An integer overflow in the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Doftcoin Token, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows the owner to cause unexpected financial losses.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for STCToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DestiNeed (DSN), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MediaCubeToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Eastcoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ohni_2 (OHNI), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for TESTAhihi, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Flow, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The transfer and transferFrom functions of a smart contract implementation for Bittelux (BTX), an Ethereum token, have an integer overflow. NOTE: this has been disputed by a third party.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ZIP, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DoccoinPreICO, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DMPToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CERB_Coin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for AMToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Sample Token (STK) (Contract Name: cashBackMintable), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow in which "amount * sellPrice" can be zero, consequently reducing a seller's assets.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CrimsonShilling, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Providence Crypto Casino (PVE) (Contract Name: ProvidenceCasinoToken), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ProjectJ, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GZS Token (GZS), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CryptosisToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Mjolnir, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for JPMD100B, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for IamRich, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for dopnetwork, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Cavecoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the function multiTransfer of Rocket Coin (XRC), an Ethereum token smart contract. An attacker could use it to set any user's balance.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for sumocoin (SUMO), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for YLCToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MomentumToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MMTCoin (MMT), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for NCU, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Carrot, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ALUXToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for hentaisolo (HAO), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for KissMe, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The transfer, transferFrom, and mint functions of a smart contract implementation for PFGc, an Ethereum token, have an integer overflow.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for JavaSwapTest (JST), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Numisma, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MJCToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for RRToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for UTCT, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Goochain, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Nectar (NCTR), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for esportz, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Bitpark, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ProvidenceCasino (PVE), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for RoyalClassicCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MyYLC, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted `AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` being included on-chain. Because the developers represent `uint64` values as native javascript `number`s, there is an issue when those variables with large (greater than 2^53) `uint64` values are included on chain. In those cases, Lodestar may view valid_`AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` as invalid, due to rounding errors in large `number` values. This causes a consensus split, where Lodestar nodes are forked away from the main network. Similarly, Lodestar may consider invalid `ProposerSlashing` as valid, thus including in proposed blocks that will be considered invalid by the network. Version 0.36.0 contains a fix for this issue. As a workaround, use `BigInt` to represent `Slot` and `Epoch` values in `AttesterSlashing` and `ProposerSlashing` objects. `BigInt` is too slow to be used in all `Slot` and `Epoch` cases, so one may carefully use `BigInt` just where necessary for consensus.

An integer overflow in the _transfer function of a smart contract implementation for Hexagon (HXG), an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows attackers to accomplish an unauthorized increase of digital assets by providing a _to argument in conjunction with a large _value argument, as exploited in the wild in May 2018, aka the "burnOverflow" issue.