Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2016-1519

Summary
Assigner-certcc
Assigner Org ID-37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b
Published At-21 Apr, 2017 | 20:00
Updated At-05 Aug, 2024 | 23:02
Rejected At-
Credits

The com.softphone.common package in the Grandstream Wave app 1.0.1.26 and earlier for Android does not properly validate SSL certificates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof the Grandstream provisioning server via a crafted certificate.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:certcc
Assigner Org ID:37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b
Published At:21 Apr, 2017 | 20:00
Updated At:05 Aug, 2024 | 23:02
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

The com.softphone.common package in the Grandstream Wave app 1.0.1.26 and earlier for Android does not properly validate SSL certificates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof the Grandstream provisioning server via a crafted certificate.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://rt-solutions.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/CVE-2016-1519-gswave-tls-mitm.pdf
x_refsource_MISC
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136290/Grandstream-Wave-1.0.1.26-TLS-Man-In-The-Middle.html
x_refsource_MISC
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/537819/100/0/threaded
mailing-list
x_refsource_BUGTRAQ
Hyperlink: https://rt-solutions.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/CVE-2016-1519-gswave-tls-mitm.pdf
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136290/Grandstream-Wave-1.0.1.26-TLS-Man-In-The-Middle.html
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/537819/100/0/threaded
Resource:
mailing-list
x_refsource_BUGTRAQ
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://rt-solutions.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/CVE-2016-1519-gswave-tls-mitm.pdf
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136290/Grandstream-Wave-1.0.1.26-TLS-Man-In-The-Middle.html
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/537819/100/0/threaded
mailing-list
x_refsource_BUGTRAQ
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://rt-solutions.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/CVE-2016-1519-gswave-tls-mitm.pdf
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136290/Grandstream-Wave-1.0.1.26-TLS-Man-In-The-Middle.html
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/537819/100/0/threaded
Resource:
mailing-list
x_refsource_BUGTRAQ
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cret@cert.org
Published At:21 Apr, 2017 | 20:59
Updated At:20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37

The com.softphone.common package in the Grandstream Wave app 1.0.1.26 and earlier for Android does not properly validate SSL certificates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof the Grandstream provisioning server via a crafted certificate.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.05.9MEDIUM
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Primary2.04.3MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.0
Base score: 5.9
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 4.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

grandstream
grandstream
>>wave>>Versions up to 1.0.1.26(inclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:grandstream:wave:*:*:*:*:*:android:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136290/Grandstream-Wave-1.0.1.26-TLS-Man-In-The-Middle.htmlcret@cert.org
Third Party Advisory
VDB Entry
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/537819/100/0/threadedcret@cert.org
N/A
https://rt-solutions.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/CVE-2016-1519-gswave-tls-mitm.pdfcret@cert.org
Third Party Advisory
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136290/Grandstream-Wave-1.0.1.26-TLS-Man-In-The-Middle.htmlaf854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Third Party Advisory
VDB Entry
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/537819/100/0/threadedaf854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
N/A
https://rt-solutions.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/CVE-2016-1519-gswave-tls-mitm.pdfaf854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136290/Grandstream-Wave-1.0.1.26-TLS-Man-In-The-Middle.html
Source: cret@cert.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory
VDB Entry
Hyperlink: http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/537819/100/0/threaded
Source: cret@cert.org
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://rt-solutions.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/CVE-2016-1519-gswave-tls-mitm.pdf
Source: cret@cert.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136290/Grandstream-Wave-1.0.1.26-TLS-Man-In-The-Middle.html
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource:
Third Party Advisory
VDB Entry
Hyperlink: http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/537819/100/0/threaded
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://rt-solutions.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/CVE-2016-1519-gswave-tls-mitm.pdf
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource:
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

74Records found

CVE-2019-8642
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-3.3||LOW
EPSS-0.09% / 25.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Oct, 2020 | 19:38
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue existed in the handling of S-MIME certificates. This issue was addressed with improved validation of S-MIME certificates. This issue is fixed in macOS Mojave 10.14.4, Security Update 2019-002 High Sierra, Security Update 2019-002 Sierra. Processing a maliciously crafted mail message may lead to S/MIME signature spoofing.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Apple Inc.
Product-mac_os_xmacOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-26766
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-3.03% / 86.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 May, 2022 | 19:22
Updated-30 May, 2025 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A certificate parsing issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in tvOS 15.5, iOS 15.5 and iPadOS 15.5, Security Update 2022-004 Catalina, watchOS 8.6, macOS Big Sur 11.6.6, macOS Monterey 12.4. A malicious app may be able to bypass signature validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Apple Inc.
Product-mac_os_xwatchosipadosiphone_ostvosmacoswatchOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-24968
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.18% / 40.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Feb, 2022 | 18:16
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 04:29
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Mellium mellium.im/xmpp through 0.21.0, an attacker capable of spoofing DNS TXT records can redirect a WebSocket connection request to a server under their control without causing TLS certificate verification to fail. This occurs because the wrong host name is selected during this verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-melliumn/a
Product-xmppn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2007-5967
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 May, 2021 | 11:50
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 15:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw in Mozilla's embedded certificate code might allow web sites to install root certificates on devices without user approval.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMozilla Corporation
Product-firefoxMozilla Firefox
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-24392
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.18% / 40.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Feb, 2021 | 22:42
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In voloko twitter-stream 0.1.10, missing TLS hostname validation allows an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack against users of the library (because eventmachine is misused).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-twitter-stream_projectn/a
Product-twitter-streamn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-2623
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.28% / 50.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jul, 2018 | 18:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 14:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

It was discovered that rpm-ostree and rpm-ostree-client before 2017.3 fail to properly check GPG signatures on packages when doing layering. Packages with unsigned or badly signed content could fail to be rejected as expected. This issue is partially mitigated on RHEL Atomic Host, where certificate pinning is used by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-rpm-ostreeProject AtomicRed Hat, Inc.
Product-rpm-ostree-clientrpm-ostreeenterprise_linuxrpm-ostree,
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-15498
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Aug, 2020 | 12:05
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered on ASUS RT-AC1900P routers before 3.0.0.4.385_20253. The router accepts an arbitrary server certificate for a firmware update. The culprit is the --no-check-certificate option passed to wget tool used to download firmware update files.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aASUS (ASUSTeK Computer Inc.)
Product-rt-ac1900p_firmwarert-ac1900pn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-15260
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.18% / 40.46%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Mar, 2021 | 22:30
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Existing TLS connections can be reused without checking remote hostname

PJSIP is a free and open source multimedia communication library written in C language implementing standard based protocols such as SIP, SDP, RTP, STUN, TURN, and ICE. In version 2.10 and earlier, PJSIP transport can be reused if they have the same IP address + port + protocol. However, this is insufficient for secure transport since it lacks remote hostname authentication. Suppose we have created a TLS connection to `sip.foo.com`, which has an IP address `100.1.1.1`. If we want to create a TLS connection to another hostname, say `sip.bar.com`, which has the same IP address, then it will reuse that existing connection, even though `100.1.1.1` does not have certificate to authenticate as `sip.bar.com`. The vulnerability allows for an insecure interaction without user awareness. It affects users who need access to connections to different destinations that translate to the same address, and allows man-in-the-middle attack if attacker can route a connection to another destination such as in the case of DNS spoofing.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-teluupjsip
Product-pjsippjproject
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-2402
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-2.68% / 85.25%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jan, 2017 | 22:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OkHttp before 2.7.4 and 3.x before 3.1.2 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to bypass certificate pinning by sending a certificate chain with a certificate from a non-pinned trusted CA and the pinned certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-squareupn/a
Product-okhttpokhttp3n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-0867
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.87% / 82.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Jul, 2012 | 23:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

PostgreSQL 8.4.x before 8.4.11, 9.0.x before 9.0.7, and 9.1.x before 9.1.3 truncates the common name to only 32 characters when verifying SSL certificates, which allows remote attackers to spoof connections when the host name is exactly 32 characters.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe PostgreSQL Global Development GroupRed Hat, Inc.openSUSEDebian GNU/Linux
Product-enterprise_linux_desktopenterprise_linux_server_ausenterprise_linux_hpc_nodeenterprise_linux_server_eusenterprise_linux_workstationdesktop_workstationpostgresqldebian_linuxopensuseenterprise_linuxenterprise_linux_servern/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-23091
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.03% / 5.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Feb, 2025 | 06:53
Updated-13 Mar, 2025 | 13:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An Improper Certificate Validation on UniFi OS devices, with Identity Enterprise configured, could allow a malicious actor to execute a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack during application update.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Ubiquiti Inc.
Product-EFGUDM-SEUNVRUDM-ProUNVR PROUCK-EnterpriseUCG-MaxUDM-Pro-MaxUCKUDMUCKPUDW
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-13245
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 May, 2020 | 18:06
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by Missing SSL Certificate Validation. This affects R7000 1.0.9.6_1.2.19 through 1.0.11.100_10.2.10, and possibly R6120, R7800, R6220, R8000, R6350, R9000, R6400, RAX120, R6400v2, RBR20, R6800, XR300, R6850, XR500, and R7000P.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNETGEAR, Inc.
Product-r6350_firmwarer9000_firmwarer6120r6850_firmwarer6220_firmwarer8000r6800_firmwarexr300r6400_firmwarer7000pr6120_firmwarer9000rbr20r6800xr300_firmwarer7800rax120_firmwarer6850r6350r6220rbr20_firmwarexr500_firmwarer7800_firmwarer6400rax120xr500r8000_firmwarer7000p_firmwaren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-1343
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 31.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 May, 2022 | 15:15
Updated-05 May, 2025 | 17:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
OCSP_basic_verify may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate

The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.
Product-h410saff_8700_firmwareactive_iq_unified_managerfas_8300_firmwarefas_500f_firmwareh500s_firmwareaff_a400aff_500fsantricity_smi-s_provideropensslh700sh500sfas_8700_firmwarea250_firmwareh700e_firmwareaff_8700h500e_firmwaresolidfire\,_enterprise_sds_\&_hci_storage_nodeclustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connectorclustered_data_ontaph300eh300e_firmwareaff_500f_firmwaresolidfire_\&_hci_management_nodeaff_8300h700eh500eh700s_firmwarea700ssmi-s_providera250fas_8700fabric-attached_storage_a400_firmwaresnapmanagerh300sh410s_firmwarefas_8300h300s_firmwarefas_500faff_8300_firmwareaff_a400_firmwarea700s_firmwarefabric-attached_storage_a400OpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-12421
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.82% / 73.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Jul, 2020 | 14:39
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 11:56
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When performing add-on updates, certificate chains terminating in non-built-in-roots were rejected (even if they were legitimately added by an administrator.) This could have caused add-ons to become out-of-date silently without notification to the user. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 68.10, Firefox < 78, and Thunderbird < 68.10.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Mozilla CorporationCanonical Ltd.
Product-firefoxubuntu_linuxthunderbirdfirefox_esrFirefoxFirefox ESRThunderbird
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-10534
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 36.95%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 May, 2018 | 20:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

electron-packager is a command line tool that packages Electron source code into `.app` and `.exe` packages. along with Electron. The `--strict-ssl` command line option in electron-packager >= 5.2.1 <= 6.0.0 || >=6.0.0 <= 6.0.2 defaults to false if not explicitly set to true. This could allow an attacker to perform a man in the middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Electron (OpenJS Foundation)HackerOne
Product-electron-packagerelectron-packager node module
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-3152
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-29.49% / 96.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 May, 2016 | 10:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Oracle MySQL before 5.7.3, Oracle MySQL Connector/C (aka libmysqlclient) before 6.1.3, and MariaDB before 5.5.44 use the --ssl option to mean that SSL is optional, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via a cleartext-downgrade attack, aka a "BACKRONYM" attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMariaDB FoundationRed Hat, Inc.Fedora ProjectThe PHP GroupDebian GNU/LinuxOracle Corporation
Product-enterprise_linux_serverenterprise_linux_server_ausmysql_connector\/centerprise_linux_eusfedoramariadbmysqlenterprise_linux_desktopenterprise_linux_server_tusenterprise_linux_workstationphpdebian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-3285
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-8.00% / 91.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jan, 2021 | 01:02
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 16:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

jxbrowser in TI Code Composer Studio IDE 8.x through 10.x before 10.1.1 does not verify X.509 certificates for HTTPS.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-tin/a
Product-code_composer_studio_intgrated_development_environmentn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-31399
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.6||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.21% / 43.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Aug, 2021 | 12:05
Updated-30 May, 2025 | 16:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

On 2N Access Unit 2.0 2.31.0.40.5 devices, an attacker can pose as the web relay for a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-2nn/a
Product-access_unit_2.0access_unit_2.0_firmwaren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-29653
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 29.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Apr, 2021 | 16:41
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise 1.5.1 and newer, under certain circumstances, may exclude revoked but unexpired certificates from the CRL. Fixed in 1.5.8, 1.6.4, and 1.7.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aHashiCorp, Inc.
Product-vaultn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-27018
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 27.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Aug, 2021 | 17:56
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The mechanism which performs certificate validation was discovered to have a flaw that resulted in certificates signed by an internal certificate authority to not be properly validated. This issue only affects clients that are configured to utilize Tenable.sc as the vulnerability data source.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aPerforce Software, Inc. ("Puppet")
Product-remediatePuppet Remediate
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-22895
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.36% / 57.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jun, 2021 | 15:49
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Nextcloud Desktop Client before 3.3.1 is vulnerable to improper certificate validation due to lack of SSL certificate verification when using the "Register with a Provider" flow.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxNextcloud GmbH
Product-desktopdebian_linuxNextcloud Desktop Client
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-21373
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.17% / 38.83%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-26 Mar, 2021 | 21:25
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Nimble falls back to insecure http url when fetching packages

Nimble is a package manager for the Nim programming language. In Nim release versions before versions 1.2.10 and 1.4.4, "nimble refresh" fetches a list of Nimble packages over HTTPS by default. In case of error it falls back to a non-TLS URL http://irclogs.nim-lang.org/packages.json. An attacker able to perform MitM can deliver a modified package list containing malicious software packages. If the packages are installed and used the attack escalates to untrusted code execution.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nim-langnim-lang
Product-nimsecurity
CWE ID-CWE-348
Use of Less Trusted Source
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-1837
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 26.18%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Sep, 2021 | 14:44
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 16:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A certificate validation issue was addressed. This issue is fixed in iOS 14.5 and iPadOS 14.5. An attacker in a privileged network position may be able to alter network traffic.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Apple Inc.
Product-iphone_osipadosiOS and iPadOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-9319
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.36% / 57.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Mar, 2017 | 00:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

There is Missing SSL Certificate Validation in the Trend Micro Enterprise Mobile Security Android Application before 9.7.1193, aka VRTS-398.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aTrend Micro Incorporated
Product-mobile_securityn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found