Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools

trusttunnel

Source -

NVD

CNA CVEs -

0

ADP CVEs -

0

CISA CVEs -

0

NVD CVEs -

2
Related CVEsRelated VendorsRelated AssignersReports
2Vulnerabilities found

CVE-2026-24902
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 7.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Jan, 2026 | 21:21
Updated-20 Feb, 2026 | 20:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
TrustTunnel has SSRF and private network restriction bypass via numeric address destinations

TrustTunnel is an open-source VPN protocol with a server-side request forgery and and private network restriction bypass in versions prior to 0.9.114. In `tcp_forwarder.rs`, SSRF protection for `allow_private_network_connections = false` was only applied in the `TcpDestination::HostName(peer)` path. The `TcpDestination::Address(peer) => peer` path proceeded to `TcpStream::connect()` without equivalent checks (for example `is_global_ip`, `is_loopback`), allowing loopback/private targets to be reached by supplying a numeric IP. The vulnerability is fixed in version 0.9.114.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-TrustTunnelAdGuard (Adguard Software Ltd.)
Product-trusttunnelTrustTunnel
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-24904
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.04% / 11.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Jan, 2026 | 21:19
Updated-20 Feb, 2026 | 20:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
TrustTunnel has `client_random_prefix` rule bypass via fragmented or partial TLS ClientHello

TrustTunnel is an open-source VPN protocol with a rule bypass issue in versions prior to 0.9.115. In `tls_listener.rs`, `TlsListener::listen()` peeks 1024 bytes and calls `extract_client_random(...)`. If `parse_tls_plaintext` fails (for example, a fragmented/partial ClientHello split across TCP writes), `extract_client_random` returns `None`. In `rules.rs`, `RulesEngine::evaluate` only evaluates `client_random_prefix` when `client_random` is `Some(...)`. As a result, when extraction fails (`client_random == None`), any rule that relies on `client_random_prefix` matching is skipped and evaluation falls through to later rules. As an important semantics note: `client_random_prefix` is a match condition only. It does not mean "block non-matching prefixes" by itself. A rule with `client_random_prefix = ...` triggers its `action` only when the prefix matches (and the field is available to evaluate). Non-matches (or `None`) simply do not match that rule and continue to fall through. The vulnerability is fixed in version 0.9.115.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-TrustTunnelAdGuard (Adguard Software Ltd.)
Product-trusttunnelTrustTunnel
CWE ID-CWE-284
Improper Access Control