Tuleap is an Open Source Suite for management of software development and collaboration. Tuleap Community Edition versions below 17.0.99.1762444754 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition versions prior to 17.0-2, 16.13-7 and 16.12-10 allow attackers trick victims into changing tracker general settings. This issue is fixed in version Tuleap Community Edition version 17.0.99.1762444754 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition versions 17.0-2, 16.13-7 and 16.12-10.

The WP Post Styling WordPress plugin before 1.3.1 does not have CSRF checks in various actions, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete plugin's data, update the settings, add new entries and more via CSRF attacks

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Mailer Plugin 391.ve4a_38c1b_cf4b_ and earlier allows attackers to use the DNS used by the Jenkins instance to resolve an attacker-specified hostname.

The Private Files WordPress plugin through 0.40 is missing CSRF check when disabling the protection, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin perform such action via a CSRF attack and make the blog public

The MyCSS WordPress plugin through 1.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

Tuleap is a free and open source suite for management of software development and collaboration. Versions of Tuleap Community Edition prior to 17.0.99.1763126988 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition prior to 17.0-3 and 16.13-8 have missing CSRF protections which allow attackers to create or remove tracker triggers. This issue is fixed in Tuleap Community Edition version 17.0.99.1763126988 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition versions 17.0-3 and 16.13-8.

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Gym Management System 1.0. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

The underConstruction WordPress plugin before 1.20 does not have CSRF check in place when deactivating the construction mode, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin perform such action via a CSRF attack

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Themis Plugin 1.4.1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified HTTP server.

A vulnerability was found in CodeAstro Expense Management System 1.0. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins 2.329 and earlier, LTS 2.319.1 and earlier allows attackers to trigger build of job without parameters when no security realm is set.

Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in GROWI v7.3.3 and earlier. If a user views a malicious page while logged in, the user may be tricked to do unintended operations.

A vulnerability was found in PHPGurukul Car Rental Portal 3.0. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Serhii Pasyuk Gmedia Photo Gallery allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Gmedia Photo Gallery: from n/a through 1.24.1.

The OpenBook Book Data WordPress plugin through 3.5.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack and lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping as well

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alex Prokopenko / JustCoded Just TinyMCE Custom Styles just-tinymce-styles allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Just TinyMCE Custom Styles: from n/a through <= 1.2.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in photoboxone SMTP Mail smtp-mail allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects SMTP Mail: from n/a through <= 1.3.47.

In OpenNMS Horizon, versions opennms-1-0-stable through opennms-27.1.0-1; OpenNMS Meridian, versions meridian-foundation-2015.1.0-1 through meridian-foundation-2019.1.18-1; meridian-foundation-2020.1.0-1 through meridian-foundation-2020.1.6-1 are vulnerable to CSRF, due to no CSRF protection, and since there is no validation of an existing user name while renaming a user. As a result, privileges of the renamed user are being overwritten by the old user and the old user is being deleted from the user list.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MERGADO Mergado Pack allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Mergado Pack: from n/a through 4.2.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ink themes WP Gmail SMTP allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Gmail SMTP: from n/a through 1.0.7.

A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Server (All versions < V2.0 SP1). Some parts of the web application are not protected against Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. The security vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker that is able to trigger requests of a logged-in user to the application. The vulnerability could allow switching the connectivity state of a user or a device. At the time of advisory publication no public exploitation of this security vulnerability was known.

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in code-projects School Fees Payment System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

The Add Post URL WordPress plugin through 2.1.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack and lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Omid Shamloo Pardakht Delkhah allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Pardakht Delkhah: from n/a through 3.0.0.

SeedDMS 5.1.x is affected by cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in out.EditDocument.php.

The Yougler Blogger Profile Page plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, v1.01. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'yougler-plugin.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Joovii Sendle Shipping allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Sendle Shipping: from n/a through 6.02.

Lack of CSRF checks in the ActiveCampaign WordPress plugin, versions before 8.0.2, on its Settings form, which could allow attacker to make a logged-in administrator change API Credentials to attacker's account.

The Seraphinite Accelerator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.27.21. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'OnAdminApi_CacheOpBegin' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform several administrative actions, including deleting the cache, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Business Directory Plugin – Easy Listing Directories for WordPress WordPress plugin before 5.11.2 suffered from a Cross-Site Request Forgery issue, allowing an attacker to make a logged in administrator update arbitrary payment history, such as change their status (from pending to completed to example)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in yonifre Lenix scss compiler allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Lenix scss compiler: from n/a through 1.2.

The Social Share Buttons by Supsystic WordPress plugin before 2.2.4 does not perform CSRF checks in it's ajax endpoints and admin pages, allowing an attacker to trick any logged in user to manipulate or change the plugin settings, as well as create, delete and rename projects and networks.

The Shantz WordPress QOTD WordPress plugin through 1.2.2 is lacking any CSRF check when updating its settings, allowing attackers to make logged in administrators change them to arbitrary values.

The DW Question & Answer Pro WordPress plugin through 1.3.4 does not properly check for CSRF in some of its functions, allowing attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions, such as update a comment or a question status.

The URL Shortify WordPress plugin before 1.5.1 does not have CSRF check in place when bulk-deleting links or groups, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary link and group via a CSRF attack.

The Timetable and Event Schedule WordPress plugin before 2.4.2 does not have proper access control when deleting a timeslot, allowing any user with the edit_posts capability (contributor+) to delete arbitrary timeslot from any events. Furthermore, no CSRF check is in place as well, allowing such attack to be performed via CSRF against a logged in with such capability

The RD Contacto plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the rdWappUpdateData() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Waituk Entrada theme allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Entrada: from n/a through 5.7.7.

The Bunny’s Print CSS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.95. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the pcss_options_subpanel() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The MediaWiki "Report" extension has a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. Before fixed version, there was no protection against CSRF checks on Special:Report, so requests to report a revision could be forged. The problem has been fixed in commit f828dc6 by making use of MediaWiki edit tokens.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Zoho Flow Zoho Flow allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Zoho Flow: from n/a through 2.14.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Shahjada Download Manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Download Manager: from n/a through 3.3.24.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Badi Jones Duplicate Content Cure duplicate-content-cure allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Duplicate Content Cure: from n/a through <= 1.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Appointify allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Appointify: from n/a through 1.0.8.

Windu CMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in user editing functionality. Malicious attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the victim, will automatically send POST request that deletes given user. Only version 4.1 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable. This issue was fixed in version 4.1 build 2250.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Helmut Wandl Advanced Settings allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Advanced Settings: from n/a through 3.1.1.

The WP Survey Plus WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have any authorisation and CSRF checks in place in its AJAX actions, allowing any user to call them and add/edit/delete Surveys. Furthermore, due to the lack of sanitization in the Surveys' Title, this could also lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issues

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TangibleWP Vehica Core allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Vehica Core: from n/a through 1.0.100.

The Orange Form WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not have any authorisation and CSRF checks in all of its AJAX calls, for example the or_delete_filed one which is available to both unauthenticated and authenticated users could allow attackers to delete arbitrary posts.The AJAX calls performing actions on posts also do not ensure that the post belong to them (or that they are allowed to perform such action on it)

The WP Limits WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF check when saving its settings, allowing attacker to make a logged in admin change them, which could make the blog unstable by setting low values