Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2017-1000417

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-22 Jan, 2018 | 23:00
Updated At-17 Sep, 2024 | 04:29
Rejected At-
Credits

MatrixSSL version 3.7.2 adopts a collision-prone OID comparison logic resulting in possible spoofing of OIDs (e.g. in ExtKeyUsage extension) on X.509 certificates.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:22 Jan, 2018 | 23:00
Updated At:17 Sep, 2024 | 04:29
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

MatrixSSL version 3.7.2 adopts a collision-prone OID comparison logic resulting in possible spoofing of OIDs (e.g. in ExtKeyUsage extension) on X.509 certificates.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP2017/papers/231.pdf
x_refsource_MISC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW--c_F_cY8
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/matrixssl/matrixssl/blob/master/doc/CHANGES.md
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP2017/papers/231.pdf
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW--c_F_cY8
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/matrixssl/matrixssl/blob/master/doc/CHANGES.md
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP2017/papers/231.pdf
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW--c_F_cY8
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://github.com/matrixssl/matrixssl/blob/master/doc/CHANGES.md
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP2017/papers/231.pdf
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW--c_F_cY8
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/matrixssl/matrixssl/blob/master/doc/CHANGES.md
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:22 Jan, 2018 | 23:29
Updated At:13 Feb, 2018 | 16:18

MatrixSSL version 3.7.2 adopts a collision-prone OID comparison logic resulting in possible spoofing of OIDs (e.g. in ExtKeyUsage extension) on X.509 certificates.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.05.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Primary2.05.0MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.0
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.0
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

matrixssl
matrixssl
>>matrixssl>>3.7.2
cpe:2.3:a:matrixssl:matrixssl:3.7.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/matrixssl/matrixssl/blob/master/doc/CHANGES.mdcve@mitre.org
Release Notes
https://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP2017/papers/231.pdfcve@mitre.org
Technical Description
Third Party Advisory
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW--c_F_cY8cve@mitre.org
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/matrixssl/matrixssl/blob/master/doc/CHANGES.md
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Release Notes
Hyperlink: https://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP2017/papers/231.pdf
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Technical Description
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW--c_F_cY8
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

87Records found

CVE-2020-36478
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.25% / 48.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Aug, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.25.0 (and before 2.16.9 LTS and before 2.7.18 LTS). A NULL algorithm parameters entry looks identical to an array of REAL (size zero) and thus the certificate is considered valid. However, if the parameters do not match in any way, then the certificate should be considered invalid.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aArm LimitedDebian GNU/LinuxSiemens AG
Product-debian_linuxlogo\!_cmr2040_firmwaresimatic_rtu3031c_firmwaresimatic_rtu3030csimatic_rtu3041c_firmwaresimatic_rtu3041clogo\!_cmr2040simatic_rtu3000clogo\!_cmr2020simatic_rtu3031csimatic_rtu3000c_firmwarelogo\!_cmr2020_firmwaresimatic_rtu3030c_firmwarembed_tlsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-27589
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 41.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Nov, 2020 | 13:15
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 16:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Synopsys hub-rest-api-python (aka blackduck on PyPI) version 0.0.25 - 0.0.52 does not validate SSL certificates in certain cases.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-synopsysn/a
Product-hub-rest-api-pythonn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-8337
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 36.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Feb, 2019 | 20:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In msmtp 1.8.2 and mpop 1.4.3, when tls_trust_file has its default configuration, certificate-verification results are not properly checked.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-marlamn/a
Product-msmtpmpopn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-3762
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 45.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2020 | 18:20
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Data Protection Central versions 1.0, 1.0.1, 18.1, 18.2, and 19.1 contains an Improper Certificate Chain of Trust Vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability by obtaining a CA signed certificate from Data Protection Central to impersonate a valid system to compromise the integrity of data.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-emc_integrated_data_protection_applianceemc_data_protection_centralData Protection Central
CWE ID-CWE-296
Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-19270
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 40.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Nov, 2019 | 03:34
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in tls_verify_crl in ProFTPD through 1.3.6b. Failure to check for the appropriate field of a CRL entry (checking twice for subject, rather than once for subject and once for issuer) prevents some valid CRLs from being taken into account, and can allow clients whose certificates have been revoked to proceed with a connection to the server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-proftpdn/aFedora Project
Product-fedoraproftpdn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-19271
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.53% / 66.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Nov, 2019 | 03:33
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in tls_verify_crl in ProFTPD before 1.3.6. A wrong iteration variable, used when checking a client certificate against CRL entries (installed by a system administrator), can cause some CRL entries to be ignored, and can allow clients whose certificates have been revoked to proceed with a connection to the server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-proftpdn/a
Product-proftpdn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-16179
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 41.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Sep, 2019 | 20:36
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Limesurvey before 3.17.14 does not enforce SSL/TLS usage in the default configuration.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-limesurveyn/a
Product-limesurveyn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-29222
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 56.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 May, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in Pion DTLS

Pion DTLS is a Go implementation of Datagram Transport Layer Security. Prior to version 2.1.5, a DTLS Client could provide a Certificate that it doesn't posses the private key for and Pion DTLS wouldn't reject it. This issue affects users that are using Client certificates only. The connection itself is still secure. The Certificate provided by clients can't be trusted when using a Pion DTLS server prior to version 2.1.5. Users should upgrade to version 2.1.5 to receive a patch. There are currently no known workarounds.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pionpion
Product-dtlsdtls
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-12496
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 May, 2019 | 10:59
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Hybrid Group Gobot before 1.13.0. The mqtt subsystem skips verification of root CA certificates by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-hybridgroupn/a
Product-gobotn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-11497
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 36.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2019 | 17:24
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 22:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Couchbase Server 5.0.0, when an invalid Remote Cluster Certificate was entered as part of the reference creation, XDCR did not parse and check the certificate signature. It then accepted the invalid certificate and attempted to use it to establish future connections to the remote cluster. This has been fixed in version 5.5.0. XDCR now checks the validity of the certificate thoroughly and prevents a remote cluster reference from being created with an invalid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCouchbase, Inc.
Product-couchbase_servern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1006
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-3.04% / 86.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jul, 2019 | 18:56
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 18:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and Windows Identity Foundation (WIF), allowing signing of SAML tokens with arbitrary symmetric keys, aka 'WCF/WIF SAML Token Authentication Bypass Vulnerability'.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_server_2016sharepoint_foundationwindows_server_2012windows_8.1windows_rt_8.1identitymodelwindows_7sharepoint_serversharepoint_enterprise_serverwindows_10.net_frameworkwindows_server_2019windows_server_2008WindowsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2012 R2Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1709 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.7.2 on Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1803 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.6Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit SystemsWindows 10 Version 1903 for x64-based SystemsWindows 10 Version 1903 for ARM64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 8.1 for 32-bit systemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1703 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1803 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Microsoft.IdentityModelMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.6/4.6.1/4.6.2/4.7/4.7.1/4.7.2Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2012Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows Server, version 1903 (Server Core installation)Windows ServerMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 7 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.7.2 on Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise ServerMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows RT 8.1Microsoft SharePoint ServerMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.6/4.6.1/4.6.2Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2016Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 8.1 for x64-based systemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.5.2Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1709 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows Server 2019Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.7.2 on Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1903 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 7 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 1Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.7.2 on Windows Server 2019Microsoft SharePoint FoundationMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5.1Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server, version 1803 (Server Core Installation)Windows Server, version 1903 (Server Core installation)Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1703 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-9040
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 34.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Jun, 2020 | 15:21
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 10:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Couchbase Server Java SDK before 2.7.1.1 allows a potential attacker to forge an SSL certificate and pose as the intended peer. An attacker can leverage this flaw by crafting a cryptographically valid certificate that will be accepted by Java SDK's Netty component due to missing hostname verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCouchbase, Inc.
Product-couchbase_server_java_sdkn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-6517
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Mar, 2019 | 19:14
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 06:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Prior to version 0.3.0, chloride's use of net-ssh resulted in host fingerprints for previously unknown hosts getting added to the user's known_hosts file without confirmation. In version 0.3.0 this is updated so that the user's known_hosts file is not updated by chloride.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Perforce Software, Inc. ("Puppet")
Product-chlorideChloride
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-20245
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 57.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jan, 2019 | 17:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 19:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The LDAP auth backend (airflow.contrib.auth.backends.ldap_auth) prior to Apache Airflow 1.10.1 was misconfigured and contained improper checking of exceptions which disabled server certificate checking.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-airflowApache Airflow
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-17612
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.01% / 76.17%
||
7 Day CHG-0.02%
Published-09 Nov, 2018 | 21:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 10:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Sennheiser HeadSetup 7.3.4903 places Certification Authority (CA) certificates into the Trusted Root CA store of the local system, and publishes the private key in the SennComCCKey.pem file within the public software distribution, which allows remote attackers to spoof arbitrary web sites or software publishers for several years, even if the HeadSetup product is uninstalled. NOTE: a vulnerability-assessment approach must check all Windows systems for CA certificates with a CN of 127.0.0.1 or SennComRootCA, and determine whether those certificates are unwanted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sennheisern/aMicrosoft Corporation
Product-windows_server_2016windows_server_2012windows_8.1headsetupwindows_rt_8.1windows_7windows_10windows_server_2019windows_server_2008n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-27782
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.28% / 51.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Jun, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 05:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libcurl would reuse a previously created connection even when a TLS or SSHrelated option had been changed that should have prohibited reuse.libcurl keeps previously used connections in a connection pool for subsequenttransfers to reuse if one of them matches the setup. However, several TLS andSSH settings were left out from the configuration match checks, making themmatch too easily.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxSplunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)CURL
Product-curluniversal_forwarderdebian_linuxhttps://github.com/curl/curl
CWE ID-CWE-840
Not Available
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1320
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 30.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Jan, 2019 | 18:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Thrift Java client library versions 0.5.0 through 0.11.0 can bypass SASL negotiation isComplete validation in the org.apache.thrift.transport.TSaslTransport class. An assert used to determine if the SASL handshake had successfully completed could be disabled in production settings making the validation incomplete.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationF5, Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxOracle Corporation
Product-global_lifecycle_management_opatchdebian_linuxnosql_databasethrifttraffix_signaling_delivery_controllerApache Thrift
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-12608
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 29.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2018 | 17:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 08:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Docker Moby before 17.06.0. The Docker engine validated a client TLS certificate using both the configured client CA root certificate and all system roots on non-Windows systems. This allowed a client with any domain validated certificate signed by a system-trusted root CA (as opposed to one signed by the configured CA root certificate) to authenticate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mobyprojectn/a
Product-mobyn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-12461
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
CVSS Score-3.5||LOW
EPSS-0.10% / 27.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jul, 2018 | 18:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Certificate Revocation Check failure

Fixed issues with NetIQ eDirectory prior to 9.1.1 when checking certificate revocation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-netiqNetIQ
Product-edirectoryeDirectory
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-44533
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.27% / 49.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Feb, 2022 | 18:27
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 did not handle multi-value Relative Distinguished Names correctly. Attackers could craft certificate subjects containing a single-value Relative Distinguished Name that would be interpreted as a multi-value Relative Distinguished Name, for example, in order to inject a Common Name that would allow bypassing the certificate subject verification.Affected versions of Node.js that do not accept multi-value Relative Distinguished Names and are thus not vulnerable to such attacks themselves. However, third-party code that uses node's ambiguous presentation of certificate subjects may be vulnerable.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Node.js (OpenJS Foundation)Oracle CorporationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-peoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsdebian_linuxgraalvmmysql_clustermysql_enterprise_monitormysql_connectorsmysql_workbenchnode.jsmysql_serverNode
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-44532
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 27.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Feb, 2022 | 18:27
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 converts SANs (Subject Alternative Names) to a string format. It uses this string to check peer certificates against hostnames when validating connections. The string format was subject to an injection vulnerability when name constraints were used within a certificate chain, allowing the bypass of these name constraints.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this escape SANs containing the problematic characters in order to prevent the injection. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Node.js (OpenJS Foundation)Oracle CorporationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-peoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsdebian_linuxgraalvmmysql_clustermysql_enterprise_monitormysql_connectorsmysql_workbenchnode.jsmysql_serverNode
CWE ID-CWE-296
Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1000520
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 28.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jun, 2018 | 16:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 12:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

ARM mbedTLS version 2.7.0 and earlier contains a Ciphersuite Allows Incorrectly Signed Certificates vulnerability in mbedtls_ssl_get_verify_result() that can result in ECDSA-signed certificates are accepted, when only RSA-signed ones should be.. This attack appear to be exploitable via Peers negotiate a TLS-ECDH-RSA-* ciphersuite. Any of the peers can then provide an ECDSA-signed certificate, when only an RSA-signed one should be accepted..

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aArm Limited
Product-mbed_tlsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0227
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.08% / 76.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Apr, 2018 | 20:00
Updated-29 Nov, 2024 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) Virtual Private Network (VPN) Client Certificate Authentication feature for Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to establish an SSL VPN connection and bypass certain SSL certificate verification steps. The vulnerability is due to incorrect verification of the SSL Client Certificate. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by connecting to the ASA VPN without a proper private key and certificate pair. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to establish an SSL VPN connection to the ASA when the connection should have been rejected. This vulnerability affects Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software that is running on the following Cisco products: 3000 Series Industrial Security Appliances (ISA), ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, ASA 5500-X Series Next-Generation Firewalls, ASA Services Module for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Switches and Cisco 7600 Series Routers, Adaptive Security Virtual Appliances (ASAv), Firepower 4110 Security Appliances, Firepower 9300 ASA Security Modules. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg40155.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCisco Systems, Inc.
Product-firepower_threat_defenseadaptive_security_appliance_softwareCisco Adaptive Security Appliance
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-7468
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.70% / 71.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Jul, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 16:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In curl and libcurl 7.52.0 to and including 7.53.1, libcurl would attempt to resume a TLS session even if the client certificate had changed. That is unacceptable since a server by specification is allowed to skip the client certificate check on resume, and may instead use the old identity which was established by the previous certificate (or no certificate). libcurl supports by default the use of TLS session id/ticket to resume previous TLS sessions to speed up subsequent TLS handshakes. They are used when for any reason an existing TLS connection couldn't be kept alive to make the next handshake faster. This flaw is a regression and identical to CVE-2016-5419 reported on August 3rd 2016, but affecting a different version range.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-[UNKNOWN]CURL
Product-libcurlcurl
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-7726
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 30.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jul, 2017 | 17:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

iSmartAlarm cube devices have an SSL Certificate Validation Vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ismartalarmn/a
Product-cubeone_firmwarecubeonen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-7192
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

WebSocket.swift in Starscream before 2.0.4 allows an SSL Pinning bypass because of incorrect management of the certValidated variable (it can be set to true but cannot be set to false).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-starscream_projectn/a
Product-starscreamn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-6594
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.25% / 47.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Aug, 2017 | 19:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The transit path validation code in Heimdal before 7.3 might allow attackers to bypass the capath policy protection mechanism by leveraging failure to add the previous hop realm to the transit path of issued tickets.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-heimdal_projectn/aopenSUSE
Product-leapheimdaln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-7080
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.44% / 62.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Oct, 2017 | 01:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in certain Apple products. iOS before 11 is affected. macOS before 10.13 is affected. tvOS before 11 is affected. watchOS before 4 is affected. The issue involves the "Security" component. It allows remote attackers to bypass intended certificate-trust restrictions via a revoked X.509 certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.
Product-iphone_ostvoswatchosmac_os_xn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-5887
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

WebSocket.swift in Starscream before 2.0.4 allows an SSL Pinning bypass because pinning occurs in the stream function (this is too late; pinning should occur in the initStreamsWithData function).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-starscream_projectn/a
Product-starscreamn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-5653
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-3.17% / 86.41%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Apr, 2017 | 16:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients in Apache CXF before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-cxfApache CXF
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-36377
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 29.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jul, 2021 | 12:11
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 00:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Fossil before 2.14.2 and 2.15.x before 2.15.2 often skips the hostname check during TLS certificate validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-fossil-scmn/aFedora Project
Product-fossilfedoran/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-2498
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 30.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 May, 2017 | 04:54
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in certain Apple products. iOS before 10.3.2 is affected. The issue involves the "Security" component. It allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via an untrusted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.
Product-iphone_osn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-18588
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 28.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Aug, 2019 | 17:18
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 21:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in the security-framework crate before 0.1.12 for Rust. Hostname verification for certificates does not occur if ClientBuilder uses custom root certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-security-framework_projectn/a
Product-security-frameworkn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25634
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Oct, 2021 | 13:33
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 00:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Timestamp Manipulation with Signature Wrapping

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to modify a digitally signed ODF document to insert an additional signing time timestamp which LibreOffice would incorrectly present as a valid signature signed at the bogus signing time. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7-0 versions prior to 7.0.6; 7-1 versions prior to 7.1.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxlibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25636
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 40.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect trust validation of signature with ambiguous KeyInfo children

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to contain both "X509Data" and "KeyValue" children of the "KeyInfo" tag, which when opened caused LibreOffice to verify using the "KeyValue" but to report verification with the unrelated "X509Data" value. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7.2 versions prior to 7.2.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationFedora Project
Product-fedoralibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-9321
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 36.82%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Mar, 2020 | 18:14
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 10:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

configurationwatcher.go in Traefik 2.x before 2.1.4 and TraefikEE 2.0.0 mishandles the purging of certificate contents from providers before logging.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-traefikn/a
Product-traefikn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-10937
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.38% / 58.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Sep, 2019 | 15:07
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IMAPFilter through 2.6.12 does not validate the hostname in an SSL certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-imapfilter_projectn/aDebian GNU/LinuxopenSUSEFedora Project
Product-debian_linuxfedoraimapfilterbackports_sleleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found