IBM QRadar SIEM 7.3.0 to 7.3.3 Patch 8 and 7.4.0 to 7.4.3 GA uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 194448.
IBM Spectrum Scale 5.1.0 through 5.1.3.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 221012.
IBM Cloud Pak for Multicloud Management Monitoring 2.2 returns potentially sensitive information in headers which could lead to further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 194513.
IBM Spectrum Protect Operations Center 8.1.0.000 through 8.1.14 could allow a remote attacker to gain details of the database, such as type and version, by sending a specially-crafted HTTP request. This information could then be used in future attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 226940.
IBM Aspera Faspex 4.4.1 and 5.0.0 could allow unauthorized access due to an incorrectly computed security token. IBM X-Force ID: 226951.
The CLI in npm before 2.15.1 and 3.x before 3.8.3, as used in Node.js 0.10 before 0.10.44, 0.12 before 0.12.13, 4 before 4.4.2, and 5 before 5.10.0, includes bearer tokens with arbitrary requests, which allows remote HTTP servers to obtain sensitive information by reading Authorization headers.
IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 8.5 through 8.5.5.9 Liberty before Liberty Fix Pack 16.0.0.2 does not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header for an unspecified JAX-RS API cookie, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information via script access to this cookie.
IBM BigFix Remote Control before 9.1.3 uses cleartext storage for unspecified passwords, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information via unknown vectors.
IBM AppScan Source could reveal some sensitive information through the browsing of testlinks on the server.
IBM API Connect (aka APIConnect) before 5.0.3.0 with NPM before 2.2.8 includes certain internal server credentials in the software package, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by leveraging knowledge of these credentials.
IBM Sametime 8.5.2 and 9.0 under certain conditions provides an error message to a user that is too detailed and may reveal details about the application. IBM X-Force ID: 113813.
IBM Security Access Manager for Web could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to security misconfigurations.
IBM Security Access Manager for Mobile 8.x before 8.0.1.4 IF3 and Security Access Manager 9.x before 9.0.1.0 IF5 do not properly restrict failed login attempts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via a brute-force approach.
IBM Security Secret Server up to 11.0 stores sensitive information in URL parameters. This may lead to information disclosure if unauthorized parties have access to the URLs via server logs, referrer header or browser history. IBM X-Force ID: 199328.
Directory traversal vulnerability in ifx CGI program in Informix Web DataBlade allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the LO parameter.
Admin Center in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 8.5.5.2 through 8.5.5.9 Liberty before Liberty Fix Pack 16.0.0.2 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information. By allowing HTTP OPTIONS method, a remote attacker could send a specially-crafted query to a vulnerable server running to cause the server to disclose sensitive information in the HTTP response.
IBM Security Identity Manager (ISIM) Virtual Appliance 7.0.0.0 through 7.0.1.0 before 7.0.1-ISS-SIM-FP0001 do not properly restrict failed login attempts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via a brute-force approach. IBM X-Force ID: 111695.
IBM Director before 5.10 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from HTTP headers via HTTP TRACE.
IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.5 before 7.5.0.10-TIV-MBS-IFIX002 and 7.6 before 7.6.0.5-TIV-MAMMT-FP001 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive URL information by reading log files.
IBM Security Identity Manager (ISIM) Virtual Appliance 7.0.0.0 through 7.0.1.1 before 7.0.1-ISS-SIM-FP0003 mishandles password creation, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access by leveraging an attack against the password algorithm.
Directory traversal vulnerability in Redirect.bat in IBM Director before 5.10 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) sequence in the file parameter.
IBM Multi-Enterprise Integration Gateway 1.0 through 1.0.0.1 and B2B Advanced Communications 1.0.0.2 through 1.0.0.4 do not require HTTPS, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network.
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in IBM WebSphere Application Server before 6.0.2.13 have unspecified vectors and impact, including (1) an "authority problem" in ThreadIdentitySupport as identified by PK25199, and "Potential security exposure" issues as identified by (2) PK22747, (3) PK24334, (4) PK25740, and (5) PK26123.
IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7 before 7.0.0.1 sends SSL traffic over "unsecured TCP," which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network.
Lotus Domino R5 and R6 WebMail, with "Generate HTML for all fields" enabled, stores sensitive data from names.nsf in hidden form fields, which allows remote attackers to read the HTML source to obtain sensitive information such as (1) the password hash in the HTTPPassword field, (2) the password change date in the HTTPPasswordChangeDate field, (3) the client platform in the ClntPltfrm field, (4) the client machine name in the ClntMachine field, and (5) the client Lotus Domino release in the ClntBld field, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-2696.
Unspecified vulnerability in GSKit on IBM MQ M2000 appliances before 8.0.0.4 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-7421.
The POP3 server in IBM iSeries AS/400 returns different error messages when the user exists or not, which allows remote attackers to determine valid user IDs on the server.
Unspecified vulnerability in GSKit on IBM MQ M2000 appliances before 8.0.0.4 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-7420.
IBM DataPower Gateway appliances with firmware 6.x before 6.0.0.17, 6.0.1.x before 6.0.1.17, 7.x before 7.0.0.10, 7.1.0.x before 7.1.0.7, and 7.2.x before 7.2.0.1 do not set the secure flag for unspecified cookies in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture these cookies by intercepting their transmission within an http session.
IBM WebSphere Message Broker 7 before 7.0.0.8 and 8 before 8.0.0.6 and IBM Integration Bus 9 before 9.0.0.3 and 10 before 10.0.0.0 allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information about the HTTP server via unspecified vectors.
IBM WebSphere Portal 6.1.0 through 6.1.0.6 CF27, 6.1.5 through 6.1.5.3 CF27, 7.0.0 through 7.0.0.2 CF29, 8.0.0 before 8.0.0.1 CF20, and 8.5.0 before CF09 allows remote attackers to bypass intended Portal AccessControl REST API access restrictions and obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.
The Update Installer in IBM WebSphere Commerce Enterprise 7.0.0.8 and 7.0.0.9 does not properly replicate the search index, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.
The DB service in IBM System Networking Switch Center (SNSC) before 7.3.1.5 and Lenovo Switch Center before 8.1.2.0 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive administrator-account information via a request on port 40999, as demonstrated by an improperly encrypted password.
IBM WebSphere Commerce Enterprise 7.0.0.9 and 8.x before Feature Pack 8 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted REST URL.
Unspecified vulnerability in the IBM Maximo Anywhere application 7.5.1 through 7.5.1.2 for Android allows attackers to bypass a passcode protection mechanism and obtain sensitive information via a crafted application.
The SSH implementation on IBM Security Access Manager for Web appliances 7.0 before 7.0.0 FP19, 8.0 before 8.0.1.3 IF3, and 9.0 before 9.0.0.0 IF1 does not properly restrict the set of MAC algorithms, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms via unspecified vectors.
The portal in IBM Tealeaf Customer Experience before 8.7.1.8814, 8.8 before 8.8.0.9026, 9.0.0, 9.0.0A, 9.0.1 before 9.0.1.1083, 9.0.1A before 9.0.1.5073, 9.0.2 before 9.0.2.1095, and 9.0.2A before 9.0.2.5144 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary charts by specifying an internal chart name.
IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.x before 7.0.0.39, 8.0.x before 8.0.0.11, and 8.5.x before 8.5.5.7 allows remote attackers to spoof servlets and obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.
IBM Security Access Manager for Web 7.0 before 7.0.0 IF21, 8.0 before 8.0.1.3 IF4, and 9.0 before 9.0.0.1 IF1 does not have a lockout mechanism for invalid login attempts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via a brute-force attack.
The IMM2 First Failure Data Capture function collects management module logs and diagnostic information when a hardware error is detected. This information is made available for download through an SFTP server hosted on the IMM2 management network interface. In versions earlier than 4.90 for Lenovo System x and earlier than 6.80 for IBM System x, the credentials to access the SFTP server are hard-coded and described in the IMM2 documentation, allowing an attacker with management network access to obtain the collected FFDC data. After applying the update, the IMM2 will create random SFTP credentials for use with OneCLI.
The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, does not properly combine state data with key data during the initialization phase, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks against the initial bytes of a stream by sniffing network traffic that occasionally relies on keys affected by the Invariance Weakness, and then using a brute-force approach involving LSB values, aka the "Bar Mitzvah" issue.
IBM Security Guardium 10.5, 10.6, and 11.0 could allow an unauthorized user to obtain sensitive information due to missing security controls. IBM X-Force ID: 141226.
IBM Cloud Pak for Security (CP4S) 1.5.0.0, 1.5.1.0, 1.6.0.0, 1.6.1.0, 1.7.0.0, and 1.7.1.0 could disclose sensitive information to an unauthorized user through HTTP GET requests. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 198920.
IBM Security Guardium 11.2 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 196280.
IBM Cloud Pak for Applications 4.3 could disclose sensitive information to a malicious attacker by accessing data stored in memory. IBM X-Force ID: 196304.
IBM Security Guardium 11.2 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 196279.
IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.x before 7.0.0.39, 8.0.x before 8.0.0.11, and 8.5.x before 8.5.5.7 and WebSphere Virtual Enterprise before 7.0.0.7 allow remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information about the proxy-server software by reading the HTTP Via header.
IBM Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence (SonarG) 3.1 uses an inadequate account lockout setting that could allow a remote attacker to brute force account credentials. IBM X-Force ID: 137773.
IBM WebSphere eXtreme Scale 7.1.0 before 7.1.0.3 and 7.1.1 before 7.1.1.1 has an improper account-lockout setting, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via a brute-force attack.