CSRF on Intelbras CIP 92200 devices allows an attacker to access the panel and perform scraping or other analysis.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the (1) Forum, (2) Event, and (3) Classifieds plugins in SocialEngine before 4.2.4.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Menubook plugin before 0.9.3 for baserCMS allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.
flaskparser.py in Webargs 5.x through 5.5.2 doesn't check that the Content-Type header is application/json when receiving JSON input. If the request body is valid JSON, it will accept it even if the content type is application/x-www-form-urlencoded. This allows for JSON POST requests to be made across domains, leading to CSRF.
Adive Framework 2.0.8 has admin/config CSRF to change the Administrator password.
An issue was discovered in Joomla! before 3.9.15. Missing token checks in the batch actions of various components cause CSRF vulnerabilities.
An issue was discovered in Joomla! before 3.9.15. A missing CSRF token check in the LESS compiler of com_templates causes a CSRF vulnerability.
CSRF in login.asp on Ruckus devices allows an attacker to access the panel, and use SSRF to perform scraping or other analysis via the SUBCA-1 field on the Wireless Admin screen.
A security issue was found in EdgePower 24V/54V firmware v1.7.0 and earlier where, due to missing CSRF protections, an attacker would have been able to perform unauthorized remote code execution.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OpenText ECM (formerly Livelink ECM) 9.7.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change folder and resource permissions.
An issue was discovered in tools/pass-change/result.php in phpIPAM 1.4. CSRF can be used to change the password of any user/admin, to escalate privileges, and to gain access to more data and functionality. This issue exists due to the lack of a requirement to provide the old password, and the lack of security tokens.
This affects the package com.softwaremill.akka-http-session:core_2.13 before 0.5.11; the package com.softwaremill.akka-http-session:core_2.12 before 0.5.11; the package com.softwaremill.akka-http-session:core_2.11 before 0.5.11. For older versions, endpoints protected by randomTokenCsrfProtection could be bypassed with an empty X-XSRF-TOKEN header and an empty XSRF-TOKEN cookie.
The CSRF protection mechanism implemented in the web administration panel on NETGEAR JGS516PE/GS116Ev2 v2.6.0.43 devices could be bypassed by omitting the CSRF token parameter in HTTP requests.
Zikula before 1.2.3 does not use the authid protection mechanism for (1) the lostpassword form and (2) mailpasswd processing, which makes it easier for remote attackers to generate a flood of password requests and possibly conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via multiple form submissions.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in usercp2.php in MyBB (aka MyBulletinBoard) before 1.4.12 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
A CSRF protection bypass vulnerability in Trend Micro InterScan Web Security Virtual Appliance 6.5 SP2 could allow an attacker to get a victim's browser to send a specifically encoded request without requiring a valid CSRF token.
The Code Snippets plugin before 2.14.0 for WordPress allows CSRF because of the lack of a Referer check on the import menu.
Cups Easy (Purchase & Inventory) 1.0 is vulnerable to CSRF that leads to admin account takeover via passwordmychange.php.
Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware 5.2 has CSRF
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Resource Data Management Data Manager before 2.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
A potential security vulnerability has been identified in the HPE StoreEver MSL2024 Tape Library and HPE StoreEver 1/8 G2 Tape Autoloaders. The vulnerability could be remotely exploited to allow Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF).
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on NEC Aterm WF800HP devices with firmware 1.0.17 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco Emergency Responder 10.5(1) and 10.5(1a) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCuv26501.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in calendar.class.php in ApPHP Calendar (ApPHP CAL) allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that use the (1) category_name, (2) category_description, (3) event_name, or (4) event_description parameter.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in admin/update_user in Hulihan Amethyst 0.1.5, and possibly earlier, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the administrative password or (2) change the site's configuration.
VIVOTEK FD8177 devices before XXXXXX-VVTK-xx06a allow CSRF.
Nagios Log Server 2.1.3 has CSRF.
PHP Scripts Mall Chartered Accountant : Auditor Website 2.0.1 has CSRF via client/auditor/updprofile.php.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository unilogies/bumsys prior to 2.1.1.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Views UI implementation in the Views module 5.x before 5.x-1.8 and 6.x before 6.x-2.11 for Drupal allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) enable all Views or (2) disable all Views.
In TopManage OLK 2020, login CSRF can be chained with another vulnerability in order to takeover admin and user accounts.
A CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Easergy T300 (Firmware version 1.5.2 and older) which could allow an attacker to execute malicious commands on behalf of a legitimate user when xsrf-token data is intercepted.
The marketo-forms-and-tracking plugin through 1.0.2 for WordPress allows wp-admin/admin.php?page=marketo_fat CSRF with resultant XSS.
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was discovered in the System Management Interface Web component of Avaya Aura Communication Manager and Avaya Aura Messaging. This vulnerability could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to perform Web administration actions with the privileged level of the authenticated user. Affected versions of Communication Manager are 7.0.x, 7.1.x prior to 7.1.3.5 and 8.0.x. Affected versions of Messaging are 7.0.x, 7.1 and 7.1 SP1.
In Honeywell WIN-PAK 4.7.2, Web and prior versions, the affected product is vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code.
Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in the firewall ePO extension of McAfee Endpoint Security (ENS) prior to 10.7.0 November 2020 Update allows an attacker to execute arbitrary HTML code due to incorrect security configuration.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Movable Type series (Movable Type 7 r.4606 (7.2.1) and earlier (Movable Type 7), Movable Type Advanced 7 r.4606 (7.2.1) and earlier (Movable Type Advanced 7), Movable Type for AWS 7 r.4606 (7.2.1) and earlier (Movable Type for AWS 7), Movable Type 6.5.3 and earlier (Movable Type 6.5), Movable Type Advanced 6.5.3 and earlier (Movable Type Advanced 6.5), Movable Type 6.3.11 and earlier (Movable Type 6.3), Movable Type Advanced 6.3.11 and earlier (Movable Type 6.3), Movable Type Premium 1.29 and earlier, and Movable Type Premium Advanced 1.29 and earlier) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in [Calendar01] free edition ver1.0.0 and [Calendar02] free edition ver1.0.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
A flaw in the WordPress plugin, Minimal Coming Soon & Maintenance Mode through 2.10, allows a CSRF attack to enable maintenance mode, inject XSS, modify several important settings, or include remote files as a logo.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Easy Property Listings versions prior to 3.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
The Security/changepassword URL action in SilverStripe 2.3.x before 2.3.10 and 2.4.x before 2.4.4 passes a token as a GET parameter while changing a password through email, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive data and hijack the session via the HTTP referer logs on a server, aka "HTTP referer leakage."
Currently, all versions of MAGMI are vulnerable to CSRF due to the lack of CSRF tokens. RCE (via phpcli command) is possible in the event that a CSRF is leveraged against an existing admin session for MAGMI.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Social Sharing Plugin versions prior to 1.2.10 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco TelePresence Server software 3.0(2.24) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug IDs CSCut63718, CSCut63724, and CSCut63760.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin.php in Collabtive 0.6.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add administrative users via the edituser action.
In Cloud Foundry UAA, versions prior to 74.14.0, a CSRF vulnerability exists due to the OAuth2 state parameter not being checked in the callback function when authenticating with external identity providers.
In versions 3.0.0-3.4.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, there is insufficient cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protections for the NGINX Controller user interface.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities exist in the Auth0 plugin before 4.0.0 for WordPress via the domain field.
SAP Disclosure Management, version 10.1, had insufficient protection against Cross-Site Request Forgery, which could be used to trick user in to browsing malicious site.
RSA Archer, versions prior to 6.7 P2 (6.7.0.2), contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability by tricking a victim application user to send arbitrary requests to the vulnerable application to perform server operations with the privileges of the authenticated victim user.