Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2017-15528

Summary
Assigner-symantec
Assigner Org ID-80d3bcb6-88de-48c2-a47e-aebf795f19b5
Published At-22 Nov, 2017 | 18:00
Updated At-05 Aug, 2024 | 19:57
Rejected At-
Credits

Prior to v 7.6, the Install Norton Security (INS) product can be susceptible to a certificate spoofing vulnerability, which is a type of attack whereby a maliciously procured certificate binds the public key of an attacker to the domain name of the target.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:symantec
Assigner Org ID:80d3bcb6-88de-48c2-a47e-aebf795f19b5
Published At:22 Nov, 2017 | 18:00
Updated At:05 Aug, 2024 | 19:57
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

Prior to v 7.6, the Install Norton Security (INS) product can be susceptible to a certificate spoofing vulnerability, which is a type of attack whereby a maliciously procured certificate binds the public key of an attacker to the domain name of the target.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101796
vdb-entry
x_refsource_BID
https://www.info-sec.ca/advisories/Norton-Security.html
x_refsource_MISC
https://www.symantec.com/security_response/securityupdates/detail.jsp?fid=security_advisory&pvid=security_advisory&year=&suid=20171121_00
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101796
Resource:
vdb-entry
x_refsource_BID
Hyperlink: https://www.info-sec.ca/advisories/Norton-Security.html
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://www.symantec.com/security_response/securityupdates/detail.jsp?fid=security_advisory&pvid=security_advisory&year=&suid=20171121_00
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101796
vdb-entry
x_refsource_BID
x_transferred
https://www.info-sec.ca/advisories/Norton-Security.html
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://www.symantec.com/security_response/securityupdates/detail.jsp?fid=security_advisory&pvid=security_advisory&year=&suid=20171121_00
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101796
Resource:
vdb-entry
x_refsource_BID
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.info-sec.ca/advisories/Norton-Security.html
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.symantec.com/security_response/securityupdates/detail.jsp?fid=security_advisory&pvid=security_advisory&year=&suid=20171121_00
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:secure@symantec.com
Published At:22 Nov, 2017 | 18:29
Updated At:13 May, 2026 | 00:24

Prior to v 7.6, the Install Norton Security (INS) product can be susceptible to a certificate spoofing vulnerability, which is a type of attack whereby a maliciously procured certificate binds the public key of an attacker to the domain name of the target.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.13.7LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Primary2.04.3MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 3.7
Base severity: LOW
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 4.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

norton
norton
>>install_norton_security>>Versions before 7.6(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:norton:install_norton_security:*:*:*:*:*:macos:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101796secure@symantec.com
Third Party Advisory
VDB Entry
https://www.info-sec.ca/advisories/Norton-Security.htmlsecure@symantec.com
Third Party Advisory
https://www.symantec.com/security_response/securityupdates/detail.jsp?fid=security_advisory&pvid=security_advisory&year=&suid=20171121_00secure@symantec.com
Vendor Advisory
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101796af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Third Party Advisory
VDB Entry
https://www.info-sec.ca/advisories/Norton-Security.htmlaf854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Third Party Advisory
https://www.symantec.com/security_response/securityupdates/detail.jsp?fid=security_advisory&pvid=security_advisory&year=&suid=20171121_00af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101796
Source: secure@symantec.com
Resource:
Third Party Advisory
VDB Entry
Hyperlink: https://www.info-sec.ca/advisories/Norton-Security.html
Source: secure@symantec.com
Resource:
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.symantec.com/security_response/securityupdates/detail.jsp?fid=security_advisory&pvid=security_advisory&year=&suid=20171121_00
Source: secure@symantec.com
Resource:
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101796
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource:
Third Party Advisory
VDB Entry
Hyperlink: https://www.info-sec.ca/advisories/Norton-Security.html
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource:
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.symantec.com/security_response/securityupdates/detail.jsp?fid=security_advisory&pvid=security_advisory&year=&suid=20171121_00
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource:
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

82Records found

CVE-2021-27018
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.54% / 42.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Aug, 2021 | 17:56
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The mechanism which performs certificate validation was discovered to have a flaw that resulted in certificates signed by an internal certificate authority to not be properly validated. This issue only affects clients that are configured to utilize Tenable.sc as the vulnerability data source.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aPerforce Software, Inc. ("Puppet")
Product-remediatePuppet Remediate
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-22895
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.03% / 60.13%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jun, 2021 | 15:49
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Nextcloud Desktop Client before 3.3.1 is vulnerable to improper certificate validation due to lack of SSL certificate verification when using the "Register with a Provider" flow.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxNextcloud GmbH
Product-desktopdebian_linuxNextcloud Desktop Client
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-53869
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.14% / 3.87%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Jan, 2026 | 02:40
Updated-29 Jan, 2026 | 19:56
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Multiple MFPs provided by Brother Industries, Ltd. does not properly validate server certificates, which may allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to replace the set of root certificates used by the product with a set of arbitrary certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Konica Minolta, Inc.Brother Industries, Ltd.Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Product-Multiple MFPs
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-11633
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulDB
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulDB
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.24% / 15.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Oct, 2025 | 12:02
Updated-30 Oct, 2025 | 19:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Tomofun Furbo 360/Furbo Mini HTTP Traffic collect_logs.sh upload_file_to_s3 certificate validation

A vulnerability was identified in Tomofun Furbo 360 and Furbo Mini. Affected by this issue is the function upload_file_to_s3 of the file collect_logs.sh of the component HTTP Traffic Handler. The manipulation leads to improper certificate validation. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The firmware versions determined to be affected are Furbo 360 up to FB0035_FW_036 and Furbo Mini up to MC0020_FW_074. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-furboTomofun
Product-furbo_minifurbo_360_dog_camera_firmwarefurbo_360_dog_camerafurbo_mini_firmwareFurbo 360Furbo Mini
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-4340
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-3.1||LOW
EPSS-0.69% / 48.77%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Sep, 2020 | 13:45
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IBM Security Secret Server prior to 10.9 could allow an attacker to bypass SSL security due to improper certificate validation. IBM X-Force ID: 178180.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft CorporationIBM Corporation
Product-windowssecurity_secret_serverSecurity Secret Server
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-36477
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.83% / 53.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Aug, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.24.0. The verification of X.509 certificates when matching the expected common name (the cn argument of mbedtls_x509_crt_verify) with the actual certificate name is mishandled: when the subjecAltName extension is present, the expected name is compared to any name in that extension regardless of its type. This means that an attacker could impersonate a 4-byte or 16-byte domain by getting a certificate for the corresponding IPv4 or IPv6 address (this would require the attacker to control that IP address, though).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aArm Limited
Product-mbed_tlsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-3230
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.34% / 68.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Jan, 2020 | 15:05
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 10:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The libwww-perl LWP::Protocol::https module 6.04 through 6.06 for Perl, when using IO::Socket::SSL as the SSL socket class, allows attackers to disable server certificate validation via the (1) HTTPS_CA_DIR or (2) HTTPS_CA_FILE environment variable.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-lwp\libwww-perl
Product-\LWP::Protocol::https
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2007-5967
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.48% / 38.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 May, 2021 | 11:50
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 15:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw in Mozilla's embedded certificate code might allow web sites to install root certificates on devices without user approval.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMozilla Corporation
Product-firefoxMozilla Firefox
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-46551
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.7||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 5.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 May, 2025 | 16:12
Updated-21 Oct, 2025 | 15:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
JRuby-OpenSSL has hostname verification disabled by default

JRuby-OpenSSL is an add-on gem for JRuby that emulates the Ruby OpenSSL native library. Starting in JRuby-OpenSSL version 0.12.1 and prior to version 0.15.4 (corresponding to JRuby versions starting in 9.3.4.0 prior to 9.4.12.1 and 10.0.0.0 prior to 10.0.0.1), when verifying SSL certificates, JRuby-OpenSSL does not verify that the hostname presented in the certificate matches the one the user tries to connect to. This means a man-in-the-middle could just present any valid cert for a completely different domain they own, and JRuby would accept the cert. Anybody using JRuby to make requests of external APIs, or scraping the web, that depends on https to connect securely. JRuby-OpenSSL version 0.15.4 contains a fix for the issue. This fix is included in JRuby versions 10.0.0.1 and 9.4.12.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-jrubyjruby
Product-jrubyjruby-openssljruby-openssl
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-24619
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.71% / 49.82%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Sep, 2020 | 11:51
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In mainwindow.cpp in Shotcut before 20.09.13, the upgrade check misuses TLS because of setPeerVerifyMode(QSslSocket::VerifyNone). A man-in-the-middle attacker could offer a spoofed download resource.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-meltytechn/a
Product-shotcutn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-24392
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.88% / 55.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Feb, 2021 | 22:42
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In voloko twitter-stream 0.1.10, missing TLS hostname validation allows an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack against users of the library (because eventmachine is misused).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-twitter-stream_projectn/a
Product-twitter-streamn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-24393
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.86% / 54.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Feb, 2021 | 22:44
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

TweetStream 2.6.1 uses the library eventmachine in an insecure way that does not have TLS hostname validation. This allows an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-tweetstream_projectn/a
Product-tweetstreamn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-15498
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.42% / 34.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Aug, 2020 | 12:05
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered on ASUS RT-AC1900P routers before 3.0.0.4.385_20253. The router accepts an arbitrary server certificate for a firmware update. The culprit is the --no-check-certificate option passed to wget tool used to download firmware update files.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aASUS (ASUSTeK Computer Inc.)
Product-rt-ac1900p_firmwarert-ac1900pn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-4587
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulDB
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulDB
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.18% / 7.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Mar, 2026 | 12:46
Updated-24 Apr, 2026 | 16:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
HybridAuth SSL Curl.php certificate validation

A vulnerability was found in HybridAuth up to 3.12.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file src/HttpClient/Curl.php of the component SSL Handler. The manipulation of the argument curlOptions results in improper certificate validation. The attack can be launched remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/a
Product-HybridAuth
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-0161
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.41% / 33.77%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Jan, 2020 | 17:30
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 09:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

ovirt-engine-sdk-python before 3.4.0.7 and 3.5.0.4 does not verify that the hostname of the remote endpoint matches the Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName as specified by its x.509 certificate in a TLS/SSL session. This could allow man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof remote endpoints via an arbitrary valid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ovirt-engine-sdk-python_projectovirt-engine-sdk-python
Product-ovirt-engine-sdk-pythonovirt-engine-sdk-python
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-8642
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-3.3||LOW
EPSS-0.32% / 23.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Oct, 2020 | 19:38
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue existed in the handling of S-MIME certificates. This issue was addressed with improved validation of S-MIME certificates. This issue is fixed in macOS Mojave 10.14.4, Security Update 2019-002 High Sierra, Security Update 2019-002 Sierra. Processing a maliciously crafted mail message may lead to S/MIME signature spoofing.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Apple Inc.
Product-mac_os_xmacOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-0104
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.83% / 53.87%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Jan, 2020 | 16:54
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 09:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In fence-agents before 4.0.17 does not verify remote SSL certificates in the fence_cisco_ucs.py script which can potentially allow for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via arbitrary SSL certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-clusterlabsfence-agents
Product-fence-agentsfence-agents
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-42791
Matching Score-4
Assigner-6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.32% / 23.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 May, 2026 | 12:23
Updated-02 Jun, 2026 | 19:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
OCSP responder certificate validity period not checked in public_key

Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP public_key (pubkey_ocsp module) allows forged OCSP responses signed with an expired responder certificate to be accepted as valid. OCSP response verification in pubkey_ocsp:verify_response/5 and pubkey_ocsp:is_authorized_responder/3 in lib/public_key/src/pubkey_ocsp.erl does not check the validity period (notBefore/notAfter) of the OCSP responder certificate. An attacker who has obtained the private key of an expired CA-designated OCSP responder certificate can forge OCSP responses that Erlang/OTP accepts as valid. This affects TLS clients using OCSP stapling via the ssl application: a malicious or compromised server can present a revoked TLS certificate together with a forged OCSP response signed by an expired responder key, and the client will accept the revoked certificate as valid. It also affects applications calling public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 directly, where the impact depends on the use case — server-side client certificate validation using this API may allow authentication bypass with a revoked client certificate. This issue affects OTP from OTP 27.0 before OTP 27.3.4.12, 28.5.0.1, and 29.0.1 corresponding to public_key from 1.16 before 1.17.1.3, 1.20.3.1, and 1.21.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-erlangErlang
Product-erlang\/otpOTP
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-672
Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release
CVE-2019-5506
Matching Score-4
Assigner-NetApp, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-NetApp, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.82% / 53.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Oct, 2019 | 18:20
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 20:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.0 and higher do not enforce hostname verification under certain circumstances making them susceptible to impersonation via man-in-the-middle attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNetApp, Inc.
Product-clustered_data_ontapClustered Data ONTAP
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2013-6662
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.35% / 27.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Apr, 2017 | 17:00
Updated-23 Feb, 2026 | 13:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Google Chrome caches TLS sessions before certificate validation occurs.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aGoogle LLC
Product-chromen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2013-2255
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.96% / 57.90%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Nov, 2019 | 18:38
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 15:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HTTPSConnections in OpenStack Keystone 2013, OpenStack Compute 2013.1, and possibly other OpenStack components, fail to validate server-side SSL certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxOpenStackRed Hat, Inc.
Product-keystonedebian_linuxopenstackcomputeKeystoneCompute
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5518
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.73% / 50.35%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Nov, 2019 | 13:06
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 21:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

vdsm: certificate generation upon node creation allowing vdsm to start and serve requests from anyone who has a matching key (and certificate)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ovirtvdsm
Product-vdsmvdsm
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1000664
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.54% / 42.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Sep, 2018 | 17:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

daneren2005 DSub for Subsonic (Android client) version 5.4.1 contains a CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in HTTPS Client that can result in Any non-CA signed server certificate, including self signed and expired, are accepted by the client. This attack appear to be exploitable via The victim connects to a server that's MITM/Proxied by an attacker.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-dsub_for_subsonic_projectn/a
Product-dsub_for_subsonicn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-24122
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.20% / 9.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Feb, 2026 | 22:27
Updated-20 Feb, 2026 | 19:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cosign Certificate Chain Expiry Validation Issue Allows Issuing Certificate Expiry to Be Overlooked

Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. In versions 3.0.4 and below, an issuing certificate with a validity that expires before the leaf certificate will be considered valid during verification even if the provided timestamp would mean the issuing certificate should be considered expired. When verifying artifact signatures using a certificate, Cosign first verifies the certificate chain using the leaf certificate's "not before" timestamp and later checks expiry of the leaf certificate using either a signed timestamp provided by the Rekor transparency log or from a timestamp authority, or using the current time. The root and all issuing certificates are assumed to be valid during the leaf certificate's validity. There is no impact to users of the public Sigstore infrastructure. This may affect private deployments with customized PKIs. This issue has been fixed in version 3.0.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sigstoresigstore
Product-cosigncosign
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-1316
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.58% / 43.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jan, 2020 | 13:11
Updated-15 Nov, 2024 | 17:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance does not check for certificate revocation which could lead to MITM attacks

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-ironport_web_security_applianceIronPort Web Security Appliance
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-0867
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-2.34% / 81.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Jul, 2012 | 23:00
Updated-29 Apr, 2026 | 01:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

PostgreSQL 8.4.x before 8.4.11, 9.0.x before 9.0.7, and 9.1.x before 9.1.3 truncates the common name to only 32 characters when verifying SSL certificates, which allows remote attackers to spoof connections when the host name is exactly 32 characters.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aopenSUSEThe PostgreSQL Global Development GroupRed Hat, Inc.Debian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxenterprise_linux_serverdesktop_workstationenterprise_linux_workstationenterprise_linux_desktopopensusepostgresqlenterprise_linux_server_eusenterprise_linux_hpc_nodeenterprise_linux_server_ausenterprise_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-24934
Matching Score-4
Assigner-ASUSTOR, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-ASUSTOR, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 5.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Feb, 2026 | 02:26
Updated-19 Feb, 2026 | 18:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
An improper certificate validation vulnerability was found in ADM while querying an external server for the device's WAN IP address.

The DDNS function uses an insecure HTTP connection or fails to validate the SSL/TLS certificate when querying an external server for the device's WAN IP address. An unauthenticated remote attacker can perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attack to spoof the response, leading the device to update its DDNS record with an incorrect IP address. Affected products and versions include: from ADM 4.1.0 through ADM 4.3.3.ROF1 as well as from ADM 5.0.0 through ADM 5.1.1.RCI1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ASUSTOR Inc.
Product-data_masterADM
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-2623
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.03% / 59.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jul, 2018 | 18:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 14:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

It was discovered that rpm-ostree and rpm-ostree-client before 2017.3 fail to properly check GPG signatures on packages when doing layering. Packages with unsigned or badly signed content could fail to be rejected as expected. This issue is partially mitigated on RHEL Atomic Host, where certificate pinning is used by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-rpm-ostreeProject AtomicRed Hat, Inc.
Product-rpm-ostree-clientrpm-ostreeenterprise_linuxrpm-ostree,
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2010-4532
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.63% / 46.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Nov, 2019 | 17:19
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 03:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

offlineimap before 6.3.2 does not check for SSL server certificate validation when "ssl = yes" option is specified which can allow man-in-the-middle attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-offlineimapofflineimapDebian GNU/Linux
Product-offlineimapdebian_linuxofflineimap
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2010-4237
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Canonical Ltd.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Canonical Ltd.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.81% / 53.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Oct, 2019 | 17:07
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 03:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Mercurial before 1.6.4 fails to verify the Common Name field of SSL certificates which allows remote attackers who acquire a certificate signed by a Certificate Authority to perform a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mercurialmercurial
Product-mercurialmercurial
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-7095
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulDB
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulDB
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.23% / 13.65%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2025 | 21:32
Updated-18 Jul, 2025 | 16:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Comodo Internet Security Premium Update certificate validation

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Comodo Internet Security Premium 12.3.4.8162. This affects an unknown part of the component Update Handler. The manipulation leads to improper certificate validation. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-comodoComodo
Product-internet_securityInternet Security Premium
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-14806
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.44% / 36.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2020 | 09:45
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Insecure handling of repodata and packages in SUSE Studio onlite

A Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in susestudio-common of SUSE Studio onsite allows remote attackers to MITM connections to the repositories, which allows the modification of packages received over these connections. This issue affects: SUSE Studio onsite susestudio-common version 1.3.17-56.6.3 and prior versions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-SUSE
Product-susestudio-ui-serverstudio_onsiteStudio onsite
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-1265
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.78% / 52.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Dec, 2018 | 16:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.0.1, 10.1, 10.1.2, 10.1.3, 10.1.4, and 10.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 124740.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-security_guardiumSecurity Guardium
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-28067
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 16.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Jul, 2024 | 00:00
Updated-30 Oct, 2024 | 19:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in Samsung Exynos Modem 5300 allows a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacker to downgrade the security mode of packets going to the victim, enabling the attacker to send messages to the victim in plaintext.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSamsung
Product-exynos_modem_5300_firmwareexynos_modem_5300n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-1000396
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.50% / 39.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jan, 2018 | 02:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 22:00
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Jenkins 2.73.1 and earlier, 2.83 and earlier bundled a version of the commons-httpclient library with the vulnerability CVE-2012-6153 that incorrectly verified SSL certificates, making it susceptible to man-in-the-middle attacks. This library is widely used as a transitive dependency in Jenkins plugins. The fix for CVE-2012-6153 was backported to the version of commons-httpclient that is bundled in core and made available to plugins.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJenkins
Product-jenkinsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-1000415
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.48% / 38.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Jan, 2018 | 20:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

MatrixSSL version 3.7.2 has an incorrect UTCTime date range validation in its X.509 certificate validation process resulting in some certificates have their expiration (beginning) year extended (delayed) by 100 years.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-matrixssln/a
Product-matrixssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-11674
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.40% / 32.41%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Oct, 2019 | 14:42
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Man-in-the-middle vulnerability in Micro Focus Self Service Password Reset, affecting all versions prior to 4.4.0.4. The vulnerability could exploit invalid certificate validation and may result in a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMicro Focus International Limited
Product-netiq_self_service_password_resetSelf Service Password Reset (SSPR) versions prior to 4.4.0.4
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-9892
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.66% / 74.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Mar, 2017 | 23:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The esets_daemon service in ESET Endpoint Antivirus for macOS before 6.4.168.0 and Endpoint Security for macOS before 6.4.168.0 does not properly verify X.509 certificates from the edf.eset.com SSL server, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof this server and provide crafted responses to license activation requests via a self-signed certificate. NOTE: this issue can be combined with CVE-2016-0718 to execute arbitrary code remotely as root.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aESET, spol. s r. o.
Product-endpoint_securityendpoint_antivirusn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-9319
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.77% / 51.74%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Mar, 2017 | 00:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

There is Missing SSL Certificate Validation in the Trend Micro Enterprise Mobile Security Android Application before 9.7.1193, aka VRTS-398.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aTrend Micro Incorporated
Product-mobile_securityn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-9064
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.03% / 59.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jun, 2018 | 21:00
Updated-25 Nov, 2025 | 17:50
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Add-on updates failed to verify that the add-on ID inside the signed package matched the ID of the add-on being updated. An attacker who could perform a man-in-the-middle attack on the user's connection to the update server and defeat the certificate pinning protection could provide a malicious signed add-on instead of a valid update. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 45.5 and Firefox < 50.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Mozilla Corporation
Product-firefoxFirefoxFirefox ESR
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1010206
Matching Score-4
Assigner-7556d962-6fb7-411e-85fa-6cd62f095ba8
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-7556d962-6fb7-411e-85fa-6cd62f095ba8
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.57% / 43.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jul, 2019 | 13:30
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OSS Http Request (Apache Cordova Plugin) 6 is affected by: Missing SSL certificate validation. The impact is: certificate spoofing. The component is: use this library when https communication. The attack vector is: certificate spoofing.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-http_request_projectOSS
Product-http_requestHttp Request (Apache Cordova Plugin)
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-8020
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-4.20% / 89.90%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Jul, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 01:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.0 to 1.2.16 and 1.1.23 to 1.1.34 has a flaw that does not properly check OCSP pre-produced responses, which are lists (multiple entries) of certificate statuses. Subsequently, revoked client certificates may not be properly identified, allowing for users to authenticate with revoked certificates to connections that require mutual TLS. Users not using OCSP checks are not affected by this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxtomcat_nativeApache Tomcat Native
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-8019
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-4.07% / 89.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Jul, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When using an OCSP responder Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.0 to 1.2.16 and 1.1.23 to 1.1.34 did not correctly handle invalid responses. This allowed for revoked client certificates to be incorrectly identified. It was therefore possible for users to authenticate with revoked certificates when using mutual TLS. Users not using OCSP checks are not affected by this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxtomcat_nativeApache Tomcat Native
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-1184
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.99% / 58.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Apr, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Tokyo Star bank App for Android before 1.4 and Tokyo Star bank App for iOS before 1.4 do not validate SSL certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-tokyostarbankn/a
Product-tokyo_star_bankn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-4954
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.67% / 48.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2018 | 17:00
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 06:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IBM BigFix Remote Control before Interim Fix pack 9.1.2-TIV-IBRC912-IF0001 improperly allows self-signed certificates, which might allow remote attackers to conduct spoofing attacks via unspecified vectors. IBM X-Force ID: 105200.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aIBM Corporation
Product-bigfix_remote_controln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-4000
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-99.86% / 99.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 May, 2015 | 00:00
Updated-27 May, 2026 | 17:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOracle CorporationMicrosoft CorporationMozilla CorporationCanonical Ltd.OpenSSLApple Inc.HP Inc.SUSEGoogle LLCIBM CorporationDebian GNU/LinuxOpera
Product-mac_os_xnetwork_security_servicesinternet_explorercontent_managerfirefox_osjrockitjdkseamonkeyiphone_osdebian_linuxsparc-opl_service_processorchromesuse_linux_enterprise_serverfirefoxsafariubuntu_linuxhp-uxlinux_enterprise_software_development_kitthunderbirdopensslfirefox_esrlinux_enterprise_desktoplinux_enterprise_serverjreopera_browsern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-2674
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.35% / 68.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Aug, 2017 | 18:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Restkit allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging use of the ssl.wrap_socket function in Python with the default CERT_NONE value for the cert_reqs argument.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-restkitn/a
Product-restkitn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-3152
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-7.08% / 93.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 May, 2016 | 10:00
Updated-06 May, 2026 | 22:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Oracle MySQL before 5.7.3, Oracle MySQL Connector/C (aka libmysqlclient) before 6.1.3, and MariaDB before 5.5.44 use the --ssl option to mean that SSL is optional, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via a cleartext-downgrade attack, aka a "BACKRONYM" attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMariaDB FoundationOracle CorporationRed Hat, Inc.The PHP GroupDebian GNU/LinuxFedora Project
Product-enterprise_linux_eusdebian_linuxmysql_connector\/centerprise_linux_serverenterprise_linux_workstationphpmariadbmysqlenterprise_linux_desktopenterprise_linux_server_tusenterprise_linux_server_ausfedoran/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-21373
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.16% / 63.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Mar, 2021 | 21:25
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Nimble falls back to insecure http url when fetching packages

Nimble is a package manager for the Nim programming language. In Nim release versions before versions 1.2.10 and 1.4.4, "nimble refresh" fetches a list of Nimble packages over HTTPS by default. In case of error it falls back to a non-TLS URL http://irclogs.nim-lang.org/packages.json. An attacker able to perform MitM can deliver a modified package list containing malicious software packages. If the packages are installed and used the attack escalates to untrusted code execution.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nim-langnim-lang
Product-nimsecurity
CWE ID-CWE-348
Use of Less Trusted Source
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-1837
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.49% / 39.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Sep, 2021 | 14:44
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 16:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A certificate validation issue was addressed. This issue is fixed in iOS 14.5 and iPadOS 14.5. An attacker in a privileged network position may be able to alter network traffic.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Apple Inc.
Product-iphone_osipadosiOS and iPadOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found