The MediaWiki "Report" extension has a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. Before fixed version, there was no protection against CSRF checks on Special:Report, so requests to report a revision could be forged. The problem has been fixed in commit f828dc6 by making use of MediaWiki edit tokens.

IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7, 11.2.0, and 11.2.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 196825.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in LOGITEC LAN-W300N/PR5B allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via a specially crafted URL. As a result, unintended operations to the device such as changes of the device settings may be conducted.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ELECOM WRC-300FEBK-A allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators and execute an arbitrary request via unspecified vector. As a result, the device settings may be altered and/or telnet daemon may be started.

OutSystems Platform 10 through 11 allows ImageResourceDetail.aspx CSRF for content modifications and file uploads. NOTE: The product is self-hosted by the customer, even though it has a *.outsystemsenterprise.com domain name.) NOTE: The vendor claims that the independent researcher created the report without any type of validation and that no such vulnerability exists

The Pricing Tables WordPress Plugin WordPress plugin before 3.1.3 does not verify the CSRF nonce when removing posts, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin remove arbitrary posts from the blog via a CSRF attack, which will be put in the trash

Msvod v10 has a CSRF vulnerability to change user information via the admin/member/edit.html URI.

IBM Sterling Partner Engagement Manager 6.1.2, 6.2, and Cloud/SasS 22.2 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 220652.

EmpireCMS 7.5.0 has XSS via the from parameter to e/member/doaction.php, as demonstrated by a CSRF payload that changes the dynamic page template. The attacker can choose to resend the e/template/member/regsend.php registered activation mail page.

The AddResolution.jspa resource in Jira before version 7.13.6, from version 8.0.0 before version 8.2.3, and from version 8.3.0 before version 8.3.2 allows remote attackers to create new resolutions via a Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.

The workspace client, openspace client, app development client, and REST API of TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Distribution for TIBCO Silver Fabric, and TIBCO Silver Fabric Enabler for ActiveMatrix BPM contain cross site scripting (XSS) and cross-site request forgery vulnerabilities. Affected releases are TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM: versions up to and including 4.2.0, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Distribution for TIBCO Silver Fabric: versions up to and including 4.2.0, and TIBCO Silver Fabric Enabler for ActiveMatrix BPM: versions up to and including 1.4.1.

The Language Bar Flags WordPress plugin through 1.0.8 does not have any CSRF in place when saving its settings and did not sanitise or escape them when generating the flag bar in the frontend. This could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change the settings, and set Cross-Site Scripting payload in them, which will be executed in the frontend for all users

Plesk Obsidian allows a CSRF attack, e.g., via the /api/v2/cli/commands REST API to change an Admin password. NOTE: Obsidian is a specific version of the Plesk product: version numbers were used through version 12, and then the convention was changed so that versions are identified by names ("Obsidian"), not numbers.

Various exposed resources of the ViewLogging class in Jira before version 7.13.6, from version 8.0.0 before version 8.2.3, and from version 8.3.0 before version 8.3.2 allow remote attackers to modify various settings via Cross-site request forgery (CSRF).

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins XebiaLabs XL Deploy Plugin in the Credential#doValidateUserNamePassword form validation method allows attackers to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Project Inheritance Plugin 2.0.0 and earlier allowed attackers to trigger project generation from templates.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in TeamMate+ 21.0.0.0 that allows a remote attacker to modify application data (upload malicious/forged files on a TeamMate server, or replace existing uploaded files with malicious/forged files). The specific flaw exists within the handling of Upload/DomainObjectDocumentUpload.ashx requests because of failure to validate a CSRF token before handling a POST request.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Netsparker Cloud Scan Plugin 1.1.5 and older in the NCScanBuilder.DescriptorImpl#doValidateAPI form validation method allowed attackers to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Warnings NG Plugin 5.0.0 and earlier allowed attackers to reset warning counts for future builds.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Static Analysis Utilities Plugin 1.95 and earlier in the DefaultGraphConfigurationView#doSave form handler method allowed attackers to change the per-job default graph configuration for all users.

The Cache Images WordPress plugin before 3.2.1 does not implement nonce checks, which could allow attackers to make any logged user upload images via a CSRF attack.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Relution Enterprise Appstore Publisher Plugin 1.24 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins initiate an HTTP connection to an attacker-specified server.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins ElectricFlow Plugin 1.1.5 and earlier in Configuration#doTestConnection allowed attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins promoted builds Plugin 3.9 and earlier allows attackers to to promote builds.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco SD-WAN vManage Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user. These actions could include modifying the system configuration and deleting accounts.

The Accept Donations with PayPal WordPress plugin before 1.3.1 provides a function to create donation buttons which are internally stored as posts. The deletion of a button is not CSRF protected and there is no control to check if the deleted post was a button post. As a result, an attacker could make logged in admins delete arbitrary posts

The Import CSV Files WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not sanitise and escaped imported data before outputting them back in a page, and is lacking CSRF check when performing such action as well, resulting in a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Compute Classic Plugin allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in GroupSession (GroupSession Free edition from ver2.2.0 to the version prior to ver5.1.0, GroupSession byCloud from ver3.0.3 to the version prior to ver5.1.0, and GroupSession ZION from ver3.0.3 to the version prior to ver5.1.0) allows a remote attacker to hijack the authentication of administrators via a specially crafted URL.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Kmap Plugin in KmapJenkinsBuilder.DescriptorImpl form validation methods allows attackers to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server.

php/qmn_options_questions_tab.php in the quiz-master-next plugin before 4.7.9 for WordPress allows CSRF, with resultant stored XSS, via the question_name parameter because js/admin_question.js mishandles parsing inside of a SCRIPT element.

Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects CM400 before 2017-01-11, CM600 before 2017-01-11, D1500 before 2017-01-11, D500 before 2017-01-11, DST6501 before 2017-01-11, JNR1010v1 before 2017-01-11, JWNR2000Tv3 before 2017-01-11, JWNR2010v3 before 2017-01-11, PLW1000 before 2017-01-11, PLW1010 before 2017-01-11, WNR500 before 2017-01-11, WNR612v3 before 2017-01-11, N450 before 2017-01-11, and CG3000Dv2 before 2017-01-11.

An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 2.1.0. It allows XSS via CSRF.

The beauty-premium theme 1.0.8 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant arbitrary file upload in includes/sendmail.php.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Rundeck Plugin allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials.

The icegram plugin before 1.9.19 for WordPress has CSRF via the wp-admin/edit.php option_name parameter.

The Lightbox Plus Colorbox plugin through 2.7.2 for WordPress has cross-site request forgery (CSRF) via wp-admin/admin.php?page=lightboxplus, as demonstrated by resultant width XSS.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Artifactory Plugin 3.2.2 and earlier in ReleaseAction#doSubmit, GradleReleaseApiAction#doStaging, MavenReleaseApiAction#doStaging, and UnifiedPromoteBuildAction#doSubmit allowed attackers to schedule a release build, perform release staging for Gradle and Maven projects, and promote previously staged builds, respectively.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins iceScrum Plugin 1.1.5 and earlier allowed attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins jenkins-reviewbot Plugin in the ReviewboardDescriptor#doTestConnection form validation method allows attackers to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server.

The copy-me plugin 1.0.0 for WordPress has CSRF for copying non-public posts to a public location.

NETGEAR JNR1010 devices before 1.0.0.32 allow cgi-bin/webproc CSRF via the :InternetGatewayDevice.X_TWSZ-COM_URL_Filter.BlackList.1.URL parameter.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in privmsg.php in phpBB 2.0.22 allows remote attackers to delete private messages (PM) as arbitrary users via a deleteall action.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EC-CUBE plugin 'Mail Magazine Management Plugin' ver4.0.0 to 4.1.1 (for EC-CUBE 4 series) and ver1.0.0 to 1.0.4 (for EC-CUBE 3 series) allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of an administrator via a specially crafted page, and Mail Magazine Templates and/or transmitted history information may be deleted unintendedly.

The Tiny Contact Form WordPress plugin through 0.7 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

RPCMS v3.0.2 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows attackers to arbitrarily change the password of any account.

Various Lexmark products have CSRF.

The WPlite WordPress plugin through 1.3.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins openid Plugin in the OpenIdSsoSecurityRealm.DescriptorImpl#doValidate form validation method allows attackers to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server.

The underConstruction WordPress plugin before 1.20 does not have CSRF check in place when deactivating the construction mode, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin perform such action via a CSRF attack