A remote code execution vulnerability was identified in HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) PLAT earlier than version 7.3 E0506P09.

Buffer overflow in line printer daemon (rlpdaemon) in HP-UX 10.01 through 11.11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands.

Unspecified vulnerability in HP Storage Essentials before 6.3.0, when LDAP authentication is enabled, allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, modify data, or cause a denial of service via unknown vectors.

A remote bypass security restrictions vulnerability was discovered in HPE OneView version(s): Prior to 7.0. HPE has provided a software update to resolve this vulnerability in HPE OneView.

A remote server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability was discovered in HPE OneView version(s): Prior to 7.0. HPE has provided a software update to resolve this vulnerability in HPE OneView.

Unspecified vulnerability in HP Operations Agent 7.36 and 8.6 on Windows allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors.

An SNMP community name is the default (e.g. public), null, or missing.

Unspecified vulnerability in HP KeyView before 10.23.0.1 and 10.24.x before 10.24.0.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-2876.

Unspecified vulnerability in HP Sprinter 12.01 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-2336.

IBM Curam Social Program Management 8.0.0 and 8.0.1 does not invalidate session after logout which could allow an authenticated user to impersonate another user on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 218281.

Unspecified vulnerability in HP Operations Manager 9.20 on UNIX allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors.

An XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in Fortify Software Security Center (SSC), version 17.1, 17.2, 18.1 allows remote unauthenticated users to read arbitrary files or conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request.

Unspecified vulnerability in HP Security Management System 3.3.0, 3.5.0 before patch 1, and 3.6.0 before patch 2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors.

Unspecified vulnerability in HP LoadRunner before 11.52 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-1736.

Unspecified vulnerability in HP Service Manager 7.11, 9.21, 9.30, 9.31, and 9.32, and ServiceCenter 6.2.8, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors.

Unspecified vulnerability in the client component in HP Application LifeCycle Management (ALM) before 11 p11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-1327.

Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in GetEventsServlet in HP ProCurve Manager (PCM) 3.20 and 4.0, PCM+ 3.20 and 4.0, and Identity Driven Manager (IDM) 4.0 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) sort or (2) dir parameter.

Unspecified vulnerability in the GossipService SOAP Request implementation in the Synchronizer component before 1.4.2 in HP Application LifeCycle Management (ALM) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-1759.

The APISiteScopeImpl SOAP service in HP SiteScope 10.1x and 11.x before 11.22 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and execute arbitrary code via a direct request to the issueSiebelCmd method, aka ZDI-CAN-1765.

Unspecified vulnerability in HP Intelligent Management Center (iMC) and HP IMC Service Operation Management Software Module allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via unknown vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-1644.

A potential security vulnerability has been identified in HPE iLO Amplifier Pack server version 1.70. The vulnerability could be exploited to allow remote code execution.

Unspecified vulnerability in HP Network Node Manager i (NNMi) 9.00, 9.1x, and 9.2x allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, modify data, or cause a denial of service via unknown vectors.

Unspecified vulnerability in HP LoadRunner before 11.52 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-1671.

Certain HP Enterprise LaserJet, HP LaserJet Managed, HP Enterprise PageWide, HP PageWide Managed products may be vulnerable to potential buffer overflow.

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in HP Select Identity 4.00, 4.01, 4.11, 4.12, 4.13, and 4.20 allow remote authenticated users to gain access via unknown vectors.

Buffer overflow in the ExtractCab function in the HPISDataManagerLib.Datamgr ActiveX control in HPISDataManager.dll in HP Instant Support before 1.0.0.24 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long first argument, a different vulnerability than CVE-2007-5605, CVE-2007-5606, and CVE-2007-5607.

Vulnerability in administration server for HP VirtualVault 4.5 on HP-UX 11.04 allows remote web servers or privileged external processes to bypass access restrictions and establish connections to the server.

Aruba ClearPass, all versions of 6.6.x prior to 6.6.9 are affected by an authentication bypass vulnerability, an attacker can leverage this vulnerability to gain administrator privileges on the system. The vulnerability is exposed only on ClearPass web interfaces, including administrative, guest captive portal, and API. Customers who do not expose ClearPass web interfaces to untrusted users are impacted to a lesser extent.

Unspecified vulnerability in HP Intelligent Management Center (iMC) and Intelligent Management Center for Automated Network Manager (ANM) before 5.2 E0401 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, modify data, or cause a denial of service via unknown vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-1660.

Unspecified vulnerability in HP ServiceCenter 6.2.8 before 6.2.8.10 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, modify data, or cause a denial of service via unknown vectors.

Unknown vulnerability in Tomcat 3.2.1 running on HP Secure OS for Linux 1.0 allows attackers to access servlet resources. NOTE: due to the vagueness of the vendor advisory, it is not clear whether this issue is already covered by other CVE identifiers.

Unspecified vulnerability in HP Intelligent Management Center (iMC) and Intelligent Management Center for Automated Network Manager (ANM) before 5.2 E0401 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, modify data, or cause a denial of service via unknown vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-1614.

Buffer overflow in the RFC_START_PROGRAM function in the SAP RFC Library 6.40 and 7.00 before 20061211 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. NOTE: This information is based upon a vague initial disclosure. Details will be updated after the grace period has ended.

A Remote Code Execution vulnerability in HPE Intelligent Management Center (iMC) PLAT version 7.2 was found.

Security vulnerabilities in the HPE Integrated Lights-Out 2 (iLO 2) firmware could be exploited remotely to allow authentication bypass, code execution, and denial of service.

HP Laserjet printers with JetDirect cards, when configured with TCP/IP, can be configured without a password, which allows remote attackers to connect to the printer and change its IP address or disable logging.

A Remote Bypass of Security Restrictions vulnerability was identified in HPE XP Command View Advanced Edition Software Earlier than 8.5.3-00. The vulnerability impacts DevMgr Earlier than 8.5.3-00 (for Windows, Linux), RepMgr earlier than 8.5.3-00 (for Windows, Linux) and HDLM earlier than 8.5.3-00 (for Windows, Linux, Solaris, AIX).

A Remote Code Execution vulnerability in HPE Intelligent Management Center (iMC) PLAT version 7.3 E0506 was found.

A Remote Bypass Security Restriction vulnerability in HPE Network Node Manager i (NNMi) Software versions v10.0x, v10.1x, v10.2x was found.

An Authentication Bypass vulnerability in HPE MSA 1040 and MSA 2040 SAN Storage IN version GL220P008 and earlier was found.

A Remote Code Execution vulnerability in HPE Intelligent Management Center (iMC) PLAT version 7.2 was found.

ArubaOS, all versions prior to 6.3.1.25, 6.4 prior to 6.4.4.16, 6.5.x prior to 6.5.1.9, 6.5.2, 6.5.3 prior to 6.5.3.3, 6.5.4 prior to 6.5.4.2, 8.x prior to 8.1.0.4 FIPS and non-FIPS versions of software are both affected equally is vulnerable to unauthenticated arbitrary file access. An unauthenticated user with network access to an Aruba mobility controller on TCP port 8080 or 8081 may be able to access arbitrary files stored on the mobility controller. Ports 8080 and 8081 are used for captive portal functionality and are listening, by default, on all IP interfaces of the mobility controller, including captive portal interfaces. The attacker could access files which could contain passwords, keys, and other sensitive information that could lead to full system compromise.

A Remote Code Execution vulnerability in Hewlett Packard Enterprise Moonshot Provisioning Manager Appliance version v1.20 was found.

A remote code execution vulnerability was identified in HPE Intelligent Management Center (iMC) Wireless Service Manager (WSM) Software earlier than version WSM 7.3 (E0506). This issue was resolved in HPE IMC Wireless Services Manager Software IMC WSM 7.3 E0506P01 or subsequent version.

A Remote Code Execution vulnerability in Hewlett Packard Enterprise Moonshot Provisioning Manager Appliance version v1.20 was found.

A Unix account has a default, null, blank, or missing password.

A input validation vulnerability in HPE Operations Orchestration product all versions prior to 10.80, allows for the execution of code remotely.

A Remote Code Execution vulnerability in HPE Intelligent Management Center (iMC) PLAT version 7.3 E0504P04 was found.

A Remote Code Execution vulnerability in HPE UCMDB version v10.10, v10.11, v10.20, v10.21, v10.22, v10.30, v10.31 was found.

In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all configurations), and 9.4.x (non-default configuration with RFC2616 compliance enabled), transfer-encoding chunks are handled poorly. The chunk length parsing was vulnerable to an integer overflow. Thus a large chunk size could be interpreted as a smaller chunk size and content sent as chunk body could be interpreted as a pipelined request. If Jetty was deployed behind an intermediary that imposed some authorization and that intermediary allowed arbitrarily large chunks to be passed on unchanged, then this flaw could be used to bypass the authorization imposed by the intermediary as the fake pipelined request would not be interpreted by the intermediary as a request.