Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2026-5052

Summary
Assigner-HashiCorp
Assigner Org ID-67fedba0-ff2e-4543-ba5b-aa93e87718cc
Published At-17 Apr, 2026 | 02:55
Updated At-17 Apr, 2026 | 17:57
Rejected At-
Credits

Vault Vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in ACME Challenge Validation via Attacker-Controlled DNS

Vault’s PKI engine’s ACME validation did not reject local targets when issuing http-01 and tls-alpn-01 challenges. This may lead to these requests being sent to local network targets, potentially leading to information disclosure. Fixed in Vault Community Edition 2.0.0 and Vault Enterprise 2.0.0, 1.21.5, 1.20.10, and 1.19.16.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:HashiCorp
Assigner Org ID:67fedba0-ff2e-4543-ba5b-aa93e87718cc
Published At:17 Apr, 2026 | 02:55
Updated At:17 Apr, 2026 | 17:57
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
Vault Vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in ACME Challenge Validation via Attacker-Controlled DNS

Vault’s PKI engine’s ACME validation did not reject local targets when issuing http-01 and tls-alpn-01 challenges. This may lead to these requests being sent to local network targets, potentially leading to information disclosure. Fixed in Vault Community Edition 2.0.0 and Vault Enterprise 2.0.0, 1.21.5, 1.20.10, and 1.19.16.

Affected Products
Vendor
HashiCorp, Inc.HashiCorp
Product
Vault
Repo
https://github.com/hashicorp/vault
Platforms
  • 64 bit
  • 32 bit
  • x86
  • ARM
  • MacOS
  • Windows
  • Linux
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 1.15.0 before 2.0.0 (semver)
Vendor
HashiCorp, Inc.HashiCorp
Product
Vault Enterprise
Repo
https://github.com/hashicorp/vault
Platforms
  • 64 bit
  • 32 bit
  • x86
  • ARM
  • MacOS
  • Windows
  • Linux
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 1.15.0 before 2.0.0 (semver)
    • -> unaffectedfrom1.19.16
    • -> unaffectedfrom1.20.10
    • -> unaffectedfrom1.21.5
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-918CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-918
Description: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
CAPEC-118CAPEC-118: Collect and Analyze Information
CAPEC ID: CAPEC-118
Description: CAPEC-118: Collect and Analyze Information
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

This issue was independently identified and reported by Oleh Konko of 1seal, as well as Vipin Chaudhary.
Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-06-vault-vulnerable-to-server-side-request-forgery-in-acme-challenge-validation-via-attacker-controlled-dns/77343
N/A
Hyperlink: https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-06-vault-vulnerable-to-server-side-request-forgery-in-acme-challenge-validation-via-attacker-controlled-dns/77343
Resource: N/A
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security@hashicorp.com
Published At:17 Apr, 2026 | 04:16
Updated At:27 Apr, 2026 | 15:03

Vault’s PKI engine’s ACME validation did not reject local targets when issuing http-01 and tls-alpn-01 challenges. This may lead to these requests being sent to local network targets, potentially leading to information disclosure. Fixed in Vault Community Edition 2.0.0 and Vault Enterprise 2.0.0, 1.21.5, 1.20.10, and 1.19.16.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Secondary3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Primary3.18.6HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 8.6
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
CPE Matches

HashiCorp, Inc.
hashicorp
>>vault>>Versions from 1.14.0(inclusive) to 1.19.16(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:hashicorp:vault:*:*:*:*:enterprise:*:*:*
HashiCorp, Inc.
hashicorp
>>vault>>Versions from 1.14.0(inclusive) to 2.0.0(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:hashicorp:vault:*:*:*:*:-:*:*:*
HashiCorp, Inc.
hashicorp
>>vault>>Versions from 1.20.0(inclusive) to 1.20.10(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:hashicorp:vault:*:*:*:*:enterprise:*:*:*
HashiCorp, Inc.
hashicorp
>>vault>>Versions from 1.21.0(inclusive) to 1.21.5(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:hashicorp:vault:*:*:*:*:enterprise:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-918Secondarysecurity@hashicorp.com
CWE ID: CWE-918
Type: Secondary
Source: security@hashicorp.com
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-06-vault-vulnerable-to-server-side-request-forgery-in-acme-challenge-validation-via-attacker-controlled-dns/77343security@hashicorp.com
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-06-vault-vulnerable-to-server-side-request-forgery-in-acme-challenge-validation-via-attacker-controlled-dns/77343
Source: security@hashicorp.com
Resource:
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

225Records found

CVE-2020-26811
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SAP SE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SAP SE
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.76% / 75.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Nov, 2020 | 16:12
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 16:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

SAP Commerce Cloud (Accelerator Payment Mock), versions - 1808, 1811, 1905, 2005, allows an unauthenticated attacker to submit a crafted request over a network to a particular SAP Commerce module URL which will be processed without further interaction, the crafted request leads to Server Side Request Forgery attack which could lead to retrieval of limited pieces of information about the service with no impact on integrity or availability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-SAP SE
Product-commerce_cloud_\(accelerator_payment_mock\)SAP Commerce Cloud (Accelerator Payment Mock)
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2023-47116
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.74% / 50.74%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Jan, 2024 | 16:21
Updated-17 Jun, 2025 | 21:29
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Label Studio SSRF on Import Bypassing `SSRF_PROTECTION_ENABLED` Protections

Label Studio is a popular open source data labeling tool. The vulnerability affects all versions of Label Studio prior to 1.11.0 and was tested on version 1.8.2. Label Studio's SSRF protections that can be enabled by setting the `SSRF_PROTECTION_ENABLED` environment variable can be bypassed to access internal web servers. This is because the current SSRF validation is done by executing a single DNS lookup to verify that the IP address is not in an excluded subnet range. This protection can be bypassed by either using HTTP redirection or performing a DNS rebinding attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-humansignalHumanSignal
Product-label_studiolabel-studio
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2020-24548
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.69% / 74.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Aug, 2020 | 18:28
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Ericom Access Server 9.2.0 (for AccessNow and Ericom Blaze) allows SSRF to make outbound WebSocket connection requests on arbitrary TCP ports, and provides "Cannot connect to" error messages to inform the attacker about closed ports.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ericomn/a
Product-access_servern/a
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2020-21122
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.85% / 54.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Sep, 2021 | 16:16
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 14:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

UReport v2.2.9 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the designer page which allows attackers to detect intranet device ports.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ureport_projectn/a
Product-ureportn/a
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2020-15819
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.44% / 70.51%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Aug, 2020 | 20:07
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.10643 was vulnerable to SSRF that allowed scanning internal ports.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJetBrains s.r.o.
Product-youtrackn/a
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2023-46236
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.46% / 37.57%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Oct, 2023 | 14:32
Updated-05 Sep, 2024 | 17:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
FOG SSRF via unauthenticated endpoint(s)

FOG is a free open-source cloning/imaging/rescue suite/inventory management system. Prior to version 1.5.10, a server-side-request-forgery (SSRF) vulnerability allowed an unauthenticated user to trigger a GET request as the server to an arbitrary endpoint and URL scheme. This also allows remote access to files visible to the Apache user group. Other impacts vary based on server configuration. Version 1.5.10 contains a patch.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-fogprojectFOGProject
Product-fogprojectfogproject
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2023-50259
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.60% / 45.21%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Dec, 2023 | 17:00
Updated-27 Nov, 2024 | 15:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Blind SSRF in /home/testslack endpoint

Medusa is an automatic video library manager for TV shows. Versions prior to 1.0.19 are vulnerable to unauthenticated blind server-side request forgery (SSRF). The `testslack` request handler in `medusa/server/web/home/handler.py` does not validate the user-controlled `slack_webhook` variable and passes it to the `notifiers.slack_notifier.test_notify` method, then `_notify_slack` and finally `_send_slack` method, which sends a POST request to the user-controlled URL on line 103 in `/medusa/notifiers/slack.py`, which leads to a blind server-side request forgery (SSRF). This issue allows for crafting POST requests on behalf of the Medusa server. Version 1.0.19 contains a fix for the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pymedusapymedusa
Product-medusaMedusa
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2025-62612
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.22% / 12.95%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Oct, 2025 | 20:45
Updated-29 Dec, 2025 | 19:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
FastGPT File Reading Node SSRF Vulnerability

FastGPT is an AI Agent building platform. Prior to version 4.11.1, in the workflow file reading node, the network link is not security-verified, posing a risk of SSRF attacks. This issue has been patched in version 4.11.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-fastgptLabring Computing Co., LTD.
Product-fastgptFastGPT
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2022-35949
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.39% / 69.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Aug, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-22 Apr, 2025 | 17:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
`undici.request` vulnerable to SSRF using absolute URL on `pathname`

undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`undici` is vulnerable to SSRF (Server-side Request Forgery) when an application takes in **user input** into the `path/pathname` option of `undici.request`. If a user specifies a URL such as `http://127.0.0.1` or `//127.0.0.1` ```js const undici = require("undici") undici.request({origin: "http://example.com", pathname: "//127.0.0.1"}) ``` Instead of processing the request as `http://example.org//127.0.0.1` (or `http://example.org/http://127.0.0.1` when `http://127.0.0.1 is used`), it actually processes the request as `http://127.0.0.1/` and sends it to `http://127.0.0.1`. If a developer passes in user input into `path` parameter of `undici.request`, it can result in an _SSRF_ as they will assume that the hostname cannot change, when in actual fact it can change because the specified path parameter is combined with the base URL. This issue was fixed in `undici@5.8.1`. The best workaround is to validate user input before passing it to the `undici.request` call.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Node.js (OpenJS Foundation)
Product-undiciundici
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2020-28978
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-15.25% / 96.41%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Nov, 2020 | 13:21
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 16:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Canto plugin 1.3.0 for WordPress contains blind SSRF vulnerability. It allows an unauthenticated attacker can make a request to any internal and external server via /includes/lib/tree.php?subdomain=SSRF.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-canton/a
Product-canton/a
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2025-52477
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.41% / 33.57%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jun, 2025 | 16:46
Updated-27 Jun, 2025 | 13:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Octo-STS Vulnerable to Unauthenticated SSRF with HTTP Response Reflection in OIDC Flow

Octo-STS is a GitHub App that acts like a Security Token Service (STS) for the GitHub API. Octo-STS versions before v0.5.3 are vulnerable to unauthenticated SSRF by abusing fields in OpenID Connect tokens. Malicious tokens were shown to trigger internal network requests which could reflect error logs with sensitive information. Upgrade to v0.5.3 to resolve this issue. This version includes patch sets to sanitize input and redact logging.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-octo-sts
Product-app
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2020-24710
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.34% / 68.32%
||
7 Day CHG+0.02%
Published-28 Oct, 2020 | 19:33
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Gophish before 0.11.0 allows SSRF attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-getgophishn/a
Product-gophishn/a
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2025-36845
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-1.58% / 72.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Jul, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-12 Sep, 2025 | 18:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Eveo URVE Web Manager 27.02.2025. The endpoint /_internal/redirect.php allows for Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). The endpoint takes a URL as input, sends a request to this address, and reflects the content in the response. This can be used to request endpoints only reachable by the application server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-eveon/a
Product-urve_web_managern/a
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-29030
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.14% / 63.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Apr, 2024 | 15:13
Updated-07 Jul, 2025 | 16:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
memos vulnerable to an SSRF in /api/resource

memos is a privacy-first, lightweight note-taking service. In memos 0.13.2, an SSRF vulnerability exists at the /api/resource that allows authenticated users to enumerate the internal network. Version 0.22.0 of memos removes the vulnerable file.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Usememos
Product-memosmemosmemos
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2025-67494
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.46% / 37.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Dec, 2025 | 22:07
Updated-19 Dec, 2025 | 18:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
ZITADEL Vulnerable to Unauthenticated Full-Read SSRF via V2 Login

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-zitadelzitadel
Product-zitadelzitadel
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-30150
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HCL Software
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HCL Software
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 26.17%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-25 Feb, 2025 | 22:21
Updated-09 Jan, 2026 | 02:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
An unauthenticated privilege escalation vulnerability affects HCL MyCloud

HCL MyCloud is affected by Improper Access Control - an unauthenticated privilege escalation vulnerability which may lead to information disclosure and potential for Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and Denial of Service(DOS) attacks from unauthenticated users.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-HCL Technologies Ltd.
Product-dryice_mycloudMyCloud
CWE ID-CWE-269
Improper Privilege Management
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2021-28941
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.13% / 63.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Apr, 2021 | 19:08
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 21:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Because of no validation on a curl command in MagpieRSS 0.72 in the /extlib/Snoopy.class.inc file, when you send a request to the /scripts/magpie_debug.php or /scripts/magpie_simple.php page, it's possible to request any internal page if you use a https request.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-magpierss_projectn/a
Product-magpierssn/a
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-23330
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.47% / 38.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jan, 2024 | 17:22
Updated-30 May, 2025 | 14:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Tuta loads images from external resources

Tuta is an encrypted email service. In versions prior to 119.10, an attacker can attach an image in a html mail which is loaded from external resource in the default setting, which should prevent loading of external resources. When displaying emails containing external content, they should be loaded by default only after confirmation by the user. However, it could be recognized that certain embedded images (see PoC) are loaded, even though the "Automatic Reloading of Images" function is disabled by default. The reloading is also done unencrypted via HTTP and redirections are followed. This behavior is unexpected for the user, since the user assumes that external content will only be loaded after explicit manual confirmation. The loading of external content in e-mails represents a risk, because this makes the sender aware that the e-mail address is used, when the e-mail was read, which device is used and expose the user's IP address. Version 119.10 contains a patch for this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-tutatutao
Product-tutanotatutanota
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-22648
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.61% / 45.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jan, 2024 | 00:00
Updated-20 Jun, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A Blind SSRF vulnerability exists in the "Crawl Meta Data" functionality of SEO Panel version 4.10.0. This makes it possible for remote attackers to scan ports in the local environment.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-seopaneln/a
Product-seo_paneln/a
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-21498
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.55% / 42.95%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Feb, 2024 | 05:00
Updated-23 Dec, 2025 | 20:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

All versions of the package github.com/greenpau/caddy-security are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) via X-Forwarded-Host header manipulation. An attacker can expose sensitive information, interact with internal services, or exploit other vulnerabilities within the network by exploiting this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-authcrunchn/aauthcrunch
Product-caddy-securitygithub.com/greenpau/caddy-securitycaddy_security
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-20404
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.2||HIGH
EPSS-21.74% / 97.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Jun, 2024 | 16:14
Updated-01 Aug, 2024 | 21:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Finesse could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an SSRF attack on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input for specific HTTP requests that are sent to an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain limited sensitive information for services that are associated to the affected device.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-finesseCisco Unified Contact Center EnterpriseCisco Packaged Contact Center EnterpriseCisco Unified Contact Center ExpressCisco Finesse
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-1965
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Spanish National Cybersecurity Institute, S.A. (INCIBE)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Spanish National Cybersecurity Institute, S.A. (INCIBE)
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.35% / 27.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Feb, 2024 | 12:19
Updated-10 Apr, 2025 | 19:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Server-Side Request Forgery Vulnerability in Haivision Products

Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in Haivision's Aviwest Manager and Aviwest Steamhub. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to enumerate internal network configuration without the need for credentials. An attacker could compromise an internal server and retrieve requests sent by other users.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-haivisionHaivisionhaivision
Product-maanagerstreamhubAviwest ManagerAviwest Streamhubaviwest_manageraviwest_streamhub
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-13924
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.40% / 32.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Mar, 2025 | 12:21
Updated-08 Apr, 2026 | 17:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Starter Templates by FancyWP <= 2.0.0 - Unauthenticated Blind Server-Side Request Forgery

The Starter Templates by FancyWP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blind Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.0 via the 'http_request_host_is_external' filter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-fancywpfancywp
Product-starter_templatesStarter Templates by FancyWP
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-13905
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.36% / 28.35%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-27 Feb, 2025 | 04:21
Updated-08 Apr, 2026 | 17:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
OneStore Sites <= 0.1.1 - Unauthenticated Blind Server-Side Request Forgery

The OneStore Sites plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.1.1 via the class-export.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sainwpsainwp
Product-onestore_sitesOneStore Sites
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-1063
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Tenable Network Security, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Tenable Network Security, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.45% / 36.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jan, 2024 | 09:20
Updated-29 May, 2025 | 15:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Appwrite <= v1.4.13 is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the '/v1/avatars/favicon' endpoint due to an incomplete fix of CVE-2023-27159.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-appwriteAppwrite
Product-appwriteAppwrite
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Next
Details not found