Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2026-50010

Summary
Assigner-GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID-a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At-12 Jun, 2026 | 14:50
Updated At-12 Jun, 2026 | 16:39
Rejected At-
Credits

Netty's wrapping plain trust manager silently disables hostname verification

Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. Prior to versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final, SimpleTrustManagerFactory.engineGetTrustManagers() and related paths wrap any user-supplied plain X509TrustManager in X509TrustManagerWrapper, which extends X509ExtendedTrustManager but implements the 3-arg checkServerTrusted(chain, authType, SSLEngine) by discarding the SSLEngine and calling the 2-arg delegate. Because the object now IS an X509ExtendedTrustManager, neither SunJSSE's internal AbstractTrustManagerWrapper nor Netty's own OpenSslX509TrustManagerWrapper will re-wrap it to add endpoint-identification. Consequently, even though Netty 4.2 sets endpointIdentificationAlgorithm="HTTPS" by default, a client built with `SslContextBuilder.forClient().trustManager(somePlainX509TrustManager)` performs no hostname verification at all. Versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final patch the issue.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
â–¼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID:a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At:12 Jun, 2026 | 14:50
Updated At:12 Jun, 2026 | 16:39
Rejected At:
â–¼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
Netty's wrapping plain trust manager silently disables hostname verification

Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. Prior to versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final, SimpleTrustManagerFactory.engineGetTrustManagers() and related paths wrap any user-supplied plain X509TrustManager in X509TrustManagerWrapper, which extends X509ExtendedTrustManager but implements the 3-arg checkServerTrusted(chain, authType, SSLEngine) by discarding the SSLEngine and calling the 2-arg delegate. Because the object now IS an X509ExtendedTrustManager, neither SunJSSE's internal AbstractTrustManagerWrapper nor Netty's own OpenSslX509TrustManagerWrapper will re-wrap it to add endpoint-identification. Consequently, even though Netty 4.2 sets endpointIdentificationAlgorithm="HTTPS" by default, a client built with `SslContextBuilder.forClient().trustManager(somePlainX509TrustManager)` performs no hostname verification at all. Versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final patch the issue.

Affected Products
Vendor
The Netty Projectnetty
Product
netty
Versions
Affected
  • >= 4.2.0.Final, < 4.2.15.Final
  • < 4.1.135.Final
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-347CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-347
Description: CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-c653-97m9-rcg9
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.135.Final
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.15.Final
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-c653-97m9-rcg9
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.135.Final
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.15.Final
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
â–¼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
â–¼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security-advisories@github.com
Published At:12 Jun, 2026 | 16:16
Updated At:12 Jun, 2026 | 16:18

Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. Prior to versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final, SimpleTrustManagerFactory.engineGetTrustManagers() and related paths wrap any user-supplied plain X509TrustManager in X509TrustManagerWrapper, which extends X509ExtendedTrustManager but implements the 3-arg checkServerTrusted(chain, authType, SSLEngine) by discarding the SSLEngine and calling the 2-arg delegate. Because the object now IS an X509ExtendedTrustManager, neither SunJSSE's internal AbstractTrustManagerWrapper nor Netty's own OpenSslX509TrustManagerWrapper will re-wrap it to add endpoint-identification. Consequently, even though Netty 4.2 sets endpointIdentificationAlgorithm="HTTPS" by default, a client built with `SslContextBuilder.forClient().trustManager(somePlainX509TrustManager)` performs no hostname verification at all. Versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final patch the issue.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Secondary3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CPE Matches

Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-347Primarysecurity-advisories@github.com
CWE ID: CWE-347
Type: Primary
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.135.Finalsecurity-advisories@github.com
N/A
https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.15.Finalsecurity-advisories@github.com
N/A
https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-c653-97m9-rcg9security-advisories@github.com
N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.135.Final
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.15.Final
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-c653-97m9-rcg9
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource: N/A

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

18Records found

CVE-2020-13810
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.01% / 1.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2020 | 14:55
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 9.7.2. It allows signature validation bypass via a modified file or a file with non-standard signatures.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aFoxit Software Incorporated
Product-phantompdfreadern/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-13803
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.01% / 1.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2020 | 14:33
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF Mac and Foxit Reader for Mac before 4.0. It allows signature validation bypass via a modified file or a file with non-standard signatures.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aFoxit Software Incorporated
Product-phantompdfreadern/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-12244
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.06% / 19.41%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 May, 2020 | 13:51
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 11:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue has been found in PowerDNS Recursor 4.1.0 through 4.3.0 where records in the answer section of a NXDOMAIN response lacking an SOA were not properly validated in SyncRes::processAnswer, allowing an attacker to bypass DNSSEC validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-powerdnsn/aDebian GNU/LinuxopenSUSEFedora Project
Product-debian_linuxfedorarecursorbackports_sleleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2026-4258
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 7.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Mar, 2026 | 05:00
Updated-03 Jun, 2026 | 14:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

All versions of the package sjcl are vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature due to missing point-on-curve validation in sjcl.ecc.basicKey.publicKey(). An attacker can recover a victim's ECDH private key by sending crafted off-curve public keys and observing ECDH outputs. The dhJavaEc() function directly returns the raw x-coordinate of the scalar multiplication result (no hashing), providing a plaintext oracle without requiring any decryption feedback.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-bitwiseshiftleftn/a
Product-stanford_javascript_crypto_librarysjcl
CWE ID-CWE-325
Missing Cryptographic Step
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-29455
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.07%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Apr, 2021 | 19:05
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Missing validation of JWT signature in `grassrootza/grassroot-platform`

Grassroot Platform is an application to make it faster, cheaper and easier to persistently organize and mobilize people in low-income communities. Grassroot Platform before master deployment as of 2021-04-16 did not properly verify the signature of JSON Web Tokens when refreshing an existing JWT. This allows to forge a valid JWT. The problem has been patched in version 1.3.1 by deprecating the JWT refresh function, which was an overdue deprecation regardless (the "refresh" flow is no longer used).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-grassrootgrassrootza
Product-grassroot_platformgrassroot-platform
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-26100
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 28.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Jul, 2021 | 18:23
Updated-25 Oct, 2024 | 13:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A missing cryptographic step in the Identity-Based Encryption service of FortiMail before 7.0.0 may allow an unauthenticated attacker who intercepts the encrypted messages to manipulate them in such a way that makes the tampering and the recovery of the plaintexts possible.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-fortimailFortinet FortiMail
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-46324
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.07% / 21.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Oct, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 20:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

pkg/suci/suci.go in free5GC udm before 1.2.0, when Go before 1.19 is used, allows an Invalid Curve Attack because it may compute a shared secret via an uncompressed public key that has not been validated. An attacker can send arbitrary SUCIs to the UDM, which tries to decrypt them via both its private key and the attacker's public key.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-free5gcn/aGo
Product-goudmn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-12607
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.17% / 37.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Jun, 2020 | 21:00
Updated-12 Feb, 2025 | 18:29
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in fastecdsa before 2.1.2. When using the NIST P-256 curve in the ECDSA implementation, the point at infinity is mishandled. This means that for an extreme value in k and s^-1, the signature verification fails even if the signature is correct. This behavior is not solely a usability problem. There are some threat models where an attacker can benefit by successfully guessing users for whom signature verification will fail.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-antonkueltzn/a
Product-fastecdsan/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-1849
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 35.95%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Sep, 2021 | 14:44
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 16:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue in code signature validation was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Big Sur 11.3, iOS 14.5 and iPadOS 14.5, watchOS 7.4, tvOS 14.5. A malicious application may be able to bypass Privacy preferences.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Apple Inc.
Product-iphone_oswatchostvosipadosmacostvOSmacOSwatchOSiOS and iPadOS
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-7906
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.00% / 0.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jan, 2020 | 17:09
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 09:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In JetBrains Rider versions 2019.3 EAP2 through 2019.3 EAP7, there were unsigned binaries provided by the Windows installer. This issue was fixed in release version 2019.3.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJetBrains s.r.o.
Product-ridern/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-24025
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.17% / 38.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Jan, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-02 Apr, 2025 | 17:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

CRYSTALS-DILITHIUM (in Post-Quantum Cryptography Selected Algorithms 2022) in PQClean d03da30 may allow universal forgeries of digital signatures via a template side-channel attack because of intermediate data leakage of one vector.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pqclean_projectn/a
Product-pqcleann/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-20837
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.01% / 1.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2020 | 16:43
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 9.5. It allows signature validation bypass via a modified file or a file with non-standard signatures.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aFoxit Software Incorporated
Product-phantompdfreadern/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-19962
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 39.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Dec, 2019 | 23:03
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

wolfSSL before 4.3.0 mishandles calls to wc_SignatureGenerateHash, leading to fault injection in RSA cryptography.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfssln/a
Product-wolfssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-20834
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.01% / 0.60%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2020 | 16:47
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF before 8.3.10. It allows signature validation bypass via a modified file or a file with non-standard signatures.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aFoxit Software Incorporated
Product-phantompdfn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-16753
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 39.88%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Dec, 2019 | 19:28
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Decentralized Anonymous Payment System (DAPS) through 2019-08-26. The content to be signed is composed of a representation of strings, rather than being composed of their binary representations. This is a weak signature scheme design that would allow the reuse of signatures in some cases (or even the reuse of signatures, intended for one type of message, for another type). This also affects Private Instant Verified Transactions (PIVX) through 3.4.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-decentralized_anonymous_payment_system_projectpivxn/a
Product-private_instant_verified_transactionsdecentralized_anonymous_payment_systemn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-16992
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 35.01%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Sep, 2019 | 23:52
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Keybase app 2.13.2 for iOS provides potentially insufficient notice that it is employing a user's private key to sign a certain cryptocurrency attestation (that an address at keybase.io can be used for Stellar payments to the user), which might be incompatible with a user's personal position on the semantics of an attestation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-keybasen/a
Product-keybasen/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2016-7064
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 35.01%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Jul, 2020 | 16:56
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 01:50
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in pritunl-client before version 1.0.1116.6. A lack of signature verification leads to sensitive information leakage

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pritunln/a
Product-pritunl-clientpritunl-client-electron
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-26540
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.01% / 0.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Oct, 2020 | 08:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:56
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 4.1 on macOS. Because the Hardened Runtime protection mechanism is not applied to code signing, code injection (or an information leak) can occur.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.Foxit Software Incorporated
Product-phantompdffoxit_readermacosn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Details not found