Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2016-9892

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-02 Mar, 2017 | 23:00
Updated At-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:07
Rejected At-
Credits

The esets_daemon service in ESET Endpoint Antivirus for macOS before 6.4.168.0 and Endpoint Security for macOS before 6.4.168.0 does not properly verify X.509 certificates from the edf.eset.com SSL server, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof this server and provide crafted responses to license activation requests via a self-signed certificate. NOTE: this issue can be combined with CVE-2016-0718 to execute arbitrary code remotely as root.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:02 Mar, 2017 | 23:00
Updated At:06 Aug, 2024 | 03:07
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

The esets_daemon service in ESET Endpoint Antivirus for macOS before 6.4.168.0 and Endpoint Security for macOS before 6.4.168.0 does not properly verify X.509 certificates from the edf.eset.com SSL server, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof this server and provide crafted responses to license activation requests via a self-signed certificate. NOTE: this issue can be combined with CVE-2016-0718 to execute arbitrary code remotely as root.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
http://support.eset.com/ca6333/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Feb/68
mailing-list
x_refsource_FULLDISC
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96462
vdb-entry
x_refsource_BID
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/141350/ESET-Endpoint-Antivirus-6-Remote-Code-Execution.html
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: http://support.eset.com/ca6333/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Feb/68
Resource:
mailing-list
x_refsource_FULLDISC
Hyperlink: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96462
Resource:
vdb-entry
x_refsource_BID
Hyperlink: http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/141350/ESET-Endpoint-Antivirus-6-Remote-Code-Execution.html
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
http://support.eset.com/ca6333/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Feb/68
mailing-list
x_refsource_FULLDISC
x_transferred
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96462
vdb-entry
x_refsource_BID
x_transferred
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/141350/ESET-Endpoint-Antivirus-6-Remote-Code-Execution.html
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://support.eset.com/ca6333/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Feb/68
Resource:
mailing-list
x_refsource_FULLDISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96462
Resource:
vdb-entry
x_refsource_BID
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/141350/ESET-Endpoint-Antivirus-6-Remote-Code-Execution.html
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:02 Mar, 2017 | 23:59
Updated At:20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37

The esets_daemon service in ESET Endpoint Antivirus for macOS before 6.4.168.0 and Endpoint Security for macOS before 6.4.168.0 does not properly verify X.509 certificates from the edf.eset.com SSL server, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof this server and provide crafted responses to license activation requests via a self-signed certificate. NOTE: this issue can be combined with CVE-2016-0718 to execute arbitrary code remotely as root.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.05.9MEDIUM
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Primary2.04.3MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.0
Base score: 5.9
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 4.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

ESET, spol. s r. o.
eset
>>endpoint_antivirus>>6.3.70.1
cpe:2.3:a:eset:endpoint_antivirus:6.3.70.1:*:*:*:*:macos:*:*
ESET, spol. s r. o.
eset
>>endpoint_security>>6.3.70.1
cpe:2.3:a:eset:endpoint_security:6.3.70.1:*:*:*:*:macos:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/141350/ESET-Endpoint-Antivirus-6-Remote-Code-Execution.htmlcve@mitre.org
Exploit
Third Party Advisory
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Feb/68cve@mitre.org
Exploit
Mailing List
http://support.eset.com/ca6333/cve@mitre.org
Vendor Advisory
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96462cve@mitre.org
Third Party Advisory
VDB Entry
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/141350/ESET-Endpoint-Antivirus-6-Remote-Code-Execution.htmlaf854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Exploit
Third Party Advisory
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Feb/68af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Exploit
Mailing List
http://support.eset.com/ca6333/af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Vendor Advisory
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96462af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Third Party Advisory
VDB Entry
Hyperlink: http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/141350/ESET-Endpoint-Antivirus-6-Remote-Code-Execution.html
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Exploit
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Feb/68
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Exploit
Mailing List
Hyperlink: http://support.eset.com/ca6333/
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96462
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory
VDB Entry
Hyperlink: http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/141350/ESET-Endpoint-Antivirus-6-Remote-Code-Execution.html
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource:
Exploit
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Feb/68
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource:
Exploit
Mailing List
Hyperlink: http://support.eset.com/ca6333/
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource:
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96462
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource:
Third Party Advisory
VDB Entry

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

87Records found

CVE-2012-1420
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-19.73% / 95.21%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Mar, 2012 | 10:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The TAR file parser in Quick Heal (aka Cat QuickHeal) 11.00, Command Antivirus 5.2.11.5, F-Prot Antivirus 4.6.2.117, Fortinet Antivirus 4.2.254.0, K7 AntiVirus 9.77.3565, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0.0.125, Antimalware Engine 1.1.6402.0 in Microsoft Security Essentials 2.0, NOD32 Antivirus 5795, Norman Antivirus 6.06.12, Panda Antivirus 10.0.2.7, and Rising Antivirus 22.83.00.03 allows remote attackers to bypass malware detection via a POSIX TAR file with an initial \7fELF character sequence. NOTE: this may later be SPLIT into multiple CVEs if additional information is published showing that the error occurred independently in different TAR parser implementations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-catauthentiumnormanpandasecurityf-protk7computingrising-globaln/aESET, spol. s r. o.Microsoft CorporationFortinet, Inc.Kaspersky Lab
Product-rising_antivirussecurity_essentialsf-prot_antivirusnorman_antivirus_\&_antispywarenod32_antiviruscommand_antiviruspanda_antiviruskaspersky_anti-virusfortinet_antivirusquick_healantivirusn/a
CVE-2012-1425
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-54.24% / 97.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Mar, 2012 | 10:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The TAR file parser in Avira AntiVir 7.11.1.163, Antiy Labs AVL SDK 2.0.3.7, Quick Heal (aka Cat QuickHeal) 11.00, Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.1.0.1, Fortinet Antivirus 4.2.254.0, Ikarus Virus Utilities T3 Command Line Scanner 1.1.97.0, Jiangmin Antivirus 13.0.900, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0.0.125, McAfee Anti-Virus Scanning Engine 5.400.0.1158, McAfee Gateway (formerly Webwasher) 2010.1C, NOD32 Antivirus 5795, Norman Antivirus 6.06.12, PC Tools AntiVirus 7.0.3.5, AVEngine 20101.3.0.103 in Symantec Endpoint Protection 11, Trend Micro AntiVirus 9.120.0.1004, and Trend Micro HouseCall 9.120.0.1004 allows remote attackers to bypass malware detection via a POSIX TAR file with an initial \50\4B\03\04 character sequence. NOTE: this may later be SPLIT into multiple CVEs if additional information is published showing that the error occurred independently in different TAR parser implementations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-catnormanemsisoftjiangminpc_toolsaviraantiyikarusn/aMcAfee, LLCESET, spol. s r. o.Symantec CorporationTrend Micro IncorporatedFortinet, Inc.Kaspersky Lab
Product-scan_engineendpoint_protectionnod32_antivirusgatewaykaspersky_anti-virusquick_healfortinet_antivirusjiangmin_antivirusanti-malwarepc_tools_antivirusikarus_virus_utilities_t3_command_line_scannerhousecallnorman_antivirus_\&_antispywareavl_sdktrend_micro_antivirusantivirn/a
CVE-2012-1455
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.14% / 34.39%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Mar, 2012 | 10:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The CAB file parser in NOD32 Antivirus 5795 and Rising Antivirus 22.83.00.03 allows remote attackers to bypass malware detection via a CAB file with a modified vMinor version field. NOTE: this may later be SPLIT into multiple CVEs if additional information is published showing that the error occurred independently in different CAB parser implementations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-rising-globaln/aESET, spol. s r. o.
Product-nod32_antivirusrising_antivirusn/a
CVE-2012-1449
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.14% / 34.39%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Mar, 2012 | 10:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The CAB file parser in NOD32 Antivirus 5795 and Rising Antivirus 22.83.00.03 allows remote attackers to bypass malware detection via a CAB file with a modified vMajor field. NOTE: this may later be SPLIT into multiple CVEs if additional information is published showing that the error occurred independently in different CAB parser implementations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-rising-globaln/aESET, spol. s r. o.
Product-nod32_antivirusrising_antivirusn/a
CVE-2012-1457
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-70.88% / 98.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Mar, 2012 | 10:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The TAR file parser in Avira AntiVir 7.11.1.163, Antiy Labs AVL SDK 2.0.3.7, avast! Antivirus 4.8.1351.0 and 5.0.677.0, AVG Anti-Virus 10.0.0.1190, Bitdefender 7.2, Quick Heal (aka Cat QuickHeal) 11.00, ClamAV 0.96.4, Command Antivirus 5.2.11.5, Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.1.0.1, eSafe 7.0.17.0, F-Prot Antivirus 4.6.2.117, G Data AntiVirus 21, Ikarus Virus Utilities T3 Command Line Scanner 1.1.97.0, Jiangmin Antivirus 13.0.900, K7 AntiVirus 9.77.3565, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0.0.125, McAfee Anti-Virus Scanning Engine 5.400.0.1158, McAfee Gateway (formerly Webwasher) 2010.1C, Antimalware Engine 1.1.6402.0 in Microsoft Security Essentials 2.0, NOD32 Antivirus 5795, Norman Antivirus 6.06.12, PC Tools AntiVirus 7.0.3.5, Rising Antivirus 22.83.00.03, AVEngine 20101.3.0.103 in Symantec Endpoint Protection 11, Trend Micro AntiVirus 9.120.0.1004, Trend Micro HouseCall 9.120.0.1004, VBA32 3.12.14.2, and VirusBuster 13.6.151.0 allows remote attackers to bypass malware detection via a TAR archive entry with a length field that exceeds the total TAR file size. NOTE: this may later be SPLIT into multiple CVEs if additional information is published showing that the error occurred independently in different TAR parser implementations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-catauthentiumvirusbusternormanalwilavgemsisoftjiangminaladdinf-protpc_toolsk7computinganti-virusantiyaviragdata-softwarerising-globalikarusn/aESET, spol. s r. o.Microsoft CorporationMcAfee, LLCKaspersky LabClamAVSymantec CorporationBitdefenderTrend Micro Incorporated
Product-ikarus_virus_utilities_t3_command_line_scannerscan_engineclamavantivirtrend_micro_antivirusavl_sdkjiangmin_antivirusbitdefenderhousecallavg_anti-virussecurity_essentialsesafecommand_antivirusquick_healendpoint_protectionvba32pc_tools_antivirusvirusbusterf-prot_antivirusrising_antiviruskaspersky_anti-virusanti-malwareg_data_antivirusgatewaynod32_antivirusnorman_antivirus_\&_antispywareantivirusavast_antivirusn/a
CVE-2012-1423
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-3.69% / 87.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Mar, 2012 | 10:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The TAR file parser in Command Antivirus 5.2.11.5, Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.1.0.1, F-Prot Antivirus 4.6.2.117, Fortinet Antivirus 4.2.254.0, Ikarus Virus Utilities T3 Command Line Scanner 1.1.97.0, K7 AntiVirus 9.77.3565, NOD32 Antivirus 5795, Norman Antivirus 6.06.12, PC Tools AntiVirus 7.0.3.5, Rising Antivirus 22.83.00.03, and VirusBuster 13.6.151.0 allows remote attackers to bypass malware detection via a POSIX TAR file with an initial MZ character sequence. NOTE: this may later be SPLIT into multiple CVEs if additional information is published showing that the error occurred independently in different TAR parser implementations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-authentiumvirusbusternormanemsisoftf-protpc_toolsk7computingrising-globalikarusn/aFortinet, Inc.ESET, spol. s r. o.
Product-rising_antivirusf-prot_antivirusnorman_antivirus_\&_antispywarenod32_antiviruscommand_antiviruspc_tools_antivirusfortinet_antivirusantivirusanti-malwarevirusbusterikarus_virus_utilities_t3_command_line_scannern/a
CVE-2012-1443
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-50.21% / 97.75%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Mar, 2012 | 10:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The RAR file parser in ClamAV 0.96.4, Rising Antivirus 22.83.00.03, Quick Heal (aka Cat QuickHeal) 11.00, G Data AntiVirus 21, AVEngine 20101.3.0.103 in Symantec Endpoint Protection 11, Command Antivirus 5.2.11.5, Ikarus Virus Utilities T3 Command Line Scanner 1.1.97.0, Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.1.0.1, PC Tools AntiVirus 7.0.3.5, F-Prot Antivirus 4.6.2.117, VirusBuster 13.6.151.0, Fortinet Antivirus 4.2.254.0, Antiy Labs AVL SDK 2.0.3.7, K7 AntiVirus 9.77.3565, Trend Micro HouseCall 9.120.0.1004, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0.0.125, Jiangmin Antivirus 13.0.900, Antimalware Engine 1.1.6402.0 in Microsoft Security Essentials 2.0, Sophos Anti-Virus 4.61.0, NOD32 Antivirus 5795, Avira AntiVir 7.11.1.163, Norman Antivirus 6.06.12, McAfee Anti-Virus Scanning Engine 5.400.0.1158, Panda Antivirus 10.0.2.7, McAfee Gateway (formerly Webwasher) 2010.1C, Trend Micro AntiVirus 9.120.0.1004, Comodo Antivirus 7424, Bitdefender 7.2, eSafe 7.0.17.0, F-Secure Anti-Virus 9.0.16160.0, nProtect Anti-Virus 2011-01-17.01, AhnLab V3 Internet Security 2011.01.18.00, AVG Anti-Virus 10.0.0.1190, avast! Antivirus 4.8.1351.0 and 5.0.677.0, and VBA32 3.12.14.2 allows user-assisted remote attackers to bypass malware detection via a RAR file with an initial MZ character sequence. NOTE: this may later be SPLIT into multiple CVEs if additional information is published showing that the error occurred independently in different RAR parser implementations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-catvirusbusterjiangmincomodoanti-virusantiygdata-softwareahnlabnprotectalwilemsisoftaladdink7computingavirarising-globalikarusauthentiumnormanavgpandasecurityf-protpc_toolsn/aMcAfee, LLCClamAVF-Secure CorporationFortinet, Inc.Trend Micro IncorporatedESET, spol. s r. o.Microsoft CorporationKaspersky LabSymantec CorporationBitdefenderSophos Ltd.
Product-scan_engineclamavtrend_micro_antivirusbitdefenderfortinet_antivirusesafecommand_antivirusquick_healendpoint_protectionvba32f-secure_anti-virusrising_antivirusanti-malwareg_data_antivirusgatewaypanda_antivirusantivirusavast_antivirusikarus_virus_utilities_t3_command_line_scannerantivirsophos_anti-virusavl_sdkjiangmin_antivirusv3_internet_securitynprotect_antivirusavg_anti-virussecurity_essentialspc_tools_antivirusvirusbustercomodo_antiviruskaspersky_anti-virushousecallf-prot_antivirusnod32_antivirusnorman_antivirus_\&_antispywaren/a
CVE-2020-9264
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 48.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Feb, 2020 | 14:56
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 10:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

ESET Archive Support Module before 1296 allows virus-detection bypass via a crafted Compression Information Field in a ZIP archive. This affects versions before 1294 of Smart Security Premium, Internet Security, NOD32 Antivirus, Cyber Security Pro (macOS), Cyber Security (macOS), Mobile Security for Android, Smart TV Security, and NOD32 Antivirus 4 for Linux Desktop.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aESET, spol. s r. o.
Product-smart_tv_securityinternet_securitycyber_securitymobile_securitysmart_securitynod32_antivirusn/a
CWE ID-CWE-436
Interpretation Conflict
CVE-2009-0548
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.28% / 50.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Feb, 2009 | 23:00
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 04:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Additional Report Settings interface in ESET Remote Administrator before 3.0.105 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aESET, spol. s r. o.
Product-remote_administratorn/a
CWE ID-CWE-79
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
CVE-2012-1456
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-22.52% / 95.63%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Mar, 2012 | 10:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The TAR file parser in AVG Anti-Virus 10.0.0.1190, Quick Heal (aka Cat QuickHeal) 11.00, Comodo Antivirus 7424, Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.1.0.1, eSafe 7.0.17.0, F-Prot Antivirus 4.6.2.117, Fortinet Antivirus 4.2.254.0, Ikarus Virus Utilities T3 Command Line Scanner 1.1.97.0, Jiangmin Antivirus 13.0.900, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0.0.125, McAfee Anti-Virus Scanning Engine 5.400.0.1158, McAfee Gateway (formerly Webwasher) 2010.1C, NOD32 Antivirus 5795, Norman Antivirus 6.06.12, Panda Antivirus 10.0.2.7, Rising Antivirus 22.83.00.03, Sophos Anti-Virus 4.61.0, AVEngine 20101.3.0.103 in Symantec Endpoint Protection 11, Trend Micro AntiVirus 9.120.0.1004, and Trend Micro HouseCall 9.120.0.1004 allows remote attackers to bypass malware detection via a TAR file with an appended ZIP file. NOTE: this may later be SPLIT into multiple CVEs if additional information is published showing that the error occurred independently in different TAR parser implementations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-catnormanavgemsisoftjiangminaladdinpandasecurityf-protcomodorising-globalikarusn/aESET, spol. s r. o.McAfee, LLCKaspersky LabSymantec CorporationSophos Ltd.Fortinet, Inc.Trend Micro Incorporated
Product-ikarus_virus_utilities_t3_command_line_scannerscan_enginesophos_anti-virustrend_micro_antivirusjiangmin_antivirushousecallavg_anti-virusfortinet_antivirusesafequick_healendpoint_protectioncomodo_antivirusrising_antiviruskaspersky_anti-virusanti-malwaregatewayf-prot_antivirusnod32_antiviruspanda_antivirusnorman_antivirus_\&_antispywaren/a
CVE-2012-1461
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-80.05% / 99.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Mar, 2012 | 10:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Gzip file parser in AVG Anti-Virus 10.0.0.1190, Bitdefender 7.2, Command Antivirus 5.2.11.5, Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.1.0.1, F-Secure Anti-Virus 9.0.16160.0, Fortinet Antivirus 4.2.254.0, Ikarus Virus Utilities T3 Command Line Scanner 1.1.97.0, Jiangmin Antivirus 13.0.900, K7 AntiVirus 9.77.3565, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0.0.125, McAfee Anti-Virus Scanning Engine 5.400.0.1158, McAfee Gateway (formerly Webwasher) 2010.1C, NOD32 Antivirus 5795, Norman Antivirus 6.06.12, Rising Antivirus 22.83.00.03, Sophos Anti-Virus 4.61.0, AVEngine 20101.3.0.103 in Symantec Endpoint Protection 11, Trend Micro AntiVirus 9.120.0.1004, Trend Micro HouseCall 9.120.0.1004, and VBA32 3.12.14.2 allows remote attackers to bypass malware detection via a .tar.gz file with multiple compressed streams. NOTE: this may later be SPLIT into multiple CVEs if additional information is published showing that the error occurred independently in different Gzip parser implementations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-authentiumnormanavgemsisoftjiangmink7computinganti-virusrising-globalikarusn/aESET, spol. s r. o.McAfee, LLCKaspersky LabSymantec CorporationF-Secure CorporationBitdefenderSophos Ltd.Fortinet, Inc.Trend Micro Incorporated
Product-ikarus_virus_utilities_t3_command_line_scannerscan_enginesophos_anti-virustrend_micro_antivirusjiangmin_antivirusbitdefenderhousecallavg_anti-virusfortinet_antiviruscommand_antivirusendpoint_protectionvba32f-secure_anti-virusrising_antiviruskaspersky_anti-virusanti-malwaregatewaynod32_antivirusnorman_antivirus_\&_antispywareantivirusn/a
CVE-2012-1422
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.20% / 42.50%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Mar, 2012 | 10:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The TAR file parser in Quick Heal (aka Cat QuickHeal) 11.00, NOD32 Antivirus 5795, Norman Antivirus 6.06.12, and Rising Antivirus 22.83.00.03 allows remote attackers to bypass malware detection via a POSIX TAR file with an initial ITSF character sequence. NOTE: this may later be SPLIT into multiple CVEs if additional information is published showing that the error occurred independently in different TAR parser implementations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-catnormanrising-globaln/aESET, spol. s r. o.
Product-rising_antivirusnorman_antivirus_\&_antispywarenod32_antivirusquick_healn/a
CVE-2012-1459
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-86.89% / 99.39%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Mar, 2012 | 10:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The TAR file parser in AhnLab V3 Internet Security 2011.01.18.00, Avira AntiVir 7.11.1.163, Antiy Labs AVL SDK 2.0.3.7, avast! Antivirus 4.8.1351.0 and 5.0.677.0, AVG Anti-Virus 10.0.0.1190, Bitdefender 7.2, Quick Heal (aka Cat QuickHeal) 11.00, ClamAV 0.96.4, Command Antivirus 5.2.11.5, Comodo Antivirus 7424, Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.1.0.1, F-Prot Antivirus 4.6.2.117, F-Secure Anti-Virus 9.0.16160.0, Fortinet Antivirus 4.2.254.0, G Data AntiVirus 21, Ikarus Virus Utilities T3 Command Line Scanner 1.1.97.0, Jiangmin Antivirus 13.0.900, K7 AntiVirus 9.77.3565, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0.0.125, McAfee Anti-Virus Scanning Engine 5.400.0.1158, McAfee Gateway (formerly Webwasher) 2010.1C, Antimalware Engine 1.1.6402.0 in Microsoft Security Essentials 2.0, NOD32 Antivirus 5795, Norman Antivirus 6.06.12, nProtect Anti-Virus 2011-01-17.01, Panda Antivirus 10.0.2.7, PC Tools AntiVirus 7.0.3.5, Rising Antivirus 22.83.00.03, Sophos Anti-Virus 4.61.0, AVEngine 20101.3.0.103 in Symantec Endpoint Protection 11, Trend Micro AntiVirus 9.120.0.1004, Trend Micro HouseCall 9.120.0.1004, VBA32 3.12.14.2, and VirusBuster 13.6.151.0 allows remote attackers to bypass malware detection via a TAR archive entry with a length field corresponding to that entire entry, plus part of the header of the next entry. NOTE: this may later be SPLIT into multiple CVEs if additional information is published showing that the error occurred independently in different TAR parser implementations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-catvirusbusterjiangmincomodoanti-virusantiygdata-softwareahnlabnprotectalwilemsisoftk7computingavirarising-globalikarusauthentiumnormanavgpandasecurityf-protpc_toolsn/aMcAfee, LLCClamAVF-Secure CorporationFortinet, Inc.Trend Micro IncorporatedESET, spol. s r. o.Microsoft CorporationKaspersky LabSymantec CorporationBitdefenderSophos Ltd.
Product-scan_engineclamavtrend_micro_antivirusbitdefenderfortinet_antiviruscommand_antivirusquick_healendpoint_protectionvba32f-secure_anti-virusrising_antivirusanti-malwareg_data_antivirusgatewaypanda_antivirusantivirusavast_antivirusikarus_virus_utilities_t3_command_line_scannerantivirsophos_anti-virusavl_sdkjiangmin_antivirusv3_internet_securitynprotect_antivirusavg_anti-virussecurity_essentialspc_tools_antivirusvirusbustercomodo_antiviruskaspersky_anti-virushousecallf-prot_antivirusnod32_antivirusnorman_antivirus_\&_antispywaren/a
CVE-2023-5594
Matching Score-6
Assigner-ESET, spol. s r.o.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-ESET, spol. s r.o.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 28.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Dec, 2023 | 11:30
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 08:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper following of a certificate's chain of trust in ESET security products

Improper validation of the server’s certificate chain in secure traffic scanning feature considered intermediate certificate signed using the MD5 or SHA1 algorithm as trusted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ESET, spol. s r. o.
Product-securityserver_securityinternet_securitynod32_antivirusfile_securityendpoint_antivirusendpoint_securitysmart_securitymail_securityESET Server Security for Windows ServerESET NOD32 AntivirusESET Endpoint Antivirus for Linux 10.0 and aboveESET Internet SecurityESET Endpoint SecurityESET Security UltimateESET Mail Security for IBM DominoESET File Security for Microsoft AzureESET Endpoint AntivirusESET Smart Security PremiumESET Security for Microsoft SharePoint ServerESET Server Security for Linux 10.1 and above ESET Mail Security for Microsoft Exchange Server
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-5506
Matching Score-4
Assigner-NetApp, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-NetApp, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 41.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Oct, 2019 | 18:20
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 20:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.0 and higher do not enforce hostname verification under certain circumstances making them susceptible to impersonation via man-in-the-middle attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNetApp, Inc.
Product-clustered_data_ontapClustered Data ONTAP
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-15528
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Symantec - A Division of Broadcom
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Symantec - A Division of Broadcom
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.23% / 45.71%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Nov, 2017 | 18:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Prior to v 7.6, the Install Norton Security (INS) product can be susceptible to a certificate spoofing vulnerability, which is a type of attack whereby a maliciously procured certificate binds the public key of an attacker to the domain name of the target.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nortonn/a
Product-install_norton_securityn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2013-2255
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.41% / 60.75%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Nov, 2019 | 18:38
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 15:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HTTPSConnections in OpenStack Keystone 2013, OpenStack Compute 2013.1, and possibly other OpenStack components, fail to validate server-side SSL certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxOpenStackRed Hat, Inc.
Product-keystonedebian_linuxopenstackcomputeKeystoneCompute
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-15698
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.83% / 73.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Jan, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When parsing the AIA-Extension field of a client certificate, Apache Tomcat Native Connector 1.2.0 to 1.2.14 and 1.1.23 to 1.1.34 did not correctly handle fields longer than 127 bytes. The result of the parsing error was to skip the OCSP check. It was therefore possible for client certificates that should have been rejected (if the OCSP check had been made) to be accepted. Users not using OCSP checks are not affected by this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxtomcat_nativeApache Tomcat Native
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5518
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Nov, 2019 | 13:06
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 21:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

vdsm: certificate generation upon node creation allowing vdsm to start and serve requests from anyone who has a matching key (and certificate)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ovirtvdsm
Product-vdsmvdsm
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-36371
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.07% / 21.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Jul, 2021 | 20:19
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 00:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Emissary-Ingress (formerly Ambassador API Gateway) through 1.13.9 allows attackers to bypass client certificate requirements (i.e., mTLS cert_required) on backend upstreams when more than one TLSContext is defined and at least one configuration exists that does not require client certificate authentication. The attacker must send an SNI specifying an unprotected backend and an HTTP Host header specifying a protected backend. (2.x versions are unaffected. 1.x versions are unaffected with certain configuration settings involving prune_unreachable_routes and a wildcard Host resource.)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-getambassadorn/a
Product-emissary-ingressn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-1316
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.20% / 42.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jan, 2020 | 13:11
Updated-15 Nov, 2024 | 17:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance does not check for certificate revocation which could lead to MITM attacks

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-ironport_web_security_applianceIronPort Web Security Appliance
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-14806
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.11% / 30.75%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2020 | 09:45
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Insecure handling of repodata and packages in SUSE Studio onlite

A Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in susestudio-common of SUSE Studio onsite allows remote attackers to MITM connections to the repositories, which allows the modification of packages received over these connections. This issue affects: SUSE Studio onsite susestudio-common version 1.3.17-56.6.3 and prior versions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-SUSE
Product-susestudio-ui-serverstudio_onsiteStudio onsite
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2010-4237
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Canonical Ltd.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Canonical Ltd.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.31% / 53.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Oct, 2019 | 17:07
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 03:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Mercurial before 1.6.4 fails to verify the Common Name field of SSL certificates which allows remote attackers who acquire a certificate signed by a Certificate Authority to perform a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mercurialmercurial
Product-mercurialmercurial
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2010-4532
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.23% / 45.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Nov, 2019 | 17:19
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 03:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

offlineimap before 6.3.2 does not check for SSL server certificate validation when "ssl = yes" option is specified which can allow man-in-the-middle attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-offlineimapofflineimapDebian GNU/Linux
Product-offlineimapdebian_linuxofflineimap
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-1265
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.10% / 29.14%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Dec, 2018 | 16:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.0.1, 10.1, 10.1.2, 10.1.3, 10.1.4, and 10.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 124740.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-security_guardiumSecurity Guardium
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-11501
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 36.01%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Jul, 2017 | 23:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

NixOS 17.03 and earlier has an unintended default absence of SSL Certificate Validation for LDAP. The users.ldap NixOS module implements user authentication against LDAP servers via a PAM module. It was found that if TLS is enabled to connect to the LDAP server with users.ldap.useTLS, peer verification will be unconditionally disabled in /etc/ldap.conf.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nixos_projectn/a
Product-nixosn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2009-3767
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.96% / 82.75%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Oct, 2009 | 19:00
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 06:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libraries/libldap/tls_o.c in OpenLDAP 2.2 and 2.4, and possibly other versions, when OpenSSL is used, does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openldapn/aOpenSSLApple Inc.Fedora Project
Product-fedoraopenldapmac_os_xopenssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-1000396
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.03% / 5.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jan, 2018 | 02:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 22:00
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Jenkins 2.73.1 and earlier, 2.83 and earlier bundled a version of the commons-httpclient library with the vulnerability CVE-2012-6153 that incorrectly verified SSL certificates, making it susceptible to man-in-the-middle attacks. This library is widely used as a transitive dependency in Jenkins plugins. The fix for CVE-2012-6153 was backported to the version of commons-httpclient that is bundled in core and made available to plugins.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJenkins
Product-jenkinsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-1000415
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Jan, 2018 | 20:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

MatrixSSL version 3.7.2 has an incorrect UTCTime date range validation in its X.509 certificate validation process resulting in some certificates have their expiration (beginning) year extended (delayed) by 100 years.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-matrixssln/a
Product-matrixssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-11674
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 36.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Oct, 2019 | 14:42
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Man-in-the-middle vulnerability in Micro Focus Self Service Password Reset, affecting all versions prior to 4.4.0.4. The vulnerability could exploit invalid certificate validation and may result in a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMicro Focus International Limited
Product-netiq_self_service_password_resetSelf Service Password Reset (SSPR) versions prior to 4.4.0.4
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1010206
Matching Score-4
Assigner-7556d962-6fb7-411e-85fa-6cd62f095ba8
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-7556d962-6fb7-411e-85fa-6cd62f095ba8
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jul, 2019 | 13:30
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OSS Http Request (Apache Cordova Plugin) 6 is affected by: Missing SSL certificate validation. The impact is: certificate spoofing. The component is: use this library when https communication. The attack vector is: certificate spoofing.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-http_request_projectOSS
Product-http_requestHttp Request (Apache Cordova Plugin)
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-9064
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.27% / 50.46%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jun, 2018 | 21:00
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 02:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Add-on updates failed to verify that the add-on ID inside the signed package matched the ID of the add-on being updated. An attacker who could perform a man-in-the-middle attack on the user's connection to the update server and defeat the certificate pinning protection could provide a malicious signed add-on instead of a valid update. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 45.5 and Firefox < 50.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Mozilla Corporation
Product-firefoxfirefox_esrFirefoxFirefox ESR
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-5812
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Tenable Network Security, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Tenable Network Security, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Feb, 2021 | 23:44
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 08:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Nessus AMI versions 8.12.0 and earlier were found to either not validate, or incorrectly validate, a certificate which could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aTenable, Inc.
Product-nessus_amazon_machine_imageTenable Nessus AMI
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-8020
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.58% / 80.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Jul, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 01:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.0 to 1.2.16 and 1.1.23 to 1.1.34 has a flaw that does not properly check OCSP pre-produced responses, which are lists (multiple entries) of certificate statuses. Subsequently, revoked client certificates may not be properly identified, allowing for users to authenticate with revoked certificates to connections that require mutual TLS. Users not using OCSP checks are not affected by this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxtomcat_nativeApache Tomcat Native
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-4340
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-3.1||LOW
EPSS-0.03% / 5.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Sep, 2020 | 13:45
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IBM Security Secret Server prior to 10.9 could allow an attacker to bypass SSL security due to improper certificate validation. IBM X-Force ID: 178180.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft CorporationIBM Corporation
Product-windowssecurity_secret_serverSecurity Secret Server
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-8167
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.17% / 38.13%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Nov, 2019 | 16:11
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 13:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

vdsm and vdsclient does not validate certficate hostname from another vdsm which could facilitate a man-in-the-middle attack

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vdsm and vdsclientRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vdscliententerprise_virtualizationvirtual_desktop_server_managervdsm and vdsclient
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-4086
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.33% / 54.90%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Apr, 2018 | 06:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 05:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in certain Apple products. iOS before 11.2.5 is affected. macOS before 10.13.3 is affected. tvOS before 11.2.5 is affected. watchOS before 4.2.2 is affected. The issue involves the "Security" component. It allows remote attackers to spoof certificate validation via crafted name constraints.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.
Product-apple_tviphone_oswatchosmac_os_xn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-36425
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.30% / 52.82%
||
7 Day CHG-0.03%
Published-19 Jul, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Arm Mbed TLS before 2.24.0. It incorrectly uses a revocationDate check when deciding whether to honor certificate revocation via a CRL. In some situations, an attacker can exploit this by changing the local clock.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxArm Limited
Product-mbed_tlsdebian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-5016
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.28% / 50.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Apr, 2017 | 19:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Pivotal Cloud Foundry 239 and earlier, UAA (aka User Account and Authentication Server) 3.4.1 and earlier, UAA release 12.2 and earlier, PCF (aka Pivotal Cloud Foundry) Elastic Runtime 1.6.x before 1.6.35, and PCF Elastic Runtime 1.7.x before 1.7.13 does not validate if a certificate is expired.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aVMware (Broadcom Inc.)
Product-cloud_foundry_uaa-releasecloud_foundry_uaacloud_foundrycloud_foundry_elastic_runtimen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-36477
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.21% / 43.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Aug, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.24.0. The verification of X.509 certificates when matching the expected common name (the cn argument of mbedtls_x509_crt_verify) with the actual certificate name is mishandled: when the subjecAltName extension is present, the expected name is compared to any name in that extension regardless of its type. This means that an attacker could impersonate a 4-byte or 16-byte domain by getting a certificate for the corresponding IPv4 or IPv6 address (this would require the attacker to control that IP address, though).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aArm Limited
Product-mbed_tlsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-4829
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.18% / 40.34%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Apr, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

DMM Movie Player App for Android before 1.2.1, and DMM Movie Player App for iPhone/iPad before 2.1.3 does not verify SSL certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-dmmn/a
Product-ppv_play_playern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-4467
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.41% / 60.41%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 May, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The C client and C-based client bindings in the Apache Qpid Proton library before 0.13.1 on Windows do not properly verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate when using the SChannel-based security layer, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software Foundation
Product-qpid_protonn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-8019
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.90% / 74.68%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Jul, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When using an OCSP responder Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.0 to 1.2.16 and 1.1.23 to 1.1.34 did not correctly handle invalid responses. This allowed for revoked client certificates to be incorrectly identified. It was therefore possible for users to authenticate with revoked certificates when using mutual TLS. Users not using OCSP checks are not affected by this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxtomcat_nativeApache Tomcat Native
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-1519
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.23% / 46.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Apr, 2017 | 20:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The com.softphone.common package in the Grandstream Wave app 1.0.1.26 and earlier for Android does not properly validate SSL certificates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof the Grandstream provisioning server via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-grandstreamn/a
Product-waven/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-24393
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.18% / 40.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Feb, 2021 | 22:44
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

TweetStream 2.6.1 uses the library eventmachine in an insecure way that does not have TLS hostname validation. This allows an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-tweetstream_projectn/a
Product-tweetstreamn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-1184
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.23% / 45.71%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Apr, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Tokyo Star bank App for Android before 1.4 and Tokyo Star bank App for iOS before 1.4 do not validate SSL certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-tokyostarbankn/a
Product-tokyo_star_bankn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-1252
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Debian GNU/Linux
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Debian GNU/Linux
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-5.96% / 90.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Dec, 2017 | 16:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The apt package in Debian jessie before 1.0.9.8.4, in Debian unstable before 1.4~beta2, in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS before 1.0.1ubuntu2.17, in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS before 1.2.15ubuntu0.2, and in Ubuntu 16.10 before 1.3.2ubuntu0.1 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to bypass a repository-signing protection mechanism by leveraging improper error handling when validating InRelease file signatures.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxCanonical Ltd.
Product-ubuntu_linuxdebian_linuxadvanced_package_tooln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1000664
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 28.68%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Sep, 2018 | 17:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

daneren2005 DSub for Subsonic (Android client) version 5.4.1 contains a CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in HTTPS Client that can result in Any non-CA signed server certificate, including self signed and expired, are accepted by the client. This attack appear to be exploitable via The victim connects to a server that's MITM/Proxied by an attacker.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-dsub_for_subsonic_projectn/a
Product-dsub_for_subsonicn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-11617
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 37.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Aug, 2020 | 14:20
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 11:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The RSS application on THOMSON THT741FTA 2.2.1 and Philips DTR3502BFTA DVB-T2 2.2.1 set-top boxes doesn't validate the SSL certificates of RSS servers, which allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to modify the data delivered to the client.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-thomsonstbn/aPhilips
Product-tht741fta_firmwaretht741ftadtr3502bfta_dvb-t2dtr3502bfta_dvb-t2_firmwaren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-4954
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 28.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2018 | 17:00
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 06:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IBM BigFix Remote Control before Interim Fix pack 9.1.2-TIV-IBRC912-IF0001 improperly allows self-signed certificates, which might allow remote attackers to conduct spoofing attacks via unspecified vectors. IBM X-Force ID: 105200.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aIBM Corporation
Product-bigfix_remote_controln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found