The Fileviewer WordPress plugin through 2.2 does not have CSRF checks in place when performing actions such as upload and delete files. As a result, attackers could make a logged in administrator delete and upload arbitrary files via a CSRF attack

The Business Directory Plugin – Easy Listing Directories for WordPress WordPress plugin before 5.11.1 suffered from Cross-Site Request Forgery issues, allowing an attacker to make a logged in administrator add, edit or delete form fields, which could also lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issues.

The Perfect Survey WordPress plugin before 1.5.2 does not have proper authorisation nor CSRF checks in the save_global_setting AJAX action, allowing unauthenticated users to edit surveys and modify settings. Given the lack of sanitisation and escaping in the settings, this could also lead to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue which will be executed in the context of a user viewing any survey

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Codestyling Localization plugin 1.99.30 and earlier for Wordpress.

Roland Gruber Softwareentwicklung LDAP Account Manager before 6.3 places a CSRF token in the sec_token parameter of a URI, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat a CSRF protection mechanism by leveraging logging.

The Simple JWT Login WordPress plugin before 3.2.1 does not have nonce checks when saving its settings, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin changed them. Settings such as HMAC verification secret, account registering and default user roles can be updated, which could result in site takeover.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in X2Engine X2CRM before 5.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create an administrative account via a crafted request to index.php/users/create.

In the Reponsive Menu (free and Pro) WordPress plugins before 4.0.4, attackers could craft a request and trick an administrator into importing all new settings. These settings could be modified to include malicious JavaScript, therefore allowing an attacker to inject payloads that could aid in further infection of the site.

The Contact Form 7 Captcha WordPress plugin before 0.0.9 does not have any CSRF check in place when saving its settings, allowing attacker to make a logged in user with the manage_options change them. Furthermore, the settings are not escaped when output in attributes, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EMC RSA Web Threat Detection before 5.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Cisco Prime Central for Hosted Collaboration Solution (PC4HCS) 10.6(1) and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCut04596.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability has been identified in Geutebruck G-Cam/EFD-2250 Version 1.12.0.4 and Topline TopFD-2125 Version 3.15.1 IP cameras, which may allow an unauthorized user to be added to the system.

Parts of the Puppet Enterprise Console 3.x were found to be susceptible to clickjacking and CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery) attacks. This would allow an attacker to redirect user input to an untrusted site or hijack a user session.

The Post Snippets WordPress plugin before 3.1.4 does not have CSRF check when importing files, allowing attacker to make a logged In admin import arbitrary snippets. Furthermore, imported snippers are not sanitised and escaped, which could lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issues

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager (UCDM) 10 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCuo77055.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Web Reference Database (aka refbase) through 0.9.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in springframework-social before 1.1.3.

The del_reistered_domains AJAX action of the Software License Manager WordPress plugin before 4.5.1 does not have any CSRF checks, and is vulnerable to a CSRF attack

The SupportCandy WordPress plugin before 2.2.7 does not have CSRF check in the wpsc_tickets AJAX action, nor has any sanitisation or escaping in some of the filter fields which could allow attackers to make a logged in user having access to the ticket lists dashboard set an arbitrary filter (stored in their cookies) with an XSS payload in it.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Connections 3.x before 3.0.1.1 CR3, 4.0 before CR4, 4.5 before CR5, and 5.0 before CR3 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences.

In the Orange Form WordPress plugin through 1.0, the process_bulk_action() function in "admin/orange-form-email.php" performs an unprepared SQL query with an unsanitized parameter ($id). Only admin can access the page that invokes the function, but because of lack of CSRF protection, it is actually exploitable and could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary posts for example

A CSRF exposure exists in NetIQ Access Manager (NAM) 4.4 Identity Server component.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in EMC RSA Archer GRC 5.5 SP1 before P3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

In BEESCMS 4.0, CSRF allows administrators to be added arbitrarily, a related issue to CVE-2018-10266.

Wampserver before 3.1.3 has CSRF in add_vhost.php.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco FireSIGHT System Software 5.4.1.2 and 6.0.0 in FireSIGHT Management Center allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCuu94721.

An issue was discovered in Western Bridge Cobub Razor 0.7.2. Authentication is not required for /index.php?/manage/channel/modifychannel. For example, with a crafted channel name, stored XSS is triggered during a later /index.php?/manage/channel request by an admin.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Meetings Server 2.5 MR1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug IDs CSCus56150 and CSCus56146.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the 1st Gen. Pelco Sarix Enhanced Camera and Spectra Enhanced PTZ Camera when an authenticated user clicks a specially crafted malicious link while logged into the camera.

The BP Better Messages WordPress plugin before 1.9.9.41 does not check for CSRF in multiple of its AJAX actions: bp_better_messages_leave_chat, bp_better_messages_join_chat, bp_messages_leave_thread, bp_messages_mute_thread, bp_messages_unmute_thread, bp_better_messages_add_user_to_thread, bp_better_messages_exclude_user_from_thread. This could allow attackers to make logged in users do unwanted actions

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ClickHeat 1.14 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the administrator password via a config action to index.php.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in XZERES 442SR OS on 442SR wind turbines allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of admins for requests that modify the default user's password via a GET request.

eClinicalWorks Population Health (CCMR) suffers from a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in portalUserService.jsp which allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of content administrators for requests that could lead to the creation, modification and deletion of users, appointments and employees.

The Formidable Form Builder WordPress plugin before 4.09.05 allows to inject certain HTML Tags like <audio>,<video>,<img>,<a> and<button>.This could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to exploit a HTML-injection byinjecting a malicous link. The HTML-injection may trick authenticated users to follow the link. If the Link gets clicked, Javascript code can be executed. The vulnerability is due to insufficient sanitization of the "data-frmverify" tag for links in the web-based entry inspection page of affected systems. A successful exploitation incomibantion with CSRF could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on an affected system with the privileges of the user. These actions include stealing the users account by changing their password or allowing attackers to submit their own code through an authenticated user resulting in Remote Code Execution. If an authenticated user who is able to edit Wordpress PHP Code in any kind, clicks the malicious link, PHP code can be edited.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alcatel-Lucent CellPipe 7130 RG 5Ae.M2013 HOL with firmware 1.0.0.20h.HOL allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create a user account via an add_user action in a request to password.cmd.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EMC Documentum WebTop before 6.8P01, Documentum Administrator through 7.2, Documentum Digital Assets Manager through 6.5SP6, Documentum Web Publishers through 6.5SP7, and Documentum Task Space through 6.7SP2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-2518.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Decisions module for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that remove individual voters via unspecified vectors.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Pluck CMS v4.7.15 allows attackers to change the password of any given user by exploiting this feature leading to account takeover.

The Insights from Google PageSpeed WordPress plugin before 4.0.7 does not verify for CSRF before doing various actions such as deleting Custom URLs, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin perform such actions via CSRF attacks

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on Cisco TelePresence Serial Gateway devices with software 1.0(1.42) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCuu90728.

The Core Tweaks WP Setup WordPress plugin through 4.1 allows to bulk-set many settings in WordPress, including the admin email, as well as creating a new admin account. There is no CSRF protection in place, allowing an attacker to arbitrary change the admin email or create another admin account and takeover the website via CSRF attacks

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WP Smiley plugin 1.4.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of editors for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the s4w-more parameter to the smilies4wp.php page to wp-admin/options-general.php.

DedeCMS 5.7 has CSRF with an impact of arbitrary code execution, because the partcode parameter in a tag_test_action.php request can specify a runphp field in conjunction with PHP code.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on Cisco TelePresence IP VCR devices with software 3.0(1.27) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCuu90736.

The WordPress Simple Ecommerce Shopping Cart Plugin- Sell products through Paypal plugin through 2.2.5 does not check for the uploaded Downloadable Digital product file, allowing any file, such as PHP to be uploaded by an administrator. Furthermore, as there is no CSRF in place, attackers could also make a logged admin upload a malicious PHP file, which would lead to RCE

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web framework in Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) 1.2(0.793), 1.3(0.876), 1.4(0.109), 2.0(0.147), and 2.0(0.169) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCus09940.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the User Import module 6.x-4.x before 6.x-4.4 and 7.x-2.x before 7.x-2.3 for Drupal allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) continue or (2) delete an ongoing import via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Watchdog Aggregator module for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that enable or disable monitoring sites via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in system/workplace/admin/accounts/user_role.jsp in OpenCMS 10.5.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrative users for requests that perform privilege escalation. Note: It is argued that OpenCMS allows only registered users to upload different kind of content artifacts (SVG, .doc, .docx). The uploaded content is stored in the CMS content repository "as is". In case of scripts inside an SVG, this may or may not be "malicious", there is no way of knowing if the uploaded SVG contains the script for a reason. To exploit the "issue", a user must have an account in the CMS as a content manager

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on Janitza UMG 508, 509, 511, 604, and 605 devices allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.