smtp capability delete arbitrary logs via a CSRF attack.

The Digital Marketing and Agency Templates Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the import_templates() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger an import via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The WP2HTML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in brijrajs WooCommerce Single Page Checkout woo-single-page-checkout allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WooCommerce Single Page Checkout: from n/a through <= 1.2.7.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Badi Jones Duplicate Content Cure duplicate-content-cure allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Duplicate Content Cure: from n/a through <= 1.0.

Windu CMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in user editing functionality. Malicious attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the victim, will automatically send POST request that deletes given user. Only version 4.1 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable. This issue was fixed in version 4.1 build 2250.

A vulnerability has been found in Konica Minolta bizhub up to 20250202 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

The RD Contacto plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the rdWappUpdateData() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in GroupSession Free edition prior to ver5.3.0, GroupSession byCloud prior to ver5.3.3, and GroupSession ZION prior to ver5.3.2. If a user accesses a malicious page while logged in, unintended operations may be performed.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in reimund Compact Admin compact-admin allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Compact Admin: from n/a through <= 1.3.3.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been reported to affect Notification Center. The remote attackers can then exploit the vulnerability to gain privileges or hijack user identities. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: Notification Center 1.10.0.3291 and later

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Di Themes Di Themes Demo Site Importer di-themes-demo-site-importer allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Di Themes Demo Site Importer: from n/a through <= 1.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Bjorn Manintveld BCM Duplicate Menu bcm-duplicate-menu allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects BCM Duplicate Menu: from n/a through <= 1.1.3.

The VR Calendar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the syncCalendar() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger a calendar sync via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The WP Firebase Push Notification plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wfpn_brodcast_notification_message() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to send broadcast notifications via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Waituk Entrada theme allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Entrada: from n/a through 5.7.7.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Stephanie Leary Dashboard Notepad dashboard-notepad allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Dashboard Notepad: from n/a through <= 1.42.