The SOY Inquiry component of SOY CMS is affected by Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF) and Remote Code Execution (RCE). The vulnerability affects versions 2.0.0.3 and earlier of SOY Inquiry. This allows remote attackers to force the administrator to edit files once the administrator loads a specially crafted webpage. An administrator must be logged in for exploitation to be possible. This issue is fixed in SOY Inquiry version 2.0.0.4 and included in SOY CMS 3.0.2.328.

The Copify plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.3.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the CopifySettings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugins settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

pramodmahato BlogCMS through 2019-12-31 has admin/changepass.php CSRF.

The Deviceconnect microservice through 1.3.0 in Northern.tech Mender Enterprise before 3.2.2. allows Cross-Origin Websocket Hijacking.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the AdminObserver function in e107_admin/users.php in e107 2.0 alpha2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add users to the administrator group via the id parameter in an admin action.

Delta Controls enteliTOUCH 3.40.3935, 3.40.3706, and 3.33.4005 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted HTTP request.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Revive Adserver before 3.0.5 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) delete data via a request to agency-delete.php, (2) tracker-delete.php, or (3) userlog-delete.php in admin/ or (4) unlink accounts via a request to admin-user-unlink.php. (5) advertiser-user-unlink.php, or (6) affiliate-user-unlink.php in admin/.

Mahara before 20.10.5, 21.04.4, 21.10.2, and 22.04.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) because randomly generated tokens are too easily guessable.

Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects GS716Tv3 before 6.3.1.36 and GS724Tv4 before 6.3.1.36.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in ZTE ZXDSL 831CII allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that disable modem lan ports via the (1) enblftp, (2) enblhttp, (3) enblsnmp, (4) enbltelnet, (5) enbltftp, (6) enblicmp, or (7) enblssh parameter to accesslocal.cmd.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Zenoss Core through 5 Beta 3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that trigger arbitrary code execution via a ZenPack upload, aka ZEN-15388.

MODX Revolution 2.x before 2.2.15 allows remote attackers to bypass the cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection mechanism by (1) omitting the CSRF token or via a (2) long string in the CSRF token parameter.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Smoothwall Express 3.1 and 3.0 SP3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the (1) admin or (2) dial password via a request to httpd/cgi-bin/changepw.cgi.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in oBlog allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the admin password, (2) force an admin logout, (3) change the visibility of posts, (4) remove links, and (5) change the name fields of a blog.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WP Limit Posts Automatically plugin 0.7 and earlier for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the lpa_post_letters parameter in the wp-limit-posts-automatically.php page to wp-admin/options-general.php.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in index.php in Acc PHP eMail 1.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change passwords.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Twitter LiveBlog plugin 1.1.2 and earlier for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the mashtlb_twitter_username parameter in the twitter-liveblog.php page to wp-admin/options-general.php.

Selenium Selenium Grid (formerly Selenium Standalone Server) Fixed in 4.0.0-alpha-7 is affected by: DNS rebinding. The impact is: execute arbitrary code (remote). The component is: WebDriver endpoint of Selenium Grid / Selenium Standalone Server. The attack vector is: Triggered by browsing to to a malicious remote web server. The WebDriver endpoint of Selenium Server (Grid) is vulnerable to DNS rebinding. This can be used to execute arbitrary code on the machine.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the twitterDash plugin 2.1 and earlier for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the username_twitterDash parameter in the twitterDash.php page to wp-admin/options-general.php.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Snowfox CMS before 1.0.10 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add a new admin account via a submit action in the admin/accounts/create uri to snowfox/.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Meetings Server allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCuj40456.

WebFOCUS Business Intelligence 8.0 (SP6) allows a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack against administrative users within the /ibi_apps/WFServlet(.ibfs) endpoint. The impact may be creation of an administrative user. It can also be exploited in conjunction with CVE-2016-9044.

Ozeki NG SMS Gateway through 4.17.6 has multiple CSRF vulnerabilities. For example, an administrator, by following a link, can be tricked into making unwanted changes such as installing new modules or changing a password.

This affects the package com.softwaremill.akka-http-session:core_2.12 from 0 and before 0.6.1; all versions of package com.softwaremill.akka-http-session:core_2.11; the package com.softwaremill.akka-http-session:core_2.13 from 0 and before 0.6.1. CSRF protection can be bypassed by forging a request that contains the same value for both the X-XSRF-TOKEN header and the XSRF-TOKEN cookie value, as the check in randomTokenCsrfProtection only checks that the two values are equal and non-empty.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in McAfee Network Data Loss Prevention (NDLP) before 9.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web framework in Cisco Integrated Management Controller in Cisco Unified Computing System allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCuq45477.

Fastweb FASTGate GPON FGA2130FWB devices through 2020-05-26 allow CSRF via the router administration web panel, leading to an attacker's ability to perform administrative actions such as modifying the configuration.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins JiraTestResultReporter Plugin 165.v817928553942 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in XXL-Job v2.3.0 allows attackers to arbitrarily create administrator accounts via the component /gaia-job-admin/user/add.

Textpattern CMS 4.6.2 allows CSRF via the prefs subsystem.

Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.x before 2.3.20 uses predictable <s:token/> values, which allows remote attackers to bypass the CSRF protection mechanism.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Online Banquet Booking System v1.0 allows attackers to change admin credentials via a crafted POST request.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in the GACL functionality of OpenEMR 5.0.2 and development version 6.0.0 (commit babec93f600ff1394f91ccd512bcad85832eb6ce). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to the execution of arbitrary requests in the context of the victim. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.

This release fixes a Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability was found in Red Hat CloudForms which forces end users to execute unwanted actions on a web application in which the user is currently authenticated. An attacker can make a forgery HTTP request to the server by crafting custom flash file which can force the user to perform state changing requests like provisioning VMs, running ansible playbooks and so forth.

The API in the Push extension for MediaWiki through 1.35 did not require an edit token in ApiPushBase.php and therefore facilitated a CSRF attack.

Ruckus Wireless H500 web management interface CSRF

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Security Network Protection 5.3 before 5.3.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

An issue was discovered in the SiteOrigin Page Builder plugin before 2.10.16 for WordPress. The live editor feature did not do any nonce verification, allowing for requests to be forged on behalf of an administrator. The live_editor_panels_data $_POST variable allows for malicious JavaScript to be executed in the victim's browser.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Job and Node ownership Plugin 0.13.0 and earlier allows attackers to change the owners and item-specific permissions of a job.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Exinda WAN Optimization Suite 7.0.0 (2160) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the admin password via a request to admin/launch.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Php-Nuke 6.x through 7.1.0 allows remote attackers to gain administrative privileges via an img tag with a URL to admin.php.

The SupportCandy WordPress plugin before 2.2.7 does not have CSRF check in the wpsc_tickets AJAX action, nor has any sanitisation or escaping in some of the filter fields which could allow attackers to make a logged in user having access to the ticket lists dashboard set an arbitrary filter (stored in their cookies) with an XSS payload in it.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Openfiler 2.99.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) shutdown or (2) reboot the server via a request to admin/system_shutdown.html.

MCMS v5.2.7 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /role/saveOrUpdateRole.do. This vulnerability allows attackers to escalate privileges and modify data.

rConfig 3.9.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) because it lacks implementation of CSRF protection such as a CSRF token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability by creating a form (add a user, delete a user, or edit a user).

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 'MicroPayments - Paid Author Subscriptions, Content, Downloads, Membership' versions prior to 1.9.6 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of an administrator and perform unintended operation via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Portal 8.0.0 through 8.0.0.1 CF15 and 8.5.0 before CF05 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences.

Combodo iTop contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability, attackers can execute specific commands via malicious site request forgery.

Lack of an anti-CSRF token in the entire administrative interface in EPSON EPS TSE Server 8 (21.0.11) allows an unauthenticated attacker to force an administrator to execute external POST requests by visiting a malicious website.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Pluck CMS v4.7.15 allows attackers to change the password of any given user by exploiting this feature leading to account takeover.