Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools

scim

Source -

NVDCNA

CNA CVEs -

2

ADP CVEs -

0

CISA CVEs -

0

NVD CVEs -

1
Related CVEsRelated VendorsRelated AssignersReports
3Vulnerabilities found

CVE-2026-67331
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-Not Assigned
Published-01 Aug, 2026 | 12:22
Updated-01 Aug, 2026 | 13:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
better-auth SCIM 1.5.0 before 1.7.0-beta.4 Authorization Bypass

better-auth SCIM versions from 1.5.0 before 1.7.0-beta.4 fail to bind non-organization SCIM providers to their creator by default, allowing authenticated users to manage other users' providers. Attackers can regenerate SCIM bearer tokens, invalidate legitimate tokens, and authenticate to SCIM API routes with the attacker-controlled token.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-better-auth
Product-scim
CWE ID-CWE-639
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
CVE-2026-67330
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.4||CRITICAL
EPSS-Not Assigned
Published-01 Aug, 2026 | 12:22
Updated-01 Aug, 2026 | 13:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
better-auth SCIM 1.4.0-beta.27 through 1.6.21 Account Takeover via Provider-ID Collision

@better-auth/scim (a better-auth plugin) versions >= 1.4.0-beta.27 through <= 1.6.21 and >= 1.7.0-beta.0 through <= 1.7.0-beta.9 contain an authorization bypass. SCIM token issuance did not reject provider IDs already used by existing SSO, SAML, OIDC, generic OAuth, or social account providers, and the same logical provider ID was used for both SCIM provider configuration and account ownership. An authenticated user could mint a SCIM token whose provider ID collided with an existing provider namespace, causing SCIM user routes to resolve account rows the token never provisioned. This allowed listing, reading, updating (including rewriting global profile/email fields without uniqueness checks), and deleting global user accounts and sessions, resulting in account takeover and unauthorized deprovisioning. Fixed in 1.6.22 and 1.7.0-beta.10 (1.7.0-rc.0).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-better-auth
Product-scim
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-10256
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.87% / 55.24%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Oct, 2020 | 13:28
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 10:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in beta versions of the 1Password command-line tool prior to 0.5.5 and in beta versions of the 1Password SCIM bridge prior to 0.7.3. An insecure random number generator was used to generate various keys. An attacker with access to the user's encrypted data may be able to perform brute-force calculations of encryption keys and thus succeed at decryption.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-1passwordn/a
Product-scimcommand_line_interfacen/a